International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 63, Issue 8, pp 1001–1008 | Cite as

Symbolic violence and disempowerment as factors in the adverse impact of immigration detention on adult asylum seekers’ mental health

  • Janet ClevelandEmail author
  • Rachel Kronick
  • Hanna Gros
  • Cécile Rousseau
Original Article



The first objective of this qualitative component of a mixed-methods study is to provide a descriptive account of adult asylum seekers’ experience of detention in Canadian immigration detention centers. The second objective is to identify the main underlying factors accounting for their reported feelings of distress.


Researchers interviewed 81 adult asylum seekers held in two Canadian immigration detention centers concerning their experience of detention. Participants were drawn from a sample of 122 detained asylum seekers who had completed structured questionnaires about mental health and detention conditions.


Asylum seekers expressed shock and humiliation at being “treated like criminals.” Detainees felt disempowered by the experience of waiting for an indeterminate period for the outcome of a discretionary decision over which they have little control, but which will determine their freedom and their future. For trauma survivors, detention sometimes triggered retraumatization.


Detention, even for brief periods in relatively adequate conditions, was found to be detrimental to asylum seekers’ mental health. This adverse impact appears to be largely attributable to the combined effect of two factors: symbolic violence and disempowerment.


Asylum seekers Detention Mental health Human rights Migrants 



The study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant MOP-102499).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in our study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Boards of the McGill University Faculty of Medicine, the Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Montagne, and the Mount Sinai Hospital.


  1. Bosworth M (2013) Can immigration detention centres be legitimate? Understanding confinement in a global world. In: Aas KF, Bosworth M (eds) The borders of punishment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosworth M (2014) Inside immigration detention. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosworth M (2016) The impact of immigration detention on mental health: a literature review. Criminal Justice, Borders and Citizenship Research Paper No. 2732892 Accessed 12 Aug 2017
  4. Cleveland J, Rousseau C (2013) Psychiatric symptoms associated with brief detention of adult asylum seekers in Canada. Can J Psychiatry 58:409–416. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleveland J, Dionne-Boivin V, Rousseau C (2013) L’expérience des demandeurs d’asile détenus au Canada. Criminologie 46:107–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coffey G, Kaplan I, Sampson RC, Tucci MM (2010) The meaning and mental health consequences of long-term immigration detention for people seeking asylum. Soc Sci Med 70(12):2070–2079. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. DeBono D (2013) ‘Less than human’: the detention of irregular immigrants in Malta. Race Class 55(2):60–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards A (2011) Back to Basics: The Right to Liberty and Security of Person and “Alternatives to Detention” of Refugees, Asylum-Seekers, Stateless Persons and Other Migrants, UNHCR Legal and Protection Policy Research Series, PPLA/2011/01.Rev 1. Accessed 12 Aug 2017
  9. Filges T, Montgomery E, Kastrup M (2016) The impact of detention on the health of asylum seekers. Res Soc Work Pract. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fili A (2013) The maze of immigration detention in Greece: a case study of the Athens airport detention facility. Prison Serv J 205:34–38Google Scholar
  11. Fiske L (2016) Human rights and refugee protest against immigration detention: refugees’ struggles for recognition as human. Refuge 32(1):18–27Google Scholar
  12. Green J, Thorogood N (2013) Qualitative methods for health research, 3rd edn. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths M (2013) Living with uncertainty: indefinite immigration detention. J Legal Anthropol 1(3):263–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths M (2014) Out of time: the temporal uncertainties of refused asylum seekers and immigration detainees. J Ethn Migr Stud 40(12):1991–2009. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gros H, van Groll P (2015) “We have no rights”. Arbitrary imprisonment and cruel treatment of migrants with mental health issues in Canada. International Human Rights Program, University of Toronto Faculty of Law. Accessed 12 Aug 2017
  16. Gustafson K (2013) Degradation ceremonies and the criminalization of low-income women. UC Irvine Law Rev 3:297–358Google Scholar
  17. Keller AS, Rosenfeld B, Trinh-Shevrin C, Meserve C, Sachs E, Leviss JA et al (2003) Mental health of detained asylum seekers. Lancet 362:1721–1723. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Physicians for Human Rights (2003) From persecution to prison: the health consequences of detention for asylum seekers. Physicians for Human Rights, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Robjant K, Hassan R, Katona C (2009a) Mental health implications of detaining asylum seekers: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 194:306–312. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Robjant K, Robbins I, Senior V (2009b) Psychological distress amongst immigration detainees: a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Br J Clin Psychol 48:275–286. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rousseau C, Pottie K, Thombs BD, Munoz M, Jurcik T (2011) Post traumatic stress disorder: evidence review for newly arriving immigrants and refugees. Guidelines for immigrant health, Canadian Collaboration for Immigrant and Refugee Health, Appendix 11. Can Med Assoc J. Accessed 12 Aug 2017
  22. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH (2010) ATLAS.ti (version 5.2)Google Scholar
  23. Steel Z, Silove D, Brooks R, Momartin S, Alzuhairi B, Susljik I (2006) Impact of immigration detention and temporary protection on the mental health of refugees. Br J Psychiatry 188:58–64. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Turnbull S (2016) ‘Stuck in the middle’: waiting and uncertainty in immigration detention. Time Soc 25(1):61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations (1951/1967) UN Convention and Protocol relating to the protection of refugees. Accessed 13 Apr 2018
  26. United Nations General Assembly resolution (2015) UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules), A/RES/70/175 (17 December 2015). Accessed 12 Aug 2017
  27. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2012) Guidelines on the Applicable Criteria and Standards relating to the Detention of Asylum-Seekers and Alternatives to Detention. Accessed 12 Aug 2017
  28. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2017) Global trends. Forced displacement in 2016. Accessed 12 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet Cleveland
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rachel Kronick
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Hanna Gros
    • 5
  • Cécile Rousseau
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre de recherche Sherpa, Institut universitaire au regard des communautés culturellesCIUSSS Centre-Ouest de l’Ile de MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Child Development and Mental HealthJewish General HospitalMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Division of Social and Transcultural PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatrySir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General HospitalMontrealCanada
  5. 5.International Human Rights Program, Faculty of LawUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations