Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 63, Issue 8, pp 945–955 | Cite as

The impact of intimate partner violence on the health and work of gender and sexual minorities in Canada

  • C. Nadine WathenEmail author
  • Jennifer C. D. MacGregor
  • Masako Tanaka
  • Barbara J. MacQuarrie
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

Intimate partner violence (IPV) has significant impacts on workers and workplaces. This paper examines the experiences of gender and sexual minority (GSM) people in this context.

Methods

People aged 15 and older completed an online survey on the impacts of IPV at work, and brief health and life quality questions. Of 7918 respondents, 8.5% (n = 672) indicated GSM status. We examined IPV exposure, health and IPV-related work impacts by overall GSM status, and separately by sexual orientation, and gender.

Results

GSM respondents were significantly more likely to report IPV and that the IPV continued at or near their workplace, impeded their ability to get to work, negatively impacted their work performance, and their co-workers; they also reported poorer mental health and life quality. While women were significantly more likely to report IPV and various negative work and health outcomes, being a sexual minority had additional independent negative effects. No differences in willingness to disclose IPV were found.

Conclusions

Workplace responses to IPV should account for the additional impacts and barriers faced by GSM people in disclosing abuse and seeking help.

Keywords

Intimate partner violence Gender Sexual orientation Work Health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been a collaborative effort between the Centre for Research and Education on Violence Against Women and Children (CNW, BM, JM), Western University’s Faculty of Information and Media Studies (CNW, JM) and the Canadian Labour Congress. Support was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded Preventing Violence Across the Lifespan (PreVAiL) Research Network (CNW, JM, MT; Grant ID: RDG99326) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant ID: 89020130102). We would like to acknowledge the contributions that the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) and the CLC made to translation of the survey, translation of responses, and study recruitment, respectively.

Funding

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research-funded Preventing Violence Across the Lifespan (PreVAiL) Research Network (CNW, JM, MT; Grant ID: RDG99326) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant ID: 89020130102).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The project was approved by Western University’s Non-Medical Research Ethics Board (#104156).

References

  1. Ahmad F, Jhajj AK, Stewart D, Burghardt M, Bierman AS (2014) Single item measures of self-rated mental health: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 14:398.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-398 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ard KL, Makadon HJ (2011) Addressing intimate partner violence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. J Gen Intern Med 26(8):930–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badenes-Ribera L, Frias-Navarro D, Bonilla-Campos A, Pons-Salvador G, Monterde-i-Bort H (2015) Intimate partner violence in self-identified lesbians: a meta-analysis of its prevalence. Sex Res Soc Policy 12(1):47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett BJ, St. Pierre M (2013) Intimate partner violence reported by lesbian-, gay-, and bisexual-identified individuals living in Canada: an exploration of within-group variations. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv 25(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyer C, Chénier L (2015) Domestic violence and the role of the employer. The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa. http://www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=7576. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
  6. Buller AM, Devries KM, Howard LM, Bacchus LJ (2014) Associations between intimate partner violence and health among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 11(3):e1001609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calton JM, Cattaneo LB, Gebhard KT (2016) Barriers to help seeking for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer survivors of intimate partner violence. Trauma Violence Abuse 17(5):585–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman TA, Bauer GR, Pug D, Aykroyd G, Powell L, Newman R (2017) Sexual orientation disclosure in primary care settings by gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in a Canadian city. LGBT Health 4(1):42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. da Rocha NS, Power MJ, Bushnell DM, Fleck MP (2012) The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: comparative psychometric properties to its parent WHOQOL-BREF. Value Health 15:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeSalvo KB, Fisher WP, Tran K, Bloser N, Merrill W, Peabody J (2006) Assessing measurement properties of two single-item general health measures. Qual Life Res 15:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dinno A (2017) Homicide rates of transgender individuals in the United States: 2010–2014. Am J Public Health.  https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.303878 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards KM, Sylaska KM, Barry JE, Moynihan MM, Banyard VL, Cohn ES et al (2015a) Physical dating violence, sexual violence, and unwanted pursuit victimization: a comparison of incidence rates among sexual-minority and heterosexual college students. J Interpers Violence 30(4):580–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards KM, Sylaska KM, Neal AM (2015b) Intimate partner violence among sexual minority populations: a critical review of the literature and agenda for future research. Psychol Viol 5(2):112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman MS, Marshal MP, Guadamuz TE, Wei C, Wong CF, Saewyc E et al (2011) A meta-analysis of disparities in childhood sexual abuse, parental physical abuse, and peer victimization among sexual minority and sexual nonminority individuals. Am J Public Health 101(8):1481–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldberg NG, Meyer IH (2013) Sexual orientation disparities in history of intimate partner violence: results from the California health interview survey. J Interpers Violence 28(5):1109–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hines DA, Douglas EM (2010) A closer look at men who sustain intimate terrorism by women. Partner Abuse 1(3):286–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hines DA, Douglas EM (2015) Health problems of partner violence victims: comparing help-seeking men to a population-based sample. Am J Prev Med 48(2):136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. International Trade Union Confederation (ITCU) (2014) Stop gender based violence at work! Support an I.L.O. Convention. Retrieved from International Trade Union Confederation. http://www2.worksafebc.com/Topics/Violence/Resources-DomesticViolence.asp#Readmore. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
  19. Johnson H (2015) Degendering violence. Soc Polit 22(3):390–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kulkin HS, Williams J, Borne HF, de la Bretonne D, Laurendine J (2007) A review of research on violence in same-gender couples: a resource for clinicians. J Homosexuality 53(4):71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langenderfer-Magruder L, Whitfield DL, Walls NE, Kattari SK, Ramos D (2016) Experiences of intimate partner violence and subsequent police reporting among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer adults in Colorado: comparing rates of cisgender and transgender victimization. J Interpers Violence 31(5):855–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacGregor JCD, Wathen CN, MacQuarrie BJ (2016a) Domestic violence in the Canadian workplace: are co-workers aware? Saf Health Work 7(3):244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacGregor JCD, Wathen CN, Olszowy L, Saxton M, MacQuarrie BJ (2016b) Gender differences in workplace disclosure and supports for domestic violence: results of a pan-Canadian survey. Viol Vict 31(6):1135–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacGregor JCD, Wathen CN, MacQuarrie BJ (2017) Resources for domestic violence in the Canadian workplace: results of a pan-Canadian survey. J Workplace Behav Health 32(3):190–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP) (2016) Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and HIV-affected intimate partner violence in 2015. New York, NY: Emily Waters. http://avp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2015_ncavp_lgbtqipvreport.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
  26. Nowinski S, Bowen E (2012) Partner violence against heterosexual and gay men: prevalence and correlates. Aggress Violent Behav 17(1):36–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliffe JL, Han C, Maria ES, Lohan M, Howard T, Stewart DE et al (2014) Gay man and intimate partner violence: a gender analysis. Sociol Health Illn 36(4):564–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pizer JC, Sears B, Mallory C, Hunter ND (2012) Evidence of persistent and pervasive workplace discrimination against lgbt people: the need for federal legislation prohibiting discrimination and providing for equal employment benefits. Loy LA Law Rev 45(3):715–780Google Scholar
  29. Potter SJ, Fountain K, Stapleton JG (2012) Addressing sexual and relationship violence in the LGBT community using a bystander framework. Harvard Rev Psychiat 20(4):201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogers M (2016) Breaking down barriers: exploring the potential for social care practice with trans survivors of domestic abuse. Health Social Care Commun 24(1):68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saxton MD, Olszowy L, MacGregor JCD, MacQuarrie BJ, Wathen CN (2018) Domestic violence victims’ experiences with police and the justice system in Canada. J Interpers Violence.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518758330 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidt S, Muhlan H, Power M (2006) The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. Eur J Public Health 16:420–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sinha M (2013) Measuring violence against women: statistical trends. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Statistics Canada. Catalogue no. 85-002-X. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2013001/article/11766-eng.htm. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
  34. St. Pierre M, Senn CY (2010) External barriers to help-seeking encountered by Canadian gay and lesbian victims of intimate partner abuse: an application of the barriers model. Viol Vict 25(4):536–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) (2012) 2011 Questionnaire and reporting guide. http://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb-bmdi/instrument/3226_Q1_V8-eng.htm. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
  36. Stiles-Shields C, Carroll RA (2015) Same-sex domestic violence: prevalence, unique aspects, and clinical implications. J Sex Marital Therapy 41(6):636–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stotzer RL (2009) Violence against transgender people: a review of United States data. Aggress Violent Behav 14(3):170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tilbrook E, Allan A, Dear G (2010) Intimate partner abuse of men. Edith Cowan University, PerthGoogle Scholar
  39. Turell SC, Brown M, Herrmann M (2017) Disproportionately high: an exploration of intimate partner violence prevalence rates for bisexual people. Sex Relat Therapy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2017.1347614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walker JK (2015) Investigating trans people’s vulnerabilities to intimate partner violence/abuse. Partner Abuse 6(1):107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walters ML, Chen J, Breidig MJ (2013) The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_sofindings.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2017
  42. Wathen CN, MacGregor JCD, MacQuarrie BJ (2015) The impact of domestic violence in the workplace: results from a pan-Canadian survey. J Occupat Environ Med 57(7):e65–e71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wathen CN, MacGregor JCD, MacQuarrie BJ (2016) The relationship between intimate partner violence, work, and health. J Interpers Violence.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515624236 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization (1996) WHA 49.25 Prevention of violence: a public health priority. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/resources/publications/en/WHA4925_eng.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Information and Media StudiesWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.PreVAiL Research NetworkLondonCanada
  3. 3.Centre for Research and Education on Violence Against Women and ChildrenLondonCanada
  4. 4.Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations