Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 17–22

Digging effort in leaf-cutting ant queens (Atta sexdens rubropilosa) and its effects on survival and colony growth during the claustral phase

  • R. S. Camargo
  • L. C. Forti
  • R. T. Fujihara
  • F. Roces
Research Article

Abstract

Nest foundation in the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens is claustral, and the single queen completely relies on its body reserves throughout, approximately, 9 weeks until the first workers emerge and initiate foraging. Nest digging is much time- and energy-consuming, and it is an open question how queens decide on the length of the tunnel they dig and therefore the depth of the initial chamber. Shallow founding nests may be energetically cheaper to dig, but queens may be more exposed to changing environmental variables. Deeper nests, on the other hand, may be climatically more stable and suitable, but more expensive to dig. We hypothesized that the maximal nest depth excavated by Atta founding queens may represent the outcome of an evolutionary trade-off between maximizing nest depth and minimizing energy expenditure during digging, so as to save energy for the long claustral phase. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the fitness consequences of increased digging effort in queens that were experimentally stimulated to excavate a complete founding nest either once, twice or three times consecutively compared to control queens that did not dig. Fitness was quantified as mortality rates, rates of egg-laying and offspring production, and size of the fungus garden until the emergence of the first workers. Results showed that, in contrast with the initial expectations, fungus growth, egg-laying rates and offspring production were not affected by the increased digging effort in the experimentally induced successive excavations. However, a significant higher mortality was observed in queens with increased digging effort, i.e., those that dug two or three nests consecutively. It is argued that in queens a behavioral mechanism for the control of nest depth has evolutionary been selected for as a trade-off between maximizing nest depth, to favor protection of the queen against unsuitable environmental variables, and minimizing energy expenditure during digging, which significantly affects survival.

Keywords

Leaf-cutting ants Egg-laying Atta Nest digging Claustral 

References

  1. Autuori M. 1942. Contribuição para o conhecimento da saúva (Atta spp.—Hymenoptera—Formicidae). II. O sauveiro inicial (Atta sexdens rubropilosa, Forel, 1908). Arq. Inst. Biol. 13: 67–86Google Scholar
  2. Boomsma J.J. and Isaaks J.A. 1985. Energy investment and respiration in queens and males of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 19–27Google Scholar
  3. Brown M.J.F. and Bonhoeffer S. 2003. On the evolution of claustral colony founding in ants. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 305–313Google Scholar
  4. Cunha W.H.A. 1968. Observações acêrca do comportamento da iça—Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel, 1908—Hymenoptera—Formicidae—na fundação do formigueiro. Ciência e Cultura 20: 233–234Google Scholar
  5. Della Lucia T.M.C., Moreira D.D.O., Oliveira M.A. and Araújo M.S. 1995. Perdas de peso de rainhas de Atta durante a fundação e o establecimento das colônias. Rev. Bras. Biol. 55: 533–536Google Scholar
  6. Della Lucia T.M.C., Vilela E.F., Moreira D.D.O., Bento J.M.S. and Dos Anjos N. 1990. Egg-laying in Atta sexdens rubropilosa, under laboratory conditions. In: Applied MyrmecologyA World Perspective (Vander Meer R.K. and Jaffé K., Eds), Westview Press, Boulder. pp 173–179Google Scholar
  7. Eidmann H. 1935. Zur Kenntnis der Blattschneiderameise Atta sexdens L., insbesondere ihrer Ökologie. Z. angew. Entomol. 22: 185–436Google Scholar
  8. Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 732 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson R.A. 2000. Water loss in desert ants: caste variation and the effect of cuticle abrasion. Physiol. Entomol. 25: 48–53Google Scholar
  10. Johnson R.A. and Gibbs A.G. 2004. Effect of mating stage on water balance, cuticular hydrocarbons and metabolism in the desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus. J. Insect Physiol. 50: 943–953Google Scholar
  11. Keller L. and Passera L. 1989. Size and fat content of gynes in relation to the mode of colony founding in ants (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Oecologia 80: 236–240Google Scholar
  12. Magwere T., Pamplona R., Miwa S., Martinez-Diaz P., Portero-Otin M., Brand M.D. and Partridge L. 2006. Flight activity, mortality rates, and lipoxidative damage in Drosophila. J. Gerontol.: Biol. Sci. 61A: 136–145Google Scholar
  13. Pereira-Da-Silva, V. 1979. Dinâmica populacional, biomassa e estrutura dos ninhos iniciais de Atta capiguara Gonçalves, 1944 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) na região de Botucatu, SP. Thesis Livre Docencia, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil, 98 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Ribeiro F.J.L. 1972. Um estudo sobre o comportamento da fêmea durante a fundação da colônia em Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel, 1908 (Hymenoptera—Formicidae). Tese Doutoramento, Universidade São Paulo, PsicologiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Ribeiro F.J.L. 1995. A escavação do solo pela fêmea da saúva (Atta sexdens rubropilosa). Psicologia USP 6: 75–93Google Scholar
  16. Seal J.N. 2009. Scaling of body weight and fat content in fungus-gardening ant queens: does this explain why leaf-cutting ants found claustrally? Insect. Soc. 56: 135–141Google Scholar
  17. Seal J.N. and Tschinkel W.R. 2007. Energetics of newly-mated queens and colony founding in the fungus-gardening ants Cyphomyrmex rimosus and Trachymyrmex septentrionalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Physiol. Entomol. 32: 8–15Google Scholar
  18. Sohal R.S. and Buchan P.B. 1981. Relationship between physical activity and life span in the adult housefly, Musca domestica. Exp. Gerontol. 16: 157–162Google Scholar
  19. Weber N.A. 1972. Gardening Ants - The Attines. Philadelphia, The American Philosophical Society, 146 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Camargo
    • 1
  • L. C. Forti
    • 1
  • R. T. Fujihara
    • 1
  • F. Roces
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Social Pest Insects, Department of Vegetal Production, Faculty of Agronomic ScienceUNESPBotucatuBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Behavioural Physiology and SociobiologyUniversity of Würzburg, Biozentrum, Am HublandWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations