Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 199–201 | Cite as

No evidence of pre-copulatory mate choice by gynes in the facultatively parthenogenetic ant Cataglyphis cursor

Short Communication

Abstract

Virgin queens (gynes) of the ant Cataglyphis cursor mate on the ground at the nest entrance, where they benefit from the protection of nestmate workers. By carrying out mating tests in the laboratory, we show that gynes mate with the first males they encounter, suggesting the absence of pre-copulatory mate choice by gynes. This is in agreement with the recent finding that workers behave aggressively towards foreign males and could thereby exercise a form of inclusive mate choice, which could replace pre-copulatory mate choice by gynes.

Keywords

Eusocial insects Sexual selection Inclusive mate choice Multiple mating 

Supplementary material

40_2015_444_MOESM1_ESM.docx (100 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 100 kb)

References

  1. Baer B (2011) The copulation biology of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 14:55–68Google Scholar
  2. Boomsma JJ (2007) Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr Biol 17:673–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boomsma JJ (2013) Beyond promiscuity: mate-choice commitments in social breeding. Philos Trans R Soc B 368:2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Heinze J (2005) The evolution of male traits in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 50:395–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chéron B, Cronin AL, Doums C, Fédérici P, Haussy C, Tirard C, Monnin T (2011) Unequal resource allocation among colonies produced by fission in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Ecology 92:1448–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronin A, Monnin T, Haussy C, Doums C (2011) Opportunities for mate choice in the fission-performing ant Cataglyphis cursor. Ecol Entomol 36:522–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson DW (1982) Sexual selection in harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pogonomyrmex). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. den Boer SPA, Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2010) Seminal fluid mediates ejaculate competition in social insects. Science 327:1506–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doums C, Cronin AL, Ruel C, Fédérici P, Haussy C, Tirard C, Monnin T (2013) Facultative use of thelytokous parthenogenesis for queen production in the polyandrous ant Cataglyphis cursor. J Evol Biol 26:1431–1444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franks NR, Hölldobler B (1987) Sexual competition during colony reproduction in army ants. Biol J Linn Soc 30:229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Helft F, Monnin T, Doums C (2015) First evidence of inclusive sexual selection in the ant Cataglyphis cursor: worker aggressions differentially affect male access to virgin queens. Ethology 121:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenoir A, Querard L, Pondicq N, Berton F (1988) Reproduction and dispersal in the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Psyche 95:21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oppelt A, Heinze J (2007) Dynamics of sperm transfer in the ant Leptothorax gredleri. Naturwissenschaften 94:781–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pearcy M, Aron S, Doums C, Keller L (2004) Conditional use of sex and parthenogenesis for workers and queen production in ants. Science 306:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sunamura E, Hoshizaki S, Sakamoto H, Fujii T, Nishisue K, Suzuki S, Terayama Y, Tatsuki S (2011) Workers select mates for queens: a possible mechanism of gene flow restriction between supercolonies of the invasive Argentine ant. Naturwissenschaften 98:361–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7618 Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of ParisParisFrance
  2. 2.Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB, UMR 7205, CNRS, UPMC, École Pratique des Hautes Études, MNHN Département Systématique et ÉvolutionParisFrance

Personalised recommendations