Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 453–458

Weaving resistance: silk and disease resistance in the weaver ant Polyrhachis dives

Research Article

Abstract

Social insects are at risk from a diverse range of parasites. The antibiotic-producing metapleural gland is an ancestral trait in ants which is thought to be one of their primary mechanisms of resistance. However, the metapleural gland has been lost secondarily in three ant genera, which include weaver ants that are characterised by the remarkable construction of their nests using larval silk. Silken nests may have allowed reduced investment in costly disease resistance mechanisms like the metapleural gland if the silk has antimicrobial properties, as in other insects, or is a hygienic substrate. Here we examine this hypothesis in the weaver ant Polyrhachis dives. We found no evidence of a beneficial effect of silk. The presence of silk did not improve the already high resistance of ants to the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium, the ants only rarely interacted with the silk regardless of whether they were exposed to Metarhizium or not, and silk also did not inhibit the in vitro germination or growth of Metarhizium. Furthermore, silk was found in vitro to be heavily contaminated with the facultative entomopathogenic fungus Aspergillus flavus, and many more ants sporulated with this fungus when kept with silk in vivo than when they were kept without silk. Further work is needed to examine the effects of silk on other parasites and of silk from other weaver ants. However, the results in combination suggest that silk in P. dives is unlikely to provide protection against parasites and that it is also not a hygienic substrate. Alternative explanations may therefore be needed for the loss of the metapleural gland in weaver ants.

Keywords

Parasites Social insects Metarhizium Aspergillus Pathogens Metapleural gland 

References

  1. Beattie A.J., Turnbull C.L., Hough T. and Knox R.B. 1986. Antibiotic production - a possible function for the metapleural glands of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79: 448-450Google Scholar
  2. Boomsma J.J., Schmid-Hempel P. and Hughes W.O.H. 2005. Life histories and parasite pressure across the major groups of social insects. In: Insect Evolutionary Ecology (Fellowes M.D.E., Holloway G.J. and Rolff J., Eds). CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 139-175Google Scholar
  3. Bot A.N.M., Ortius-Lechner D., Finster K., Maile R. and Boomsma J.J. 2002. Variable sensitivity of fungi and bacteria to compounds produced by the metapleural glands of leaf-cutting ants. Insect. Soc. 49: 363-370Google Scholar
  4. Boucias D.G. and Pendland J.C. 1998. Principles of Insect Pathology. Kluwer, Norwell, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown W.L. 1968. An hypothesis concerning function of metapleural glands in ants. Am. Nat. 102: 188-191Google Scholar
  6. Castella G., Chapuisat M. and Christe P. 2008. Prophylaxis with resin in wood ants. Anim. Behav. 75: 1591-1596Google Scholar
  7. Chapuisat M., Oppliger A., Magliano P. and Christe P. 2007. Wood ants use resin to protect themselves against pathogens. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274: 2013Google Scholar
  8. Christe P., Oppliger A., Bancala F., Castella G. and Chapuisat M. 2003. Evidence for collective medication in ants. Ecol. Lett. 6: 19-22Google Scholar
  9. Cremer S., Armitage S.A.O. and Schmid-Hempel P. 2007. Social immunity. Curr. Biol. 17: R693-R702Google Scholar
  10. Dong C.J., Zhang J.M., Huang H., Chen W.G. and Hu Y.Y. 2009. Pathogenicity of a new China variety of Metarhizium anisopliae (M. anisopliae var. dcjhyium) to subterranean termite Odontotermes formosanus. Microbiol. Res. 164: 27-35Google Scholar
  11. Freed S., Jin F.-L. and Ren S.-X. 2011. Determination of genetic variability among the isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae from different geographical origins. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27: 359-370Google Scholar
  12. Hölldobler B. and Engel-Siegel H. 1984. On the metapleural gland of ants. Psyche 91: 201-224Google Scholar
  13. Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Belknap Press, Cambridge. 732 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes W.O.H. and Boomsma J.J. 2004. Let your enemy do the work: within-host interactions between two fungal parasites of leaf-cutting ants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271: S104-S106Google Scholar
  15. Hughes W.O.H., Eilenberg J. and Boomsma J.J. 2002. Trade-offs in group living: transmission and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1811-1819Google Scholar
  16. Hughes W.O.H., Petersen K., Ugelvig L., Pedersen D., Thomsen L., Poulsen M. and Boomsma J.J. 2004a. Density-dependence and within-host competition in a semelparous parasite of leaf-cutting ants. BMC Evol. Biol. 4: 45Google Scholar
  17. Hughes W.O.H., Thomsen L., Eilenberg J. and Boomsma J.J. 2004b. Diversity of entomopathogenic fungi near leaf-cutting ant nests in a Neotropical forest, with particular reference to Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae. J. Invert. Pathol. 85: 46-53Google Scholar
  18. Johnson R.N., Agapow P.M. and Crozier R.H. 2003. A tree island approach to inferring phylogeny in the ant subfamily Formicinae, with especial reference to the evolution of weaving. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 29: 317-330Google Scholar
  19. Keller S., Kessler P. and Schweizer C. 2003. Distribution of insect pathogenic soil fungi in Switzerland with special reference to Beauveria brongniartii and Metarhizium anisopliae. Biocontrol 48: 307-319Google Scholar
  20. Korayem A.M., Hauling C., Lesch M., Fabbri M., Lindgren O., Loseva O., Schmidt M., Dushay S. and Theopold U. 2007. Evidence for an immune function of lepidopteran silk proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 352: 317-322Google Scholar
  21. Lacey L.A. 1997. Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Li B.C., Zhang S.Q., Dan W.B., Chen Y.Q. and Cao P. 2007. Expression in Escherichia coli and purification of bioactive antibacterial peptide ABP-CM4 from the Chinese silk worm, Bombyx mori. Biotechnol. Lett. 29: 1031-1036Google Scholar
  23. Mackintosh J.A., Trimble J.E., Jones M.K., Karuso P.H., Beattie A.J. and Veal D.A. 1995. Antimicrobial mode of action of secretions from the metapleural gland of Myrmecia gulosa (Australian bull ants). Can. J. Microbiol. 41: 136-144Google Scholar
  24. Meyling N.V. and Eilenberg J. 2006. Isolation and characterisation of Beauveria bassiana isolates from phylloplanes of hedgerow vegetation. Mycol. Res. 110: 188-195Google Scholar
  25. Morelos-Juárez C., Walker T.N., Lopes J.F.S. and Hughes W.O.H. 2010. Ant farmers practice proactive personal hygiene to protect their fungus crop. Curr. Biol. 20: 553-554Google Scholar
  26. Poulsen M., Bot A.N.M., Nielsen M.G. and Boomsma J.J. 2002. Experimental evidence for the costs and hygienic significance of the antibiotic metapleural gland secretion in leaf-cutting ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 151-157Google Scholar
  27. Poulsen M., Hughes W.O.H. and Boomsma J.J. 2006. Differential resistance and the importance of antibiotic production in Acromyrmex echinatior leaf-cutting ant castes towards the entomopathogenic fungus Aspergillus nomius. Insect. Soc. 53: 349-355Google Scholar
  28. Robson S.K.A. and Kohout R.J. 2005. Evolution of nest-weaving behaviour in arboreal nesting ants of the genus Polyrhachis Fr. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Austral. J. Entomol. 44: 164-169Google Scholar
  29. Rosengaus R.B., Maxmen A.B., Coates L.E. and Traniello J.F.A. 1998. Disease resistance: a benefit of sociality in the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (Isoptera: Termopsidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44: 125-134Google Scholar
  30. Schlüns H. and Crozier R.H. 2009. Molecular and chemical immune defenses in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 12: 237-249Google Scholar
  31. Schmid-Hempel P. 1998. Parasites in Social Insects. Princeton Univ. Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  32. St Leger R.J., Screen S.E. and Shams-Pirzadeh B. 2000. Lack of host specialization in Aspergillus flavus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 320-324 doi:10.1128/aem.66.1.320-324.2000 Google Scholar
  33. St Leger R.J., Staples R.C. and Roberts D.W. 1993. Entomopathogenic isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae, Beauveria bassiana, and Aspergillus flavus produce multiple extracellular chitinase isozymes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 61: 81-84Google Scholar
  34. Sumner S., Hughes W.O.H. and Boomsma J.J. 2003. Evidence for differential selection and potential adaptive evolution in the worker caste of an inquiline social parasite. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54: 256-263Google Scholar
  35. Sun B.D. and Liu X.Z. 2008. Occurrence and diversity of insect-associated fungi in natural soils in China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 39: 100-108Google Scholar
  36. Ugelvig L.V. and Cremer S. 2007. Social prophylaxis: group interaction promotes collective immunity in ant colonies. Curr. Biol. 17: 1967-1971Google Scholar
  37. Veal D.A., Trimble J.E. and Beattie A.J. 1992. Antimicrobial properties of secretions from the metapleural glands of Myrmecia gulosa (the Australian bull ant). J. Appl. Bacteriol. 72: 188-194Google Scholar
  38. Walker T.N. and Hughes W.O.H. 2009. Adaptive social immunity in leaf-cutting ants. Biol. Lett. 5: 446-448Google Scholar
  39. Wilson-Rich N., Spivak M., Fefferman N.H. and Starks P.T. 2009. Genetic, individual, and group facilitation of disease resistance in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 54: 405-423. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093301 Google Scholar
  40. Wilson K., Knell R., Boots M. and Koch-Osborne J. 2003. Group living and investment in immune defence: an interspecific analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 133-143Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Integrative and Comparative BiologyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations