International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 59–69 | Cite as

Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments

  • Andrea Abraham
  • Kathrin Sommerhalder
  • Thomas Abel
Review

Abstract

Objectives

The present literature review conceptualises landscape as a health resource that promotes physical, mental, and social well-being. Different health-promoting landscape characteristics are discussed.

Methods

This article is based on a scoping study which represents a special kind of qualitative literature review. Over 120 studies have been reviewed in a five-step-procedure, resulting in a heuristic device.

Results

A set of meaningful pathways that link landscape and health have been identified. Landscapes have the potential to promote mental well-being through attention restoration, stress reduction, and the evocation of positive emotions; physical well-being through the promotion of physical activity in daily life as well as leisure time and through walkable environments; and social well-being through social integration, social engagement and participation, and through social support and security.

Conclusion

This scoping study allows us to systematically describe the potential of landscape as a resource for physical, mental and social well-being. A heuristic framework is presented that can be applied in future studies, facilitating systematic and focused research approaches and informing practical public health interventions.

Keywords

Landscape Well-being Health-promoting behaviour Resources Scoping study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This literature review was partly funded by the Swiss Foundation for Landscape Conservation, the Swiss Society of Doctors for the Environment, the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, and the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment. We express our appreciation to these organizations for making our scoping study possible.

References

  1. Adams M, Cox T, Moore G, Croxford B, Refaee M, Sharples S (2006) Sustainable soundscapes: noise policy and the urban experience. Urban Stud 43:2385–2398Google Scholar
  2. Addy CL, Wilson DK, Kirtland KA, Ainsworth BE, Sharpe P, Kimsey D (2004) Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. Am J Public Health 94:440–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Meth 8:19–32Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong DA (2000) Survey of community gardens in upstate New York: implications for health promotion and community development. Health Place 6:319–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson R (2007) Ecology of sound: the sonic order of urban space. Urban Stud 44:1905–1917Google Scholar
  6. Augenstein I (2002) Die Ästhetik der Landschaft. Ein Bewertungsverfahren für die planerische Umweltvorsorge. Weissensee Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Badger D, Nursten J, Williams P, Woodward M (2000) Should all literature reviews be systematic? Eval Res Educ 14:220–230Google Scholar
  8. Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N (2001) Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med 33:434–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauer MW, Gaskell G (2000) Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum F, Palmer C (2002) ‘Opportunity structures’: urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia. Health Promot Int 17:351–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baur B, Gilgen C (1999) Der Allschwiler Wald (The forest of Allschwil.). Verkehrs- und Kulturverein, AllschwilGoogle Scholar
  12. Berto R (2005) Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. J Environ Psychol 25:249–259Google Scholar
  13. Booth ML, Owen N, Bauman A, Clavisi O, Leslie E (2000) Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Prev Med 31:15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown KH, Jameton AL (2000) Public health implications of urban agriculture. J Public Health Policy 21:20–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchecker M, Hunziker M, Kienast F (2003) Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landsc Urban Plan 64:29–46Google Scholar
  16. Cackowski JM, Nasar JL (2003) The restorative effects of roadside vegetation—implications for automobile driver anger and frustration. Environ Behav 35:736–751Google Scholar
  17. Carles JL, Lopez Barrio I, de Lucio JA (1999) Sound influence on landscape values. Landsc Urban Plan 43:191–200Google Scholar
  18. Cervero R, Duncan M (2003) Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Am J Public Health 93:1478–1483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Coen SE, Ross NA (2006) Exploring the material basis for health: characteristics of parks in Montreal neighborhoods with contrasting health outcomes. Health Place 12:361–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Coley RL, Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (1997) Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environ Behav 29:468–494Google Scholar
  21. Council of Europe (2000) European landscape convention. Vol European Treaty Series No. 176:1–9Google Scholar
  22. Craig CL, Brownson RC, Cragg SE, Dunn AL (2002) Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: a study examining walking to work. Am J Prev Med 23:36–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Davenport MA, Anderson DH (2005) Getting from sense of place to place-based management: an interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Soc Nat Resour 18:625–641Google Scholar
  24. Doyle R, Krasny M (2003) Participatory rural appraisal as an approach to environmental education in urban community gardens. Environ Educ Res 9:91–115Google Scholar
  25. Ewert AHJ (1991) Group development in the natural environment. Expectations, outcomes and techniques. Environ Behav 23:592–615Google Scholar
  26. Eyler AA, Baker E, Cromer L, King AC, Brownson RC, Donatelle RJ (1998) Physical activity and minority women: a qualitative study. Health Educ Behav 25:640–652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Frank LD, Engelke PO (2001) The built environment and human activity patterns: exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. J Plan Lit 16:202–218Google Scholar
  28. Fredrickson LM, Anderson DH (1999) A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. J Environ Psychol 19:21–39Google Scholar
  29. French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW (2001) Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annu Rev Public Health 22:309–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Frumkin P (2001) Beyond toxicity—human health and the natural environment. Am J Prev Med 20:234–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Frumkin H (2003) Healthy places: exploring the evidence. Am J Public Health 93:1451–1456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Frumkin H, Frank L, Jackson R (2004) Urban sprawl and public health. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Gasser K, Kaufmann-Hayoz R (2004) Woods, trees and human health & well-being (Wald und Volksgesundheit). Literatur und projekte aus der Schweiz. Interfakultäre Koordinationsstelle für Allgemeine Ökologie (IKAÖ), BernGoogle Scholar
  34. Ge J, Hokao K (2005) Applying the methods of image evaluation and spatial analysis to study the sound environment of urban street areas. J Environ Psychol 25:455–466Google Scholar
  35. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Öhrström E (2007) Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 83:115–126Google Scholar
  36. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ (2002) The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med 54:1793–1812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM (2006) Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics 117:417–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hancock T (2001) People, partnerships and human progress: building community capital. Health Promot Int 16:275–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hartig T, Book A, Garvill J, Olsson T, Garling T (1996) Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scand J Psychol 37:378–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hartig T, Nyberg L, Nilsson LG, Garling T (1999) Testing for mood congruent recall with environmentally induced mood. J Environ Psychol 19:353–367Google Scholar
  41. Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, Davis DS, Garling T (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol 23:109–123Google Scholar
  42. Health Council of the Netherlands, Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Spatial Planning NatE. Nature and Health (2004) The influence of nature on social, psychological and physical well-being. Health Council of the Netherlands and RMNO, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  43. Herzog TR, Chernick KK (2000) Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. J Environ Psychol 20:29–39Google Scholar
  44. Herzog TR, Black AM, Fountaine KA, Knotts DJ (1997) Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. J Environ Psychol 17:165–170Google Scholar
  45. Humpel N, Marshall AL, Leslie E, Bauman A, Owen N (2004a) Changes in neighborhood walking are related to changes in perceptions of environmental attributes. Ann Behav Med 27:60–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Humpel N, Owen N, Iverson D, Leslie E, Bauman A (2004b) Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. Am J Prev Med 26:119–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ingold T (1992) Culture and the perception of the environment. In: Parkin D, Croll E (eds) Bush base, forest farm: culture, environment and development. Routledge, London, pp 39–56Google Scholar
  48. Irvine S, Johnson L, Peters K (1999) Community gardens and sustainable land use planning: a case-study of the Alex Wilson community garden. Local Environ 4:33–46Google Scholar
  49. Jackson LE (2003) The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landsc Urban Plan 64:191–200Google Scholar
  50. Kaplan S (1995a) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15:169–182Google Scholar
  51. Kaplan S (1995b) The urban forest as a source of psychological well-being. In: Bradley GA (ed) Urban forest landscapes: integrating multidisciplinary perspectives. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 101–108Google Scholar
  52. Kaplan R (2001) The nature of the view from home—psychological benefits. Environ Behav 33:507–542Google Scholar
  53. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Kaspar H, Bühler E (2006) Räume und Orte als soziale Konstrukte. Plädoyer für einen verstärkten Einbezug sozialer Aspekte in die Gestaltung städtischer Parkanlagen (Spaces and places as social constructs. A plea for considering social aspects in the design of urban parks.). RaumPlanung 125:37–41Google Scholar
  55. Korpela K, Hartig T (1996) Restorative qualities of favorite places. J Environ Psychol 16:221–233Google Scholar
  56. Korpela KM, Hartig T, Kaiser FG, Fuhrer U (2001) Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environ Behav 33:572–589Google Scholar
  57. Korpela KM, Klementtila T, Hietanen JK (2002) Evidence for rapid affective evaluation of environmental scenes. Environ Behav 34:634–650Google Scholar
  58. Kuo FE (2001) Coping with poverty—impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environ Behav 33:5–34Google Scholar
  59. Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001a) Aggression and violence in the inner city—effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environ Behav 33:543–571Google Scholar
  60. Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001b) Environment and crime in the inner city—does vegetation reduce crime? Environ Behav 33:343–367Google Scholar
  61. Kuo FE, Bacaicoa M, Sullivan WC (1998) Transforming inner-city landscapes—trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environ Behav 30:28–59Google Scholar
  62. Kvale S (1995) The social construction of validity. Qual Inq 1:19–40Google Scholar
  63. Kweon BS, Sullivan WC, Wiley AR (1998) Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environ Behav 30:832–858Google Scholar
  64. Lamnek S (2005) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Beltz Verlag, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  65. Lamprecht M, Stamm H (2002) Bekanntheit, Nutzung und Bewertung der Vita Parcours durch die Schweizer Bevölkerung. Unveröffentlichter Bericht, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  66. Laumann K, Garling T, Stormark KM (2003) Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 23:125–134Google Scholar
  67. Lee JH, Scott D, Floyd MF (2001) Structural inequalities in outdoor recreation participation: a multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. J Leisure Res 33:427–449Google Scholar
  68. Leslie E, Saelens B, Frank L et al (2005) Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study. Health Place 11:227–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Leyden KM (2003) Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health 93:1546–1551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Li F, Fisher KJ, Brownson RC, Bosworth M (2005) Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:558–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Macintyre S (2007) Deprivation amplification revisited; or, is it always true that poorer places have poorer access to resources for healthy diets and physical activity? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4:1–7Google Scholar
  72. Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, Brown P, St Leger L (2006) Healthy nature healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promot Int 21:45–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Marti B, Lamprecht M, Bächler J, Spring S, Gutzwiller F (2002) Bekanntheit, Nutzung und Bewertung des Vitaparcours: Vergleich zwischen 1997 und 2001 (Attitude towards, use of the fitness trail «Vitaparcours»: comparison between 1997 and 2001.). Schweiz Z Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie 50:161–163Google Scholar
  74. McCormack G, Giles-Corti B, Lange A, Smith T, Martin K, Pikora TJ (2004) An update of recent evidence of the relationship between objective and self-report measures of the physical environment and physical activity behaviours. J Sci Med Sport 7:81–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Milligan C, Bingley A (2007) Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Health Place 13:799–811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Milligan C, Gatrell A, Bingley A (2004) ‘Cultivating health’: therapeutic landscapes and older people in northern England. Soc Sci Med 58:1781–1793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Neff LJ, Ainsworth BE, Wheeler FC, Krumwiede SE, Trepal AJ (2000) Assessment of trail use in a community park. Fam Community Health 23:76–84Google Scholar
  78. O’Connor P (2008) The sound of silence: valuing acoustics in heritage conservation. Geogr Res 46:361–373Google Scholar
  79. Oreszczyn S, Lane A (2000) The meaning of hedgerows in the English landscape: different stakeholder perspectives and the implications for future hedge management. J Environm Manage 60:101–118Google Scholar
  80. Parsons R, Daniel TC (2002) Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landsc Urban Plan 60:43–56Google Scholar
  81. Parsons R, Tassinary LG, Ulrich RS, Hebl MR, Grossman-Alexander M (1998) The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization. J Environ Psychol 18:113–140Google Scholar
  82. Payne LL, Mowen AJ, Orsega-Smith E (2002) An examination of park preferences and behaviors among urban residents: the role of residential location, race, and age. Leis Sci 24:181–198Google Scholar
  83. Pikora T, Giles-Corti B, Bull F, Jamrozik K, Donovan R (2003) Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc Sci Med 56:1693–1703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Pikora TJ, Giles-Corti B, Knuiman MW, Bull FC, Jamrozik K, Donovan RJ (2006) Neighborhood environmental factors correlated with walking near home: using SPACES. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:708–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Pohl SL, Borrie WT, Patterson ME (2000) Women, wilderness, and everyday life: a documentation of the connection between wilderness recreation and women’s everyday lives. J Leis Res 32:415–434Google Scholar
  86. Popkin BM, Duffey K, Gordon-Larsen P (2005) Environmental influences on food choice, physical activity and energy balance. Physiol Behav 86:603–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Porteous JD (1990) Landscapes of the mind: worlds of sense and metaphor. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  88. Powell KE (2005) Land use, the built environment, and physical activity: a public health mixture; a public health solution. Am J Prev Med 28:216–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Pretty J, Griffin M, Peacock J, Hine R, Sellens M, South NA (2005a) Countryside for health and wellbeing: the physical and mental health benefits of green exercise. Sheffield Hallam University, Countryside Recreation Network, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  90. Pretty J, Peacock J, Sellens M, Griffin M (2005b) The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. Int J Environ Health Res 15:319–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Raimbault M, Dubois D (2005) Urban soundscapes: experiences and knowledge. Cities 22:339–350Google Scholar
  92. Rishbeth C, Finney N (2006) Novelty and nostalgia in urban greenspace: refugee perspectives. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 97:281–295Google Scholar
  93. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D (2003) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 93:1552–1558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sallis JF, Glanz K (2006) The role of built environments in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Future Child 16:89–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Seeland K, Ballesteros N (2004) Kulturvergleichende Untersuchungen zum sozialintegrativen Potential gestalteter urbaner Naturräume in den Agglomerationen Genf, Lugano und Zürich. Forstwissenschaftliche Beiträge 31Google Scholar
  96. Sharpe EK (2005) Delivering communitas: wilderness adventure and the making of community. J Leisure Res 37:255–280Google Scholar
  97. St Leger L (2003) Health and nature—new challenges for health promotion. Health Promot Int 18:173–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Staats H, Hartig T (2004) Alone or with a friend: a social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. J Environ Psychol 24:199–211Google Scholar
  99. Staats H, Gatersleben B, Hartig T (1997) Change in mood as a function of environmental design: arousal and pleasure on a simulated forest hike. J Environ Psychol 17:283–300Google Scholar
  100. Staats H, Kieviet A, Hartig T (2003) Where to recover from attentional fatigue: an expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. J Environ Psychol 23:147–157Google Scholar
  101. Steinke I (2003) Gütekriterien qualitativer Forschung. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds) Qualitative Forschung, Ein Handbuch. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg, pp 319–331Google Scholar
  102. Stigsdotter U, Grahn P (2004) A garden at your doorstep may reduce stress—private gardens as restorative environments in the city. OPENspace—an international conference on inclusive environments. EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  103. Sullivan WC, Kuo FE, DePooter SF (2004) The fruit of urban nature—vital neighborhood spaces. Environ Behav 36:678–700Google Scholar
  104. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (1999) Gesellschaftliche Ansprüche an den Schweizer Wald. Meinungsumfrage (Social requirements on Swiss forests. Opinion survey.). Swiss Federal Office for the Environment, BernGoogle Scholar
  105. Takano T, Nakamura K (2004) Participatory research to enhance vision sharing for Healthy Town initiatives in Japan. Health Promot Int 19:299–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Tennessen C, Cimprich B (1995) Views to nature. Effects on attention. J Environ Psychol 15:77–85Google Scholar
  107. Titze S, Stronegger W, Owen N (2005) Prospective study of individual, social, and environmental predictors of physical activity: women’s leisure running. Psychol Sport Exerc 6:363–376Google Scholar
  108. Twiss J, Dickinson J, Duma S, Kleinman T, Paulsen H, Rilveria L (2003) Community gardens: lessons learned from California healthy cities and communities. Am J Public Health 93:1435–1438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Ulrich R, Simons R, Losito B, Fiorito E, Miles M, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–203Google Scholar
  110. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Miles MA (2003) Effects of environmental simulations and television on blood donor stress. J Archit Plann Res 20:38–47Google Scholar
  111. Wakefield S, Yeudall F, Taron C, Reynolds J, Skinner A (2007) Growing urban health: community gardening in South-East Toronto. Health Promot Int 22:92–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Waliczek TM, Zajicek JM, Lineberger RD (2005) The influence of gardening activities on consumer perceptions of life satisfaction. Hortscience 40:1360–1365Google Scholar
  113. Wendel-Vos GCW, Schuit AJ, De Niet R, Boshuizen HC, Saris WHM, Kromhout D (2004) Factors of the physical environment associated with walking and bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:725–730PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. WHO (1986) Ottawa-charter for health promotion. First International Conference on Health Promotion. Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  115. Wilbur J, Chandler P, Dancy B, Choi J, Plonczynski D (2002) Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity in urban, African American women. Women’s Health 36:17–28Google Scholar
  116. Yang W, Kang J (2005) Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Appl Acoust 66:211–229Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Abraham
    • 1
  • Kathrin Sommerhalder
    • 1
  • Thomas Abel
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Social and Behavioural Health Research, Department of Social and Preventive MedicineUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations