International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 513–520 | Cite as

If I tweet will you cite? The effect of social media exposure of articles on downloads and citations

  • Thomy Tonia
  • Herman Van Oyen
  • Anke Berger
  • Christian Schindler
  • Nino Künzli
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

We sought to investigate whether exposing scientific papers to social media (SM) has an effect on article downloads and citations.

Methods

We randomized all International Journal of Public Health (IJPH) original articles published between December 2012 and December 2014 to SM exposure (blog post, Twitter and Facebook) or no exposure at three different time points after first online publication.

Results

130 papers (SM exposure = 65, control = 65) were randomized. The number of downloads did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.60) nor did the number of citations (p = 0.88). Adjusting for length of observation and paper’s geographical origin did not change these results. There was no difference in the number of downloads and citations between the SM exposure and control group when we stratified for open access status. The number of downloads and number of citations were significantly correlated in both groups.

Conclusions

SM exposure did not have a significant effect on traditional impact metrics, such as downloads and citations. However, other metrics may measure the added value that social media might offer to a scientific journal, such as wider dissemination.

Keywords

Social media Citations Downloads Bibliometrics Twitter Facebook 

Supplementary material

38_2016_831_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Allen HG, Stanton TR, Di Pietro F, Moseley GL (2013) Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences. PLoS One 8:e68914CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bik H, Goldstein M (2013) An introduction to social media for scientists. PLoS Biol 11:e1001535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Brody T, Harnad S (2005) Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. arXiv:cs/0503020 [cs.IR]. Ref Type: Online Source
  4. Colman R, Anand A (2015) Twitter discussions from a respirology journal club. Lancet Respir Med 3:e10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cosco TD (2015) Medical journals, impact and social media: an ecological study of the Twittersphere. Can Med Assoc J 187:1353–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costas R, Zahedi Z, Wouters PF (2014) Do 'altmetrics' correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Centre for Social Science and Technology Studies, The Netherlands, p 30Google Scholar
  7. Davis PM, Lewenstein BV, Simon DH, Booth JG, Connolly MJL (2008) Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 337:a568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans P, Krauthammer M (2011) Exploring the use of social media to measure journal article impact. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011:374–381PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Eysenbach G (2011) Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res 13:e123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox CS, Bonaca MP, Ryan JJ, Massaro JM, Barry K, Loscalzo J (2015) A randomized trial of social media from circulation. Circulation 131:28–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goff DA, Kullar R, Newland JG (2015) Review of twitter for infectious diseases clinicians: useful or a waste of time? Clin Infect Dis 60:1533–1540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto C, Thelwall M, Lariviere V (2014) Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 65:656–659Google Scholar
  13. Haustein S, Costas R, Larivière V (2015) Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: the effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS One 10:e0120495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Künzli N, Crivelli L, Spurmont D, Nocera S (2015) Does the Swiss School of Public Health exist? Int J Public Health 60:873–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Li X, Thelwall M, Giustini D (2012) Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics 91:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu C, Xu Y, Wu H, Chen S, Guo J (2013) Correlation and Interaction visualization of altmetric indicators extracted from scholarly social network activities: dimensions and structure. J Med Internet Res 15:e259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehta N, Flickinger T (2014) The times they are A-Changin’: academia, social media and the JGIM Twitter Journal Club. J Gen Intern Med 29:1317–1318CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Moorhead S, Hazlett D, Harrison L, Carroll J, Irwin A, Hoving C (2013) A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res 15:e85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Perneger TV (2004) Relation between online “hit counts” and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ. BMJ 329:546–547CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Ringelhan S, Wollersheim J, Welpe IM (2015) I like, I cite? Do Facebook likes predict the impact of scientific work? PLoS One 10:e0134389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Shuai X, Pepe A, Bollen J (2012) How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations. PLoS One 7:e47523CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith C (2014) How many people use 600+ of the top social media, apps and digital services? http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/resource-how-many-people-use-the-top-social-media/. Accessed May 2014
  23. Sorenson M (2014) Neurology and the social media experiment: “Likes” but not loves. Sci Editor 37:77–78Google Scholar
  24. Terras M (2012) Is blogging and tweeting about research papers worth it? The verdict. http://melissaterras.blogspot.ch/2012/04/is-blogging-and-tweeting-about-research.html. Accessed November 2015
  25. Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR (2013) Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One 8:e64841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Thornley C, Wotkinson A, Nicholas D (2015) The role of trust and authority in the citation behaviour of researchers. Inform Res 20(3). Ref Type: Journal (Full)Google Scholar
  27. Tonia T (2014) Social media in public health: is it used and is it useful? Int J Public Health 59:889–891CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yan KK, Gerstein M (2011) The spread of scientific information: insights from the web usage statistics in PLoS article-level metrics. PLoS One 6:e19917CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomy Tonia
    • 1
  • Herman Van Oyen
    • 2
  • Anke Berger
    • 1
  • Christian Schindler
    • 3
    • 4
  • Nino Künzli
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Social and Preventive MedicineUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public HealthBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Swiss Tropical and Public Health InstituteBaselSwitzerland
  4. 4.University of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations