International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 459–465 | Cite as

Son preference and sex-selective abortion in China: informing policy options

  • Chi Zhou
  • Xiao Lei Wang
  • Xu Dong Zhou
  • Therese Hesketh
Original Article



There is growing evidence in China that son preference is on the decline, but the sex ratio at birth is still the highest in the world at around 120 male births to 100 females. The aim of the study was to explore attitudes towards gender preference among people of reproductive age, to determine the reasons why the sex ratio is persistently high, and to inform policy options.


We conducted in-depth interviews with 212 individuals who aged from 18 to 39 in rural and urban areas of three provinces: Yunnan, Guizhou and Zhejiang.


We show that while son preference has weakened considerably, it has not disappeared. The sex ratio remains high, because of this small minority of individuals, who still choose sex-selective abortion to ensure male offsprings.


Intensive local policy interventions have been successful in reducing the sex ratio in some areas and these should be disseminated widely. In addition, the law forbidding sex selection should be actively enforced, and the One Child Policy should be relaxed in some areas, to reduce the disproportionately high sex ratio in the second order births.


China Son preference Sex-selective abortion Sex ratio Policy 


  1. Central Intelligence Agency (2010) The world factbook. Sexratios.
  2. Chung W, Das Gupta M (2007) The decline of son preference in South Korea: the roles of development and public policy. Popul Dev Rev 33(4):757–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corrigall EA, Konrad AM (2007) Gender role attitudes and careers: a longitudinal study. Sex Roles 56(11–12):847–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Das Gupta M, Jiang ZH, Li BH, Xie ZM, Chung WJ, Bae HO (2003) Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. J Dev Studies 40:153–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das Gupta M, Chung W, Li S (2009) Evidence for an incipient decline in numbers of girls in China and India. Popul Dev Rev 35(2):401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodkind D (1996) On substituting sex ratio strategies in east Asia: does prenatal sex selection reduce postnatal discrimination? Popul Dev Rev 22(1):111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gu SZ, Chen L (2005) Urbanization effects and gender preference. Chin J Popul Sci 3:30–37 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Hesketh T, Zhu WX (2006) Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: Causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 36:13271–13275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hesketh T, Lu L, Xing ZW (2005) The effect of China’s one-child family policy after 25 years. N Engl J Med 353(11):1171–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang QY (2008) The report of China’s 10th National Women’s Congress, 31 October, Vice-chairman of National Women’s Congress, Women Union. (in Chinese)
  12. Jha P, Kumar R, Vasa P, Dhingra N, Thirichelvam D, Moineddan R (2006) Low male-to-female sex ratio of children born in India: national survey of 1.1 million households. Lancet 367:211–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li Y (2000) Women’s movement and change of women’s status in China. J Int Womens Studies 1:1–20Google Scholar
  14. Li SZ, Yan SH (2008) A special study on the “Care for Girls” campaign. Popul Family Planning 10:23–24 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Lin T (2009) The decline of son preference, rise of gender indifference in Taiwan since 1990. Demogr Res 20(16):377–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo WX, Li JX (2007) Women status and fertility decision. Market Demogr Anal 7:246–254 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Mo LX (2005) The fertility desire situation of rural residents in China. Popul Res 29(2):62–68Google Scholar
  18. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2009)
  19. Park CB, Cho NH (1995) Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: imbalance of the SRB in Korea. Popul Dev Rev 21(1):59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qu JD, Hesketh T (2006) Family size, sex ratio and fertility preferences in the era of the one child policy: results from the national family planning and reproductive health survey. BMJ 333:371–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sen A (2003) Missing women—revisited. BMJ 327:1297–1298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sjostrom O, Holst D (2002) Validity of a questionnaire survey: response patterns in different subgroups and the effect of social desirability. Acta Odontol Scand 60:136–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zeng LM (2010) The 2009 sex ratio at birth is 119.45 in the mainland of China, the first drop in recent years. China News, 3 June, viewed 3 June 2010, (in Chinese)
  24. Zhu WX, Li L, Hesketh T (2009) China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy: analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. Br Med J 338:1211–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chi Zhou
    • 1
  • Xiao Lei Wang
    • 1
  • Xu Dong Zhou
    • 1
  • Therese Hesketh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Public HealthZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Centre for International Health and DevelopmentUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations