Advertisement

Circuits, Systems & Signal Processing

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 409–431 | Cite as

Flexible Frequency-Band Reallocation: Complex Versus Real

  • Amir Eghbali
  • Håkan Johansson
  • Per Löwenborg
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses a new approach for implementing flexible frequency-band reallocation (FFBR) networks for bentpipe satellite payloads which are based on variable oversampled complex-modulated filter banks (FBs). We consider two alternatives to process real signals using real input/output and complex input/output FFBR networks (or simply real and complex FFBR networks, respectively). It is shown that the real case has a lower overall number of processing units, i.e., adders and multipliers, compared to its complex counterpart. In addition, the real system eliminates the need for two Hilbert transformers, further reducing the arithmetic complexity. An analysis of the computational workload shows that the real case has a smaller rate of increase in the arithmetic complexity with respect to the prototype filter order and number of FB channels. This makes the real case suitable for systems with a large number of users. Furthermore, in the complex case, a high efficiency in FBR comes at the expense of high-order Hilbert transformers; thus, trade-offs are necessary. Finally, the performance of the two alternatives based on the error vector magnitude (EVM) for a 16-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) signal is presented.

Keywords

Flexible frequency-band reallocation Multi-input multi-output Discrete Fourier transform Hilbert transformer Arithmetic complexity Error vector magnitude 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.N. Abdulazim, H.G. Göckler, Flexible bandwidth reallocation MDFT SBC-FDFMUX filter bank for future bent-pipe FDM satellite systems, in 9th International Workshop on Signal Process. for Space Commun. (SPSC 2006), Noordwijk, Netherlands, 2006 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Arbesser-Rastburg, R. Bellini, F. Coromina, R.D. Gaudenzi, O. del Rio, M. Hollreiser, R. Rinaldo, P. Rinous, A. Roederer, R&D directions for next generation broadband multimedia systems: an ESA perspective, in Proc. 20th AIAA Int. Commun. Satellite Syst. Conf. Exhibit, Montreal, Canada, May 2002 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.L. Boucheret, I. Mortensen, H. Favaro, Fast convolution filter banks for satellite payloads with on-board processing. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 17(2), 238–248 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Chiassarini, G. Gallinaro, Frequency domain switching: algorithms, performances, implementation aspects, in 7th Tyrrhenian Int. Workshop Digital Comm., Viareggio, Italy, Sept. 1995 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Duhamel, Implementation of split-radix FFT algorithms for complex, real, and real-symmetric data. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-34, 285–295 (1986) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Duhamel, M. Vetterli, Fast Fourier transforms: a tutorial review and state of the art. Signal Process. 19, 259–295 (1990) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Eghbali, On filter bank based MIMO frequency multiplexing and demultiplexing, Master’s thesis, Linköping University, Sweden, Sept. 2006, Report Number: LITH-ISY-EX–06/3911–SE Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Eghbali, H. Johansson, P. Löwenborg, Flexible frequency-band reallocation MIMO networks for real signals, in Proc. Int. Symp. Image Signal Process. Analysis, Istanbul, Turkey, Sept. 2007 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Eghbali, H. Johansson, P. Löwenborg, An arbitrary bandwidth transmultiplexer and its application to flexible frequency-band reallocation networks, in Proc. Eur. Conf. Circuit Theory Design, Seville, Spain, Aug. 2007 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Eghbali, H. Johansson, P. Löwenborg, A multimode transmultiplexer structure. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 55(3), 279–283 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Farserotu, R. Prasad, A survey of future broadband multimedia satellite systems, issues and trends. IEEE Commun. Mag. 38(6), 128–133 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.G. Göckler, B. Felbecker, Digital on-board FDM-demultiplexing without restrictions on channel allocation and bandwidth, in 7th Int. Workshop Digital Sign. Process. Techn. for Space Appl., Noordwijk, Netherlands, 1999 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Haitao, G.A. Sitton, C.S. Burrus, The quick Fourier transform: an FFT based on symmetries. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 46(2), 335–341 (1998) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.T. Heideman, C.S. Burrus, On the number of multiplications necessary to compute a length-2n DFT. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-34, 91–95 (1986) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Johansson, E. Hermanowicz, Adjustable fractional-delay filters utilizing the Farrow structure and multirate techniques, in Proc. Sixth Int. Workshop Spectral Methods Multirate Signal Process., Florence, Italy, Sept. 2006 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Johansson, P. Löwenborg, Flexible frequency-band reallocation networks using variable oversampled complex-modulated filter banks. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2007, Article ID 63714, 15 pages, 2007 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.F. Kaiser, Nonrecursive digital filter design using I 0-sinh window function, in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., Apr. 1974, pp. 20–23 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Lippolis, L. Simone, M.C. Comparing, D. Gelfusa, V. Piloni, R. Novello, Overview on band-pass sampling approaches for on-board processing, in Proc. Fourth IEEE Int. Symp. Signal Process. Inf. Technol., Dec. 2004, pp. 543–548 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.G. Lyons, Understanding Digital Signal Processing, 2nd edn. (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2004) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.F. Mansour, On the odd-DFT and its applications to DCT/IDCT computation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54, 2819–2822 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.K. Mitra, Digital Signal Processing: A Computer Based Approach (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Murakami, Real-valued decimation-in-time and decimation-in-frequency algorithms. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 41, 808–816 (1994) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Nguyen, J. Hant, D. Taggart, C.-S. Tsang, D.M. Johnson, J.-C. Chuang, Design concept and methodology for the future advanced wideband satellite system, in Proc. IEEE Military Commun. Conf., MILCOM 2002, Anaheim, CA, USA, Oct. 2002, vol. 1, pp. 189–194 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E.D. Re, L. Pierucci, Next-generation mobile satellite networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(9), 150–159 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Rosenbaum, H. Johansson, P. Löwenborg, Oversampled complex-modulated causal IIR filter banks for flexible frequency-band reallocation networks, in Proc. XIV Eur. Signal Process. Conf., Florence, Italy, Sept. 2006 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B.R. Sekhar, K.M.M. Prabhu, Radix-2 decimation-in-frequency algorithm for the computation of the real-valued FFT. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 47, 1181–1184 (1999) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    H.V. Sorensen, D.L. Jones, M.T. Heideman, C.S. Burrus, Real-valued fast Fourier transform algorithms. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-35, 849–863 (1987) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Vetterli, H.J. Nussbaumer, Simple DFT and DCT algorithms with reduced number of operations. Signal Process. 6, 267–278 (1984) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Z. Wang, On computing discrete Fourier and cosine transforms. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-33, 1341–1344 (1985) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    A.K. Wang, R. Ligmanowski, J. Castro, A. Mazzara, EVM simulation and analysis techniques, in Proc. IEEE Military Commun. Conf., MILCOM 2006, Washington, DC, USA, Oct. 2006, pp. 1–7 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Wittig, Satellite on-board processing for multimedia applications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 38(6), 134–140 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. Technical Specification Group Access Network, Base station conformance testing, 2000 (TS 25.141 V3.2.0) Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    12-bit, 500 MSPS ADC with buffered input, Part Number: ADS5463, Nov. 2006 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Eghbali
    • 1
  • Håkan Johansson
    • 1
  • Per Löwenborg
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Electronics Systems, Department of Electrical EngineeringLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations