Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 343–349 | Cite as

Competition hierarchy and plant defense in a guild of ants on tropical Passiflora

Research Article

Abstract

In facultative ant–plant interactions, ants may compete with each other for food provided by extrafloral nectar (EFN) plants. We studied resource competition and plant defense in a guild of ants that use the same EFN resource provided by two species of Passiflora in a seasonal rain forest in tropical China. At least 22 ant species were recorded using the EFN resource, although some of those species were rare. Among these ants, Paratrechina sp.1 and Dolichoderus thoracicus were more aggressive than other species. Ant aggressiveness measured as ant behavioral dominance index (BDI) was positively correlated with ant abundance on the Passiflora species studied. Ant BDI was also positively correlated to the protection that ants provided against herbivory. In Passiflora siamica, the number of workers patrolling on the plants did negatively correlate with average leaf loss per plant. We conclude that in this facultative Passiflora–ant system, plant defense upon herbivore was indeed influenced by the total number of ants present on plant and the aggressiveness of these ants.

Keywords

EFN plant Ant competition Ant–plant mutualism Plant defense Competitive hierarchies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Zhenghui Xu for identifying ants, Dr. Darong Yang for identifying other insects, Dr. Hong Wang for identifying plants in the habitat, Prof. Theodore Fleming, Dr. Matthew Warren for insight comments and help with language editing, Prof. Anthony R. Ives for advice in statistics, and Ms. Jianxiang Hu, Mr. Baogui Li, Mr. Xinming Li and Mr. Jianping Huang, Mr. Meng Li and Ms. Xiaomei He for field assistance.

References

  1. Andersen A.N. 1995. A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. J. Biogeography 22: 15-29Google Scholar
  2. Apple J.L. and Feener D.H. 2001. Ant visitation of extrafloral nectaries of Passiflora: The effects of nectary attributes and ant behavior on patterns in facultative ant-plant mutualisms. Oecologia 127: 409-416Google Scholar
  3. Bestelmeyer B.T. 2000. The trade-off between thermal tolerance and behavioural dominance in a subtropical South American ant community. J. Anim. Ecology 69: 998-1009Google Scholar
  4. Bluethgen N. and Fiedler K. 2004a. Competition for composition: Lessons from nectar-feeding ant communities. Ecology 85: 1479-1485Google Scholar
  5. Bluethgen N. and Fiedler K. 2004b. Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 155-166Google Scholar
  6. Blüethgen N., Verhaagh M., Goitia W., Jaffé K., Morawetz W. and Barthlott W. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125: 229-240Google Scholar
  7. Davidson D.W. 1997. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 153-181Google Scholar
  8. Debout G.D.G., Dalecky A., Ngomi N.A. and McKey D.B. 2009 Dynamics of species coexistence: maintenance of a plant-ant competitive metacommunity. Oikos 118: 873-884Google Scholar
  9. de la Fuente M.A.S. and Marquis R.J. 1999. The role of ant-tended extrafloral nectaries in the protection and benefit of a Neotropical rainforest tree. Oecologia 118: 192-202Google Scholar
  10. Dejean A. and Corbara B. 2003. A review of mosaics of dominant ants in rainforests and plantations. In: Arthropods of Tropical Forests: Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy (Y. Basset, V. Novotny, S.E. Miller and R.L. Kitching, Eds), Cambrige University Press, Cambridge. pp 341-347Google Scholar
  11. Djiéto-Lordon C., Dejean A., Gibernau M., Hossaert-McKey M. and McKey D. 2004. Symbiotic mutualism with a community of opportunistic ants: protection, competition, and ant occupancy of the myrmecophyte Barteria nigritana (Passifloraceae). Acta Oecol. 26: 109-116Google Scholar
  12. Fellers J.H. 1987. Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68: 1466-1478Google Scholar
  13. Gaume L. and McKey D. 1999. An ant-plant mutualism and its host-specific parasite: activity rhythms, young leaf patrolling, and effects on herbivores of two specialist plant-ants inhabiting the same myrmecophyte. Oikos 84: 130-144Google Scholar
  14. Gaume L., McKey D. and Anstett M.C. 1997. Benefits conferred by” timid” ants: active anti-herbivore protection of the rainforest tree Leonardoxa africana by the minute ant Petalomyrmex phylax. Oecologia 112: 209-216Google Scholar
  15. Heil M. and McKey D. 2003. Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 425-453Google Scholar
  16. Leal I.R., Fischer E., Kost C., Tabarelli M. and Wirth R. 2006. Ant protection against herbivores and nectar thieves in Passiflora coccinea flowers. Ecoscience 13: 431-438Google Scholar
  17. Meunier L., Dalecky A., Berticat C., Gaume L. and McKey D. 1999. Worker size variation and the evolution of an ant-plant mutualism: Comparative morphometrics of workers of two closely related plant-ants, Petalomyrmex phylax and Aphomomyrmex afer (Formicinae). Insect. Soc. 46: 171-178Google Scholar
  18. Ness J.H., Morris W.F. and Bronstein J.L. 2006. Integrating quality and quantity of mutualistic service to contrast ant species protecting Ferocactus wislizeni. Ecology 87: 912-921Google Scholar
  19. Oliveira P.S., Rico-Gray V., Diaz-Castelazo C. and Castillo-Guevara C. 1999. Interaction between ants, extrafloral nectaries and insect herbivores in Neotropical coastal sand dunes: Herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Funct. Ecol. 13: 623-631Google Scholar
  20. Palmer T.M. and Brody A.K. 2007. Mutualism as reciprocal exploitation: African plant-ants defend foliar but not reproductive structures. Ecology 88: 3004-3011Google Scholar
  21. Palmer T.M., Young T.P. and Stanton M.L. 2002. Burning bridges: Priority effects and the persistence of a competitively subordinate acacia-ant in Laikipia, Kenya. Oecologia 133: 372-379Google Scholar
  22. Palmer T.M., Young T.P., Stanton M.L. and Wenk E. 2000. Short-term dynamics of an acacia ant community in Laikipia, Kenya. Oecologia 123: 425-435Google Scholar
  23. Rico-Gray V. and Oliveira P.S. 2007. The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-plant Interactions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 123 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Rocha C.F.D. and Bergallo H.G. 1992. Bigger ant colonies reduce herbivory and herbivore residence time on leaves of an ant-plant: Azteca muelleri vs. Coelomera ruficornis on Cecropia pachystachya. Oecologia 91: 249-252Google Scholar
  25. Savolainen R. and Vepsäläinen K. 1988. A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51: 135-155Google Scholar
  26. Santini G., Tucci L., Ottonetti L. and Frizzi F. 2007. Competition trade-offs in the organisation of a Mediterranean ant assemblage. Ecol. Entomol. 32: 319-326Google Scholar
  27. Suarez A.V., De Moraes C. and Ippolito A. 1998. Defense of Acacia collinsii by an obligate and nonobligate ant species: the significance of encroaching vegetation 1. Biotropica 30: 480-482Google Scholar
  28. Wu Z.Y. and Raven P.H. 2007. Clusiaceae through Araliaceae. In: Flora of China. Vol. 13, Science Press, Beijing. pp 141-149Google Scholar
  29. Young T.P., Stubblefield C.H. and Isbell L.A. 1997. Ants on swollen-thorn acacias: species coexistence in a simple system. Oecologia 109: 98-107Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest EcologyXishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of SciencesMenglaChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations