Income-related health inequalities: does perceived discrimination matter?
- First Online:
- 545 Downloads
Because of their meritocratic ideology, Western countries might promote the belief that every individual is responsible for his or her socioeconomic position. These beliefs might enhance discrimination which, in turn, might affect health. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the role of perceived discrimination within income-related health inequalities.
Two-year follow-up data (2008–2010) from the Dutch Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social sciences panel (N = 2,139) were used to examine the relation between income, perceived discrimination, and self-rated health and feeling hindered by health problems.
Results showed that poor health was more prevalent in the low income and in the discriminated group. Participants from the low income group were also more likely to perceive discrimination (OR = 1.57, 95 % CI = 1.03–2.42). However, there was no substantial evidence for a mediating effect of perceived discrimination on the income–health association.
The results emphasise the importance of a more in-depth study of discrimination in relation to socioeconomic health inequalities. Since ethnicity was a major confounder, it is recommended to take account of the complex interplay between discrimination and both the socioeconomic and ethnic background.
KeywordsIncome-related health inequality Socioeconomic status Discrimination Ethnicity Self-rated health Meritocracy
- Aldabe B, Anderson R, Lyly-Yrjanainen M, Parent-Thirion A, Vermeylen G, Kelleher CC, Niedhammer I (2011) Contribution of material, occupational, and psychosocial factors in the explanation of social inequalities in health in 28 countries in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health 65(12):1123–1131. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.102517 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CentERdata (2011) Guidelines. Tilburg University. http://www.lissdata.nl/assets/uploaded/References_LISS.pdf. Accessed Nov 22 2011
- De Botton A (2004) Statusangst. Olympus, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- De Vos K (2008) Imputation of income in household questionnaire LISS panel. CentERdata, TilburgGoogle Scholar
- De Vos K (2010) Representativeness of the LISS-panel 2008, 2009, 2010. CentERdata http://www.lissdata.nl/assets/uploaded/Representativeness%20of%20the%20LISS%20panel%202008,%202009,%202010.pdf. Accessed April 18 2012
- Gamarel KE, Reisner SL, Parsons JT, Golub SA (2012) Association between socioeconomic position discrimination and psychological distress: findings from a community-based sample of gay and bisexual men in New York City. Am J Public Health 102(11):2094–2101Google Scholar
- Liu WM (2010) Social class, classism, and mental and physical health. In: Social class and classism in the helping professions: research, theory, and practice. Sage Publicationa, Inc., CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Mackenbach JP (2006) Health inequalities: Europe in profile. Produced by COI for the Dept. of HealthGoogle Scholar
- Skalická V, van Lenthe F, Bambra C, Krokstad S, Mackenbach J (2009) Material, psychosocial, behavioural and biomedical factors in the explanation of relative socio-economic inequalities in mortality: evidence from the HUNT study. Int J Epidemiol 38(5):1272–1284. doi:10.1093/ije/dyp262 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Netherlands (2009) Bevolking; generatie, geslacht, leeftijd en herkomstgroepering, 1 januari 2009 (Population; generation, sex, age and origin, January 1, 2009). http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=37325&D1=0-2&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0&D5=0-4&D6=13&HD=120309-1458&HDR=G2,G3&STB=G1,T,G5,G4. Accessed March 9 2012
- Vrooman C, Hoff S, Otten F, Bos W (2007) Armoedemonitor 2007. Netherlands Institue for Social Research (SCP) and Statistics Netherlands (CBS), The HagueGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson RG, Pickett K (2010) The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar