Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 257–267 | Cite as

The efficacy and short-term effects of electronic cigarettes as a method for smoking cessation: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

  • S. Khoudigian
  • T. Devji
  • L. Lytvyn
  • K. Campbell
  • R. Hopkins
  • D. O’Reilly
Review

Abstract

Objectives

E-cigarettes are increasingly popular as smoking cessation aids. This review assessed the efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation as well as desire to smoke, withdrawal symptoms, and adverse events in adult smokers.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted. Studies comparing e-cigarettes to other nicotine replacement therapies or placebo were included. Data were pooled using meta-analysis.

Results

Of 569 articles, 5 were eligible. Study participants were more likely to stop smoking when using nicotine e-cigarettes (43/489, 9 %) versus placebo e-cigarettes (8/173, 5 %); however, this difference was not statistically significant (RR 2.02; 95 % CI 0.97, 4.22). The pooled effect estimates for the desire to smoke (RR −0.22; 95 % CI −0.80, 0.36), irritability (RR −0.03; 95% CI −0.38, 0.31), restlessness (RR −0.03; 95 % CI −0.42, 0.35), poor concentration (RR −0.01; 95 % CI −0.35, 0.32), depression (RR −0.01; 95 % CI −0.22, 0.20), hunger (RR −0.01; 95 % CI −0.32, 0.30), and average number of non-serious adverse events (RR −0.09; 95 % CI −0.28, 0.46) were not statistically significantly different. Only one study reported serious adverse events with no apparent association with e-cigarette use.

Conclusions

Limited low-quality evidence of a non-statistically significant trend toward smoking cessation in adults using nicotine e-cigarettes exists compared with other therapies or placebo. Larger, high-quality studies are needed to inform policy decisions.

Keywords

Meta-analysis E-cigarettes Smoking cessation Withdrawal symptoms Public health 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author contribution statement

SK and DO designed the systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. SK and KC created the search strategy. SK and TD searched for publications, and did the review and data extraction, and LL helped with the disagreements. SK, DO, and RΒ developed the analysis frame. SK and TD did the analysis, and SK and DO critically interpreted the results. SK drafted the article, and all authors provided critical revision of the article.

Supplementary material

38_2016_786_MOESM1_ESM.docx (48 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 kb)
38_2016_786_MOESM2_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) (2014) Electronic cigarettes. http://www.ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_715.pdf
  2. Akl EA, Briel M, You JJ et al (2012) Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review BMJ Br Med J 344Google Scholar
  3. Altman DG, Bland JM (2003) Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates Bmj 326:219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bam TS, Bellew W, Berezhnova I et al (2014) Position statement on electronic cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 18:5–7. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0815 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buck SF (1960) A method of estimation of missing values in multivariate data suitable for use with an electronic computer. J Royal Stat Soc Series B (Methodological) 22:302–306Google Scholar
  6. Bullen C, McRobbie H, Thornley S et al (2010) Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial. Tobacco Control 19:98–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M et al (2013) Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 382:1629–1637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Papale G et al (2012) The emerging phenomenon of electronic cigarettes. Exp Rev Respir Med 6:63–74. doi: 10.1586/ers.11.92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F et al (2013) EffiCiency and safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study. PLoS One 8:e66317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawkins L, Turner J, Hasna S et al (2012) The electronic-cigarette: effects on desire to smoke, withdrawal symptoms and cognition. Addict Behav 37:970–973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawkins L, Turner J, Crowe E (2013) Nicotine derived from the electronic cigarette improves time-based prospective memory in abstinent smokers. Psychopharmacology 227:377–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Etter JF, Bullen C (2011) Electronic cigarette: users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction 106:2017–2028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Farsalinos KE, Polosa R (2014) Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf 5:67–86. doi: 10.1177/2042098614524430 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fidler J, Shahab L, West O et al (2011) ‘The smoking toolkit study’: a national study of smoking and smoking cessation in England. BMC Public Health 11:479CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Franck C, Budlovsky T, Windle SB et al (2014) Electronic cigarettes in North America history, use, and implications for smoking cessation. Circulation 129:1945–1952CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrell PT, Simmons VN, Correa JB et al (2014) Electronic nicotine delivery systems (“e-cigarettes”): review of safety and smoking cessation efficacy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 151:381–393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Cochrane CollaborationGoogle Scholar
  18. Hughes JR, Keely J, Naud S (2004) Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers. Addiction 99:29–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hartmann-Boyce J et al (2014) Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2014) Press release: UK moves towards safe and effective electronic cigarettes and other nicotine-containing productsGoogle Scholar
  21. Orr KK, Asal NJ (2014) Efficacy of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Ann Pharmacotherap 1060028014547076Google Scholar
  22. Pepper JK, Brewer NT (2013) Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review. Tobacco ControlGoogle Scholar
  23. Polosa R, Benowitz NL (2011) Treatment of nicotine addiction: present therapeutic options and pipeline developments. Trends Pharmacol Sci 32:281–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Polosa R, Caponnetto P, Morjaria J et al (2011) Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e-Cigarette) on smoking reduction and cessation: a prospective 6-month pilot study. BMC Public Health 11:786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Polosa R, Morjaria J, Caponnetto P et al (2014) Effectiveness and tolerability of electronic cigarette in real-life: a 24-month prospective observational study. Intern Emerg Med 9:537–546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stanbrook MB (2013) Regulate e-cigarettes as drug-delivery devices. Can Med Assoc JGoogle Scholar
  27. World Health Organization (2014) Tobacco. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  28. Yamin CK, Bitton A, Bates DW (2010) E-cigarettes: a rapidly growing internet phenomenon. Ann Intern Med 153:607–609. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-9-201011020-00011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Khoudigian
    • 1
  • T. Devji
    • 1
  • L. Lytvyn
    • 1
  • K. Campbell
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • R. Hopkins
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • D. O’Reilly
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.PATH Research InstituteSt Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.Research Institute of St. Joseph’sHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations