International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 59–67 | Cite as

Test–retest reliability of selected physical activity and sedentary behaviour HBSC items in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland

  • Daniela Bobakova
  • Zdenek Hamrik
  • Petr Badura
  • Dagmar Sigmundova
  • Hania Nalecz
  • Michal Kalman
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

Better assessment of the reliability of the physical activity and sedentary behaviour items across countries in all WHO regions is highly needed. The aim of the study was to examine the test–retest reliability of selected physical activity and sedentary behaviour items of the HBSC questionnaire in Czech, Slovak and Polish adolescents.

Methods

We obtained data from 693 Czech, Slovak and Polish (50.9 % boys) primary school pupils, grades five (mean age = 11.08; SD = 0.45) and nine (mean age = 15.12; SD = 0.45), who participated in a test–retest study in 2013. We used the single measures of Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Cohen’s Kappa statistic to estimate the test–retest reliability of all selected items within the sample and stratified by gender, age group and country.

Results

Both physical activity items (VPA and MVPA) and most of the sedentary behaviour items showed moderate agreement (ICC 0.41–0.60) and a similarly moderate correlation (Cohen’s Kappa 0.3–0.5) after dichotomization.

Conclusions

The physical activity and sedentary behaviour items of the HBSC questionnaire seem to be at the borderline of reliability to be used in adolescents.

Keywords

Test–retest reliability Physical activity Sedentary behaviour HBSC The Czech Republic Slovakia Poland 

References

  1. Allen MJ, Yen WM (1979) Introduction to measurement theory. Brooks/Cole, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  2. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth ML, Okely AD, Chey T, Bauman A (2001) The reliability and validity of the physical activity questions in the WHO health behaviour in schoolchildren (HBSC) survey: a population study. Brit J Sport Med 35(4):263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinapaw MJM, Mokkink LB, van Poppel MNM, van Mechelen W, Terwee CB (2010) Physical activity questionnaires for youth: a systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med 40(7):539–563. doi:10.2165/11530770-000000000-00000 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  6. Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A et al (2012) Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. HBSC International Report from the 2009/2010 Survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents No. 6. WHO Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  7. Evenson KR, McGinn AP (2005) Test–retest reliability of a questionnaire to assess physical environmental factors pertaining to physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2:7–13. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-2-7 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund F (2012) Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 380(9838):247–257. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kohl HW, Fulton JE, Caspersen CJ (2000) Assessment of physical activity among children and adolescents: a review and synthesis. Prev Med 31(2):54–76. doi:10.1006/pmed.1999.0542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu Y, Wang M, Tynjälä J, Lv Y, Villberg J, Zhang Z, Kannas L (2010) Test–retest reliability of selected items of health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) survey questionnaire in Beijing, China. BMC Med Res Methodol 10:73. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-73 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loucaides CA, Chedzoy SM, Bennett N (2003) Pedometer-assessed physical (ambulatory) activity in Cypriot children. Eur Phys Educ Rev 9(1):43–55. doi:10.1177/1356336X03009001179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lubans DR, Hesketh K, Cliff DP, Barnett LM, Salmon J, Dollman J, Morgan PJ, Hills AP, Hardy LL (2011) A systematic review of the validity and reliability of sedentary behaviour measures used with children and adolescents. Obes Rev 12(10):781–799. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00896.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ngo T, Stupar M, Côté P, Boyle E, Shearer H (2010) A study of the test–retest reliability of the self-perceived general recovery and self-perceived change in neck pain questions in patients with recent whiplash-associated disorders. Eur Spine J 19(6):957–962. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1289-x PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF, Long B (2001) A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care. Arch Pediat Adol Med 155(5):554–559. doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.5.554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rangul V, Holmen TL, Kurtze N, Cuypers K, Midthjell K (2008) Reliability and validity of two frequently used self-administered physical activity questionnaires in adolescents. BMC Med Res Methodol 8:47. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-47 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roberts C, Freeman J, Samdal O, Schnohr C, Looze M, Gabhainn Nic S, Iannotti R, The HBSC Methods Development Group (2009) The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: methodological developments and current tensions. Int J Public Health 54(2):140–150Google Scholar
  18. Samdal O, Tynjälä J, Roberts C, Sallis JF, Villberg J, Wold B (2007) Trends in vigorous physical activity and TV watching of adolescents from 1986 to 2002 in seven European Countries. Eur J Public Health 17(3):242–248. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckl245 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmitz KH, Harnack L, Fulton JE, Jacobs DR, Gao S, Lytle LA, Van Coevering P (2004) Reliability and validity of a brief questionnaire to assess television viewing and computer use by middle school children. J School Health 74(9):370–377. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb06632.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sigmundova D, AnsariW El, Sigmund E, Frömel K (2011) Secular trends: a ten-year comparison of the amount and type of physical activity and inactivity of random samples of adolescents in the Czech Republic. BMC Public Health 11:731–743. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-731 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor NJ, Crouter SE, Lawton RJ, Conner MT, Prestwich A (2013) Development and validation of the Online Self-Reported Walking and Exercise Questionnaire (OSWEQ). JPhys Act Health 10(8):1091–1101Google Scholar
  22. Torsheim T, Wold B, Samdal O, Haugland S (1995) Test–retest reliability of survey indicators measuring adolescent health and health behaviour. Research Centre for Health Promotion, University of Bergen, BergenGoogle Scholar
  23. Trinh OT, Do Nguyen N, van der Ploeg HP, Dibley MJ, Bauman A (2009) Test–retest repeatability and relative validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire in a developing country context. J Phys Act Health 6(1):46–53Google Scholar
  24. Utter J, Neumark-Sztainer D, Jeffery R, Story M (2003) Couch potatoes or french fries: are sedentary behaviors associated with body mass index, physical activity, and dietary behaviors among adolescents? J Am Diet Assoc 103(10):1298–1305. doi:10.1053/S0002-8223(03)01079-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vereecken CA, Todd J, Roberts C, Mulvihill C, Maes L (2006) Television viewing behaviour and associations with food habits in different countries. Public Health Nutr 9(2):244–250. doi:10.1079/PHN2005847 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vuori M (2005) Reliability of physical activity items in the HBSC study Pilot study among Finnish 11, 13 and 15-year-old school children. Research Centre for Health Promotion, University of Jyväskylä, JyväskyläGoogle Scholar
  27. Vuori M, Ojala K, Tynjälä J, Villberg J, Valimaa R, Kannas L (2005) The stability of physical activity survey items in the HBSC study. Liik Tiede 42(6):39–46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Bobakova
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zdenek Hamrik
    • 3
  • Petr Badura
    • 3
  • Dagmar Sigmundova
    • 3
  • Hania Nalecz
    • 4
  • Michal Kalman
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Health Psychology Unit, Institute of Public HealthP.J. Safarik University in KosiceKošiceSlovak Republic
  2. 2.Olomouc University Social Health InstitutePalacky University in OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic
  3. 3.Faculty of Physical Culture, Department of Recreation and Leisure StudiesPalacky University in OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic
  4. 4.Faculty of Physical Culture, Department of PedagogyThe Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations