The lower prevalence of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands: a nationwide study in Dutch midwifery practices
- 522 Downloads
To determine the prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM) in women giving birth in 2008 in the Netherlands.
A retrospective questionnaire study was conducted. The study covered all 513 midwifery practices in the Netherlands. The data were analysed with SPSS 17.0.
The response from midwifery practices was 93% (n = 478). They retrospectively reported 470 circumcised women in 2008 (0.32%). The expected prevalence in the Netherlands based on the estimated prevalence of FGM in the country of birth was 0.7%. It is likely that there was underreporting in midwifery practices since midwives do not always enquire about the subject and may not notice the milder types of FGM. Midwives who checked their records before answering our questionnaire reported a prevalence of 0.8%.
On the basis of this study, we can conclude that FGM is a serious clinical problem in Europe for migrant women from risk countries for FGM. These women should receive extra attention from obstetricians and midwives during childbirth, since almost half are mutilated and FGM involves a risk of complications during delivery for both women and children.
KeywordsFemale genital mutilation Prevalence Midwifery practices Country of birth Migrants Delivery
We thank the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS) for financing this study.
- Andro A, Les Clingand M (2007) Les mutilations sexuelles féminines: le point sur la situation en Afrique et en France. Population & Sociétés, numéro 438Google Scholar
- De Bruyn M (2003) Discussion paper: socio-cultural aspects of female genital cutting. In: Leye E, De Bruyn M, Meuwese S (eds) Proceedings of the expert meeting on female genital mutilation. Ghent-Belgium, November 5–7, 1998. ICRH Publications N°2. De Consulterij, Lokeren, pp 68–82Google Scholar
- Dorkenoo E, Morison Z, Mac Farlane A (2007) A statistical study to estimate the prevalence of female genital mutilation in England and Wales. FORWARD, LondonGoogle Scholar
- El-Gibaly O, Ibrahim B, Mensch B S, Clark WH (2002) The decline of female circumcision in Egypt: evidence and interpretation. Soc Sci Med 54(2):205–222Google Scholar
- El-Zanaty F, Way A (2009) The Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 2008, Ministry of Health and Population, USAID, UNICEF, El-Zanaty and Associates, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
- Leye E (2008) Female Genital Mutilation; a study of health services and legislation in some countries of the European Union; Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Leye E, Sabbe A (2009) Overview of legislation in The European Union to address female genital mutilation: challenges and recommendations for the implementation of laws. Expert paper prepared by: International Centre for Reproductive Health Ghent University, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Leye E, Powell RA, Nienhuis G, Claeys P, Temmerman M (2006) Health care in Europe for women with genital mutilation. Health Care Women Int 22(4):362–378Google Scholar
- Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland (2008) Perinatale Zorg in Nederland 2006; Utrecht Stichting Perinatale Registratie NederlandGoogle Scholar
- Vloeberghs E, Knipscheer J, Kwaak van der A, Naleie Z, Muijsenbergh van den M (2010) Versluierde Pijn. Pharos, Utrecht ISBN 978-90-75955-72-9Google Scholar
- WHO (2008) Eliminating female genital mutilation; an interagency statement by OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHOGoogle Scholar
- Yoder PS, Abderrahim N, Zhuzhuni A (2004) Female genital cutting in the Demographic Health Surveys: a critical and comparative analysis. ORC Marco, Calverton (DHS Comparative Reports No. 7)Google Scholar