Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 141–149 | Cite as

Review of bees as guests in termite nests, with a new record of the communal bee, Gaesochira obscura (Smith, 1879) (Hymenoptera, Apidae), in nests of Anoplotermes banksi Emerson, 1925 (Isoptera, Termitidae, Apicotermitinae)

  • T. F. CarrijoEmail author
  • R. B. Gonçalves
  • R. G. Santos
Review Article

Abstract

Associations between bees and termites are documented infrequently, but records are available for bee species ranging in behavior from solitary to highly eusocial. The subtribe Meliponina (stingless bees) is the most common bee group reported in termite nests, and, for some species, the occupancy of termite nests may be obligatory. The records of solitary bees nesting within termite nests include species of the tribes Emphorini, Centridini, Megachilini, and Paracolletini. Most of these bees can probably nest in other substrates, and their relationships with termite nests are presumably opportunistic. This study provides a review of published records of bees as guests in termite nests, and also describes the aggregation of nests of Gaesochira obscura within one nest of Anoplotermes banksi in Brazilian Amazonia. One termite nest contained at least ten nest entrances of G. obscura, with burrows 4–6 mm in diameter and about 10 cm long. Each burrow ended in brood cells in different stages of food provisioning and larval development. As commonly reported for other associations of this nature, there was no connection between the tunnels of bees and those of termites. This record adds important data on the biology of A. banksi. Because this is a single record, it is impossible to classify G. obscura either as a termitophile or termitariophile; this species may be opportunistic in relation to nesting substrate.

Keywords

Nesting biology Termitophiles Termitariophiles Termites Bees Association 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to PROBIOTA Consultoria Ambiental and Santo Antônio Energia for the execution of the Entomological Monitoring Program from Santo Antônio UHE, and full support in the field during the report of the association between Gaesochira obscura and Anoplotermes banksi. Partial support was provided by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Ph.D. scholarship (to TFC) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Ph.D. Scholarship 07/01296-0 (to RBG). Special thanks for Jerome G. Rozen Jr., Eliana M. Cancello, Felipe Vivallo, the Associate Editor of this Journal, Miriam Richards, and an anonymous review for comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Araujo R.L. 1970. Termites of the Neotropical region. In: Biology of Termites, Vol. II (Krishna K. and Weesner F.M., Eds), Academic Press, New York. pp 527–576Google Scholar
  2. Barreto L.S. and Castro M.S. 2007. Ecologia de nidificação de abelhas do gênero Partamona (Hymenoptera: Apidae) na caatinga, Milagres, Bahia. Biot. Neotrop. 7: 87–92Google Scholar
  3. Bennet F.D. 1964. Notes on the nesting site of Centris derasa (Hymenoptera; Apoidea). Pan-Pac. Entomol. 49: 125–135Google Scholar
  4. Berg K. 1900. Termitariophilie. Comm. Mus. Nacl. Buenos Aires 1: 212–215Google Scholar
  5. Bourguignon T., Šobotník J., Lepoint G., Martin J.M. and Roisin Y. 2009 Niche differentiation among neotropical soldierless soil-feeding termites revealed by stable isotope ratios. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41: 2038–2043Google Scholar
  6. Callan E.C. 1977. Observations on Centris rufosuffusa Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) and its parasites. J. Nat. Hist. 11: 127–135Google Scholar
  7. Camargo J.M.F. 1984. Notas sobre hábitos de nidificação de Scaura (Scaura) latitarsis (Friese). Bol. Mus. Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Zool. 1: 89–95Google Scholar
  8. Camargo J.M.F. 1970. Ninhos e biologia de algumas espécies de meliponídeos (Hymenoptera: Apidae) da região de Porto Velho, Território de Rondônia, Brasil. Ver. Biol. Tropic. 16: 207–239Google Scholar
  9. Camargo J.M.F. 1980. O grupo Partamona (Partamona) testacea (Klug): suas espécies, distribuição e diferenciação geográfica. Acta Amazon. 10: 1–175Google Scholar
  10. Camargo J.M.F. and Moure J.S. 1994. Meliponinae neotropicais: Os gêneros Paratrigona Schwarz, 1938 e Aparatrigona Moure, 1951. Arq. Zool. 32: 33–109Google Scholar
  11. Camargo J.M.F. and Pedro S.R.M. 2003. Meliponini neotropicais: o gênero Partamona Schwarz, 1939 (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Apinae) - bionomia e biogeografia. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 47: 311–372Google Scholar
  12. Camargo J.M.F. and Posey D.A. 1990. O conhecimento dos Kayapó sobre as abelhas sociais sem ferrão (Meliponinae, Apidae, Hymenoptera): notas adicionais. Bol. Mus. Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Zool. 6: 17–42Google Scholar
  13. Cardinal S., Straka J. and Danforth B.N. 2010. Comprehensive phylogeny of apid bees reveals the evolutionary origins and antiquity of cleptoparasitism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107: 16207–16211Google Scholar
  14. Constantino R. 1999. Chave ilustrada para a identificação dos gêneros de cupins (Insecta: Isoptera) que ocorrem no Brasil. Pap. Avulsos Zool. 40: 387–448Google Scholar
  15. Constantino R. 2005. Padrões de diversidade e endemismo de térmitas no bioma cerrado. In: Biodiversidade, ecologia e conservação do Cerrado (Scariot A.O., Silva J.C.S. and Felfili J.M., Eds), Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília. pp 319–333Google Scholar
  16. Constantino R. and Acioli A.N.S. 2006. Termite diversity in Brazil (Insecta: Isoptera). In: Soil biodiversity in Amazonian and other Brazilian Ecosystems (Moreira F., Siqueira J.O. and Brussaard L., Eds), CAB International, Wallingford. pp 117–128Google Scholar
  17. Corville R.E., Gordon W.F. and Vinson B.S. 1983. Nests of Centris segregata (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) with a review of the nesting habits of the genus. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 56: 109–122Google Scholar
  18. Costa C. and Vanin S.A. 2010. Coleoptera larval fauna associated with termite nests (Isoptera) with emphasis on the “bioluminescent termite nests” from Central Brazil. Psyche 2010: 1–13Google Scholar
  19. Costa D.A., Carvalho R.A., Lima Filho G.F. and Brandão D. 2009. Inquilines and invertebrate fauna associated with termite nests of Cornitermes cumulans (Isoptera, Termitidae) in the Emas National Park, Mineiros, Goiás, Brazil. Sociobiology 53: 443–453Google Scholar
  20. Deligne J., Quennedey A. and Blum M.S. 1981. The enemies and defense mechanisms of termites. In: Social Insects, Vol. II (Hermann H.R., Ed), Academic Press, New York. pp 1–76Google Scholar
  21. Dodson C.H. 1966. Ethology of some bee of the tribe Euglossini (Hymenoptera; Apidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 39: 507–629Google Scholar
  22. Eardley C.D. 2004. Taxonomic revision of the African stingless bees. Afr. Plant. Prot. 10: 63–96Google Scholar
  23. Eggleton P. 2000. Global patterns of termite diversity. In: Termites: Evolution, Sociality, Symbioses, Ecology (Abe T., Bignell D.E. and Higashi M., Eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. pp 25–53Google Scholar
  24. Emerson A.E. 1925. The termites from Kartabo, Bartica District, British Guiana. Zoologica 6: 291–459Google Scholar
  25. Gaglianone M.C. 2001. Nidificação e forrageamento de Centris (Ptilotopus) scopipes Friese. Rev. Bras. Zool. 18: 107–117Google Scholar
  26. Grassé P.P. 1986. Termitologia, Tome III. Comportement, Socialité, Ecologie, Evolution, Systématique. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Higashi M. and Abe T. 1997. Global diversification of termites driven by the evolution of symbiosis and sociality. In: Biodiversity: an ecological perspective (Abe T., Levin S.A. and Higashi M. Eds), Springer, New York, pp 83–112Google Scholar
  28. Kerr W.E., Sakagami S.F., Zucchi R., Portugal-Araujo V. and Camargo J.M.F. 1967. Observações sobre a arquitetura dos ninhos e comportamento de algumas espécies de abelhas sem ferrão das vizinhanças de Manaus, Amazonas. Acta Simp. Biota Amazônica, Zool. 5: 255–309Google Scholar
  29. Kimsey L.S. 1982. Systematics of bees of the genus Eufriesea (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 95: 1–125Google Scholar
  30. Kistner D.H. 1979. Social and evolutionary significance of social insect symbionts. In: Social insects, Vol. I (Hermann H.R., Ed), Academic Press, New York. pp 339–413Google Scholar
  31. Kistner D.H. 1982. The social insect’s bestiary. In: Social Insects, Vol. III (Hermann H.R., Ed), Academic Press, New York. pp 1–244Google Scholar
  32. Kistner D.H. 1969. The biology of termitophiles. In: Biology of Termites, Vol. I (Krishna K. and Weesner F.M., Eds), Academic Press, New York. pp 525–557Google Scholar
  33. Laroca S., Reynaud dos Santos D.T. and Schwartz Filho D.L. 1993. Observations on the nesting biology of three Brazilian Centridini bees: Melanocentris dorsata (Lepeletier 1841), Ptilotopus sponsa (Smith 1854) and Epicharitides obscura (Friese 1899) (Hymenoptera Anthophoridae). Trop. Zool. 6: 151–163Google Scholar
  34. Lenko K. 1971. Nota bionômica sobre a abelha Trigona recursa F. Smith (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Arq. Inst. Biol. 38: 75–77Google Scholar
  35. Martius C. and Ribeiro J.d’A. 1996. Colony populations and biomass in nests of the Amazonian Forest termite Anoplotermes banksi Emerson (Isoptera: Termitidae). Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environm. 31: 82–86Google Scholar
  36. Maynard G. and Rao S. 2010. The solitary bee, Leioproctus (Leioproctus) nigrofulvus (Cockerell 1914) (Hymenoptera: Colletidae), in SE Australia: Unique termite-mound-nesting behavior and impacts of bushfires on local populations. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 86: 14–19Google Scholar
  37. Melo G.A.R. and Gonçalves R.B. 2005. Higher-level bee classifications (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Apida sensu lato). Rev. Bras. Zool. 22: 153–159Google Scholar
  38. Messer A.C. 1984. Chalicodoma pluto: the world`s largest bee rediscovered living communally in termite nests (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 57: 165–168Google Scholar
  39. Michener C.D. 2000. The Bees of the World. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  40. Michener C.D. 2007. The Bees of the World, 2nd Ed. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  41. Michelette E.R.F., Camargo J.M.F. and Rozen J.G. 2000. Biology of the bee Canephorula apiformis and its cleptoparasite Melectoides bellus: nesting habits, floral preferences, and mature larvae (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Am. Mus. Nov. 3308: 1–23Google Scholar
  42. Moure J. 1967. A new genus and two new species of eucerine bee from South America (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Dusenia 8: 147–152Google Scholar
  43. Pickel B. 1928. Contribuição para a biologia de Centris sponsa e Acanthopus excellens (Hymen.). Bol. Biol. 14: 135–143Google Scholar
  44. Posey D.A. and Camargo J.M.F. 1985. Additional notes on the classification and knowledge of stingless bees (Meliponinae, Apidae, Hymenoptera) by the Kayapó Indians of Gorotire, Pará, Brazil. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 54: 247–274Google Scholar
  45. Prestwich G.D. 1984. Defense mechanisms of termites. Annu. Ver. Entomol. 29: 201–232Google Scholar
  46. Ramos M., Mendes F., Aluquerque P. and Rêgo M. 2007. Nidificação e forrageamento de Centris (Ptilotopus) maranhensis Ducke (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Centridini). Rev. Bras. Zool. 24: 1006–1010Google Scholar
  47. Ratnieks F.L.W., Piery M.A. and Cuadrielo I. 1991. The natural nest and nest density of the Africanized Honey Bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae) near Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico. Can. Ent. 123: 353–359Google Scholar
  48. Redford K.H. 1984. The Termitaria of Cornitermes cumulans (Isoptera, Termitidae) and their role in determining a potential keystone species. Biotropica 16: 112–119Google Scholar
  49. Roisin Y. and Pasteels J.M. 2000. The genus Microcerotermes (Isoptera: Termitidae) in New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Invertebr. Taxon. 14: 137–174Google Scholar
  50. Roubik D.W. 1979. Nest and colony characteristics of stingless bees from French Guiana (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 53: 443–470Google Scholar
  51. Roubik D.W. 1983. Nest and colony characteristics of stingless bees from Panama. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 56: 327–355Google Scholar
  52. Rozen J.G. 1965. The larvae of the Anthophoridae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Part 1. Introduction, Eucerini, and Centridini (Anthophorinae). Am. Mus. Nov. 2233: 1–27Google Scholar
  53. Rozen J.G. 1969. The larvae of the Anthophoridae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Part 3. The Melectini, Ericrocini, and Rhathymini. Am. Mus. Nov. 2382: 1–24Google Scholar
  54. Rozen J.G. 1991. Nesting biology and mature larva of the bee Idiomelissodes duplocincta (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae: Eucerini). Am. Mus. Nov. 3012: 1–11Google Scholar
  55. Rozen J.G. and Ayala R. 1987. Nesting biology of the squash bee Peponapis utahensis (Hymenoptera; Anthophoridae; Eucerini). J. N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 95: 28–33Google Scholar
  56. Schwarz M. 1948. Stingless bees (Meliponidae) of the Western Hemisphere. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 90: 1–546Google Scholar
  57. Silvestri F. 1903. Contribuzione alla conoscenza dei Termiti e Termitofili dell’America Meridionale. Redia 1: 1–234Google Scholar
  58. Silveira F.A., Melo G.A.R. and Almeida E.A.B. 2002. Abelhas Brasileiras: Sistemática e Identificação. Silveira, Belo Horizonte. 253 ppGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith F. 1879. Descriptions of New Species of Hymenoptera in the Collection of the British Museum. British Museum, London. 240 ppGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith F. 1854. Notes on the biology and waxes of four species of African Trigona bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 29: 62–70Google Scholar
  61. Sobotník J., Jirsová A. and Hanus R. 2010. Chemical warfare in termites. J. Insect Physiol. 56: 1012–1021Google Scholar
  62. Vesey-Fitzgerald D. 1939. Observations on bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in Trinidad, BWI. Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 14: 107–110Google Scholar
  63. Wille A. and Michener C.D. 1973 The nest architecture of stingless bee with special reference to those of Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 21: 1–278Google Scholar
  64. Wilson E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Belknap Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. F. Carrijo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • R. B. Gonçalves
    • 1
    • 3
  • R. G. Santos
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Museu de ZoologiaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  3. 3.Universidade Federal do ParanáPalotinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations