Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Honeybee colony drone production and maintenance in accordance with environmental factors: an interplay of queen and worker decisions

Review Article

Abstract

Social insect colonies display a remarkable ability to adjust investment in reproduction (i.e., production of sexuals) in accordance with environmental conditions such as season and food availability. How this feat is accomplished by the colony’s queen(s) and workers remains a puzzle. Here, I review what we have learned about this subject in the European honeybee (Apis mellifera), specifically with regard to a colony’s production of males (drones). I identify five environmental conditions that influence colony-level patterns of drone production and then define five stages of drone rearing that are accomplished by the queen and workers. Using this framework, I detail our current understanding of how the queen or workers adjust their actions at each stage of drone rearing in response to each of the environmental conditions. Future investigations of this topic in honeybees and other social insect societies will lead to a better understanding of how colonies manage to flexibly and efficiently allocate their resources under changing environmental conditions.

Keywords

Honeybees Drones Colony organization Sex allocation Cooperation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank F. C. Dyer, T. Getty and T. D. Seeley for helpful discussions on the ideas in this paper. Many thanks are due also to K. E. Holekamp, Z. Y. Huang and two anonymous reviewers for comments on a draft of this paper. My work was supported by an NSF fellowship on sequential decision-making (IGERT DGE 0114378).

References

  1. Allen M.D. 1958. Drone brood in honeybee colonies. J. Econ. Entomol. 51: 46–48Google Scholar
  2. Allen M.D. 1963. Drone production in honey-bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.). Nature 199: 4895–4896Google Scholar
  3. Allen M.D. 1965a. The effect of a plentiful supply of drone comb on colonies of honeybees. J. Apic. Res. 4: 109–119Google Scholar
  4. Allen M.D. 1965b. The production of queen cups and queen cells in relation to the general development of honeybee colonies and its connection with swarming and supersedure. J. Apic. Res. 4: 121–141Google Scholar
  5. Beekman M., Komdeur J. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2003. Reproductive conflicts in social animals: who has power? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 277–282Google Scholar
  6. Beekman M. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2003. Power over reproduction in social Hymenoptera. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358: 1741–1753Google Scholar
  7. Berg S., Koeniger N., Koeniger G. and Fuchs S. 1997. Body size and reproductive success of drones (Apis mellifera L). Apidologie 28: 449–460Google Scholar
  8. Bourke A.F.G. and Franks N.R. 1995. Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 529 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Buhler A., Lanzrein B. and Wille H. 1983. Influence of temperature and carbon dioxide concentration on juvenile hormone titer and dependent parameters of adult worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L). J. Insect Physiol. 29: 885–893Google Scholar
  10. Camazine S. 1991. Self-organizing pattern formation on the combs of honeybee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 61–76Google Scholar
  11. Camazine S., Deneubourg J.-L., Franks N.R., Sneyd J., Theraulaz G. and Bonabeau E. 2001. Self-organization in Biological Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 538 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Charnov E.L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. 355 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Crozier R.H. and Pamilo P. 1996. Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 306 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Darwin C. 1874. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (2nd edition). John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  15. Delaplane K.S. and Harbo J.R. 1987. Drone production by young versus old worker honeybees in queenless colonies. Apidologie 18: 115–119Google Scholar
  16. Free J.B. 1957. The food of adult drone honeybees (Apis mellifera). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 5: 7–11Google Scholar
  17. Free J.B. 1967. The production of drone comb by honeybee colonies. J. Apic. Res. 6: 29–36Google Scholar
  18. Free J.B. and Williams I.H. 1975. Factors determining the rearing and rejection of drones by the honeybee colony. Anim. Behav. 23: 650–675Google Scholar
  19. Fukuda H. and Ohtani T. 1977. Survival and life span of drone honeybees. Res. Popul. Ecol. 19: 51–68Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1–16Google Scholar
  21. Haydak M.H. 1958. Do the nurse honeybees recognize the sex of the larvae? Science 127: 1113Google Scholar
  22. Henderson C.E. 1991. Reproductive Investment in Drones in Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Colonies. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. 92 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Henderson C.E. 1994. Influence of the presence of adult drones on the further production of drones in honeybee (Apis mellifera L) colonies. Apidologie 25: 31–37Google Scholar
  24. Hrassnigg N. and Crailsheim K. 2005. Differences in drone and worker physiology in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 36: 255–277Google Scholar
  25. Johansson T.S.K. and Johansson M.P. 1971. Effects of drone comb on brood and honey production in honeybee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera-Apidae) colonies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 954–956Google Scholar
  26. Koeniger N. 1970. Factors determining the laying of drone and worker eggs by the queen honeybee. Bee World 51: 166–169Google Scholar
  27. Kronauer D.J.C., Schoning C., Pedersen J.S., Boomsma J.J. and Gadau J. 2004. Extreme queen-mating frequency and colony fission in African army ants. Mol. Ecol. 13: 2381–2388Google Scholar
  28. Lee P.C. and Winston M.L. 1985. The effects of swarm size and date of issue on comb construction in newly founded colonies of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Can. J. Zool. 63: 524–527Google Scholar
  29. Lee P.C and Winston M.L. 1987. Effects of reproductive timing and colony size on the survival, offspring colony size and drone production in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Ecol. Entomol. 12: 187–195Google Scholar
  30. Martin C.G., Oldroyd B.P. and Beekman M. 2004. Differential reproductive success among subfamilies in queenless honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56: 42–49Google Scholar
  31. Martin S.J., Beekman M., Wossler T.C. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2002. Parasitic Cape honeybee workers, Apis mellifera capensis, evade policing. Nature 415: 163–165Google Scholar
  32. Miller D.G. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2001. The timing of worker reproduction and breakdown of policing behaviour in queenless honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) societies. Insect. Soc. 48: 178–184Google Scholar
  33. Moritz R.F.A. 1985. The effects of multiple mating on the worker–queen conflict in Apis mellifera L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 375–377Google Scholar
  34. Morse R.A., Strang G.E. and Nowakowski J. 1967. Fall death rates of drone honeybees. J. Econ. Entomol. 60: 1198–1202Google Scholar
  35. Newton D.C. and Michl D.J. 1974. Cannibalism as an indication of pollen insufficiency in honeybees: ingestion or recapping of manually exposed pupae. J. Apic. Res. 13: 235–241Google Scholar
  36. Page R.E. 1981. Protandrous reproduction in honeybees. Environ. Entomol. 10: 359–362Google Scholar
  37. Page R.E. and Erickson E.H. 1988. Reproduction by worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23: 117–126Google Scholar
  38. Page R.E. and Metcalf R.A. 1984. A population investment sex ratio for the honeybee (Apis mellifera L). Am. Nat. 124: 680–702Google Scholar
  39. Palmer K.A. and Oldroyd B.P. 2000. Evolution of multiple mating in the genus Apis. Apidologie 31: 235–248Google Scholar
  40. Pratt S.C. 1998. Decentralized control of drone comb construction in honey bee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 193–205Google Scholar
  41. Pratt S.C. 2004. Collective control of the timing and type of comb construction by honeybees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 35: 193–205Google Scholar
  42. Ratnieks F.L.W., Foster K.R. and Wenseleers T. 2006. Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51: 581–608Google Scholar
  43. Ratnieks F.L.W. and Keller L. 1998. Queen control of egg fertilization in the honeybee. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44: 57–61Google Scholar
  44. Rheindt F.E., Gadau J., Strehl C.P. and Hölldobler B. 2004. Extremely high mating frequency in the Florida harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex badius). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56: 472–481Google Scholar
  45. Rinderer T.E., Hellmich II R.L, Danka R.G. and Collins A.M. 1985. Male reproductive parasitism: a factor in the africanization of European honey-bee populations. Science 228: 1119–1121Google Scholar
  46. Robinson G.E., Page R.E. and Fondrk M.K.. 1990. Intracolonial behavioral variation in worker oviposition, oophagy, and larval care in queenless honeybee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 315–323Google Scholar
  47. Sasaki K., Kitamura H. and Obara Y. 2004. Discrimination of larval sex and timing of male brood elimination by workers in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39: 393–399Google Scholar
  48. Sasaki K. and Obara Y. 2001. Nutritional factors affecting the egg sex ratio adjustment by a honeybee queen. Insect. Soc. 48: 355–359Google Scholar
  49. Sasaki K., Satoh T. and Obara Y. 1996. The honeybee queen has the potential ability to regulate the primary sex ratio. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 31: 247–254Google Scholar
  50. Schmickl T., Blaschon B., Gurmann B. and Crailsheim K. 2003. Collective and individual nursing investment in the queen and in young and old honeybee larvae during foraging and non-foraging periods. Insect. Soc. 50: 174–184Google Scholar
  51. Schmickl T. and Crailsheim K. 2001. Cannibalism and early capping: strategy of honeybee colonies in times of experimental pollen shortages. J. Comp. Physiol. A 187: 541–547Google Scholar
  52. Schmickl T. and Crailsheim K. 2002. How honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) change their brood care behaviour in response to non-foraging conditions and poor pollen conditions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 415–425Google Scholar
  53. Seeley T.D. 2002. The effect of drone comb on a honeybee colony’s production of honey. Apidologie 33: 75–86Google Scholar
  54. Seeley T.D. and Mikheyev A.S. 2003. Reproductive decisions by honeybee colonies: tuning investment in male production in relation to success in energy acquisition. Insect. Soc. 50: 134–138Google Scholar
  55. Seeley T.D. and Morse R.A. 1976. The nest of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L). Insect. Soc. 23: 495–512Google Scholar
  56. Strassmann J. 2001. The rarity of multiple mating by females in the social Hymenoptera. Insect. Soc. 48: 1–13Google Scholar
  57. Trivers R.L. and Hare H. 1976. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191: 249–263Google Scholar
  58. Visscher P.K. 1989. A quantitative study of worker reproduction in honeybee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 247–254Google Scholar
  59. Webster T.C., Peng Y.S. and Duffey S.S. 1987. Conservation of nutrients in larval tissue by cannibalizing honeybees. Physiol. Entomol. 12: 225–231Google Scholar
  60. Wharton K.E., Dyer F.C. and Getty T. 2008. Male elimination in the honeybee. Behav. Ecol. 19: 1075–1079Google Scholar
  61. Wharton K. E., Dyer F.C., Huang Z.Y. and Getty T. 2007. The honeybee queen influences the regulation of colony drone production. Behav. Ecol. 18: 1092–1099Google Scholar
  62. Winston M.L. 1987. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 281 ppGoogle Scholar
  63. Woyke J. 1977. Cannibalism and brood-rearing efficiency in the honeybee. J. Apic. Res. 16: 84–94Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations