Selecta Mathematica

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 2059–2098 | Cite as

Relative Yangians of Weyl type

Article
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Let \(\mathfrak {g}\) be a semisimple Lie algebra. A \(\mathfrak {g}\)-algebra is an algebra R on which \(\mathfrak {g}\) acts by derivations. The diagonal copy of \(\mathfrak {g}\) acting on \(R\otimes U(\mathfrak {g})\) is denoted by \(\mathfrak {k}\). If V is a finite dimensional \(\mathfrak {g}\) module and \(R={\text {End}}V\) (resp. R is the algebra D(V) of differential operators on \(V^*\)) the invariant algebra \((R\otimes U(\mathfrak {g}))^\mathfrak {k}\) is called a relative Yangian (resp. relative Yangian of Weyl type). Extending the essentially complete representation theory of \(({\text {End}}V \otimes U(\mathfrak {g}))^\mathfrak {k}\) inspired by the work of Khoroshkin and Nazarov, a study is made of the representation theory of \(E:=(D(V)\otimes U(\mathfrak {g}))^\mathfrak {k}\). A category \(\mathscr {E}^\star \) of modules for E is introduced and shown to be abelian. Here a number of new techniques have to be introduced because unlike \({\text {End}}V\) the algebra D(V) is infinite dimensional and known to have a rather complicated representation theory. The simples and their projective covers in \(\mathscr {E}^\star \) are described. However an example shows that the simples in \(\mathscr {E}^\star \) do not suffice to exhaust the primitive ideals of E. The description of simple modules for E is reduced to those for D(V). This analysis is valid for certain other \(\mathfrak {g}\)-algebras, notably \(R=U(\mathfrak {g})\). In this it is shown that all the simple modules of \((U\mathfrak {g}) \otimes U(\mathfrak {g}))^\mathfrak {k}\) are finite dimensional and the representation theory of the latter algebra precisely recovers the Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials. Through Olshanski homomorphisms these results can in principle have applications to the study of Yangians and of twisted Yangians.

Keywords

Harish-Chandra modules Family algebras Differential operator algebras 

Mathematics Subject Classification

17B35 

References

  1. 1.
    Bernstein, J.N.: Analytic continuation of generalized functions with respect to a parameter. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozen. 6(4), 26–40 (1972)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein, J.N., Gelfand, S.I.: Tensor products of finite- and infinite-dimensional representations of semisimple Lie algebras. Composit. Math. 41(2), 245–285 (1980)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernstein, J.N., Gelfand, I.M., Gelfand, S.I.: Structure of representations that are generated by vectors of highest weight (Russian). Funckcional. Anal. i Prilozen 5(1), 1–9 (1971)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernstein, J.N., Gelfand, I.M., Gelfand, S.I.: Schubert cells, and the cohomology of the spaces G/P. (Russian) Uspehi Mat. Nauk 28(3(171)), 3–26 (1973)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borho, W., Brylinski, J.-L.: Differential operators on homogeneous spaces. I. Irreducibility of the associated variety for annihilators of induced modules. Invent. Math. 69(3), 437–476 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dixmier, J.: Algèbres enveloppantes. Reprint of the 1974 original. Les Grands Classiques Gauthier-Villars. Éditions Jacques Gabay, Paris (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duflo, M.: Sur la classification des idéaux primitifs dans l’algèbre enveloppante d’une algèbre de Lie semi-simple. Ann. Math. 105(1), 107–120 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Enright, T.J., Joseph, A.: An intrinsic analysis of unitarizable highest weight modules. Math. Ann. 288(4), 571–594 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gabber, O., Joseph, A.: On the Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand resolution and the Duflo sum formula. Composit. Math. 43(1), 107–131 (1981)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herstein, I.N.: Noncommutative rings. Reprint of the 1968 original. With an afterword by Lance W. Small. Carus Mathematical Monographs, 15. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joseph, A.: Dixmier’s problem for Verma and principal series submodules. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 20(2), 193–204 (1979)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joseph, A.: Rings of \({\mathfrak{b}}\)-finite endomorphisms of simple highest weight modules are Goldie. Ring theory 1989 (Ramat Gan and Jerusalem, 1988/1989). In: Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 124–134. Weizmann, Jerusalem (1989)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joseph, A.: Quantum Groups and Their Primitive Ideals. Springer, Berlin (1995)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joseph, A.: Sur l’annulateur d’un module de Verma. With an outline of the annihilation theorem by M. Gorelik and E. Lanzmann. NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. 514. Representation theories and algebraic geometry (Montreal, PQ, 1997), pp. 237–300. Kluwer Acad. Publ, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joseph, A.: Selected Topics in Representation Theory. http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~gorelik/agrt.htm
  16. 16.
    Joseph, A.: Analogue Zhelobenko invariants, Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand operators and the Kostant Clifford algebra conjecture. Transform. Groups 17(3), 823–833 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joseph, A.: Modules for relative Yangians and Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials. Transform. Groups 19(1), 105–129 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khoroshkin, S., Nazarov, M.: Mickelsson algebras and representations of Yangians. TAMS 364(3), 1293–1367 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirillov, A.A.: Introduction to family algebras. Mosc. Math. J. 1(1), 49–63 (2001)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kirillov, A.A.: Family algebras and generalized exponents for polyvector representations of simple Lie algebras of type Bn (Russian). Funct. Anal. Appl. 42(4), 308–316 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kostant, B.: Clifford algebra analogue of the Hopf–Koszul–Samelson theorem, the \(\rho \)-decomposition \(C(\mathfrak{g})=V_\rho \otimes C(P)\), and the \(\mathfrak{g}\)-module structure of \(\wedge \mathfrak{g}\). Adv. Math. 125(2), 275–350 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kostant, B.: Lie group representations on polynomial rings. Am. J. Math. 85, 327–404 (1963)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McConnell, J.C., Robson, J.C.: Noncommutative Noetherian rings. In: Small, L.W. (ed.) Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York). Wiley, Chichester (1987)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levasseur, T., Stafford, J.T.: Invariant differential operators and an homomorphism of Harish-Chandra. J. Am. Math. Soc. 8(2), 365–372 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Popov, V.L., Vinberg, E.B.: Invariant theory. In: Parshin, A.N., Shafarevich, I.R. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Math. Sciences, Algebraic Geometry IV, vol. 55. Springer, Berlin (1991)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wallach, N.R.: Invariant differential operators on a reductive Lie algebra and Weyl group representations. J. Am. Math. Soc. 6(4), 779–816 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zahid, A.: Les endomorphismes \(\mathfrak{k}\)-finis des modules de Whittaker. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 117(4), 451–477 (1989)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhelobenko, D.P.: Harmonic Analysis on Semisimple Complex Lie Groups Izdat. Nauka, Moscow (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Donald Frey Professional Chair, Department of MathematicsWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations