Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 307–323 | Cite as

Myrmica ants host highly diverse parasitic communities: from social parasites to microbes

Review Article

Abstract

Myrmica ants have been model species for studies in a variety of disciplines, including insect physiology, chemical communication, ant social dynamics, ant population, community ecology, and ant interactions with other organisms. Species belonging to the genus Myrmica can be found in virtually every habitat within the temperate regions of the northern hemisphere and their biology and systematics have been thoroughly studied. These ants serve as hosts to highly diverse parasitic organisms from socially parasitic butterfly caterpillars to microbes, and many Myrmica species even evolved into parasitizing species of their own genus. These parasites have various impacts both on the individuals and on the social structure of their hosts, ranging from morphological malformations to reduction in colony fitness. A comprehensive review of the parasitic organisms supported by Myrmica and the effects of these organisms on individuals and on whole ant colonies has not yet been compiled. Here, we provide a review of the interactions of these organisms with Myrmica ants by discussing host and parasite functional, behavioral or physiological adaptations. In addition, for all “symbiont groups” of Myrmica ants described in this paper, we examine the present limitations of the knowledge at present of their impact on individuals and host colony fitness. In conclusion, we argue that Myrmica ants serve as remarkable resource for the evolution of a wide variety of associated organisms.

Keywords

Host–parasite interaction Maculinea Microdon Myrmecophily Nematodes Rickia wasmannii 

References

  1. Akino T., Knapp J.J., Thomas J.A. and Elmes G.W. 1999. Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 266: 1419–1426Google Scholar
  2. Akre R.D., Garnett W.B. and Zach R.S. 1990. Ant hosts of Microdon (Diptera: Syrphidae) in the Pacific Northwest. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 63: 175–178Google Scholar
  3. Als T.D., Vila R., Kandul N.P., Nash D.R., Yen S.H., Hsu Y.F., Mignault A.A., Boomsma J.J. and Pierce N.E. 2004. The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies. Nature 432: 386–390Google Scholar
  4. Baer B. and Schmid-Hempel P. 1999. Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397: 151–154Google Scholar
  5. Barbero F., Thomas J. A., Bonelli S., Balletto E. and Schönrogge K. 2009a. Queen ants make distinctive sounds that are mimicked by a butterfly social parasite. Science 323: 782–785Google Scholar
  6. Barbero F., Bonelli S., Thomas J.A., Balletto E. and Schönrogge K. 2009b. Acoustical mimicry in a predatory social parasite of ants. J. Exp. Biol. 212: 4084–4090Google Scholar
  7. Barbero F., Patricelli D., Witek M., Balletto E., Casacci L.P., Sala M. and Bonelli S. 2012. Myrmica ants and their butterfly parasites with special focus on the acoustic communication. Psyche, review article ID 725237Google Scholar
  8. Bereczki J., Pecsenye K., Peregovits L. and Varga Z. 2005. Pattern of genetic differentiation in the. Maculinea alcon species group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) in Central Europe. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 43: 157–165Google Scholar
  9. Berg M. 1995. De mierenpissebed. Platyarthrus hoffmannseggi, een mysterieuze gast in mierennesten. Natura 3: 62–65Google Scholar
  10. Bezděčka P., Kočárek P. and Šuhaj J. 2000. Rozšíření cvrčíka Myrmecophilus acervorum (Orthoptera: Myrmecophilidae) na Moravě a ve Slezsku a poznámky k jeho biologii (Distribution of the cricket Myrmecophilus acervorum (Orthoptera: Myrmecophilidae) in Moravia and Silesia with notes on the biology). Klapalekiana 36: 7–17 (in Czech with English abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Bharti H. 2012. Myrmica nefaria sp.n. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)—a new social parasite from Himalaya. Myrmecol. News 16: 149–156Google Scholar
  12. Bonelli S., Witek M., Canterino S., Sielezniew M., Stankiewicz-Fiedurek A., Tartally A., Balletto E. and Schӧnrogge K. 2011. Distribution, host specificity and the potential for cryptic speciation in hoverfly Microdon myrmicae (Diptera: Syrphidae), a social parasite of Myrmica ants. Ecol. Entomol. 36: 135–143Google Scholar
  13. Brian M.V and Brian A.D. 1955. On the two forms macrogyna and microgyna of the ant Myrmica rubra L. Evolution 9: 280–290Google Scholar
  14. Brian M.V. and Kelly A.F. 1967. Studies of caste differentiation in Myrmica rubra L. 9. Maternal environment and the caste bias of larvae. Insect. Soc. 14: 13–24Google Scholar
  15. Buschinger A. 2009. Social parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 12: 219–235Google Scholar
  16. Cammaerts M.N., Cammaerts R. and Bruge H. 1987. Some physiological information on the microgyne form of Myrmica rubra L. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Belg. 117: 147–158Google Scholar
  17. Cole A.C. 1957. Paramyrmica, a new north American genus of ants allied to Myrmica Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 32: 37–42Google Scholar
  18. Constantinescu, I.C., Ivan, O., Călugăr, A. and Markó, B. 2011. Mite fauna of ant nests - comparative study of mite fauna in the Argeș River Basin (South Romania). Trav. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. “Grigore Antipa” 54: 327–342Google Scholar
  19. Csata E., Czekes Zs., Erős K., Német E., Hughes M., Csősz S. and Markó B. 2013. Comprehensive survey of Romanian myrmecoparasitic fungi: new species, biology and distribution. North-Western J. Zool. 9: 23–29Google Scholar
  20. Csata E., Erős K. and Markó B. 2014. Effects of the ectoparasitic fungus Rickia wasmannii on its ant host Myrmica scabrinodis: changes in host mortality and behavior. Insect. Soc. 61, DOI 10.1007/s00040-014-0349-3
  21. Csősz S. 2012. Nematode infection as significant source of unjustified taxonomic descriptions in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 17: 27–31Google Scholar
  22. Csősz S. and Majoros G. 2009. Onthogenic origin of mermithogenic Myrmica phenotypes (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 56: 70–76Google Scholar
  23. Czechowski W., Czechowska W. and Radchenko A. 2007a. Strikingly altered host morphology: Myrmica rugulosa Nyl. and Myrmica sabuleti Mein. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) parasitised by mermithid nematodes. Fragm. Faun. 50: 139–148Google Scholar
  24. Czechowski W., Radchenko A. and Czechowska W. 2007b. Mermithid infestation strikingly alters the morphology of Myrmica rubra (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): possible taxonomical involvements. Ann. Zool. 57: 325–330Google Scholar
  25. Czechowski W., Radchenko A., Czechowska W. and Vepsäläinen K. 2012. The Ants of Poland with Reference to the Myrmecofauna Europa. Natura Optima dux Fundation, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  26. Czekes Zs., Radchenko A.G., Csősz S., Szász-Len A., Tăușan I., Benedek K. and Markó B. 2012. The genus Myrmica Latreille, 1804 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Romania: distribution of species and key for their identification. Entomol. Rom. 17: 29–50Google Scholar
  27. Czekes Zs., Markó B., Nash D.R., Ferencz M., Lázár B. and Rákosy L. 2014. Differences in oviposition strategies between two ecotypes of the endangered myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) under unique syntopic conditions. Insect Conserv. Diver. 7: 122–131Google Scholar
  28. Davidson D.W., Cook S.C., Snelling R.R. and Chua T.H. 2003. Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300: 969–972Google Scholar
  29. Dekoninck W., Lock K. and Janssens F. 2007. Acceptance of two native myrmecophilous species, Platyarthrus hoffmannseggi (Isopoda: Oniscidae) and Cyphoderus albinus (Collembola: Cyphoderidae) by the introduced invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 159–161Google Scholar
  30. DeVries P.J., Cocroft R.B. and Thomas J.A. 1993. Comparison of acoustical signals in Maculinea butterfly caterpillars and their obligate host Myrmica ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49: 229–238Google Scholar
  31. Elmes G.W. 1976. Some observations on the microgyne form of Myrmica rubra L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 23: 3–22Google Scholar
  32. Elmes G.W. 1987. Temporal variation in colony populations of the ant Myrmica sulcinodis. I. Changes in queen number, worker number and spring production. J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 559–571Google Scholar
  33. Elmes G.W. and Brian M.V. 1991. The importance of the egg mass to the activity of normal queens and microgynes of Myrmica rubra L. (Hym. Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 38: 51–62Google Scholar
  34. Elmes G.W. and Petal J. 1990. Queen number as an adaptable trait: evidence from wild populations of two red ant species (genus Myrmica). J. Anim. Ecol. 59: 675–690Google Scholar
  35. Elmes G.W., Radchenko A. and Thomas J.A. 2003. First record of Myrmica vandeli (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) for Britain. Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. 16: 145–152Google Scholar
  36. Elmes G.W., Wardlaw J.C. and Thomas J.A. 1991. Larvae of Maculinea rebeli, a large blue butterfly, and their Myrmica host ants: patterns of caterpillar growth and survival. J. Zool. 224: 79–92Google Scholar
  37. Elmes G.W., Thomas J.A., Hammarsted O., Munguira M.L., Martin J. and Van der Made J. 1994. Differences in host-ant specificity between Spanish, Dutch and Swedish populations of the endangered butterfly, Maculinea alcon (Denis et Schiff.) (Lepidoptera). Memor. Zool. 48: 55–68Google Scholar
  38. Elmes G.W., Thomas J.A., Wardlaw J.C., Hochberg M.E., Clarke R.T. and Simcox D.J. 1998. The ecology of Myrmica ants in relation to the conservation of Maculinea butterflies. J. Insect Conserv. 2: 67–78Google Scholar
  39. Elmes G.W., Akino T., Thomas J.A., Clarke R.T. and Knapp J. J. 2002. Interspecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies. Oecologia 130: 525–535Google Scholar
  40. Emery C. 1909. Űber den Ursprung der dulotischen, parasitischen under myrmekophilen Ameisen. Biol. Zentralbl. 29: 352–362Google Scholar
  41. Errard C., Fresneau D., Heinze J., Francoeur D. and Lenoir A. 1997. Social organization in the quest ant Formicoxenus provancheri. Ethology 103: 149–159Google Scholar
  42. Espadaler X. and Santamaria S. 2012. Ecto- and endoparasitic fungi on ants from the Holarctic region. Psyche: e168478Google Scholar
  43. Evans H.C., Groden E. and Bischoff J.F. 2010. New fungal pathogens of the red ant, Myrmica rubra, from the UK and implications for ant invasions in the USA. Fungal Biol. 114: 451–466Google Scholar
  44. Fiedler K. 2006. Ant-associates of Palaearctic lycaenid butterfly larvae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)—a review. Myrmecol. News 9: 77–87Google Scholar
  45. Foitzik S., Fischer B. and Heinze J. 2003. Arms races between social parasites and their hosts: geographic patterns of manipulation and resistance. Behav. Ecol. 14: 80–88Google Scholar
  46. Francoeur A. 2002. Deuxième mention de Myrmica lampra Francoeur au Québec (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fabreries 27: 156Google Scholar
  47. Francoeur A. 2007. The Myrmica punctiventris and M. crassirugis species group in the Nearctic region. In: Advances in Ant Systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Homage to E.O. Wilson50 Years of Contributions (Snelling R.R., Fisher B.L. and Ward P.S., Eds). Mem. Am. Entomol. Inst. 80: 153–185Google Scholar
  48. Francoeur A., Loiselle R. and Buschinger R.A. 1985. Biosystématique de la tribu Leptothoracini (Formicidae, Hvmenoptera) 1. Le genre Fomicoxenus dans la région holarctique. Nat. Can. 112: 343–403Google Scholar
  49. Funaro C.F., Kronauer D.J.C., Moreau C.S., Goldman-Huertas B., Pierce N.E. and Russell J.A. 2011. Army ants harbor a host-specific clade of Entomoplasmatales bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77: 346Google Scholar
  50. Fürst M. and Nash D.R. 2010. Host ant independent oviposition in the parasitic butterfly Maculinea alcon. Biol. Lett. 6: 174–176Google Scholar
  51. Fürst M., Durey M. and Nash D.R. 2012. Testing the adjustable threshold model for intruder recognition on Myrmica ants in the context of a social parasite. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 279: 516–525Google Scholar
  52. Gammelmo O. and Aarvik L. 2007. The myrmecophilous fly Microdon myrmicae Schönrogge et al., 2002 (Diptera: Syrphidae) in Norway. Norw. J. Entomol. 54: 43–48Google Scholar
  53. Gardner M.G., Schonrogge K., Elmes G.W. and Thomas J.A. 2007. Increased genetic diversity as a defence against parasites is undermined by social parasites: Microdon mutabilis hoverflies infesting Formica lemani ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. B. 274: 103–110Google Scholar
  54. Gibson C.M. and Hunter M.S. 2010. Extraordinarily widespread and fantastically complex: comparative biology of endosymbiotic bacterial and fungal mutualists of insects. Ecol. Lett. 13: 223–234Google Scholar
  55. Graystock P. and Hughes W.O.H. 2011. Disease resistance in a weaver ant, Polyrachis dives, and the role of antibiotic-producing glands. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 2319–2327Google Scholar
  56. Heinze J. and Walter B. 2010. Moribund ants leave their nests to die in social isolation. Curr. Biol. 20: 249–252Google Scholar
  57. Hölldobler B. 1970. Contribution to the physiology of guest-host-relations (myrmecophfly) in ants. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 66: 215–250Google Scholar
  58. Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  59. Hornung E., Vilisics F. and Tartally A. 2005. Occurrence of Platyarthrus schoblii (Isopoda, Oniscidae) and its ant hosts in Hungary. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 41: 129–133Google Scholar
  60. Hovestadt T., Thomas J.A., Mitesser O., Elmes G.W. and Schönrogge K. 2012. Unexpected benefit of a social parasite for a key fitness component of its ant host. Am. Nat. 179: 100–123Google Scholar
  61. Howard R.D., Stanley-Samnelson S. and Akre R.D. 1990. Biosynthesis and chemical mimicry of cuticular hydrocarbons from the obligate predator, Microdon albicomatus Novak (Diptera: Syrphidae) and its ant prey, Myrmica incompleta Provancher (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 63: 437–443Google Scholar
  62. Höttinger H., Schlick-Steiner B.C. and Steiner F.M. 2003. The Alcon blue Maculinea alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in eastern Austria: status and conservation measures. Ekologia (Bratisl.) 22: 107–118Google Scholar
  63. Hughes W.O.H. and Boomsma J.J. 2004. Genetic diversity and disease resistance in leafcutting ant societies. Evolution 58: 1251–1260Google Scholar
  64. Jansen G., Savolainen R. and Vepsäläinen K. 2010. Phylogeny, divergence-time estimation, biogeography and social parasite-host relationships of the Holarctic ant genus Myrmica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 56: 294–304Google Scholar
  65. Jansen G., Vepsäläinen K. and Savolainen R. 2011. A phylogenetic test of the parasite-host associations between Maculinea butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and Myrmica ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 108: 53–62Google Scholar
  66. Joharchi O., Halliday B., Saboori A. and Kamali K. 2011. New species and new records of mites of the family Laelapidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) associated with ants in Iran. Zootaxa 2972: 22–36Google Scholar
  67. Kaiser H. 1986. On the interactions between nematodes (Mermithidae) and ants. Zool. Anz. 217: 156–177Google Scholar
  68. Konrad M., Vyleta M.L., Theis F.J. Stock M., Tragust S., Klatt M., Drescher V., Marr C., Ugelvig L.V. and Cremer S. 2012. Social transfer of pathogenic fungus promotes active immunisation in ant colonies. PLoS Biol. 10: e1001300Google Scholar
  69. Lenoir A., Malosse C. and Yamaoka R. 1997. Chemical mimicry between parasitic ants of the genus Formicoxenus and their host Myrmica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 25: 379–389Google Scholar
  70. Lenoir A., D’Ettorre P., Errard C. and Hefetz A. 2001. Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 87: 573–599Google Scholar
  71. Leppänen J., Vepsäläinen K. and Savolainen R. 2011. Phylogeography of the ant Myrmica rubra and its inquiline social parasite. Ecol. Evol. 1: 46–62Google Scholar
  72. Li H.W., Medina F., Vinson S.B. and Coates C.J. 2005. Isolation, characterization, and molecular identification of bacteria from the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) midgut. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 89: 203–209Google Scholar
  73. Little A.E.F. and Currie C.R. 2007. Symbiotic complexity: discovery of a fifth symbiont in the attine ant-microbe symbiosis. Biol. Lett. 3: 501–504Google Scholar
  74. Mueller U.G. 2012. Symbiont recruitment versus ant-symbiont co-evolution in the attine ant-microbe symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15: 269–277Google Scholar
  75. Munguira M.L. and Martín J. 1999. Action Plan for the Maculinea Butterflies in Europe. Nature and Environmental Series, 97. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, pp 64Google Scholar
  76. Musche M., Anton C., Worgan A. and Settele J. 2006. No experimental evidence for host ant related oviposition in a parasitic butterfly. J. Insect Conserv. 19: 631–643Google Scholar
  77. Nash D.R. and Boomsma J.J. 2008. Communication between hosts and social parasites. In: Sociobiology of Communicationan Interdisciplinary Approach (d’ Ettorre P. and Hughes D.P., Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 55–79Google Scholar
  78. Nash D.R., Als T.D., Maile R., Jones G.R. and Boomsma J.J. 2008. A mosaic of chemical coevolution in a large blue butterfly. Science 319: 88–90Google Scholar
  79. Nowicki P., Witek M., Skórka P. and Woyciechowski M. 2005. Oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea alcon Denis & Schiffermüller (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in relation to characteristics of food plant and presence of ant hosts. Pol. J. Ecol. 53: 409–417Google Scholar
  80. Oi D.H. and Pereira R.M. 1993. Ant behavior and microbial pathogens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fla. Entomol. 76: 63–7Google Scholar
  81. Parmentier T., Dekoninck W. and Wenseleers T. 2014. A highly diverse microcosm in a hostile world: a review on the associates of red wood ants (Formica rufa group). Insect. Soc. 61: 229–237Google Scholar
  82. Patricelli D., Witek M., Barbero F., Casacci L.P., Bonelli S. and Balletto E. 2010. Evidence of high larval host ant specificity in the first post adoption phase for the myrmecophilous butterfly Phengaris (Maculinea) nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Sociobiology 55: 861–870Google Scholar
  83. Patricelli D., Barbero F., La Morgia V., Casacci L.P., Witek M., Balletto E. and Bonelli S. 2011. To lay or not to lay: oviposition of Maculinea arion in relation to Myrmica ant presence and host plant phenology. Anim. Behav. 82: 791–799Google Scholar
  84. Pearson B. and Raybould A.F. 1998. The effects of antibiotics on the development of larvae and the possible role of bacterial load in caste determination and diapause in Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 31: 77–90Google Scholar
  85. Pech P., Fric Z. and Konvicka M. 2007. Species-specificity of the Phengaris (Maculinea)—Myrmica host system: Fact or myth? (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 50: 983–1003Google Scholar
  86. Pierce N.E., Braby M.F., Heath A., Lohman D.J., Mathew J., Rand D.B. and Travassos M.A. 2002. The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 733–771Google Scholar
  87. Pinto-Tomas A.A., Anderson M.A., Suen G., Stevenson D.M., Chu F.S.T., Cleland W.W., Weimer P.J. and Currie C.R. 2009. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the fungus gardens of leaf-cutter ants. Science 326: 1120–1123Google Scholar
  88. Poinar G. Jr. 2012. Nematode parasites and associates of ants: past and present. Psyche: e192017Google Scholar
  89. Poinar G. Jr. and Yanoviak S.P. 2008. Myrmeconema neotropicum n. g., n. sp., a new tetradonematid nematode parasitising South American populations of Cephalotes atratus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with the discovery of an apparent parasite-induced host morph. Syst. Parasitol. 69: 145–153Google Scholar
  90. Poinar G. Jr., Lachaud J.P., Castilla A. and Infante F. 2006. Recent and fossil nematode parasites (Nematoda: Mermithidae) of Neotropical ants. J. Invertebr Pathol. 91: 19–26Google Scholar
  91. Radchenko A.G. and Elmes G.W. 2001. A taxonomic revision of the ant genus Myrmica Latreille, 1804 from the Himalaya (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Entomol. Basil. 23: 237–276Google Scholar
  92. Radchenko A.G. and Elmes G.W. 2003. A taxonomic revision of the socially parasitic Myrmica ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Palaearctic region. Ann. Zool. 53: 217–243Google Scholar
  93. Radchenko A.G. and Elmes G.W. 2010. Myrmica ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of the Old World. Natura Optima Dux Foundation, Warszawa, pp 789Google Scholar
  94. Reber A., Purcell J., Buechel S.D., Buri P. and Chapuisat M. 2011. The expression and impact of antifungal grooming in ants. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 954–964Google Scholar
  95. Renwick J.A.A. and Chew F.S. 1994. Oviposition behaviour in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol 39: 377–400Google Scholar
  96. Rüppell O. and Heinze J. 1999. Alternative reproductive tactics in females: the case of size polymorphism in winged ant queens. Insect. Soc. 46: 6–17Google Scholar
  97. Russell J.A., Moreau C.S., Goldman-Huertas B., Fujiwara M., Lohman D.J. and Pierce N.E. 2009. Bacterial gut symbionts are tightly linked with the evolution of herbivory in ants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106: 21236–21241Google Scholar
  98. Sala M., Casacci L.P., Balletto E., Bonelli S. and Barbero F. 2014. Variation in butterfly larval acoustics as a strategy to infiltrate and exploit host ant colony resources. PLoS ONE 9: e94341. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094341
  99. Savolainen R. and Vepsäläinen K. 2003. Sympatric speciation through intraspecific social parasitism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100: 7169–7174Google Scholar
  100. Scheper M., Van der Made J.G. and Wynhoff I. 1995. Maculinea alcon: interactions between a myrmecophilous butterfly its larval foodplant and its host ant. Proc. Exp. Appl. Entomol. 6: 77–78Google Scholar
  101. Schlick-Steiner B.C., Steiner F.M. and Buschinger A. 2003. Ameisengrillen (Myrmecophilus spp.) im wissenschaftlichen Niemandsland Mitteleuropas (Ensifera: Myrmecophilidae). Beitr. Entomofaunistik 4: 67–73Google Scholar
  102. Schmid-Hempel P. 1998. Parasites in Social Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  103. Schönrogge K., Wardlaw J.C., Thomas J.A. and Elmes G.W. 2000. Polymorphic growth rates in myrmecophilous insects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 771–777Google Scholar
  104. Schönrogge K., Barr B., Wardlaw J.C., Napper E., Gardner M.G., Breen J., Elmes G.W. and Thomas J.A. 2002. When rare species become endangered: cryptic speciation in myrmecophilous hoverflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 75: 291–300Google Scholar
  105. Schönrogge K., Wardlaw J.C., Peters A.J., Everett S., Thomas J.A. and Elmes G.W. 2004. Changes in chemical signature and host specificity from larval retrieval to full social integration in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea rebeli. J. Chem. Ecol. 30: 91–107Google Scholar
  106. Schönrogge K., Gardner M.G., Elmes G.W., Napper E.K.V., Simcox D.J., Wardlaw J.C., Breen J., Barr B., Knapp J.J., Pickett J.A. and Thomas J.A. 2006. Host propagation permits extreme local adaptation in a social parasite of ants. Ecol. Lett. 9: 1032–1040Google Scholar
  107. Schönrogge K., Napper E.K.V., Birkett M.A., Woodcock C.M., Pickett J.A., Wadhams L.J. and Thomas J.A. 2008. Host recognition by the specialist hoverfly Microdon mutabilis, a social parasite of the ant Formica lemani. J. Chem. Ecol. 34: 168–178Google Scholar
  108. Seifert B. 1993. Taxonomic description of Myrmica microrubra n. sp. - a social parasitic ant so far known as the microgyne of Myrmica rubra (L.). Abh. Ber. Natur. Gorlitz 67: 1–44Google Scholar
  109. Seppä P. and Walin L. 1996. Sociogenetic organization of the red ant Myrmica rubra. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 207–217Google Scholar
  110. Settele J., Barbero F., Musche M., Thomas J.A. and Schönrogge K. 2011. Singing the Blues: from experimental biology to conservation application. J. Exp. Biol. 214: 1407–1410Google Scholar
  111. Sielezniew M. and Dziekanska I. 2009. Butterfly-ant relationship: host ant specificity of Phengarisrebeli’ Hirschke (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Pieniny Mts (Southern Poland). Polish J. Ecol. 57: 403–409Google Scholar
  112. Sielezniew M. and Stankiewicz A.M. 2004. Simultaneous exploitation of Myrmica vandeli and M. scabrinodis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) colonies by the endangered myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 693–696Google Scholar
  113. Sielezniew M. and Stankiewicz A. 2008. Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) not necessary for the survival of the population of Phengaris (Maculinea) arion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in eastern Poland: Lower host-ant specificity or evidence for geographical variation of an endangered social parasite? Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 637–641Google Scholar
  114. Sielezniew M., Dziekanska I. and Stankiewicz-Fiedurek A. 2010. Multiple host-ant use by the predatory social parasite Phengaris (= Maculinea) arion (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). J. Insect Conserv. 14: 141–149Google Scholar
  115. Speight M.C.D. 2003. Microdon myrmicae Schönrogge et al., 2002 (Diptera: Microdontidae): presence in Ireland confirmed. Entomol. Rec. J. Var. 115: 155–157Google Scholar
  116. Stankiewicz A. 2003. Hoverfly Microdon myrmicae Schönrogge et al., 2002 (Diptera: Syrphidae) in Poland. Polish J. Entomol. 75: 145–151Google Scholar
  117. Stankiewicz A. and Sielezniew M. 2002. Host specificity of Maculinea teleius Bgstr. and M. nausithous Bgstr. (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). The new sight. Ann. Zool. 52: 403–408Google Scholar
  118. Stankiewicz A., Sielezniew M. and Baranski M. 2005b. The first record of Myrmica rugulosa Nylander, 1849 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as a host-ant of Maculinea rebeli Hirschke, 1904 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Pol. Pis. Entomol. 74: 99–103Google Scholar
  119. Stankiewicz A., Sielezniew M. and Švitra G. 2005a. Myrmica schencki (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) rears Maculinea rebeli (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Lithuania: new evidence for geographical variation of host-ant specificity of an endangered species. Myrmecol. Nachr. 7: 51–54Google Scholar
  120. Steiner F.M., Sielezniew M., Schlick-Steiner B.C., Höttinger H., Stankiewicz A. and Górnicki A. 2003. Host specificity revisited: New data on Myrmica host ants of the lycaenid butterfly Maculinea rebeli. J. Insect Conserv. 7: 1–6Google Scholar
  121. Steiner F.M., Schlick-Steiner B.C., Konrad H., Moder K., Christian E., Seifert B., Crozier R.H., Stauffer C. and Buschinger A. 2006. No sympatric speciation here: multiply data sources show that the ant Myrmica microrubra is not a separate species but an alternate reproductive morph if Myrmica rubra. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1–11Google Scholar
  122. Stoll S., Gadau J., Gross R. and Feldhaar H. 2007. Bacterial microbiota associated with ants of the genus Tetraponera. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 90: 399–412Google Scholar
  123. Sundström L. 1995. Sex allocation and colony maintenance in monogyne and polygyne colonies of Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)—the impact of kinship and mating structure. Am. Nat. 146: 182–201Google Scholar
  124. Tartally A. 2005. Neotypus melanocephalus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): the first record of a parasitoid wasp attacking Maculinea teleius (Lycaenidae). Nota Lepid. 28:65-67Google Scholar
  125. Tartally A. and Varga Z. 2005. Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): the first data on host-ant specificity of Maculinea nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Hungary. Myrmecol. Nachr. 7: 55–59Google Scholar
  126. Tartally A. and Varga Z. 2008. Host ant use of Maculinea teleius in the Carpathian basin (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 54: 257–268Google Scholar
  127. Tartally A., Koschuh A. and Varga Z. 2014. The re-discovered Maculinea rebeli (Hirschke, 1904): host ant usage, parasitoid and initial food plant around the type locality with taxonomical aspects (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). ZooKeys 406: 25–40Google Scholar
  128. Tartally A., Nash D.R., Lengyel S. and Varga Z. 2008a. Patterns of host ant use by sympatric populations of Maculinea alcon and M. ‘rebeli’ in the Carpathian Basin. Insect. Soc. 55: 370–381Google Scholar
  129. Tartally A., Rodrigues M.C., Brakels P. and Arnaldo P.S. 2013. Myrmica aloba (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) hosts isolated populations of a hoverfly, a butterfly and an ichneumon species in NE-Portugal. J. Insect Conserv. 17: 851–855Google Scholar
  130. Tartally A., Rákosy L., Vizauer T.C., Goia M. and Varga Z. 2008. Maculinea nausithous exploits Myrmica scabrinodis in Transylvania: unusual host ant species of a myrmecophlious butterfly in an isolated region (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidea, Hymenoptera: Formcidae). Sociobiology 51: 373-380Google Scholar
  131. Thomas J.A. 1980. Why did the large blue become extinct in Britain? Oryx 15: 243–247Google Scholar
  132. Thomas J.A. 1984. The behaviour and habitat requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the dusky large blue butterfly) and M. teleius (the scarce large blue) in France. Biol. Conserv. 28: 325–347Google Scholar
  133. Thomas J.A. and Elmes G.W. 1993. Specialized searching and the hostile use of allomones by a parasitoid whose host, the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, inhabits ant nests. Anim. Behav. 45: 593–602Google Scholar
  134. Thomas J.A and Elmes G.W. 1998. Higher productivity at the cost of increased host-specificity when Maculinea butterfly larvae exploit ant colonies through trophallaxis rather than by predation. Ecol. Entomol. 23:457–464Google Scholar
  135. Thomas J.A. and Elmes G.W. 2001. Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 471–477Google Scholar
  136. Thomas J.A. and Settele J. 2004. Butterfly mimics of ants. Nature 432: 283–284Google Scholar
  137. Thomas J.A. and Wardlaw J.C. 1992. The capacity of a Myrmica ant nest to support a predacious species of Maculinea butterfly. Oecologia 91: 101–109Google Scholar
  138. Thomas J.A., Elmes G.W. and Wardlaw J.C. 1998. Polymorphic growth in larvae of the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1895–1901Google Scholar
  139. Thomas J.A., Schönrogge K. and Elmes G.W. 2005. Specialization and host associations of social parasites of ants. In: Insect Evolutionary Ecology (Fellowes M.D.E., Holloway G.J. and Rolff J., Eds), CABI Publishing, Wallingford. pp 475–514Google Scholar
  140. Thomas J.A., Elmes G.W., Wardlaw J.C. and Woyciechowski M. 1989. Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. Oecologia 79: 452–457Google Scholar
  141. Thomas J.A., Knapp J.J., Akino T., Gerty S., Wakamura S., Simcox D.J., Wardlaw J.C. and Elmes G.W. 2002. Insect communication: Parasitoid secretions provoke ant warfare- subterfuge used by a rare wasp may be the key to an alternative type of pest control. Nature 417: 505–506Google Scholar
  142. Thomas J.A., Schönrogge K., Bonelli S., Barbero F. and Balletto E. 2010. Corruption of ant acoustical signals by mimetic social parasites - Maculinea butterflies achieve elevated status in host societies by mimicking the acoustics of queen ants. Comm. Integr. Biol. 3: 169–171Google Scholar
  143. Thomas J.A., Elmes G.W., Sielezniew M., Stankiewicz-Fiedurek A., Simcox D.J., Settele J. and Schönrogge K. 2013. Mimetic host shifts in an endangered social parasite of ants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 280: 20122336Google Scholar
  144. Van Dyck H. and Regniers S. 2010. Egg spreading in the ant–parasitic butterfly, Maculinea alcon: from individual behaviour to egg distribution pattern. Anim. Behav. 80: 621–627Google Scholar
  145. Van Dyck H., Talloen W., Oostermeijer J.G.B., Feenstra V., Van der Hidde A. and Wynhoff I. 2000. Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? Proc. R. Soc. B 267: 861–866Google Scholar
  146. Vepsäläinen K., Ebsen J.R., Savolainen R. and Boomsma J.J. 2009. Genetic differentiation between the ant Myrmica rubra and its microgynous social parasite. Insect. Soc. 56: 425–437Google Scholar
  147. Wardlaw J.C. and Elmes G.W. 1996. Exceptional colony size in Myrmica species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Entomologist 115: 191–196Google Scholar
  148. Wardlaw J.C., Thomas J.A. and Elmes G.W. 2000. Do Maculinea rebeli caterpillars provide vestigial mutualistic benefits to ants when living as social parasites inside Myrmica ant nests? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 95: 97–103Google Scholar
  149. Wilson E.O. 1971. The Insects Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  150. Witek M., Sliwinska E., Skorka P., Nowicki P., Settele J. and Woyciechowski M. 2006. Polymorphic growth in larvae of Maculinea butterflies, as an example of biennialism in myrmecophilous insects. Oecologia 148: 729–733Google Scholar
  151. Witek M., Śliwińska E.B., Skórka P., Nowicki P., Wantuch M., Vrabec V., Settele J. and Woyciechowski M. 2008. Host ant specificity of Large Blue butterflies Phengaris (Maculinea) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inhabiting humid grassland in East-central Europe. Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 871–877Google Scholar
  152. Witek M., Nowicki P., Śliwinska B.E., Skórka P., Settele J., Schӧnrogge K. and Woyciechowski M. 2010. Local host ant specificity of Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius butterfly, an obligatory social parasite of Myrmica ants. Ecol. Entomol. 35: 557–564Google Scholar
  153. Witek M., Canterino S., Balletto E. and Bonelli S. 2012. Life cycle and growth pattern of the endangered myrmecophilous Microdon myrmicae (Diptera: Syrphidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 109: 457–461Google Scholar
  154. Witek M., Babik H., Czechowski W. and Czechowska W. 2013a. Myrmica karavajevi (Arn.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Poland: a species not as rare as it is thought to be? Fragm. Faun. 56: 17–24Google Scholar
  155. Witek M., Casacci L.P., Barbero F., Patricelli D., Sala M., Bossi S., Maffei M., Woyciechowski M., Baletto E. and Bonelli S. 2013b. Interspecific relationships in co-occurring populations of social parasites and their host ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 109: 699–709Google Scholar
  156. Woyciechowski M., Slowik J. and Muehlenberg M. 2006. Hosts of the butterfly, Maculinea teleius, among Myrmica ants in Northern Mongolia (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 48: 493–502Google Scholar
  157. Wynhoff I., Grutters M. and Van Langevelde F. 2008. Looking for the ants: selection of oviposition sites by two myrmecophilous butterfly species. Anim. Biol. 58: 371–388Google Scholar
  158. Yamaguchi S. 1988. The Life Histories of Five Myrmecophilous Lycaenid Butterflies of Japan. Shirozu, Kodansha of Japan, pp 21–116Google Scholar
  159. Yanoviak S.P., Kaspari M., Dudley R. and Poinar Jr. R. 2008. Parasite-induced fruit mimicry in a tropical canopy ant. Am. Nat. 171: 536–544Google Scholar
  160. Zhou X., Kaya H.K., Heungens K. and Goodrich-Blair H. 2002. Response of ants to a deterrent factor(s) produced by the symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 6202–6209Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Museum and Institute of ZoologyPolish Academy of ScienceWarszawaPoland
  2. 2.Department of Life Sciences and Systems BiologyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  3. 3.Hungarian Department of Biology and EcologyBabeş-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations