Frequent electronic media communication with friends is associated with higher adolescent substance use
- 855 Downloads
This study investigated the unique associations between electronic media communication (EMC) with friends and adolescent substance use (tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis), over and beyond the associations of face-to-face (FTF) interactions with friends and the average level of classroom substance use.
Drawn from the cross-national 2009/2010 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in The Netherlands, 5,642 Dutch adolescents (M age = 14.29) reported on their substance use, EMC, and FTF interactions. Two-level multilevel analyses (participants nested within classrooms) were run.
Electronic media communication was positively associated with adolescent substance use, though significantly more strongly with alcohol (β = 0.15, SE β = 0.02) than with tobacco (β = 0.05, SE β = 0.02, t (5,180) = 3.33, p < 0.001) or cannabis use (β = 0.06, SE β = 0.02, t (5,160) = 2.79, p < 0.01). Further, EMC strengthened several positive associations of FTF interactions and average classroom substance use with adolescent substance use.
Electronic media communication was uniquely associated with substance use, predominantly with alcohol use. Thus, adolescents’ EMC and other online behaviors should not be left unnoticed in substance use research and prevention programs.
KeywordsSubstance use Adolescents Electronic media communication Face-to-face interactions Multilevel analysis
- Brown BB, Larson J (2009) Peer relationships in adolescence. In: Lerner R, Steinberg L (eds) Handbook of adolescent psychology, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 74–103Google Scholar
- Chassin L, Hussong A, Beltran I (2009) Adolescent substance use. In: Lerner R, Steinberg L (eds) Handbook of adolescent psychology, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 723–763Google Scholar
- Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, de Looze M, Roberts C, Samdel O, Smith ORF, Barnekow V (2012) Social determinants of health and well-being among young people: health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Harrison LD, Martin SS, Enev T, Harrington D (2007) Comparing drug testingand self-report of drug use among youths and young adults in the general population. In: Rockville, MD (ed) substance abuse and mental health services administration, Office of Applied StudiesGoogle Scholar
- Hox JJ (2010) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications, 2nd edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Iannotti RJ, Janssen I, Haug E, Kololo H, Annaheim B, Borraccino A, The HBSC Physical Activity Focus Group (2009) Interrelationships of adolescent physical activity, screen-based sedentary behaviour, and social and psychological health. Int J Public Health 54:191–198Google Scholar
- Kuntsche E, Simons-Morton B, ter Bogt T, Sánchez Queija I, Muñoz Tinoco V, Gaspar de Matos M, Santinello M, Lenzi M, The HBSC Peer Culture Focus Group (2009) Electronic media communication with friends from 2002 to 2006 and links to face-to-face contacts in adolescence: an HBSC study in 31 European and North American countries and regions. Int J Public Health 54:243–250Google Scholar
- Lenhart A (2012) Teens, smartphones, and texting. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-smartphones.aspx
- Lenhart A, Madden M (2007). Pew internet project data memo: 55% of online teens use social networks and 55% have created online profiles. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2007/01/07/social-networking-websites-and-teens/
- Loss J, Lindacher V, Curbach J (2013) Do social networking sites enhance the attractiveness of risky health behavior?. Impression management in adolescents’ communication on Facebook and its ethical implications, Public Health IssuesGoogle Scholar
- Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2012) Mplus User’s Guide, 7th edn. Muthén and Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA (2008) Current issues in peer influence research. In: Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA (eds) Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. Guilford Press, New York, pp 3–13Google Scholar
- Purcell K (2013) 10 things to know about how teens use technology. Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/07/10/10-things-to-know-about-how-teens-use-technology/
- Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF (2010) Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds, Kaiser Family Foundation. http://kff.org/other/report/generation-m2-media-in-the-lives-of-8-to-18-year-olds/