Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 829–836 | Cite as

Induced abortion in a Southern European region: examining inequalities between native and immigrant women

  • Elena Rodriguez-AlvarezEmail author
  • Luisa N. Borrell
  • Yolanda González-Rábago
  • Unai Martín
  • Nerea Lanborena
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To examine induced abortion (IA) inequalities between native and immigrant women in a Southern European region and whether these inequalities depend on a 2010 Law facilitating IA.

Methods

We conducted two analyses: (1) prevalence of total IAs, repeat and second trimester IA, in native and immigrant women aged 12–49 years for years 2009–2013 according to country of origin; and (2) log-binomial regression was used to quantify the association of place of origin with repeat and second trimester IAs among women with IAs.

Results

Immigrants were more likely to have an IA than Spanish women, with the highest probability in Sub-Saharan Africa (PR 8.32 95 % CI 3.66–18.92). Immigrant women with an IA from countries other than Maghreb and Asia have higher probabilities of a repeat IA than women from Spain. Women from Europe non-EU/Romania were 50 % (95 % CI 0.30–0.79) less likely to have a second trimester IA, while women from Central America/Caribbean were 45 % (95 % CI 1.11–1.89) more likely than Spanish women. The 2010 Law did not affect these associations.

Conclusions

There is a need for parenthood planning programs and more information and access to contraception methods especially in immigrant women to help decrease IAs.

Keywords

Induced abortion Immigration Inequalities Repeat induced abortion Second trimester induced abortion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [project EHU14/55] and Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain [project CSO22013-44886-R]. The authors acknowledge Nieves Rodríguez-Sierra Huguet (Health Department of Basque Government, Spain) for providing data for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  1. Addor V, Narring F, Michaud PA (2003) Abortion trends 1990–1999 in a Swiss region and determinants of abortion recurrence. SWISS MED WKLY 133:219–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arimany Manso J, Morlans Molina M (2010) About the new law of voluntary termination of pregnancy. Rev Esp Med Legal 36(2):49–50. doi: 10.1016/S0377-4732(10)70044-4 Google Scholar
  3. Bleil ME, Adler NE, Pasch LA, Sternfeld B, Reijo-Pera RA, Cedars MI (2011) Adverse childhood experiences and repeat induced abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(2):122. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.029 (e1–6) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown JS Jr, Adera T, Masho SW (2008) Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and preterm births. J Epidemiol Community Health 62(1):16–22. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.050369 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Gil MP (2014) Contribution of the Central American and Caribbean obstetrics and gynecology societies to the prevention of unsafe abortion in the region. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 126(Suppl 1):S10–S12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.03.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher WA, Singh SS, Shuper PA, Carey M, Otchet F, MacLean-Brine D, Dal Bello D, Gunter J (2005) Characteristics of women undergoing repeat induced abortion. CMAJ 172(5):637–641. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040341 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Font-Ribera L, Perez G, Salvador J, Borrell C (2008) Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision. J Urban Health 85(1):125–135. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9233-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Font-Ribera L, Perez G, Espelt A, Salvador J, Borrell C (2009) Determinants of induced abortion delay. Gac Sanit 23(5):415–419. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.08.001 [In Spanish] CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Helstrom L, Odlind V, Zatterstrom C, Johansson M, Granath F, Correia N, Ekbom A (2003) Abortion rate and contraceptive practices in immigrant and native women in Sweden. Scan J of Public Health 31(6):405–410. doi: 10.1080/14034940210165181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Helstrom L, Zatterstrom C, Odlind V (2006) Abortion rate and contraceptive practices in immigrant and Swedish adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 19(3):209–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2006.02.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Human Development Report (UNDP) (2011) Sustainability and equity: a better future for all. Available at http://www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/en/news/2011/human-development-report-2011.html
  12. Janiak E, Kawachi I, Goldberg A, Gottlieb B (2014) Abortion barriers and perceptions of gestational age among women seeking abortion care in the latter half of the second trimester. Contraception 89(4):322–327. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones RK, Finer LB (2012) Who has second-trimester abortions in the USA? Contraception 85(6):544–551. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.10.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kotz DM (2009) The financial and economic crisis of 2008: a systemic crisis of neoliberal capitalism. Rev Radic Political Econ 41(3):305–317. doi: 10.1177/0486613409335093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laanpere M, Ringmets I, Part K, Allvee K, Veerus P, Karro H (2014) Abortion trends from 1996 to 2011 in Estonia: special emphasis on repeat abortion. BMC Women’s Health 14:81. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-81 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Larrañaga I, Martín U, Bacigalupe A (2014) Sexual and reproductive health and the economic crisis in Spain SESPAS report. Gac Sanit 28:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.03.007 [In Spanish] CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lete I, Hassan F, Chatzitheofilou I, Wood E, Mendivil J, Lambrelli D, Filonenko A (2015) Direct costs of unintended pregnancy in Spain. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 20(4):308–318. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1028617 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Loeber O, Wijsen C (2008) Factors influencing the percentage of second trimester abortions in the Netherlands. Reproductive Health Matters. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31377-9 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Malmusi D, Perez G (2009) Induced abortion in immigrant women in a urban setting. Gac Sanit 23(Suppl 1):64–66. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.05.006 [In Spanish] CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Malumusi D, Borrell C, Benach J (2010) Migration-related health inequalities: showing the complex interactions between gender, social class and place of origin. Soc Sci Med 71(9):1610–1619. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ministerio de Sanidad Servicios Sociales e Igualdad (2015). Datos estadísticos sobre Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo. 2015 Available at http://www.msssi.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/embarazo/tablas_figuras.htm#Tabla3. Accessed July 2015
  22. Orjuela M, Ronda E, Regidor E (2009) Contribution of immigration to increase of legal induced abortion. Med Clin 133(6):213–216. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2008.10.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ostrach B (2013) “Yo no sabia…”-immigrant women’s use of national health systems for reproductive and abortion care. J Immigr Minor Health 15(2):262–272. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9680-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Perez G (2009) Sexual and reproductive health in Spain. Gac Sanit 23(3):171–173. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.02.004 [In Spanish] CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Picavet C, Goenee M, Wijsen C (2013) Characteristics of women who have repeat abortions in the Netherlands. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 18(5):327–334. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.820824 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Prey B, Talavlikar R, Mangat R, Freiheit EA, Drummond N (2014) Induced abortion and contraception use among immigrant and Canadian-born women in Calgary, Alta. Can Fam Physician 60:e455–e463PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Rasch V et al (2007) Contraceptive attitudes and contraceptive failure among women requesting induced abortion in Denmark. Hum Reprod 22(5):1320–1326. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruiz-Ramos M, Ivanez-Gimeno L, Garcia Leon FJ (2012) Sociodemographic characteristics of induced abortions in Andalusia (Spain): differences between native and foreign populations. Gac Sanit 26(6):504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.11.017 [In Spanish] CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R (2014) Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann 45(3):301–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00393.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Urbanos Garrido R, Puig-Junoy J (2014) Austerity policies and changes in healthcare use patterns. SESPAS report 2014. Gac Sanit 28(Suppl 1):81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.02.013 [In Spanish] CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vangen S, Eskild A, Forsen L (2008) Termination of pregnancy according to immigration status: a population-based registry linkage study. BJOG 115(10):1309–1315. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01832.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zurriaga O, Martinez-Beneito MA, Galmes Truyols A, Torne MM, Bosch S, Bosser R, Portell Arbona M (2009) Recourse to induced abortion in Spain: profiling of users and the influence of migrant populations. Gac Sanit 23(Suppl 1):57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.09.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Rodriguez-Alvarez
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Luisa N. Borrell
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yolanda González-Rábago
    • 2
    • 4
  • Unai Martín
    • 2
    • 4
  • Nerea Lanborena
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Nursing IUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)LeioaSpain
  2. 2.Social Determinants of Health and Demographic ChangeOPIKLeioaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Health SciencesLehman College, City University of New YorkBronxUSA
  4. 4.Department of Sociology 2University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)LeioaSpain

Personalised recommendations