Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 167–177 | Cite as

Frequent electronic media communication with friends is associated with higher adolescent substance use

  • Rob GommansEmail author
  • Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens
  • Emily Finne
  • Antonius H. N. Cillessen
  • Meyran Boniel-Nissim
  • Tom F. M. ter Bogt
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigated the unique associations between electronic media communication (EMC) with friends and adolescent substance use (tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis), over and beyond the associations of face-to-face (FTF) interactions with friends and the average level of classroom substance use.

Methods

Drawn from the cross-national 2009/2010 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in The Netherlands, 5,642 Dutch adolescents (M age = 14.29) reported on their substance use, EMC, and FTF interactions. Two-level multilevel analyses (participants nested within classrooms) were run.

Results

Electronic media communication was positively associated with adolescent substance use, though significantly more strongly with alcohol (β = 0.15, SE β  = 0.02) than with tobacco (β = 0.05, SE β  = 0.02, t (5,180) = 3.33, p < 0.001) or cannabis use (β = 0.06, SE β  = 0.02, t (5,160) = 2.79, p < 0.01). Further, EMC strengthened several positive associations of FTF interactions and average classroom substance use with adolescent substance use.

Conclusions

Electronic media communication was uniquely associated with substance use, predominantly with alcohol use. Thus, adolescents’ EMC and other online behaviors should not be left unnoticed in substance use research and prevention programs.

Keywords

Substance use Adolescents Electronic media communication Face-to-face interactions Multilevel analysis 

References

  1. Branstetter SA, Low S, Furman W (2011) The influence of parents and friends on adolescent substance use: a multidimensional approach. J Subst Use 16:150–160CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brechwald WA, Prinstein MJ (2011) Beyond homophily: a decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. J Res Adolesc 21:166–179CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown BB, Larson J (2009) Peer relationships in adolescence. In: Lerner R, Steinberg L (eds) Handbook of adolescent psychology, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 74–103Google Scholar
  4. Chassin L, Hussong A, Beltran I (2009) Adolescent substance use. In: Lerner R, Steinberg L (eds) Handbook of adolescent psychology, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 723–763Google Scholar
  5. Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, de Looze M, Roberts C, Samdel O, Smith ORF, Barnekow V (2012) Social determinants of health and well-being among young people: health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  6. Dijkstra JK, Veenstra R (2011) Peer relations. In: Brown BB, Prinstein MJ (eds) Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Elsevier, New York, pp 255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Strycker LA (2006) Alcohol use from ages 9 to 16: a cohort-sequential latent growth model. Drug Alcohol Depend 81:71–81CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ennett ST, Bauman KE, Hussong A, Faris R, Foshee VA, Cai Li (2006) The peer context of adolescent substance use: findings from social network analysis. J Res Adolesc 16:159–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison LD, Martin SS, Enev T, Harrington D (2007) Comparing drug testingand self-report of drug use among youths and young adults in the general population. In: Rockville, MD (ed) substance abuse and mental health services administration, Office of Applied StudiesGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartup WW (2005) Peer interactions: what causes what? J Abnorm Child Psychol 33:387–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hox JJ (2010) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications, 2nd edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang GC, Unger JB, Soto D, Fujimoto K, Pentz MA, Jordan-Marsh M et al (2014) Peer influences: the impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. J Adolesc Health 54:508–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hussong AM (2002) Differentiating peer contexts and risk for adolescent substance use. J Youth Adolesc 31:207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iannotti RJ, Janssen I, Haug E, Kololo H, Annaheim B, Borraccino A, The HBSC Physical Activity Focus Group (2009) Interrelationships of adolescent physical activity, screen-based sedentary behaviour, and social and psychological health. Int J Public Health 54:191–198Google Scholar
  15. Iannotti RJ, Kogan MD, Janssen I, Boyce WF (2009) Patterns of adolescent physical activity, screen-based media use, and positive and negative health indicators in the US and Canada. J Adolesc Health 44:493–499CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Killeya-Jones LA, Nakajima R, Costanzo PR (2007) Peer standing and substance use in early-adolescent grade-level networks: a short-term longitudinal study. Prev Sci 8:11–23CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kokkevi AE, Arapaki AA, Richardson C, Florescu S, Kuzman M, Stergar E (2007) Furtherinvestigation of psychological and environmental correlates of substance use in adolescence in six European countries. Drug Alcohol Depend 88:308–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraut R, Kiesler S, Boneva B, Cummings J, Helgeson V, Crawford A (2002) Internet paradox revisited. J Soc Issues 58:49–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuntsche E, Simons-Morton B, ter Bogt T, Sánchez Queija I, Muñoz Tinoco V, Gaspar de Matos M, Santinello M, Lenzi M, The HBSC Peer Culture Focus Group (2009) Electronic media communication with friends from 2002 to 2006 and links to face-to-face contacts in adolescence: an HBSC study in 31 European and North American countries and regions. Int J Public Health 54:243–250Google Scholar
  20. Kuntsche E, Simons-Morton B, Fotiou A, ter Bogt T, Kokkevi A (2009) Decrease in adolescent cannabis use from 2002 to 2006 and links to evenings out with friends in 31 European and North American countries and regions. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163:119–125CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Leena K, Tomi L, Arja R (2005) Intensity of mobile phone use and health compromising behaviours. How is information and communication technology connected to health-related lifestyle in adolescence? J Adolesc 28:35–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lenhart A (2012) Teens, smartphones, and texting. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-smartphones.aspx
  23. Lenhart A, Madden M (2007). Pew internet project data memo: 55% of online teens use social networks and 55% have created online profiles. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2007/01/07/social-networking-websites-and-teens/
  24. Litt DM, Stock ML (2011) Adolescent alcohol-related risk cognitions: the roles of social norms and social networking sites. Psychol Addict Behav 25:708–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Loss J, Lindacher V, Curbach J (2013) Do social networking sites enhance the attractiveness of risky health behavior?. Impression management in adolescents’ communication on Facebook and its ethical implications, Public Health IssuesGoogle Scholar
  26. Moreno MA, Parks MR, Zimmerman FJ, Brito TE, Christakis DA (2009) Display of health risk behaviors on Myspace by adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163:27–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan EM, Snelson C, Elison-Bowers P (2010) Image and video disclosure of substance use on social media websites. Comput Hum Behav 26:1405–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson MD, Gordon-Larsen P (2006) Physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns are associated with selected adolescent health risk behaviors. Pediatrics 117:1281–1290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2012) Mplus User’s Guide, 7th edn. Muthén and Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  30. Ohannessian CM (2009) Does technology use moderate the relationship between parental alcoholism and adolescent alcohol and cigarette use? Addict Behav 34:606–609CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Osaki Y, Ohida T, Kanda H, Kaneita Y, Kishimoto T (2012) Mobile phone use does not discourage adolescent smoking in Japan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13:1011–1014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Piehler TF (2011) Peer influence. In: Brown BB, Prinstein MJ (eds) Encyclopedia of adolescence. Elsevier, New York, pp 249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA (2008) Current issues in peer influence research. In: Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA (eds) Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. Guilford Press, New York, pp 3–13Google Scholar
  34. Purcell K (2013) 10 things to know about how teens use technology. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/07/10/10-things-to-know-about-how-teens-use-technology/
  35. Rai AA, Stanton B, Wu Y, Li X, Galbraith J, Cottrell L et al (2003) Relative influences of perceived parental monitoring and perceived peer involvement on adolescent risk behaviors. An analysis of six cross-sectional data sets. J Adolesc Health 33:108–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF (2010) Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds, Kaiser Family Foundation. http://kff.org/other/report/generation-m2-media-in-the-lives-of-8-to-18-year-olds/
  37. Roberts C, Freeman J, Samdal O, Schnohr CW, de Looze ME, Nic Gabhainn S, Iannotti R, Rasmussen M (2009) The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: methodological developments and current tensions. Int J Public Health 54:140–150CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Simons-Morton BG, Farhat T (2010) Recent findings on peer group influences on adolescent smoking. J Prim Prev 31:191–208CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (1994) Modeled variance in two-level models. J Sociol Methods Res 22:342–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stoddard SA, Bauermeister JA, Gordon-Messer D, Johns M, Zimmerman MA (2012) Permissive norms and young adults’ alcohol and marijuana use: the role of online communities. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 73:968–975PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Subrahmanyam K, Greenfield P (2008) Online communication and adolescent relationships. Future Child 18:119–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Valkenburg PM, Peter J (2010) Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J Adolesc Health 48:121–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Gommans
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Gonneke W. J. M. Stevens
    • 1
  • Emily Finne
    • 3
  • Antonius H. N. Cillessen
    • 2
  • Meyran Boniel-Nissim
    • 4
  • Tom F. M. ter Bogt
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Child and Adolescent StudiesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Behavioural Science InstituteRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  4. 4.University of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations