Advertisement

Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 304–328 | Cite as

Image Block Compressive Sensing Reconstruction via Group-Based Sparse Representation and Nonlocal Total Variation

  • Jin Xu
  • Yuansong Qiao
  • Zhizhong Fu
  • Quan Wen
Article
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Compressive sensing (CS) has recently drawn considerable attentions in signal and image processing communities as a joint sampling and compression approach. Generally, the image CS reconstruction can be formulated as an optimization problem with a properly chosen regularization function based on image priors. In this paper, we propose an efficient image block compressive sensing (BCS) reconstruction method, which combine the best of group-based sparse representation (GSR) model and nonlocal total variation (NLTV) model to regularize the solution space of the image CS recovery optimization problem. Specifically, the GSR model is utilized to simultaneously enforce the intrinsic local sparsity and the nonlocal self-similarity of natural images, while the NLTV model is explored to characterize the smoothness of natural images on a larger scale than the classical total variation (TV) model. To efficiently solve the proposed joint regularized optimization problem, an algorithm based on the split Bregman iteration is developed. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms current state-of-the-art image BCS reconstruction methods in both objective quality and visual perception.

Keywords

Block compressive sensing Group-based sparse representation Nonlocal total variation Joint regularization Split Bregman iteration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61671126 and Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under Grant 13/SIRG/2178. The authors would like to thank the authors of [4, 11, 19, 27, 28, 29] and [33] for kindly providing their software or codes to reproduce their experimental results in Sect. 5 and thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions to improve the manuscript. They also would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Nasser Eslahi (Tampere University of Technology, Finland) for fruitful discussions.

References

  1. 1.
    R.G. Baraniuk, Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 24(4), 118–120+124 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.M. Bruckstein, D.L. Donoho, M. Elad, From sparse solutions of systems of equations to sparse modeling of signals and images. SIAM Rev. 51(1), 34–81 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Buades, B. Coll, J. Morel, A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Model. Simul. 4(2), 490–530 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Chen, E.W. Tramel, J.E. Fowler, Compressed-sensing recovery of images and video using multihypothesis predictions, in Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, United States (2011), pp. 1193–1198Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Chen, J. Zhang, D. Li, Fractional-order total variation combined with sparsifying transforms for compressive sensing sparse image reconstruction. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 38, 407–422 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Chen, Y. Gao, C. Ma, Y. Kuo, Compressive sensing image reconstruction based on multiple regulation constraints. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 36(4), 1621–1638 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Dong, G. Shi, X. Li, Y. Ma, F. Huang, Compressive sensing via nonlocal low-rank regularization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(8), 3618–3632 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Dong, G. Shi, X. Li, L. Zhang, X. Wu, Image reconstruction with locally adaptive sparsity and nonlocal robust regularization. Signal Process. Image Commun. 27(10), 1109–1122 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.L. Donoho, De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 41(3), 613–627 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.L. Donoho, Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52(4), 1289–1306 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Eslahi, A. Aghagolzadeh, Compressive sensing image restoration using adaptive curvelet thresholding and nonlocal sparse regularization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 25(7), 3126–3140 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. Fei, Z. Wei, L. Xiao, Iterative directional total variation refinement for compressive sensing image reconstruction. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 20(11), 1070–1073 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Gan, Block compressed sensing of natural images, in: 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing, Wales, United Kingdom (2007), pp. 403–406Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Gholami, S.M. Hosseini, A balanced combination of Tikhonov and total variation regularizations for reconstruction of piecewise-smooth signals. Signal Process. 93(7), 1945–1960 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Gilboa, S. Osher, Nonlocal operators with applications to image processing. Multiscale Model. Simul. 7(3), 1005–1028 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Goldstein, S. Osher, The split Bregman method for l1-regularized problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2(2), 323–343 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. He, L. Carin, Exploiting structure in wavelet-based Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 57(9), 3488–3497 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Jung, X. Bresson, T.F. Chan, L.A. Vese, Nonlocal Mumford-Shah regularizers for color image restoration. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(6), 1583–1598 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    C. Li, W. Yin, H. Jiang, Y. Zhang, An efficient augmented Lagrangian method with applications to total variation minimization. Comput. Optim. Appl. 56(3), 507–530 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Mun, J.E. Fowler, Block compressed sensing of images using directional transforms, in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Cairo, Egypt (2009), pp. 3021–3024Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Rudin, S. Osher, E. Fatemi, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 60(1–4), 259–259 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Y. Shen, J. Li, Z. Zhu, W. Cao, Y. Song, Image reconstruction algorithm from compressed sensing measurements by dictionary learning. Neurocomputing 151(P3), 1153–1162 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Tikhonov, Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Sov. Meth. Dokl. 4, 1035–1038 (1963)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Q. Wang, D. Li, Y. Shen, Intelligent nonconvex compressive sensing using prior information for image reconstruction by sparse representation. Neurocomputing 224, 71–81 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    X. Wu, W. Dong, X. Zhang, G. Shi, Model-assisted adaptive recovery of compressed sensing with imaging applications. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(2), 451–458 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Xu, J. Ma, D. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Lin, Improved total variation minimization method for compressive sensing by intra-prediction. Signal Process. 92(11), 2614–2623 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Zhang, S. Liu, R. Xiong, S. Ma, D. Zhao, Improved total variation based image compressive sensing recovery by nonlocal regularization, in IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Beijing, China (2013), pp. 2836–2839Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. Zhang, C. Zhao, D. Zhao, W. Gao, Image compressive sensing recovery using adaptively learned sparsifying basis via l0 minimization. Signal Process. 103, 114–126 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Zhang, D. Zhao, W. Gao, Group-based sparse representation for image restoration. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(8), 3336–3351 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. Zhang, D. Zhao, R. Xiong, S. Ma, W. Gao, Image restoration using joint statistical modeling in a space-transform domain. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 24(6), 915–928 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. Zhang, D. Zhao, C. Zhao, R. Xiong, S. Ma, W. Gao, Image compressive sensing recovery via collaborative sparsity. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 2(3), 380–391 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    K. Zhang, X. Gao, J. Li, H. Xia, Single image super-resolution using regularization of non-local steering kernel regression. Signal Process. 123, 53–63 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    X. Zhang, M. Burger, X. Bresson, S. Osher, Bregmanized nonlocal regularization for deconvolution and sparse reconstruction. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 3(3), 253–276 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information and Communication EngineeringUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina
  2. 2.Software Research InstituteAthlone Institute of TechnologyAthloneIreland
  3. 3.School of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina

Personalised recommendations