Advertisement

Alpine Botany

, Volume 128, Issue 2, pp 179–189 | Cite as

Are introduced plants a threat to native pollinator services in montane–alpine environments?

  • Christa M. Miller
  • Barbara I. P. Barratt
  • Katharine J. M. Dickinson
  • Janice M. LordEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

While introduced plants often have restricted distributions at high elevations, their impacts may be more extensive if they compete for native pollinators, potentially reducing pollinator services to native biotically pollinated plants. Conversely, introduced biotically pollinated plants might facilitate improved pollinator services to native plants by supporting higher pollinator densities and extending the flowering season. We examined weekly pollinator visitation to native and introduced plants, at five elevations over two flowering seasons on The Remarkables range, south-central South Island, New Zealand. In this area, introduced plants dominate the vegetation at lower elevations but are restricted to disturbed areas above treeline. We tested whether pollinator visitation rates and quantities of introduced pollen on insects or transferred to native flowers differed with elevation and community context, or with the local abundance of introduced flowers regardless of elevation. Introduced biotically pollinated plants produced more flowers and flowered later than most native species and were extensively utilised by native solitary bees. Weekly visitation rates to native flowers were higher in the first half of the flowering season than the second half, and were positively correlated with visitation rates to co-occurring introduced flowers. Introduced flower abundance did not affect visitation to native flowers but did significantly predict the occurrence of introduced pollen on native insects and stigmas of native flowers. Pollen contamination was also higher in the latter part of the flowering season. While an increase in introduced flowers at high elevations may benefit native pollinators by increasing the quantity and duration of floral resources available, the heavy use of introduced flowers by native bees will lead to at least localised stigma contamination, particularly for late flowering species. However, more information is required on foraging ranges of native pollinators and pollen limitation in native species to understand the consequences of introduced species expansion into alpine areas.

Keywords

Asteraceae Biological invasions Flower visitation Flowering phenology Insect behaviour Stigma clogging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Vickey Tomlinson for assistance with equipment, Jeanne Hutchinson, Olivia Sawrey and Dana Dudle for assistance in the field and Barry Donovan, John Dugdale, Brian Patrick and Dave Voice for insect identifications. We also appreciate the valuable contributions of two anonymous reviewers.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to study design, CM conducted experiments and wrote the first draft, JML led subsequent writing and analysis, all authors commented on final manuscript.

Funding

CM was supported by a University of Otago PhD scholarship and a Brenda Shore Award (New Zealand Federation of Graduate Women), with additional funding from the Miss E. L. Hellaby Indigenous Grasslands Research Trust.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Work in the Rastus Burn Recreational Reserve was conducted under a Department of Conservation research permit. Ngāi Tahu (traditional land owners) were consulted prior to the commencement of the study through the University of Otago Ngāi Tahu Research Consultation committee.

Supplementary material

35_2018_206_MOESM1_ESM.docx (47 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 47 KB)

References

  1. Aizen MA, Morales CL, Morales JM (2008) Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs. PLoS Biol 6:e31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht M, Schmid B, Hautier Y, Müller CB (2012) Diverse pollinator communities enhance plant reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 279:4845–4852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht M, Padrón B, Bartomeus I, Traveset A (2014) Consequences of plant invasions on compartmentalization and species’ roles in plant–pollinator networks. Proc R Soc B 281:20140773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander JM, Lembrechts JJ, Cavieres LA, Dachler C, Haider S, Kueffer C, Liu G, McDougall K, Milbau A, Pauchard A, Rew LJ, Seipel T (2016) Plant invasions into mountains and alpine ecosystems: current status and future challenges. Alpine Bot 126:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arroyo MTK, Armesto JJ, Primack RB (1985) Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile II. Effect of temperature on visitation rates and pollination possibilities. Plant Syst Evol 149:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartomeus I, Vilà M, Santamaría L (2008) Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant–pollinator networks. Oecologia 155:761–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergman P, Molau U, Holmgren B (1996) Micrometerological impacts on insect activity and plant reproductive success in an alpine environment, Swedish Lapland. Arct Alp Res 28:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bingham RA, Orthner AR (1998) Efficient pollination of alpine plants. Nature 391:238–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bischoff M (2008) Pollination ecology of the New Zealand alpine flora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Bischoff M, Campbell DR, Lord JM, Robertson AW (2013a) The relative importance of solitary bees and syrphid flies as pollinators of two outcrossing plant species in the New Zealand alpine. Austral Ecol 38: 169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bischoff M, Lord JM, Robertson AW, Dyer AG (2013b) Hymenopteran pollinators as agents of selection on flower colour in the New Zealand alpine region: salient chromatic signals enhance flower discrimination. N Z J Bot 51:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjerknes A-L, Totland Ø, Hegland SJ, Nielsen A (2007) Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biol Conserv 138:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (Purple Loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83:2328–2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruckman D, Campbell DR (2014) Floral neighborhood influences pollinator assemblages and effective pollination in a native plant. Oecologia 176:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buxton MN, Anderson BJ, Lord JM (2018) The secret service: analysis of the available knowledge on moths as pollinators in New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 42:1–9Google Scholar
  16. Campbell DR, Bischoff M, Lord JM, Robertson AW (2010) Flower colour influences insect visitation in alpine New Zealand. Ecology 91:2638–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell DR, Bischoff M, Lord JM, Robertson AW (2012) Where have all the blue flowers gone? Pollinator responses and selection on flower colour in New Zealand Wahlenbergia albomarginata. J Evol Biol 25: 352–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chittka L, Schürkens S (2001) Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature 411:653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dafni A (1992) Pollination ecology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Donovan BJ (2007) Fauna of New Zealand, Number 57: Apoidea (Insecta:Hymenoptera). Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  21. Dorado J, Vázquez DP (2014) The diversity–stability relationship in floral production. Oikos 123:1137–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esler AE, Astridge SJ (1986) The naturalisation of plants in urban Auckland, New Zealand 2. Records of introduction and naturalisation. NZ J Botany 25:523–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fontaine C, Collin CL, Dajoz I (2008) Generalist foraging of pollinators: diet expansion at high density. J Ecol 96:1002–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. García-Camacho R, Totland Ø (2009) Pollen limitation in the alpine: a meta-analysis. Arct Antarct Alp Res 41(1):103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghazoul J (2006) Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. J Ecol 94:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gómez JM, Abdelaziz M, Lorite J, Muñoz-Pajares AJ, Perfectti F (2010) Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation. J Ecol 98:1243–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodell K, Parker IM (2017) Invasion of a dominant floral resource: effects on the floral community and pollination of native plants. Ecology 98:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graves SD, Shapiro AM (2003) Exotics as host plants for the Californian butterfly fauna. Biol Conserv 110:413–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halloy SRP, Mark AF (2003) Climate-change effects on alpine plant biodiversity: a New Zealand perspective on quantifying threats. Arct Antarct Alp Res 35:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirao AS, Kameyama Y, Ohara Y, Isagi Y, Kudo G (2006) Seasonal changes in pollinator activity influence pollen dispersal and seed production of the alpine shrub Rhododendron aureum (Ericaceae). Mol Ecol 15:1165–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Iler AM, Goodell K (2014) Relative floral density of an invasive plant affects pollinator foraging behaviour on a native plant. J Poll Ecol 13: 174–183Google Scholar
  32. Iwasaki JM, Dickinson KJM, Barratt BIP, Mercer AR, Jowett TWD, Lord JM (2018) Floral usage partitioning and competition between social (Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris) and solitary bees in New Zealand: niche partitioning via floral preferences? Austral Ecol Rev (in review) Google Scholar
  33. Jakobsson A, Padrón B, Traveset A (2008) Pollen transfer from invasive Carpobrotus spp. to natives—a study of pollinator behaviour and reproduction success. Biol Conserv 141: 136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnston F, Pickering C (2001) Alien plants in the Australian Alps. Mt Res Devel 21:284–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lázaro A, Lundgren R, Totland Ø (2009) Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos 118:691–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lembrechts JJ, Pauchard A, Lenoir J, Nuñez MA, Geron C, Ven A, Bravo-Monasterio P, Teneb E, Nijs I, Milbau A (2016) Disturbance is the key to plant invasions in cold environments. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 113:14061–14066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lloyd DG (1985) Progress in understanding the natural history of New Zealand plants. N Z J Bot 23:707–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lopezaraiza-Mikel ME, Hayes RB, Whalley MR, Memmott J (2007) The impact of an alien plant on a native plant–pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol Lett 10:539–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mark AF (2012) Above the treeline. Craig Potton Publishing, NelsonGoogle Scholar
  41. Mark AF, Dickindon KJM, Hofstede RGM (2000) Alpine vegetation, plant distribution, life forms, and environments in a perhumid New Zealand region: oceanic and tropical high mountain affinities. Arct Antarct Alp Res 32:240–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Masters JA, Emery SM (2015) The showy invasive plant Ranunculus ficaria facilitates pollinator activity, pollen deposition, but not always seed production for two native spring ephemeral plants. Biol Invasions 17:2329–2337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McDougall KL, Morgan JW, Walsh NG, Williams RJ (2005) Plant invasions in treeless vegetation of the Australian Alps. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McGimpsey V, Lord JM (2015) In a world of white, flower colour matters: a white-purple transition signals lack of reward in an alpine Euphrasia Austral Ecol 40:701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Memmott J, Waser NM (2002) Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269(1508):2395–2399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller CM (2015) The impact of introduced flowering species on alpine plant–pollinator networks in southern New Zealand. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Otago, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  47. Mitchell RJ, Flanagan RJ, Brown BJ, Waser NM, Karron JD (2009) New frontiers in competition for pollination. Ann Bot 103:1403–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moar NT (1993) Pollen grains of New Zealand dicotyledonous plants. Manaaki Whenua Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  49. Montero-Castaño A, Vilá M (2012) Impact of landscape alteration and invasions on pollinators: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 100:884–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morales CL, Traveset A (2009) A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol Lett 12:716–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Muñoz AA, Cavieres LA (2008) The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. J Ecol 96: 459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newstrom L, Robertson A (2005) Progress in understanding pollination systems in New Zealand. N Z J Bot 43:1–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Olesen JM, Jordano P (2002) Geographic patterns in plant–pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology 83:2416–2424Google Scholar
  54. Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Patrick B, Patrick H (2012) Butterflies of the South Pacific. Otago University Press, DunedinGoogle Scholar
  56. Pauchard A, Kueffer C, Dietz H, Daehler CC, Alexander J, Edwards PJ, Arévalo JR, Cavieres LA, Guisan A, Haider S, Jakobs G, McDougall K, Millar CI, Naylor BJ, Parks CG, Rew LJ, Seipel T (2009) Ain’t no mountain high enough: plant invasions reaching high elevations. Front Ecol Environ 7:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Petitpierre B, McDougall K, Siepel T, Broennimann O, Guisan A, Kueffer C (2016) Will climate change increase the risk of plant invasions into mountains? Ecol Appl 26:530–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pleasants JM (1983) Structure of plant and pollinator communities. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp 375–393Google Scholar
  59. Primack RB (1978) Variability in New Zealand montane and alpine pollinator assemblages. N Z J Ecol 1:66–73Google Scholar
  60. Primack RB (1983) Insect pollination in New Zealand mountain flora. N Z J Bot 21: 317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pyšek P, Jarošik V, Chytrý Danihelka J, Kühn I, Pergl J, Tichý L, Biesmeijer JC, Ellis WN, Kunin WE, Settele J (2011) Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. Ecol Monogr 81:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sawrey O (2013) Effect of altitude and co-occurring species on sequential reproductive stages in a grassland harebell. New Zealand. Unpublished M.Sc. Dissertation, University of Otago, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  63. Sullivan JJ, Williams PA, Timmins SM, Smale MC (2009) Distribution and spread of environmental weeds along New Zealand roadsides. N Z J Ecol 33:190–204Google Scholar
  64. Tiedeken EJ, Stout JC (2015) Insect–flower interaction network structure is resilient to a temporary pulse of floral resources from invasive Rhododendron ponticum. PLOS ONE 10(3):e0119733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tomb AS (1975) Pollen morphology in Tribe Lactuceae (Compositae). Grana 15:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Traveset A, Richardson DM (2006) Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Trunschke J, Stöcklin J (2017) Plasticity of flower longevity in alpine plants is increased in populations from high elevation compared to low elevation populations. Alpine Bot 127:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vilà M, Bartomeus I, Dietzsch AC, Petanidou T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Stout JC, Tscheulin T (2009) Invasive plant integration into native plant–pollinator networks across Europe. Proc R Soc B 276:3887–3893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Waters SM, Fisher SE, Hille Ris Lambers J (2014) Neighborhood-contingent indirect interactions between native and exotic plants: multiple shared pollinators mediate reproductive success during invasions. Oikos 123: 433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilton AD, Brietwiesser I (2000) Composition of the New Zealand seed plant flora. N Z J Bot 38: 537–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wratten SD, White AJ, Bowie MH, Berry NA, Weigmann U (1995) Phenology and ecology of hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) in New-Zealand. Environ Entomol 24:595–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zefferman E, Stevens JT, Charles GK, Dunbar-Irwin M, Emam T, Fick S, Morales LV, Wolf KM, Young DJ, Young TP (2015) Plant communities in harsh sites are less invaded: a summary of observations and proposed explanations. AoB Plants 22:7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Botanical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christa M. Miller
    • 1
  • Barbara I. P. Barratt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Katharine J. M. Dickinson
    • 1
  • Janice M. Lord
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural CentreMosgielNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations