Botanica Helvetica

, Volume 119, Issue 1, pp 53–61 | Cite as

Geographic variation among Iberian communities of the exotic halophyte Cotula coronopifolia

  • José Carlos Costa
  • Carlos Neto
  • Pedro Arsénio
  • Jorge Capelo
Article

Abstract

The exotic annual forb Cotula coronopifolia has locally invaded salt marsh communities naturally dominated by Spergularia marina along large parts of the Iberian coastline. While the floristic composition of C. coronopifolia dominated communities on the Atlantic coast of northern Portugal has already been described, this information was missing for the southern part of the country. We carried out a phytosociological study at 21 sites along the south-western and southern coast of mainland Portugal to determine the ecology and syntaxonomical status of these communities, and to compare them to the Atlantic ones. Plant communities co-dominated by C. coronopifolia and S. marina were generally found in the sub-halophilous inner part of salt marshes. They occupied gaps within taller perennial vegetation (Juncus maritimus formations), such as small pools temporarily inundated with brackish waters. Southern communities differed from the northern ones by the high abundance of Triglochin barrelieri and the absence of salt-intolerant species that are present in the Atlantic communities. This difference may result from the drier summer climate in southern regions, leading to intense water evaporation and thus, more saline conditions. We propose to classify the Mediterranean communities in a new association, the Cotulo coronopifoliae–Triglochinetum barrelieri. High abundance of Limonium diffusum further allowed the distinction of a new subassociation limonietosum diffusi for the southernmost part of Portugal. Results show that invasive exotic plants can form new phytosociological associations with a characteristic species composition, but that these community types, despite being dominated by the same invader, still show ecological and geographical differentiation.

Keywords

Iberian Peninsula Phytosociology Pioneer vegetation Salt marshes Syntaxonomy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and also S. Güsewell, whose suggestions much improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Alves P (2004) Sobre as comunidades de Cotula coronopifolia L. do litoral português. Quercetea 4:151–155Google Scholar
  2. Bueno A. 1997. Flora y vegetación de los estuarios asturianos. Cuadernos de Medio Ambiente Naturaleza 3, Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Principado de AsturiasGoogle Scholar
  3. Campos JA, Herrera M, Biurrun I, Loidi J (2004) The role of alien plants in the natural coastal vegetation in central-northern Spain. Biodivers Conserv 13:2275–2293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter C, Ungar IA (2004) Relationships between seed germinability of Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae) and the formation of zonal communities in an inland salt marsh. Ann Bot 93:119–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castroviejo S, Laínz M, López González G, Monserrat P, Muñoz Garmendia F, Paiva J, Villar L (eds) (1986–2007) Flora Iberica, Vols I-VIII, X, XIV, XV, XVIII, XXI. Real Jardín Botánico de Madrid, CSIC, MadridGoogle Scholar
  6. Chae S, Warde W (2006) Effect of using principal coordinates and principal components on retrieval of clusters. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:1407–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa JC, Lousã M, Espírito Santo MD (1997) Vegetação do Parque Natural da Ria Formosa. Stud. Bot 15:69–157Google Scholar
  8. Costa JC, Aguiar C, Capelo J, Lousã M, Neto C (1999) Biogeografia de Portugal Continental. Quercetea 0:5–56Google Scholar
  9. Costa JC, Arsénio P, Monteiro-Henriques T, Neto C, Pereira E, Almeida T, Izco J (2009) Finding the boundary between Eurosiberian and Mediterranean salt marshes. J Coast Res 56:1340–1344 (special issue)Google Scholar
  10. Coutinho AXP (1939) Flora de Portugal. Bertrand, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  11. Díaz González TE, Fernández Prieto JA (2005) Prados y pastos cantábricos: origen y diversidad”. In: Roza Delgado B. de la, Martínez Fernández A, Carballal Samalea A (eds) Producciones agroganaderas: Gestión eficiente y conservación del medio natural, vol II. Actas de la XLV Reunión Científica de la Sociedad Española para el Estudio de los Pastos, 699–729Google Scholar
  12. Franco JA (1971) Nova Flora de Portugal (Continente e Açores)—Lycopodiaceae–Umbelliferae, vol I, Author Edition, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  13. Franco JA (1984) Nova Flora de Portugal (Continente e Açores)—Clethraceae–Compositae, vol II, Author Edition, Lisboa Google Scholar
  14. Franco JA, Rocha Afonso MA (1994) Nova Flora de Portugal (Continente e Açores)—Alismataceae–Iridaceae, vol III(1), Escolar Editora, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  15. Franco JA, Rocha Afonso MA (1998) Nova Flora de Portugal (Continente e Açores)—Gramineae, vol III(2), Escolar Editora, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  16. Franco JA, Rocha Afonso MA (2003) Nova Flora de Portugal (Continente e Açores)—Juncaceae–Orchidaceae, vol III(3), Escolar Editora, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  17. Géhu J-M, Rivas-Martínez S (1981) Notions fondamentales de phytosociologie. In: Dierschke H (ed) Syntaxonomie. J Cramer Vaduz 5-33Google Scholar
  18. Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53(3/4):325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hultén E (1968) Flora of Alaska and Neighbouring Territories. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. Izco J, Guitán P, Sánchez JM (1992) La marisma superior cántabro-atlántica meridional: estudio de las comunidades de Juncus maritimus y Elymus pycnanthus. Lazaroa 13:149–169Google Scholar
  21. Manning J, Golblatt P (1996) West Coast. South African Wild Flower Guide 7. Botanical Society of South Africa, KirsstenbochGoogle Scholar
  22. Partridge TR, Wilson JB (1987) Germination in relation to salinity in some plants of salt marshes in Otago, New Zealand. N Z J Bot 25:255–261Google Scholar
  23. Podani J (2001) Syn-Tax 2000. Computer programs for data analysis in ecology and systematics. Scientia Publishing, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramírez C, San Martín J, San Martín C, Contreras D (1987) Estudio florístico y vegetacional de la laguna El Peral, Quinta Región de Chile. Revista Geogr. de Valparaíso 18:105–120Google Scholar
  25. Ramírez C, San Martín C, Contreras D, San Martín J (1989) Flora de las marismas del centro-sur de Chile. Medio Ambiente 10(2):11–24Google Scholar
  26. Rivas-Martínez S (2005) Notions on dynamic-catenal phytosociology as a basis of landscape science. Plant Biosyst 139(2):135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rivas-Martínez S (2007) Mapas de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España Memoria del mapa de vegetación potencial de España. Parte I, Itinera Geobotanica 17:5–436Google Scholar
  28. Rivas-Martínez S, Fernández-González F, Loidi J, Lousã M, Penas A (2001) Syntaxonomical checklist of vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal to association level. Itinera Geobotanica 14:5–341Google Scholar
  29. Rivas-Martínez S, Díaz TE, Fernández-González F, Izco J, Loidi J, Lousã M, Penas A (2002) Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal. Addenda to the Syntaxonomical checklist of 2001. Itinera Geobotanica 15(1,2):5–922Google Scholar
  30. San Martín C, Subiabre M, Ramírez C (2006) A floristic and vegetational study of a latitudinal gradient of salt marshes in South-Central Chile. Cien. Inv. Agr 33(1):33–40Google Scholar
  31. Thiébaut G (2007) Non-indigenous aquatic and semiaquatic plant species in France. In: Francesca G (ed) Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution, and threats, vol 2, pp 209–229Google Scholar
  32. Thompson K, Grime JP (1979) Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J Ecol 67:893–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ungar IA (1998) Are biotic factors significant in influencing the distribution of halophytes in saline habitats? Bot Rev 64:176–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van der Toorn J (1980) On the ecology of Cotula coronopifolia L. and Ranunculus sceleratus L. I. Geographic distribution, habitat, and field observation. Acta Bot. Neerl 29(5/6):385–396Google Scholar
  35. Van der Toorn J, ten Hove HJ (1982) On the ecology of Cotula coronopifolia L. and Ranunculus sceleratus L. II. Experiment on germination, seed longevity, and seedling survival. Acta Oecol 3(17):409–418Google Scholar
  36. Weber HE, Moravec J, Theurillat JP (2000) International code of phytosociological nomenclature, 3rd ed. J Veg Sci 11(5):739–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Switzerland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Carlos Costa
    • 1
  • Carlos Neto
    • 2
  • Pedro Arsénio
    • 3
  • Jorge Capelo
    • 4
  1. 1.Departamento de Protecção de Plantas e de FitoecologiaInstituto Superior de Agronomia, Technical University of Lisbon (TULisbon)LisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de GeografiaFaculdade de Letras de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Secção Autónoma de Arquitectura PaisagistaInstituto Superior de Agronomia, Technical University of Lisbon (TULisbon)LisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Instituto Nacional de Recursos Biológicos, I. P.OeirasPortugal

Personalised recommendations