Advertisement

Development of a theoretical framework for assessment of quality of primary care medical service trips in Latin America

  • Christopher DaintonEmail author
  • Charlene H. Chu
  • Christina Gorman
  • William Cherniak
Original Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

Short-term medical service trips (MSTs) are a controversial modality for addressing the health of marginalized populations. Despite their prevalence, there are no routinely used evaluative frameworks. This study used stakeholder consensus to validate a literature-based framework for MST best practices.

Methods

A recent systematic review was used to construct a preliminary list of best practices for short-term MSTs. We then recruited a multidisciplinary panel of academics, medical professionals, program coordinators, and non-medical volunteers for a three-round e-Delphi consensus-building exercise to review the list. A 7-point Likert scale was used, with mean scores 4–7 representing rejection, scores < 2 representing acceptance, and elements scoring in between being redistributed for discussion.

Results

The literature review identified 30 best practices. Twenty-six stakeholders were recruited for the e-Delphi panel, with 73.1% responding to all three rounds. Eighteen elements were accepted into the final framework.

Conclusions

This framework identifies essential MST best practices and enables volunteers to compare organizations. Future research should translate this framework into an assessment tool and initiate dialogue between host communities, local clinicians, and sending organizations.

Keywords

Medical missions Global health Primary care Medical service trips Medical education Medical volunteering 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ADAPTE (2009) The ADAPTE process: resource toolkit for guideline adaptation. ADAPTE (2009) Guideline adaptation: a resource toolkit. http://www.g-i-n.net
  2. Ahmed F, Grade M, Malm C et al (2017) Surgical volunteerism or voluntourism—are we doing more harm than good? Int J Surg Lond Engl 42:69–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR (2005) Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:37.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-37 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. AmeriCares (2013) Medical outreach best practices study: a literature review. AmeriCares. https://medicaloutreach.americares.org/globalassets/_mo/resources/07_bestpractices/americares-medoutreachpracticesstudy-lit-review-final.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2018
  5. Caldron PH, Impens A, Pavlova M, Groot W (2015) A systematic review of social, economic, and diplomatic aspects of short-term medical missions. BMC Health Serv Res 15:380.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0980-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Crump JA, Sugarman J (2008) Ethical Considerations for Short-term Experiences by Trainees in Global Health. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 300:1456–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.12.1456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dainton C, Chu C (2015) Symptom clusters on primary care medical service trips in five regions in Latin America. J Epidemiol Glob Health 5:259–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2014.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dainton C, Chu CH, Lin H, Loh L (2016) Clinical guidelines for Western clinicians engaged in primary care medical service trips in Latin America and the Caribbean: an integrative literature review. Trop Med Int Health 21:470–478.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12675 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 32:1008–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Langowski MK, Iltis AS (2011) Global Health Needs and the Short-Term Medical Volunteer: ethical Considerations. HEC Forum 23:71–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-011-9158-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lasker JN (2016) Hoping to Help: The Promises and Pitfalls of Global Health Volunterring. Cornell Univeristy Press, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  14. Lynn MR (1986) Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity. Nurs Res 35:382–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maki J, Qualls M, White B et al (2008) Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: a methods study to evaluate quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res 8:121.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-121 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Meshkat B, Cowman S, Gethin G et al (2014) Using an e-Delphi technique in achieving consensus across disciplines for developing best practice in day surgery in Ireland. J Hosp Adm 3:1.  https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v3n4p1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roche SD, Ketheeswaran P, Wirtz VJ (2016) International short-term medical missions: a systematic review of recommended practices. Int J Public Health 62:31–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0889-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rozier MD, Lasker JN, Compton B (2017) Short-term volunteer health trips: aligning host community preferences and organizer practices. Glob Health Action 10:1267957.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1267957 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Seager G (2012) When Healthcare Hurts: An Evidence Based Guide for Best Practices in Global Health Initiatives. AuthorHouse, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID (2013) Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sykes KJ (2014) Short-Term Medical Service Trips: a Systematic Review of the Evidence. Am J Public Health 104(7):e38–e48.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301983 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Walker L, Avant K (2011) Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing, 5th edn. Pearson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. WHO (2013) Classification and minimum standards for foreign medical teams in sudden onset disasters. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  24. WPRO (2010) The WHO health systems framework. In: WPRO, World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.wpro.who.int/health_services/health_systems_framework/en/. Accessed 1 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineMcMaster UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Occupational Health and Occupational Science, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Division of Emergency MedicineMarkham Stouffville HospitalMarkhamCanada
  7. 7.Bridge to Health Medical and DentalTorontoCanada
  8. 8.TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations