Advertisement

On Space and Depth in Resolution

  • Alexander Razborov
Article

Abstract

We show that the total space in resolution, as well as in any other reasonable proof system, is equal (up to a polynomial and \({(\log n)^{O(1)}}\) factors) to the minimum refutation depth. In particular, all these variants of total space are equivalent in this sense. The same conclusion holds for variable space as long as we penalize for excessively (that is, super-exponential) long proofs, which makes the question about equivalence of variable space and depth about the same as the question of (non)-existence of “supercritical” tradeoffs between the variable space and the proof length. We provide a partial negative answer to this question: for all \({s(n) \leq n^{1/2}}\) there exist CNF contradictions \({\tau_n}\) that possess refutations with variable space s(n) but such that every refutation of \({\tau_n}\) with variable space \({o(s^2)}\) must have double exponential length \({2^{2^{\Omega(s)}}}\). We also include a much weaker tradeoff result between variable space and depth in the opposite range \({s(n) \ll \log n}\) and show that no supercritical tradeoff is possible in this range.

Keywords

Resolution proofs supercritical tradeoff variable and total space 

Subject classification

Primary 03F20 Secondary 68Q17 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alekhnovich M., Ben-Sasson E., Razborov A., Wigderson A. (2002) Space complexity in propositional calculus. SIAM Journal on Computing 31(4): 1184–1211MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Alekhnovich M., Razborov A. (2008) Resolution is not automatizable unless \({W[P]}\) is tractable. SIAM Journal on Computing 38(4): 1347–1363MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Atserias A., Dalmau V. (2008) A combinatorial characterization of resolution width. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 74(3): 323–334MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Babai L., Seress A. (1992) On the Diameter of Permutation Groups. European Journal of Combinatorics 13: 231–243MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. B. Barak & D. Steurer (2014). Sum-of-squares proofs and the quest toward optimal algorithms. In Proceedings of International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM), volume IV, 509–533.Google Scholar
  6. C. Beck, J. Nordström & B. Tang (2013). Some trade-off results for polynomial calculus: extended abstract. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, 813–822.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Sasson E. (2009) Size-space tradeoffs for resolution. SIAM Journal on Computing 38(6): 2511–2525MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Ben-Sasson E., Wigderson A. (2001) Short Proofs are Narrow - Resolution made Simple. Journal of the ACM 48(2): 149–169MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Berkholz & J. Nordström (2016a). Near-Optimal Lower Bounds on Quantifier Depth and Weisfeiler-Leman Refinement Steps. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 267–276.Google Scholar
  10. C. Berkholz & J. Nordström (2016b). Supercritical Space-Width Trade-offs for Resolution. In Proceedings of the 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, 57:1–57:14.Google Scholar
  11. A. Blake (1937). Canonical expressions in Boolean algebra. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. I. Bonacina (2016). Total space in Resolution is at least width squared. In Proceedings of the 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, 56:1–56:13.Google Scholar
  13. Cook S.A., Reckhow A.R. (1979) The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems. Journal of Symbolic Logic 44(1): 36–50MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Esteban J.L., Torán J. (2001) Space bounds for resolution. Information and Computation 171(1): 84–97MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Y. Filmus, M. Lauria, M. Mikša, J. Nordström & M. Vinyals (2015). From Small Space to Small Width in Resolution. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 16(4), article 28.Google Scholar
  16. Grigoriev D. (2001) Linear lower bounds on degrees of Postivestellensatz calculus proofs for the parity. Theoretical Computer Science 259: 613–622MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Nordström J. (2013) Pebble Games, Proof Complexity and Time-Space Trade-Offs. Logical Methods in Computer Science 9: 1–63MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Razborov (2016). A New Kind of Tradeoffs in Propositional Proof Complexity. Journal of the ACM 62(3), article 16.Google Scholar
  19. A. Razborov (2017). On the Width of Semi-Algebraic Proofs and Algorithms. Mathematics of Operation Research http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/moor.2016.0840.
  20. Robinson J.A. (1965) A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle. Journal of the ACM 12(1): 23–41MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Urquhart A. (2011) The Depth of Resolution Proofs. Studia Logica 99: 349–364MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Steklov Mathematical InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations