The impact of intimate partner violence on the health and work of gender and sexual minorities in Canada
Intimate partner violence (IPV) has significant impacts on workers and workplaces. This paper examines the experiences of gender and sexual minority (GSM) people in this context.
People aged 15 and older completed an online survey on the impacts of IPV at work, and brief health and life quality questions. Of 7918 respondents, 8.5% (n = 672) indicated GSM status. We examined IPV exposure, health and IPV-related work impacts by overall GSM status, and separately by sexual orientation, and gender.
GSM respondents were significantly more likely to report IPV and that the IPV continued at or near their workplace, impeded their ability to get to work, negatively impacted their work performance, and their co-workers; they also reported poorer mental health and life quality. While women were significantly more likely to report IPV and various negative work and health outcomes, being a sexual minority had additional independent negative effects. No differences in willingness to disclose IPV were found.
Workplace responses to IPV should account for the additional impacts and barriers faced by GSM people in disclosing abuse and seeking help.
KeywordsIntimate partner violence Gender Sexual orientation Work Health
This research has been a collaborative effort between the Centre for Research and Education on Violence Against Women and Children (CNW, BM, JM), Western University’s Faculty of Information and Media Studies (CNW, JM) and the Canadian Labour Congress. Support was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded Preventing Violence Across the Lifespan (PreVAiL) Research Network (CNW, JM, MT; Grant ID: RDG99326) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant ID: 89020130102). We would like to acknowledge the contributions that the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) and the CLC made to translation of the survey, translation of responses, and study recruitment, respectively.
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded Preventing Violence Across the Lifespan (PreVAiL) Research Network (CNW, JM, MT; Grant ID: RDG99326) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant ID: 89020130102).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The project was approved by Western University’s Non-Medical Research Ethics Board (#104156).
- Boyer C, Chénier L (2015) Domestic violence and the role of the employer. The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa. http://www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=7576. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
- Edwards KM, Sylaska KM, Barry JE, Moynihan MM, Banyard VL, Cohn ES et al (2015a) Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: a comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. J Interpers Violence 30(4):580–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Trade Union Confederation (ITCU) (2014) Stop gender based violence at work! Support an I.L.O. Convention. Retrieved from International Trade Union Confederation. http://www2.worksafebc.com/Topics/Violence/Resources-DomesticViolence.asp#Readmore. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
- Langenderfer-Magruder L, Whitfield DL, Walls NE, Kattari SK, Ramos D (2016) Experiences of intimate partner violence and subsequent police reporting among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer adults in Colorado: comparing rates of cisgender and transgender victimization. J Interpers Violence 31(5):855–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP) (2016) Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and HIV-affected intimate partner violence in 2015. New York, NY: Emily Waters. http://avp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2015_ncavp_lgbtqipvreport.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
- Pizer JC, Sears B, Mallory C, Hunter ND (2012) Evidence of persistent and pervasive workplace discrimination against lgbt people: the need for federal legislation prohibiting discrimination and providing for equal employment benefits. Loy LA Law Rev 45(3):715–780Google Scholar
- Sinha M (2013) Measuring violence against women: statistical trends. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Statistics Canada. Catalogue no. 85-002-X. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2013001/article/11766-eng.htm. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
- Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) (2012) 2011 Questionnaire and reporting guide. http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb-bmdi/instrument/3226_Q1_V8-eng.htm. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
- Tilbrook E, Allan A, Dear G (2010) Intimate partner abuse of men. Edith Cowan University, PerthGoogle Scholar
- Walters ML, Chen J, Breidig MJ (2013) The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_sofindings.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
- World Health Organization (1996) WHA 49.25 Prevention of violence: a public health priority. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/resources/publications/en/WHA4925_eng.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2017