Neighbourhood green space, social environment and mental health: an examination in four European cities
- 1.1k Downloads
This study examines the relationship between neighbourhood green space, the neighbourhood social environment (social cohesion, neighbourhood attachment, social contacts), and mental health in four European cities.
The PHENOTYPE study was carried out in 2013 in Barcelona (Spain), Stoke-on-Trent (United Kingdom), Doetinchem (The Netherlands), and Kaunas (Lithuania). 3771 adults living in 124 neighbourhoods answered questions on mental health, neighbourhood social environment, and amount and quality of green space. Additionally, audit data on neighbourhood green space were collected. Multilevel regression analyses examined the relation between neighbourhood green space and individual mental health and the influence of neighbourhood social environment.
Mental health was only related to green (audit) in Barcelona. The amount and quality of neighbourhood green space (audit and perceived) were related to social cohesion in Doetinchem and Stoke-on-Trent and to neighbourhood attachment in Doetinchem. In all four cities, mental health was associated with social contacts.
Neighbourhood green was related to mental health only in Barcelona. Though neighbourhood green was related to social cohesion and attachment, the neighbourhood social environment seems not the underlying mechanism for this relationship.
KeywordsNeighbourhood Green Social environment Mental health
On behalf of the PHENOTYPE Consortium, the field workers Magdalena van den Berg, Gemma Hurst, Margarita Triguero-Mas and Sandra Andrusaityte, are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Peter Spreeuwenberg (NIVEL) for his advice on the statistical analysis.
Compliance with ethical standards
The work was supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) [Grant Agreement No: 282,996].
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Cohen S (2004) Social relationships and health American psychologist 59:676Google Scholar
- Coley RL, Sullivan WC, Kuo FE (1997) Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing Environment behavior 29:468–494Google Scholar
- Di Nardo F, Saulle R, La Torre G (2012) Green areas and health outcomes: a systematic review of the scientific literature Italian. J Publ Health 7Google Scholar
- Hox J (2010) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Routledge, UKGoogle Scholar
- de Jong K, Albin M, Skärbäck E, Grahn P, Wadbro J, Merlo J, Björk J (2011) Area-aggregated assessments of perceived environmental attributes may overcome single-source bias in studies of green environments and health: results from a cross-sectional survey in southern Sweden. Environ Health 10:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kawachi I, Berkman L (2000) Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I (eds) Social Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 174–190Google Scholar
- Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, McHorney CA, Rogers WH, Raczek A (1995) Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Medical Care AS264–AS279Google Scholar
- Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 473–483Google Scholar