Towed Array Shape Estimation Based on Single or Double Near-Field Calibrating Sources
Towed array shape estimation is a crucial step for most array processing algorithms, since the position uncertainty of hydrophone elements seriously degrades the algorithm performance. Different from conventional methods using far-field calibrating sources, this paper introduces two kinds of towed array shape estimation methods, the single near-field source-dependent method (S-NFSDM) and the double near-field source-dependent method (D-NFSDM), respectively. Under the assumption that the frequency and direction of calibrating sources are known, the proposed methods can obtain the position of every hydrophone element based on eigenvector technique and the geometric relationship between the calibrating sources and hydrophone elements. In S-NFSDM, the shape of each segment between adjacent array elements is assumed to be straight, which ensures a low computational load and high real-time capability. But in this way, S-NFSDM can only estimate the distortion of uniform linear arrays. To address this, the D-NFSDM is proposed to eliminate the linear constraint of adjacent elements in S-NFSDM. Not only can it ensure the estimation accuracy of element positions, but also estimate distorted non-uniform linear arrays. The Cramer–Rao lower bounds of the proposed S-NFSDM and D-NFSDM are derived in this paper. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the S-NFSDM and D-NFSDM have better estimation performance than the classical method and strong robustness for different array shapes. Moreover, the estimation accuracy of Multiple Signal Classification algorithm can be improved obviously through the proposed methods in the direction of arrival estimation.
KeywordsArray shape estimation Near-field calibrating source CRLB DOA estimation
This work was supported in part by the TianJin Natural Science Foundations of China under Grant No. 17JCQNJC01100, National Natural Science Foundations of China under Grant Nos. 61501319, 51775377, 61505140, National Key Research and Development Plan (2017YFF0204800), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program By Cast of China under Grant No. 2016QNRC001, Open Project (MOMST2015-7) of Key Laboratory of Micro-Opto-Electro Mechanical System Technology, Tianjin University, Ministry of Education, Photoelectric Information and Instrument–Engineering Research Center of Beijing Open Project No. GD2015007.
- 1.R.N. Challa, S. Shamsunder, High-order subspace-based algorithms for passive localization of near-field sources, in Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. IEEE Computer Society (1995), pp. 777–781Google Scholar
- 5.D.A. Gray, W.O. Wolfe, J.L. Riley, An eigenvector method for estimating the positions of the elements of an array of receivers, in Proceedings of the Australia Symposium Signal Processing Application. (Adelaide, Australia, 1989), pp. 391–393Google Scholar
- 7.W.S. Hodgkiss, Shape determination of a shallow-water bottomed array, in Oceans IEEE (1989), pp. 1199–1204Google Scholar
- 13.M. Levi, H. Messer, Sufficient conditions for array calibration using sources of mixed tapes, in International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. (IEEE, 1990), pp. 2943–2946Google Scholar
- 15.N. Ma, J.T. Goh, Eigenstructure based towed array shape estimation using sources in unknown locations, in Proceedings of the IEEE Oceans (2000), pp. 1895–1900Google Scholar
- 18.B. Newhall, J. Jenkins, J. Dietz, Improved estimation of the shape of towed sonar arrays, in IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (2004), pp. 873–876Google Scholar
- 19.J.L. Odom, J. Krolik, Heading and hydrophone data fusion for towed array shape estimation, in Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA, ASA (2013), p. 055081Google Scholar
- 21.J.L. Odom, J. Krolik, Time-varying array shape estimation by mapping acoustic field directionality, in Proceedings of the IEEE Oceans (2012), pp. 1–5Google Scholar
- 25.J.J. Smith, Y.H. Leung, A. Cantoni, Broadband eigenvector methods for towed array shape estimation with a single source, in Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP-96 (1996), pp. 3193–3196Google Scholar
- 28.H.C. So, P.C. Ching, Comparative study of five LMS-based adaptive time delay estimators, in IEE Proceedings-Radar, Sonar and Navigation (2001), pp. 9–15Google Scholar
- 33.A.J. Weiss, B. Friedlander, Array shape calibration using eigenstructure methods, in Proceedings of the IEEE Asilomar Conference (1991), pp. 925–929Google Scholar
- 36.M. Zhang, Z.D. Zhu, Array shape calibration using sources in known directions, in Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1993. NAECON 1993. Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 National (1993), pp. 70–73Google Scholar