Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 59, Issue 6, pp 897–903 | Cite as

The Philippines Field Management Training Program (FMTP): strengthening management capacity in a decentralized public health system

  • Nemia L. Sucaldito
  • Enrique A. Tayag
  • Maria Concepcion R. Roces
  • Michael D. Malison
  • Brian D. RobieEmail author
  • Elizabeth H. Howze
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

The decentralization of the Philippines’ health sector in 1991 sought to improve the efficiency of local health resource allocation; however, local officials were unprepared for the increased responsibility. In 1999 the Philippines Department of Health, with assistance from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), implemented the Philippines Field Management Training Program (FMTP) to provide local health officials with the managerial skills needed to perform their new, more responsible jobs. This paper addresses whether the FMTP has provided participants with useful managerial skills needed for their more responsible positions.

Methods

The method involved reviewing program outcomes, including results of applied management improvement projects the participants completed to solve managerial problems.

Results

Between 2000 and 2010, 294 participants completed the FMTP and many were later promoted to more responsible positions. The participants also completed 204 applied management improvement projects resulting in documented improvements in service delivery, information systems, logistics, health insurance, policy and laboratory outcomes. Examples of their successes are included in this paper.

Conclusions

The results provide compelling evidence that managers are using the skills learned to solve significant managerial problems.

Keywords

Devolution Decentralization Management capacity building Sustainability 

References

  1. Fernandez M, Armstrong C, Arnold N, Pieche S (1990) Mid-term Evaluation of the Field Epidemiology Training Program. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDABI966.pdf. Accessed 25 Jul 2013
  2. Grundy J, Healy V, Gorgolon L, Sandig E (2003) Overview of devolution of health services in the Philippines. Rural Remote Health 3(2):220 (Epub 2003 Jul 1)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kolehmainen-Aitken R, Newbrander W (1997) Lessons from FPMD: decentralizing the management of health and family planning programs. Newton, MA: management sciences for health, office of health, population and nutrition, US Agency for International DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  4. Lakshminarayanan R (2003) Decentralisation and its implications for reproductive health: the Philippines experience. Reprod Health Matter 11(21):96–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lariosa T (1999) Effect of devolution on the Philippine National Tuberculosis and Control Program Case Studies. WHO. Health Sector Reform. Tropical Disease Research. Final Report No. 960698—Negative impact of devolution on health servicesGoogle Scholar
  6. Larsen M, Gulis G, Pederson K (2012) Use of evidence in local public health work in Denmark. Int J Public Health 57:477–483. doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0324-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McEwan E, Conway M, Bull D, Malison M (2001) Developing public health management training capacity in Nicaragua. Am J Pub Health 91(10):1586–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mills A, Vaughan J et al (1990) Health system decentralization: concepts, issues, and country experience. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. Pappaioanou M, Malison M, Wilkins K et al (2003) Strengthening capacity in developing countries for evidence-based public health: the data for decision making project. Soc Sci Med 57:1925–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Potvin L (2013) Wishful thinking will not do it! Practitioners and decision-makers need tools to implement evidence-informed public health. Int J Public Health 58:491–492. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0474-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Setliff R, Porter J, Malison M, Frederick S, Balderson T (2003) Strengthening the public health workforce: three CDC programs that prepare managers and leaders for the challenges of the 21st century. J Public Health Manag Pract 9(2):91–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sogoric S, Dzakula A, Vukusic Rukavina T, Grozic-Zivolic S, Lazaric-Zec D, Dzono-Boban A, Brborovic O, Lang S, Vuletic S (2009) Evaluation of croatian model of polycentric health planning and decision making. Health Policy 89:271–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Umble K, Brooks J, Lowman A, Malison M, Huong N, Iademarco M, Laserson K (2009) Improving management training capacity in Vietnam’s national tuberculosis program: an evaluation. Int J Tub Lung Dis 13(2):238–246Google Scholar
  14. World Bank (1992) Governance and development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organization Western Pacific Region (2013) Non-communicable diseases. http://www.wpro.who.int/philippines/areas/noncommunicable_diseases/en/. Accessed 28 Aug 2013

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nemia L. Sucaldito
    • 1
  • Enrique A. Tayag
    • 2
  • Maria Concepcion R. Roces
    • 3
  • Michael D. Malison
    • 4
  • Brian D. Robie
    • 5
    Email author
  • Elizabeth H. Howze
    • 4
  1. 1.Applied Public Health DivisionNational Epidemiology Center (NEC), Department of HealthManilaPhilippines
  2. 2.Department of HealthSupport Service Delivery Technical Cluster II\National Epidemiology Center (NEC)ManilaPhilippines
  3. 3.South Asia Field Epidemiology and Technology Network, Inc. (SAFETYNET)LagunaPhilippines
  4. 4.AtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Non-Communicable Disease Unit, Division of Global Health ProtectionCenter for Global Health, CDCAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations