Does parental involvement make a difference in school-based nutrition and physical activity interventions? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
- 2.6k Downloads
Parental involvement is often advocated as important for school-based interventions, however, to date, only inconsistent evidence is available. Therefore, this study aimed at determining the impact of parental involvement in school-based obesity prevention interventions in children and adolescents.
A systematic review of obesity prevention studies published from 1990 to 2010 including a comparison between school-based interventions with and without parental component was conducted. Only studies reporting effects on health behaviour-related outcomes were included.
Some positive effects of parental involvement were found on children’s behaviours and behavioural determinants. Parental modules including different strategies and addressing several home-related determinants and parenting practices concerning eating and physical activity behaviours were more likely to be effective. However, no conclusive evidence could be provided concerning the added value of parent involvement, because of the paucity of studies to test this hypothesis. The few studies that are available provide inconsistent evidence.
There is a need for more studies comparing school-based interventions with and without a parental component, and dose, strategies and content of parental components of school-based interventions should be better reported in articles.
KeywordsObesity Children Parents Health promotion Nutrition Physical activity Prevention
This study was conducted as a part of the “EuropeaN Energy balance Research to prevent excessive weight Gain among Youth” (ENERGY)-project. The ENERGY-project is funded by the Seventh Framework Programme (CORDIS FP7) of the European Commission, HEALTH (FP7-HEALTH-2007-B), Grant agreement no. 223254.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J (eds) Action-control: from cognition to behaviour. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 11–39Google Scholar
- Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D et al (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134:663–694 Google Scholar
- Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ)Google Scholar
- Becker M (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior. Charles B. Slack, Inc., ThorofareGoogle Scholar
- Commission of European Communities (2007) White paper on a strategy for Europe on nutrition, overweight and obesity related health issues. Report no.: COM(2007) 279 final. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/nutrition/documents/nutrition_wp_en.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2010
- Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N et al (2004) Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 94:361–366 Google Scholar
- Eccles JS, Harold RD (1996) Family involvement in children’s and adolescents’ schooling. In: Booth A, Dunn JF (eds) Family–school links: how do they affect educational outcomes?. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwa, pp 3–34Google Scholar
- Golley RK, Hendrie GA, Slater A et al (2010) Interventions that involve parents to improve children’s weight-related nutrition intake and activity patterns—what nutrition and activity targets and behaviour change techniques are associated with intervention effectiveness. Obes Rev 12(2):114–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00745.x Google Scholar
- Hirschi T (1969) Causes of delinquency. University of California press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Hopper CA, Gruber MB, Munoz KD et al (1996) School-based cardiovascular exercise and nutrition programs with parent participation. J Health Educ 27(5):S32–S39Google Scholar
- Jackson N (2005) Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions. Health Promot Int 20:367–374 Google Scholar
- Kamath CC, Vickers KS, Ehrlich A, McGovern L, Johnson J, Singhal V, Paulo R, Hettinger A, Erwin PJ, Montori VM (2008) Clinical review: behavioural interventions to prevent childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:4606–4615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kanfer F (1975) Self-management methods. In: Kanfer F, Goldstein A (eds) Helping people change: a textbook of methods. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Koplan JP, Liverman CT, Kraak VI (2005) Preventing childhood obesity: health in the balance. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 285–317Google Scholar
- Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D (2001a) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 1:2 Google Scholar
- Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L et al (2001b) Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 285:1992–1995 Google Scholar
- Reilly JJ, Houston-Callaghan K-A, Donaghey Z et al (2010) Physical health consequences of child and adolescent obesity. In: Crawford D, Jeffery RW, Ball K, et al. (eds) Obesity epidemiology from aetiology to public health. Oxford University Press, pp 27–42Google Scholar
- Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P et al (2002) Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:119–127 Google Scholar
- Summerbell CD, Waters E, Edmunds LD, Kelly S, Brown T, Campbell KJ (2005) Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:1–80Google Scholar
- Thomas H (2003) Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Effective public health practice project. McMaster University, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
- Werch CE, Diclemente CC (1994) A multi-component stage model for matching drug prevention strategies and messages to youth stage of use. Health Educ Res Theory prac 9(1):37–46Google Scholar