Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 413–420 | Cite as

The lower prevalence of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands: a nationwide study in Dutch midwifery practices

  • Dineke G. KorfkerEmail author
  • Ria Reis
  • Marlies E. B. Rijnders
  • Sanna Meijer-van Asperen
  • Lucienne Read
  • Maylis Sanjuan
  • Kathy Herschderfer
  • Simone E. Buitendijk
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM) in women giving birth in 2008 in the Netherlands.

Method

A retrospective questionnaire study was conducted. The study covered all 513 midwifery practices in the Netherlands. The data were analysed with SPSS 17.0.

Results

The response from midwifery practices was 93% (n = 478). They retrospectively reported 470 circumcised women in 2008 (0.32%). The expected prevalence in the Netherlands based on the estimated prevalence of FGM in the country of birth was 0.7%. It is likely that there was underreporting in midwifery practices since midwives do not always enquire about the subject and may not notice the milder types of FGM. Midwives who checked their records before answering our questionnaire reported a prevalence of 0.8%.

Conclusion

On the basis of this study, we can conclude that FGM is a serious clinical problem in Europe for migrant women from risk countries for FGM. These women should receive extra attention from obstetricians and midwives during childbirth, since almost half are mutilated and FGM involves a risk of complications during delivery for both women and children.

Keywords

Female genital mutilation Prevalence Midwifery practices Country of birth Migrants Delivery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS) for financing this study.

References

  1. Afifi M (2009) Women’s empowerment and the intention to continue the practice of female genital cutting in Egypt. Arch Iran Med 12(2):154–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlberg BM, Kranz I, Lindmark G, Warsame M (2004) It’s only a tradition: making sense of eradication interventions and the persistence of female ‘circumcision’ within a Swedish context. Crit Soc Policy 24(1):50–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andro A, Les Clingand M (2007) Les mutilations sexuelles féminines: le point sur la situation en Afrique et en France. Population & Sociétés, numéro 438Google Scholar
  4. Bijlsma-Schlosser JF, van Eerdenburg-Keuning IA (2005) Prevention of female genital mutilation in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 149(47):2603–2606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boama V, Arulkumaran S (2009) Safer childbirth: a rights-based approach. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 106:125–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carolan M (2010) Pregnancy health status of sub-Saharan refugee women who have resettled in developed countries: overview of the literature. Midwifery 26:407–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chalmers B, Hashi KO (2000) 432 Somali women’s birth experiences in Canada after earlier female genital mutilation. Birth 27(4):227–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Bruyn M (2003) Discussion paper: socio-cultural aspects of female genital cutting. In: Leye E, De Bruyn M, Meuwese S (eds) Proceedings of the expert meeting on female genital mutilation. Ghent-Belgium, November 5–7, 1998. ICRH Publications N°2. De Consulterij, Lokeren, pp 68–82Google Scholar
  9. Dorkenoo E, Morison Z, Mac Farlane A (2007) A statistical study to estimate the prevalence of female genital mutilation in England and Wales. FORWARD, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubourg D, Richard F, Leye E, Ndame S, Rommens T, Maes S (2011) Estimating the number of women with female genital mutilation in Belgium. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 16(4):248–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Eke N, Nkanginieme KE (2006) Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome. Lancet 367(9525):1799–1800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. El-Gibaly O, Ibrahim B, Mensch B S, Clark WH (2002) The decline of female circumcision in Egypt: evidence and interpretation. Soc Sci Med 54(2):205–222Google Scholar
  13. Elgaali M, Strevens H, Mardh PA (2005) Female genital mutilation—an exported medical hazard. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 10(2):93–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Gibaly O, Ibrahim B, Mensch BS, Clark WH (2002) The decline of female circumcision in Egypt: evidence and interpretation. Soc Sci Med 54(2):205–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El-Zanaty F, Way A (2009) The Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 2008, Ministry of Health and Population, USAID, UNICEF, El-Zanaty and Associates, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  16. Hassanin IM, Saleh R, Bedaiwy AA, Peterson RS, Bedaiwy MA (2008) Prevalence of female genital cutting in Upper Egypt: 6 years after enforcement of prohibition law. Reprod Biomed Online 16(Suppl 1):27–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jäger F, Schulze S, Hohlfeld P (2002) Female genital mutilation in Switzerland: a survey among gynaecologists. Swiss Med Wkly 132:259–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnsdotter S, Essén B (2005) It is only a tradition: making sense of Swedish Somalis’ narratives of female circumcision and avoiding submission to hegemonic political discourse. Crit Soc Policy 25(4):577–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnsdotter S, Moussa K, Carlbom A, Aregai R, Essen B (2009) “Never my daughters”: a qualitative study regarding attitude change toward female genital cutting among Ethiopian and Eritrean families in Sweden. Health Care Women Int 30(1–2):114–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kangoum AA, Flodin U, Hammar M, Sydsjö G (2004) Prevalence of female genital mutilation among African women resident in the Swedish country of Östergötland. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(2):187–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Knight R, Hotchin A, Bayly C, Grover S (1999) Female genital mutilation—experience of The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 39(1):50–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leye E (2008) Female Genital Mutilation; a study of health services and legislation in some countries of the European Union; Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  23. Leye E, Sabbe A (2009) Overview of legislation in The European Union to address female genital mutilation: challenges and recommendations for the implementation of laws. Expert paper prepared by: International Centre for Reproductive Health Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  24. Leye E, Powell RA, Nienhuis G, Claeys P, Temmerman M (2006) Health care in Europe for women with genital mutilation. Health Care Women Int 22(4):362–378Google Scholar
  25. Leye E, Ysebaert I, Deblonde J, Claeys P, Vermeulen G, Jacquemyn Y, Timmerman M (2008) Female genital mutilation: knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 13(2):182–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Litorp H, Franck M, Almroth L (2008) Female genital mutilation among antenatal care and contraceptive advice attendees in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:716–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundberg PC, Gerezgiher A (2008) Experiences from pregnancy and childbirth related to female genital mutilation among Eritrean immigrant women in Sweden. Midwifery 24(2):214–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morison LA, Dirir A, Elmi S, Warsame J, Dirir S (2004) How experience and attitudes relating to female circumcision vary according to age on arrival in Britain: a study among young Somalis in London. Ethn Health 9(1):75–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Obermeyer CM (2005) The consequences of female circumcision for health and sexuality: an update on the evidence. Cult Health Sex 7(5):443–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powell RA, Leye E, Jayakody A, Mwangi-Powell FN, Morison L (2004) Female genital mutilation, asylum seekers and refugees: the need for an integrated European Union agenda. Health Policy 70:151–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Small R, Gagnon A, Gissler M, Zeitlin J, Bennis M, Glazier RH, Haelterman E, Martens G, McDermott S, Urquia M, Vangen S (2008) Somali women and their pregnancy outcomes postmigration: data from six receiving countries. BJOG 115(13):1630–1640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland (2008) Perinatale Zorg in Nederland 2006; Utrecht Stichting Perinatale Registratie NederlandGoogle Scholar
  33. Tag-Eldin MA, Gadallah MA, Al-Tayeb MN, Abdel-Aty M, Mansour E, Sallem M (2008) Prevalence of female genital cutting among Egyptian girls. Bull World Health Organ 86(4):269–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamaddon L, Johnsdotter S, Liljestrand J, Essen B (2006) Swedish health care providers’ experience and knowledge of female genital cutting. Health Care Women Int 27(8):709–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thierfelder C, Tanner M, Bodiang CM (2005) Female genital mutilation in the context of migration: experience of African women with the Swiss health care system. Eur J Public Health 15(1):86–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vangen S, Stoltenberg C, Johansen RE, Sundby J, Stray-Pedersen B (2002) Perinatal complications among ethnic Somalis in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81(4):317–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vangen S, Johansen RE, Sundby J, Traeen B, Stray-Pedersen B (2004) Qualitative study of perinatal care experiences among Somali women and local health care professionals in Norway. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112(1):29–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vloeberghs E, Knipscheer J, Kwaak van der A, Naleie Z, Muijsenbergh van den M (2010) Versluierde Pijn. Pharos, Utrecht ISBN 978-90-75955-72-9Google Scholar
  39. WHO (2008) Eliminating female genital mutilation; an interagency statement by OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHOGoogle Scholar
  40. Yoder PS, Abderrahim N, Zhuzhuni A (2004) Female genital cutting in the Demographic Health Surveys: a critical and comparative analysis. ORC Marco, Calverton (DHS Comparative Reports No. 7)Google Scholar
  41. Zaidi N, Khalil A, Roberts C, Browne M (2007) Knowledge of female genital mutilation among healthcare professionals. J Obstet Gynaecol 27(2):161–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dineke G. Korfker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ria Reis
    • 2
    • 3
  • Marlies E. B. Rijnders
    • 1
  • Sanna Meijer-van Asperen
    • 4
  • Lucienne Read
    • 5
    • 6
  • Maylis Sanjuan
    • 7
  • Kathy Herschderfer
    • 8
  • Simone E. Buitendijk
    • 2
  1. 1.TNO Innovation for LifeLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)LeidenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.BovenIJ HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.OLVG HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Midwifery Practice BijlmermeerAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  7. 7.Midwifery Practice VidaAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  8. 8.Royal Tropical InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations