Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 97–99 | Cite as

Comparative study of resistance to heat in two species of leaf-cutting ants

  • S. Bouchebti
  • C. Jost
  • N. Caldato
  • L. C. Forti
  • V. Fourcassié
Research Article

Abstract

Atta laevigata and Atta capiguara are two species of leaf-cutting ants that are found in the pastures of Central Brazil and build huge underground nests linked to the outdoor environment by underground tunnels, which can reach several tens of meters and further extend through foraging trails to distant foraging grounds. The tunnels built by mature colonies of A. capiguara are usually longer and deeper than those built by mature colonies of A. laevigata. The physical trails are also shorter on average. We hypothesized that these differences could be related to differences in thermotolerance between the two species. To test this we collected ants on foraging trails and placed them individually in waterproof test tubes plunged in a thermostatic bath at 25 °C (control), 37 and 39 °C (test temperatures). The results showed that at both 37 and 39 °C, the survival time of A. laevigata was much more extended than that of A. capiguara. A possible explanation for the longer and deeper underground foraging tunnels, as well as the shorter foraging trails, built by A. capiguara may thus be their lower resistance to heat stress. The longer tunnels built by A. capiguara colonies may reduce the exposure to heat of the foraging workers that commute between their nest and the foraging grounds or act as a thermal refuge in which the workers can find temporary protection against high outdoor temperatures.

Keywords

Leaf-cutting ants Atta laevigata Atta capiguara Longevity Thermotolerance 

References

  1. Bollazzi M., Forti L.C. and Roces F. 2012. Ventilation of the giant nests of Atta leaf-cutting ants: does underground circulating air enter the fungus chambers? Insect. Soc. 59: 487–498Google Scholar
  2. Chown S.L., Sorensen J.G. and Terblanche J.S. 2011. Water loss in insects: An environmental change perspective. J. Insect Physiol. 57: 1070–1084Google Scholar
  3. Clemencet J., Cournault L., Odent A. and Doums C. 2010. Worker thermal tolerance in the thermophilic ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 57 : 11–15Google Scholar
  4. Gehring W.J. and Wehner R. 1995. Heat shock protein synthesis and thermotolerance in Cataglyphis, an ant from the Sahara desert. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 92: 2994–2998Google Scholar
  5. Hood W.G. and Tschinkel W.R. 1990. Dessiccation resistance in arboreal and terrestrial ants. Physiol. Entomol. 15: 23–35Google Scholar
  6. Lighton J.R.B., Quinlan M.C. and Feener D.H. 1994. Is bigger better—water balance in the polymorphic desert harvester ant Messor pergandei. Physiol. Entomol. 19: 325–334Google Scholar
  7. Moreira A.A., Forti L.C., Andrade A.P.P., Boaretto M.A.C. and Lopes J.F.S. 2004. Nest architecture of Atta laevigata (F. Smith, 1858) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). St. Neotrop. Fauna Env. 39: 109–116Google Scholar
  8. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
  9. Therneau T. 2012. coxme: Mixed Effects Cox Models. R package version 2.2-3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxme

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Bouchebti
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Jost
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. Caldato
    • 3
  • L. C. Forti
    • 3
  • V. Fourcassié
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition AnimaleUniversité de Toulouse, UPSToulouse Cedex 9France
  2. 2.CNRS, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition AnimaleToulouse Cedex 9France
  3. 3.Laboratorio de Insetos Sociais Pragas, Departamento de Produção Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrònomica de BotucatuFazenda Experimental Lageado, UNESPBotucatuBrazil

Personalised recommendations