Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 401–413 | Cite as

Available space, symbiotic fungus and colony brood influence excavation and lead to the adjustment of nest enlargement in leaf-cutting ants

  • D. RömerEmail author
  • F. Roces
Research Article


The size of underground ant nests positively correlates with their worker number, suggesting that during colony growth, workers respond to increased space demands by enlarging the existing nest. In leaf-cutting ants, the presence of brood and a growing symbiotic fungus are expected to generate spatial demands workers should respond to. We investigated to what extent the presence of in-nest stores, such as brood and fungus, and actual space availability influence the digging behavior of leaf-cutting ants and lead to the adjustment of nest enlargement. In the laboratory, we offered worker groups of Acromyrmex lundi a nest site consisting of either a tunnel, representing reduced available space, or a tunnel and a small chamber, representing ample available space as a starting point for nest enlargement. Workers could move and store offered brood and fungus into the nest structure, and enlarge it as needed. The presence of brood and fungus influenced digging activity as well as the architecture of the nest. In the presence of relocated brood, digging activity was higher in reduced space than in ample space, suggesting that high worker density stimulated excavation. When workers relocated fungus and brood into ample space, digging activity was similar as in their absence, yet a larger chamber and fewer tunnels were excavated. During the process of nest enlargement, workers were observed to initially excavate space in excess, which was refilled with part of the removed soil pellets, thus leading to a reduction of available space. Pellet deposition seemed to be opportunistic, with workers refilling unused space. Results indicate that the size of a leaf-cutting ant nest does not simply depend on the number of inhabiting workers. Rather, workers adjust the enlargement of their nest space depending on the current space available and the presence of in-nest stores.


Leaf-cutting ant Nest enlargement Acromyrmex Building behavior Brood Symbiotic fungus 



We would like to thank Kerstin Fröhle for sharing her experience with the laboratory methods to investigate ant digging behavior, and Steffen Pielström, James Waters, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript. Annette Laudahn and Adrienne Gerber-Kurz assisted with experimental preparation and were responsible for ant rearing. This study was partially supported by funds from the German Research Foundation (DFG, Grant SFB 554/TP E1).

Supplementary material

40_2015_419_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (935 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 936 kb)


  1. Antonialli WF, Giannotti E (2001) Nest architecture and population dynamics of the ponerine ant Ectatomma edentatum. Sociobiology 38:475–486Google Scholar
  2. Autuori M (1942) Contribuição para o conhecimento da saúva (Atta spp. Hymenoptera–Formicidae). III. Excavação de um saúveiro (Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel, 1908). Arq Inst Biol 13:137–148Google Scholar
  3. Bollazzi M, Kronenbitter J, Roces F (2008) Soil temperature, digging behaviour, and the adaptive value of nest depth in South American species of Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Oecologia 158:165–175. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1113-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollazzi M, Forti LC, Roces F (2012) Ventilation of the giant nests of Atta leaf-cutting ants: does underground circulating air enter the fungus chambers? Insect Soc 59:487–498. doi: 10.1007/s00040-012-0243-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buhl J, Deneubourg JL, Grimal A, Theraulaz G (2005) Self-organized digging activity in ant colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:9–17. doi: 10.1007/s00265-004-0906-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camargo RS, Forti LC (2015) What is the stimulus for excavation of fungus chamber in leaf-cutting ants? Acta Ethol 18:31–35. doi: 10.1007/s10211-014-0181-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camargo RS, Forti LC, Fujihara RT, Roces F (2011) Digging effort in leaf-cutting ant queens (Atta sexdens rubropilosa) and its effects on colony survival in the claustral phase. Insect Soc 58:17–22. doi: 10.1007/s00040-010-0110-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camazine S, Deneubourg JL, Franks NR, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton studies in complexity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen J (2009) Automatic system for continuously monitoring digging volume of Red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the laboratory. J Econ Entomol 102:1393–1395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Deneubourg JL, Franks NR (1995) Collective control without explicit coding: the case of communal nest excavation. J Insect Behav 8:417–432. doi: 10.1007/BF01995316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franks NR, Deneubourg JL (1997) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behavior and the nest’s dynamics. Anim Behav 54:779–796. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0496 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Franks NR, Wilby A, Silverman BW, Tofts C (1992) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: sophisticated building by blind bulldozing. Anim Behav 44:357–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fröhle K (2009) Mechanismen zur Regulierung der Nestgröße während des Koloniewachstums bei Blattschneiderameisen. PhD dissertation, Julius-Maximilians Universität Würzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. Fröhle K, Roces F (2009) Underground agriculture: the control of nest size in fungus-growing ants. In: Theraulaz G, Solé R, Kuntz P (eds) From insect nests to human architecture - Workshop on engineering principles of innovation in swarm-made architecture. European Centre for Living Technology, Venice, pp 95–104Google Scholar
  15. Fröhle K, Roces F (2012) The determination of nest depth in founding queens of leaf-cutting ants (Atta vollenweideri): idiothetic and temporal control. J Exp Biol 215:1642–1650. doi: 10.1242/jeb.066217 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordon DM, Paul RE, Thorpe K (1993) What is the function of encounter patterns in ant colonies? Anim Behav 45:1083–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grassé PP (1959) La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations inter-individuelles chez Bellicositermes natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La Théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d’interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs. Insect Soc 6:41–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halley JD, Burd M, Wells P (2005) Excavation and architecture of Argentine ant nests. Insect Soc 52:350–356. doi: 10.1007/s00040-005-0818-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hangartner W (1969) Carbon dioxide, a releaser for digging behavior in Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 76:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansell MH (1984) Animal architecture and building behavior. Longman Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacoby M (1936) Über das Wachsen des Atta-Nestes im ersten Jahre nach der Gründung (Hym. Formicidae). Rev Entomol 6:120–126Google Scholar
  23. Jacoby M (1937) Das räumliche Wachsen des Atta-Nestes vom 50. bis zum 90. Tage (Hym. Formicidae). Rev Entomol 7:416–425Google Scholar
  24. Jonkman JCM (1980a) The external and internal structure and growth of nests of the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri Forel, 1983 (Hym.:Formicidae) Part I. Z angew Entomol 89:158–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jonkman JCM (1980b) The external and internal structure and growth of nests of the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri Forel, 1983 (Hym.:Formicidae) Part II. Z angew Entomol 89:217–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mallon EB, Franks NR (2000) Ants estimate area using Buffon’s needle. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mikheyev AS, Tschinkel WR (2004) Nest architecture of the ant Formica pallidefulva: structure, costs and rules of excavation. Insect Soc 51:30–36. doi: 10.1007/s00040-003-0703-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moreira AA, Forti LC, Andrade APP, Boaretto MAC, Lopes JFS (2004a) Nest architecture of Atta laevigata (F. Smith, 1958) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Stud Neotrop Fauna En 39:109–116. doi: 10.1080/01650520412331333756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moreira AA, Forti LC, Boaretto MAC, Andrade APP, Lopes JFS, Ramos VM (2004b) External and internal structure of Atta bisphaerica Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) nests. J Appl Entomol 128:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moser JC (1963) Contents and structure of Atta texana nest in summer. Ann Entomol Soc Am 56:286–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pielström S (2013) On the role of local information in the spatial organization of collective nest digging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri (Forel, 1893). PhD dissertation, Julius-Maximilians Universität Würzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  32. Pielström S, Roces F (2012) Vibrational communication in the spatial organization of collective digging in the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Anim Behav 84:743–752. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pielström S, Roces F (2013) Sequential soil transport and its influence on the spatial organization of collective digging in leaf-cutting ants. PLoS One 8:e57040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057040 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pielström S, Roces F (2014) Soil moisture and excavation behaviour in the Chaco leaf-cutting ant (Atta vollenweideri): digging performance and prevention of water inflow into the nest. PLoS One 9:e95658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095658 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pratt SC (2005) Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol 16:488–496. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ari020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pratt SC, Pierce NE (2001) The cavity-dwelling ant Leptothorax curvispinosus uses nest geometry to discriminate between potential homes. Anim Behav 62:281–287. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rasse P, Deneubourg JL (2001) Dynamics of nest excavation and nest size regulation of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: formicidae). J Insect Behav 14:433–449. doi: 10.1023/A:1011163804217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Römer D, Roces F (2014) Nest enlargement in leaf-cutting ants: relocated brood and fungus trigger the excavation of new chambers. PLoS One 9:e97872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097872 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Solomon SE, Lopes CT, Mueller UG, Rodrigues A, Sosa-Calvo J, Schultz TR, Vasconcelos HL (2011) Nesting biology and fungiculture of the fungus-growing ant, Mycetagroicus cerradensis: New light on the origin of higher attine agriculture. J Ins Sci 11:12.
  40. Stahel G, Geijskes DC (1941) Weitere Untersuchungen über Nestbau und Gartenpilz von Atta cephalotes L. und Atta sexdens L. (Hym. Formicidae). Rev Entomol 12:243–268Google Scholar
  41. Sudd JH (1969) The excavation of soil by ants. Z Tierpsychol 26:257–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sudd JH (1972) The response of digging ants to gravity. Insect Soc 19:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sudd JH, Franks NR (1987) The behavioral ecology of ants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Toffin E, Di Paolo D, Campo A, Detrain C, Deneubourg JL (2009) Shape transition during nest digging in ants. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18616–18620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902685106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Toffin E, Kindekens J, Denoubourg JL (2010) Excavated substrate modulates growth instability during nest building in ants. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 277:2617–2625. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tschinkel WR (1987) Seasonal life history and nest architecture of a winter-active ant, Prenolepsis imparis. Insect Soc 34:143–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tschinkel WR (2003) Subterranean ant nests: trace fossils past and future? Palaeogeogr Palaeocl Palaeoecol 192:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tschinkel WR (2004) The nest architecture of the Florida harvester ant. Pogonomyrmex badius. J Ins Sci 4:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weber NA (1966) Fungus-growing ants. Science 153:587–604. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3736.587 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Physiology and Sociobiology, BiocenterUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations