Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 465–469 | Cite as

Evidence for social nesting in Neotropical ceratinine bees

Research Article


Small carpenter bees (Ceratinini) are a key taxon to understanding the transition from subsocial to social behaviour, as all documented groups are long-lived and tend to their young periodically throughout development, though the behaviour of multiple lineages is little known. This study provides the first evidence for social nesting in three Neotropical species of Ceratina (Ceratinula) from Panama. Social nesting was associated with nest reuse, consistent with the hypothesis of kin associations, and the proportion of nests (per species) that displayed sociality was as follows: C. buscki 5 %; C. rectangulifera 0 %; C. tricolor 6 %; and C. zeteki 23 %. Sociality is always a low-frequency phenomenon in ceratinine bee populations, and generally represents a third or less of the population. The fact that the majority of colonies remain solitary indicates that solitary nesting is adaptive in the studied species.


Subsocial Facultatively social Small carpenter bee Ceratinini Xylocopinae 



This research was supported by an STRI short-term fellowship and a Sigma Xi grant to S. M. R., an STRI postdoctoral fellowship to S. M. T., and general research funds from STRI to W. T. W.


  1. Flores-Prado L, Chiappa E, Niemeyer HM (2008) Nesting biology, life cycle, and interactions between females of Manuelia postica, a solitary species of the Xylocopinae (Hymenoptera: Apidae). New Zeal J Zool 35:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gonzalez VH, Moreno E, Richards MH (2004) Nesting biology of a Neotropical bee, Ceratina mexicana currani Schwarz (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopinae). J Kans Entomol Soc 77:58–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Michener CD (1962) The genus Ceratina in Australia with notes on its nests (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). J Kans Entomol Soc 35:414–421Google Scholar
  4. Michener CD (1985) From solitary to eusocial: need there be a series of intervening species? Fort Zool 31:293–305Google Scholar
  5. Michener CD (1990) Castes in xylocopine bees. In: Engels W (ed) Social insects: an evolutionary approach to castes and reproduction. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Michener CD (2007) The bees of the world, 2nd edn. The John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  7. Michener CD, Eickwort KR (1966) Observations on nests of Ceratina in Costa Rica (Hymeoptera: Apoidea). Rev Biol Trop 14:279–286Google Scholar
  8. Rehan SM, Richards MH (2010) Nesting biology and subsociality of Ceratina calcarata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can Entomol 142:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rehan SM, Richards MH, Schwarz MP (2009) Evidence of social nesting in the Ceratina of Borneo. J Kans Entomol Soc 82:194–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rehan SM, Richards MH, Schwarz MP (2010) Sociality in the Australian small carpenter bee Ceratina (Neoceratina) australensis. Insect Soc 57:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rehan SM, Schwarz MP, Richards MH (2011) Fitness consequences of ecological constraints and implications for the evolution of sociality in an incipiently social bee. Biol J Linn Soc 103:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rehan SM, Leys R, Schwarz MP (2012) A mid-Cretaceous origin of sociality in xylocopine bee with only two origins of true worker castes indicates severe barriers to eusociality. PLoS One 7:e34690PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rehan SM, Richards MH, Adams M, Schwarz MP (2014) The costs and benefits of sociality in a facultatively social bee. Anim Behav 97:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sakagami SF, Laroca S (1971) Observations of the bionomics of some Neotropical xylocopine bees, with comparative and biofaunistic notes (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae). J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ 18:57–127Google Scholar
  15. Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1977) Some presumably presocial habits of Japanese Ceratina bees, with notes on various social types in Hymenoptera. Insect Soc 24:319–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1989) Compatibility and incompatibility of solitary life with eusociality in two normally solitary bees Ceratina japonica and Ceratina okinawana (Hymenoptera, Apoidea), with notes on the incipient phase of eusociality. Jpn J Entomol 57:417–739Google Scholar
  17. Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1995) Task allocation in artificially induced colonies of a basically solitary bee Ceratina (Ceratinidia) okinawana, with a comparison of sociality between Ceratina and Xylocopa (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae, Xylocopinae). Jpn J Ecol 63:115–150Google Scholar
  18. Schwarz MP, Tierney SM, Rehan SM, Chenoweth LB, Cooper SJ (2011) The evolution of eusociality in bees: workers began by waiting. Biol Lett 7:277–280PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tallamy DW, Wood TK (1986) Convergence patterns in subsocial insects. Annu Rev Entomol 31:369–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Smithsonian Tropical Research InstitutePanamaPanama

Personalised recommendations