Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 949–953 | Cite as

Population-based reference values for the 1-min sit-to-stand test

  • Alexandra Strassmann
  • Claudia Steurer-Stey
  • Kaba Dalla Lana
  • Marco Zoller
  • Alexander J. Turk
  • Paolo Suter
  • Milo A. Puhan
Brief Report

Abstract

Objectives

To determine reference values for the 1-min sit-to-stand (STS) test in an adult population.

Methods

Cross-sectional study nested within a nationwide health promotion campaign in Switzerland. Adults performed the STS test and completed questions on demographics and health behavior.

Results

6,926 out of 7,753 (89.3 %) adults were able to complete the STS test. The median number of repetitions ranged from 50/min (25–75th percentile 41–57/min) in young men and 47/min (39–55/min) in young women aged 20–24 years to 30/min (25–37/min) in older men and 27/min (22–30/min) in older women aged 75–79 years.

Conclusions

The reference values support the interpretation of 1-min STS test performance and identification of subjects with decreased lower body muscular strength and endurance.

Keywords

Lower body strength Endurance Interpretation Reference values Sit-to-stand test 

References

  1. Bautmans I, Lambert M, Mets T (2004) The six-minute walk test in community dwelling elderly: influence of health status. BMC Geriatr 4:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohannon RW (1995) Sit-to-stand test for measuring performance of lower extremity muscles. Percept Mot Skills 80:163–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohannon RW (2006) Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: a descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders. Percept Mot Skills 103:215–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohannon RW (2012) Measurement of sit-to-stand among older adults. Topics Geriartic Rehabil 28:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen P (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Janssen WGM, Bussmann HBJ, Stam HJ (2002) Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement: a review. Phys Ther 82:866–879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC (1999) A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 70:113–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kasymjanova G, Correa JA, Kreisman H, Dajczman E, Pepe C, Dobson S, Lajeunesse L, Sharma R, Small D (2009) Prognostic value of the six-minute walk in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4:602–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lord SR, Murray SM, Chapman K, Munro B, Tiedemann A (2002) Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57:M539–M543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE (2002) Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med 346:793–801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ozalevli S, Ozden A, Itil O, Akkoclu A (2007) Comparison of the sit-to-stand test with 6 min walk test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 101:286–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pinto-Plata VM, Cote C, Cabral H, Taylor J, Celli BR (2004) The 6-min walk distance: change over time and value as a predictor of survival in severe COPD. Eur Respir J 23:28–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Puhan M, Siebling L, Zoller M, Muggensturm P, ter Riet G (2013) Simple functional performance tests and mortality in COPD. Eur Resp J, pp 1–22. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00131612
  14. Rikli RE, Jones CJ (1999) Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60–94. J Aging Phys Act 7:162–181Google Scholar
  15. Ritchie C, Trost SG, Brown W, Armit C (2005) Reliability and validity of physical fitness field tests for adults aged 55 to 70 years. J Sci Med Sports 8:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ, Pellikka PA, Miller TD, Bailey KR, Gersh BJ (1998) Prognostic value of treadmill exercise testing. Circulation 98:2836–2841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Solberg HE (2004) The IFCC recommendation on estimation of reference intervals. The RefVal program. Clin Chem Lab Med 42:710–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wright EM, Royston P (1999) Calculating reference intervals for laboratory measurements. Stat Methods Med Res 8:93–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Strassmann
    • 1
  • Claudia Steurer-Stey
    • 2
  • Kaba Dalla Lana
    • 2
  • Marco Zoller
    • 2
  • Alexander J. Turk
    • 3
  • Paolo Suter
    • 4
  • Milo A. Puhan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Social and Preventive MedicineUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institute of General PracticeUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Zürcher Höhenklinik WaldFaltiberg-WaldSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity Hospital of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations