Advertisement

Road map towards a harmonized pan-European surveillance of obesity-related lifestyle behaviours and their determinants in children and adolescents

  • Antje HebestreitEmail author
  • Barbara Thumann
  • Maike Wolters
  • Jens Bucksch
  • Inge Huybrechts
  • Joanna Inchley
  • Cornelia Lange
  • Nanna Lien
  • Kristin Manz
  • Nadia Slimani
  • Hidde P. van der Ploeg
  • Wolfgang Ahrens
  • DEDIPAC Consortium
Original article

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a road map towards a harmonized pan-European surveillance system for children and adolescents.

Methods

Representatives of five European surveillance systems and the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents contributed to the road map through a structured workshop in 2016.

Results

A conceptual framework for this road map was developed with seven action points (APs) guiding the successive cross-country harmonization. First, key indicators of health behaviour and their determinants in children and adolescents will be identified (AP1, 2); short screening instruments will be developed and implemented to assess and monitor key indicators (AP3, 4). In parallel, optional supplementary modules could be implemented to provide objective data (AP5). This would allow mutual calibration and improvement of existing instruments before their progressive replacement by more comparable measurement tools (AP6). The establishment of a competence platform is envisaged for guiding the harmonization process (AP7).

Conclusions

This approach builds on existing systems, provides comparable key health indicators across European regions, helps to assess temporal trends and—once in place—will facilitate health reporting and monitoring of national and international health targets.

Keywords

Surveillance Policy evaluation Health Diet Physical activity Sedentary behaviour 

Abbreviations

AP

Action points

ASA24

Automated Self-Administered 24-h Recall

DEDIPAC

Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity

ECHI

European Core Health Indicators

EGHI

Expert Group on Health Information

EFSA

European Food Safety Authority

EHIS

European Health Interview Survey

FFQ

Food Frequency Questionnaire

HBSC

Health Behaviour in School-aged Children

HEPA PAT

Health-Enhancing Physical Activity Policy Audit Tool

INFORMAS

International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support

KiGGS

German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents

NHANES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

OECD

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

SB

Sedentary behaviour

WHO

World Health Organization

WHO-COSI

WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative

24HDR

24-h dietary recall

PA

Physical activity

Notes

Authors’ contributions

All authors were closely involved in the development of the conceptual framework and provided the discussion section related to their field of expertise. All authors provided feedback and contributed to further versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Joint Programming Initiative ‘A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life’. The funding agencies supporting this work are (in alphabetical order of participating country): Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF); The Netherlands: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw); Norway: The Research Council of Norway, Division for Society and Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Atkin AJ, Gorely T, Clemes SA et al (2012) Methods of measurement in epidemiology: sedentary behaviour. Int J Epidemiol 41:1460–1471.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basterfield L, Adamson AJ, Parkinson KN et al (2008) Surveillance of physical activity in the UK is flawed: validation of the Health Survey for England Physical Activity Questionnaire. Arch Dis Child 93:1054–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.135905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF et al (2012) Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet 380:258–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bel-Serrat S, Huybrechts I, Thumann BF et al (2017) Inventory of surveillance systems assessing dietary, physical activity and sedentary behaviours in Europe: a DEDIPAC study. Eur J Public Health 27:747–755.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bobakova D, Hamrik Z, Badura P et al (2015) Test–retest reliability of selected physical activity and sedentary behaviour HBSC items in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. Int J Public Health 60:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks F, Magnusson J, Klemera E, Chester K, Spencer N, Smeeton N (2015) HBSC England National Report 2014. University of Hertfordshire, HatfieldGoogle Scholar
  7. Brug J, van der Ploeg HP, Loyen A et al (2017) Determinants of diet and physical activity (DEDIPAC): a summary of findings. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14:150.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0609-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brussaard JH, Lowik, Steingrimsdottir L et al (2002) A European food consumption survey method–conclusions and recommendations. Eur J Clin Nutr 56(Suppl 2):S89–94.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buck C, Bornhorst C, Pohlabeln H et al (2013) Clustering of unhealthy food around German schools and its influence on dietary behavior in school children: a pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 10:65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Currie C, Hurrelmann K, Settertobulte W et al (2000) Health and health behaviour among young people (Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No.1). WHO Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  11. De Keyzer W, Bracke T, McNaughton SA et al (2015) Cross-continental comparison of national food consumption survey methods–a narrative review. Nutrients 7:3587–3620.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7053587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Moraes AC, Carvalho HB, Siani A et al (2015) Incidence of high blood pressure in children—effects of physical activity and sedentary behaviors: the IDEFICS study: High blood pressure, lifestyle and children. Int J Cardiol 180:165–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DIET@NET partnership (2017) Nutritools. Medical Reserach Council. https://www.nutritools.org/. Accessed Nov 2017
  14. European Food Safety Authority (2014) Guidance on the EU menu methodology. EFSA J 12:3944.  https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3944 Google Scholar
  15. Expert Group on Health Information (EGHI) The European Core Health Indicators shortlist http://ec.europa.eu/health/indicators/docs/echi_shortlist_by_policy_area_en.pdf. Accessed Sept 2016
  16. Fernandez-Alvira JM, Bammann K, Eiben G et al (2017) Prospective associations between dietary patterns and body composition changes in European children: the IDEFICS study. Public Health Nutr.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980017002361 Google Scholar
  17. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study (2014) Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study protocol: background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2013/14 survey. CAHRU, St AndrewsGoogle Scholar
  18. Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL et al (2012) Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet 380:272–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60816-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hebestreit A, Bornhorst C, Pala V et al (2014) Dietary energy density in young children across Europe. Int J Obes 38:S124–S134.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hebestreit A, Intemann T, Siani A et al (2017) Dietary Patterns of European Children and Their Parents in Association with Family Food Environment: Results from the I. Fam Study Nutr.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9020126 Google Scholar
  21. Helmerhorst HJ, Brage S, Warren J et al (2012) A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9:103.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF et al (2005) Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes 6:123–132.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2005.00176.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamtsiuris P, Lange M, Schaffrath Rosario A (2007) [The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS): sample design, response and nonresponse analysis]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 50:547–556.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-007-0215-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC et al (2013) Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 98:1084–1102.  https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.058362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McVeigh J, Smith A, Howie E et al (2016) Trajectories of television watching from childhood to early adulthood and their association with body composition and mental health outcomes in young adults. PloS ONE 11:e0152879.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment R (2012) ECHIM Echi indicator development and documentation. Joint Action for ECHIM Final Report Part II, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  27. Olafsdottir S, Berg C, Eiben G et al (2014) Young children’s screen activities, sweet drink consumption and anthropometry: results from a prospective European study. Eur J Clin Nutr 68:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearson N, Biddle SJ, Gorely T (2009) Family correlates of breakfast consumption among children and adolescents. A Syst Rev Appet 52:1–7Google Scholar
  29. Pedisic Z, Bauman A (2015) Accelerometer-based measures in physical activity surveillance: current practices and issues. Br J Sports Med 49:219–223.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM et al (2016) Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 41:S197–239.  https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenheck R (2008) Fast food consumption and increased caloric intake: a systematic review of a trajectory towards weight gain and obesity risk. Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes 9:535–547.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00477.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sleddens EF, Kroeze W, Kohl LF et al (2015) Determinants of dietary behavior among youth: an umbrella review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12:7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0164-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stierlin AS, De Lepeleere S, Cardon G et al (2015) A systematic review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in youth: a DEDIPAC-study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12:133.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0291-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Hecke L, Loyen A, Verloigne M et al (2016) Variation in population levels of physical activity in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:70.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0396-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Verloigne M, Loyen A, Van Hecke L et al (2016) Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:69.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0395-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang X, Ouyang Y, Liu J et al (2014) Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ (Clin Res) 349:g4490.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4490 Google Scholar
  37. Woll A, Albrecht C, Worth A (2017) Monitoring Motorik-Module (MoMo) – the KiGGS Wave 2 module to survey motor performance and physical activity. J Health Monit.  https://doi.org/10.17886/rki-gbe-2017-110 Google Scholar
  38. World Health Organization (2011) mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies: second global survey on eHealth, vol 3. Global Observatory for eHealth series. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  39. World Health Organization (2014) The European child and adolescent health strategy 2015–2020. Denmark, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  40. World Health Organization (2016) Report of the commission on: ending childhood obesity. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204176/1/9789241510066_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed June 2016
  41. World Health Organization - Europe (2014) WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI). http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/activities/monitoring-and-surveillance/who-european-childhood-obesity-surveillance-initiative-cosi. Accessed Nov 2016
  42. World Health Organization Europe (2013) Vienna declaration on nutrition and noncommunicable diseases in the context of health 2020. World Health Organization Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antje Hebestreit
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barbara Thumann
    • 1
  • Maike Wolters
    • 1
  • Jens Bucksch
    • 2
  • Inge Huybrechts
    • 3
  • Joanna Inchley
    • 4
  • Cornelia Lange
    • 5
  • Nanna Lien
    • 6
  • Kristin Manz
    • 5
  • Nadia Slimani
    • 3
  • Hidde P. van der Ploeg
    • 7
  • Wolfgang Ahrens
    • 1
    • 8
  • DEDIPAC Consortium
  1. 1.Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPSBremenGermany
  2. 2.University of Education HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.International Agency for Research On CancerLyonFrance
  4. 4.University of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  5. 5.Robert Koch InstituteBerlinGermany
  6. 6.University of OsloOsloNorway
  7. 7.VU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  8. 8.University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations