Differences in individual empowerment outcomes of socially disadvantaged women: effects of mode of participation and structural changes in a physical activity promotion program
- 647 Downloads
This study explored the differences in individual empowerment outcomes of a group of socially disadvantaged women participating in physical activity promotion. The outcomes observed were assessed in the context of the women’s mode of participation and the structural organizational and community level changes, which took place during the implementation of the program.
Fifteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Two groups of women participated in the interviews—those involved in the whole process of planning, implementation and evaluation of the program and those who took part in the program activities.
Individual empowerment outcomes were achieved for all those interviewed, although those participating in the planning, implementation and evaluation of the program achieved the greatest. A number of organizational and community level processes were also identified that supported the individual empowerment of those taking part.
This study supports the use of multilevel empowerment approaches to health as they help to identify the ideal characteristics that organizations and communities should possess and the potential structural changes required to support individual empowerment.
KeywordsWomen’s development Social inequalities Immigration Integration Health promotion
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- Berelson B (1995) Content analysis in communication research. Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
- Gerbner G, Holsti OR, Krippendorff K et al (1969) The analysis of communication content. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kilian R, Lindenbach I, Löbig U et al (2003) Indicators of empowerment and disempowerment in the subjective evaluation of the psychiatric treatment process by persons with severe and persistent mental illness: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. Soc Sci Med 57:1127–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayring P (2002) Qualitative content analysis—research instrument or mode of interpretation? In: Kiegelmann M (ed) The role of the researcher in qualitative psychology. Huber, Tuebingen, pp 139–148Google Scholar
- Mead GH (1968) Geist, Identität und Gesellschaft [mind, identity and society]. Suhrkamp, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
- Minkler M, Wallerstein N (2003) Community based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Zimmerman MA et al (1995) Empowerment as a mulit-level construct: perceived control at the individual, organizational and community levels. Health Educ Res 10:309–327Google Scholar
- Wallerstein N (2006) What is the evidence of effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network report). http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E88086.pdf. Accessed 28 February 08
- WHO (1997) The jakarta declaration on leading health promotion into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 12:261–264Google Scholar
- Zimmerman MA (2000) Empowerment theory. psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In: Rappaport J, Seidman E (eds) Handbook of community psychology. Kluwer Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar