Geometric and Functional Analysis

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 558–590 | Cite as

Boundaries and JSJ Decompositions of CAT(0)-Groups

Article

Abstract

Let G be a one-ended group acting discretely and co-compactly on a CAT(0) space X. We show that ∂X has no cut points and that one can detect splittings of G over two-ended groups and recover its JSJ decomposition from ∂X.

We show that any discrete action of a group G on a CAT(0) space X satisfies a convergence type property. This is used in the proof of the results above but it is also of independent interest. In particular, if G acts co-compactly on X, then one obtains as a corollary that if the Tits diameter of ∂X is bigger than 3π/2 then it is infinite and G contains a free subgroup of rank 2.

Keywords and phrases

Boundary cut point JSJ decomposition closing lemma 

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification

20F67 20E06 20E34 57M07 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B.
    W. Ballmann, Lectures on Spaces of Nonpositive Curvature, with an appendix by Misha Brin, DMV Seminar, 25, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. BB.
    W. Ballmann, M. Brin, Orbihedra of nonpositive curvature, Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 82 (1995), (1996), 169–209.Google Scholar
  3. BBu.
    W. Ballmann, S. Buyalo, Periodic rank one geodesics in Hadamard spaces, preprint (2002).Google Scholar
  4. BeF.
    Bestvina M., Feighn M. (1991) Bounding the complexity of simplicial group actions on trees. Invent. Math. 103: 449–469MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. BeM.
    Bestvina M., Mess J. (1991) The boundary of negatively curved groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 4(3): 469–481MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bo1.
    Bowditch B.H. (1998) Cut points and canonical splittings of hyperbolic groups. Acta Math. 180(2): 145–186MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bo2.
    Bowditch B.H. (1998) Group actions on trees and dendrons. Topology 37(6): 1275–1298MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bo3.
    Bowditch B. (1999) Treelike structures arising from continua and convergence groups. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 139: 662MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. BrH.
    M. Bridson, A. Haefliger, Metric Spaces of Non-positive Curvature, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 319 (1999).Google Scholar
  10. CJ.
    Casson A., Jungreis D. (1994) Convergence groups and Seifert fibered 3-manifolds. Invent. Math. 118: 441–456MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. CrK.
    Croke C.B., Kleiner B. (2000) Spaces with nonpositive curvature and their ideal boundaries. Topology 39(3): 549–556MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. DS.
    Dunwoody M.J., Sageev M.E. (1999) JSJ-splittings for finitely presented groups over slender groups. Invent. Math. 135(1): 25–44MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. DSw.
    Dunwoody M.J., Swenson E.L. (2000) The algebraic torus theorem. Invent. Math. 140(3): 605–637MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. G.
    Gabai D. (1992) Convergence groups are Fuchsian groups. Annals of Math. 136: 477–510MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gr.
    M. Gromov, Hyperbolic groups, Essays in Group Theory (S.M. Gersten, ed.), MSRI Publ. 8, Springer-Verlag (1987), 75–263.Google Scholar
  16. HY.
    Hocking J., Young G. (1961) Topology. Dover, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. K.
    Karlsson A. (2005) On the dynamics of isometries. Geometry and Topology 9: 2359–2394MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. L.
    Levitt G. (1998) Non-nesting actions on real trees. Bull. London Math. Soc. 30: 46–54MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O.
    P. Ontaneda, Cocompact CAT(0) are almost geodesically complete, preprint (2003).Google Scholar
  20. P1.
    Papasoglu P. (2005) Quasi-isometry invariance of group splittings. Annals of Math. 161: 759–830MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. PS.
    Papasoglu P., Swenson E. (2006) From continua to \({\mathbb {R}}\)-trees. Algebraic and Geometric Topology 6: 1759–1784MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. RS.
    Rips E., Sela Z. (1997) Cyclic splittings of finitely presented groups and the canonical JSJ decomposition. Ann. of Math. (2) 146(1): 53–109MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ru.
    Ruane K. (2001) Dynamics of the action of a CAT(0) group on the boundary. Geom. Dedicata 84(1-3): 81–99MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. SW.
    Sageev M., Wise D. (2005) The Tits alternative for CAT(0) cubical complexes. Bull. London Math. Soc. 37(5): 706–710MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. ScS.
    P. Scott, G.A. Swarup, Regular Neighbourhoods and Canonical Decompositions for Groups, Asterisque 289, (2003).Google Scholar
  26. Se.
    Sela Z. (1997) Structure and rigidity in (Gromov) hyperbolic groups and discrete groups in rank 1 Lie groups. II. GAFA, Geom. funct. anal. 7(3): 561–593MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Sw.
    Swarup G.A. (1996) On the cut point conjecture. Electron. Res. Announc. Am. Math. Soc. 2(2): 98–100MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swe.
    Swenson E. (1999) A cut point theorem for CAT(0) groups. J. Differential Geom. 53(2): 327–358MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. W.
    Whyburn G.T. (1928) Concerning the structure of a continuous curve. Amer. J. Math. 50: 167–194MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Mathematics DepartmentBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations