Abstract
Objectives
Working age disability is a major challenge for policymakers in European countries. This pertains to both occupational reintegration and social benefits for work incapacity. In many states reforms have been initiated aimed at reducing disability scheme inflow and fostering return to work. Our study was motivated by the question as to which aspects of these reforms seem to have been effective.
Methods
Three different approaches were utilized: case vignettes, interviews and expert workshops in the respective countries (Netherlands and Germany in 2012; Finland in 2015), and a systematic search for relevant studies on occupational reintegration was performed.
Results
We found considerable differences as to the assessment of work incapacity and resulting monetary benefits in the three countries. Also, organisation and practices of occupational reintegration vary from one country to another. Major differences concern (1) the timing of interventions, (2) employer responsibility and workplace involvement, (3) incentives and sanctions and (4) organisational and procedural issues.
Conclusions
Our results may partly explain why some reform strategies have been more successful than others, and thus contribute to the further development of social and labour policies in Europe.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cornelissen R (2009) 50 years of European social security coordination. Eur J Soc Secur 11(1–2):9–45
De Boer W (2010) Quality of evaluation of work disability. Academisch Proefschrift. http://publications.tno.nl/publication/102641/Nannhn/boer-2010-quality. Accessed 17 June 2018
Devetzi S (2011) Reforms of the incapacity benefits system in Europe. In: Devetzi S, Stendahl S (eds) Too sick to work? Social security reforms in Europe for persons with reduced earnings capacity. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 175–184
Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J (2005) Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative research. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):607–631
Gabbay M, Taylor L, Sheppard L, Hillage J, Bambra C, Ford F, Preece R, Taske N, Kelley MP (2011) NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity. Br J Gen Pract 61(584):e118–e124
Halonen JI, Solovieva S, Pentti J, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Viikari-Juntura E (2016) Effectiveness of legislative changes obligating notification of prolonged sickness absence and assessment of remaining work ability on return to work and work participation: a natural experiment in Finland. Occup Environ Med 73(1):42–50
Hetzler A (2009) Labour market activation policies for the long-term ill—a sick idea? Eur J Soc Secur 11(4):369–401
Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJN (2012) Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil 22:462–477
International Monetary Fund (2017) https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2012&ey=2016&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&pr1.x=49&pr1.y=6&c=172%2C138%2C134&s=NGDPRPC%2CNGDPPC&grp=0&a=. Accessed 17 June 2018
Jørgensen H (2009) From a beautiful swan to an ugly duckling. Eur J Soc Secur 11(4):337–367
Kausto J, Viikari-Juntura E, Virta LJ, Gould R, Koskinen A, Solovieva S (2014) Effectiveness of new legislation on partial sickness benefit on work participation: a quasi-experiment in Finland. BMJ Open 4:e006685. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006685
Kohte W (2008) Betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement und Bestandsschutz. Der Betrieb 11:582–587
Mittag O, Reese C, Meffert C (2014) (Keine) Reha vor Rente: Analyse der Zugänge zur Erwerbsminderungsrente von 2005 bis 2009. WSI-Mitteilungen 67(2):149–155
Niemelä H, Salminen K (2006) Soziale Sicherheit in Finnland. Helsinki: ETK, KELA, STM & TELA. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/17438/sozialelsiche.PDF?sequence=1. Accessed 17 June 2018
OECD (2010) Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. http://www.oecd.org/publications/sickness-disability-and-work-breaking-the-barriers-9789264088856-en.htm. Accessed 17 June 2018
Pennings F (2011) The new Dutch disability benefits act: the link between income provision and participation in work. In: Devetzi S, Stendahl S (eds) Too sick to work? Social security reforms in Europe for persons with reduced earnings capacity. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 77–93
Pomaki G, Franche RL, Khushrushahi N, Murray E, Lampinen T, Mah P (2010) Best practice for return-to-work/stay-at-work interventions for workers with mental health conditions. Final report. Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare in BC (OHSAH), Vancouver, BC
Prinz C (2010) Sickness, disability and work: lessons from reforms and lack of change across the OECD countries. In: Kautto M, Bach-Othman J (eds) Disability and employment—lessons from reforms, Finnish Center for Pensions, Helsinki, pp 23–34
Ramm D, Mahnke C, Tauscher A, Welti F, Seider H, Shafaei R (2014) Betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben. Rechtliche Anforderungen und Voraussetzungen einer erfolgreichen Umsetzung. Die Rehabilitation 51:10–17
Rentenversicherung Deutsche (2012) Rentenversicherung in Zahlen 2012. DRV, Berlin
Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen (2015) Krankengeld: Entwicklung, Ursachen und Steuerungsmöglichkeiten. Sondergutachten. http://www.svr-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/GA2015/SVR_Sondergutachten_2015_Krankengeld_Druckfassung.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2018
Schandelmaier S, Ebrahim S, Burkhardt SC, de Boer WE, Zumbrunn T, Guyatt GH, Busse JW, Kunz R (2012) Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One 7(11):e49760
Van der Burg C, Prins R (2010) Employment instead of benefit receipt? Process and outcomes of reassessment of Dutch disability benefit recipients. Eur J Soc Secur 12(2):144–155
Van Sonsbeek JM, Gradus R (2011) Estimating the effects of recent disability reforms in the Netherlands. Tinbergen-Institute, Rotterdam
Van Wel V, Knijn T, Amba R, Peeters-Bijlsma M (2012) Partially disabled employees: dealing with a double role in the Netherlands. Eur J Soc Secur 14(2):86–110
Funding
This study was funded by the Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, a foundation of the Confederation of German Trade Unions (Grant Number 2014-694-4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any study with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mittag, O., Kotkas, T., Reese, C. et al. Intervention policies and social security in case of reduced working capacity in the Netherlands, Finland and Germany: a comparative analysis. Int J Public Health 63, 1081–1088 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1133-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1133-3