Abstract
Let \(\mathfrak {g}\) be a semisimple Lie algebra. A \(\mathfrak {g}\)-algebra is an algebra R on which \(\mathfrak {g}\) acts by derivations. The diagonal copy of \(\mathfrak {g}\) acting on \(R\otimes U(\mathfrak {g})\) is denoted by \(\mathfrak {k}\). If V is a finite dimensional \(\mathfrak {g}\) module and \(R={\text {End}}V\) (resp. R is the algebra D(V) of differential operators on \(V^*\)) the invariant algebra \((R\otimes U(\mathfrak {g}))^\mathfrak {k}\) is called a relative Yangian (resp. relative Yangian of Weyl type). Extending the essentially complete representation theory of \(({\text {End}}V \otimes U(\mathfrak {g}))^\mathfrak {k}\) inspired by the work of Khoroshkin and Nazarov, a study is made of the representation theory of \(E:=(D(V)\otimes U(\mathfrak {g}))^\mathfrak {k}\). A category \(\mathscr {E}^\star \) of modules for E is introduced and shown to be abelian. Here a number of new techniques have to be introduced because unlike \({\text {End}}V\) the algebra D(V) is infinite dimensional and known to have a rather complicated representation theory. The simples and their projective covers in \(\mathscr {E}^\star \) are described. However an example shows that the simples in \(\mathscr {E}^\star \) do not suffice to exhaust the primitive ideals of E. The description of simple modules for E is reduced to those for D(V). This analysis is valid for certain other \(\mathfrak {g}\)-algebras, notably \(R=U(\mathfrak {g})\). In this it is shown that all the simple modules of \((U\mathfrak {g}) \otimes U(\mathfrak {g}))^\mathfrak {k}\) are finite dimensional and the representation theory of the latter algebra precisely recovers the Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials. Through Olshanski homomorphisms these results can in principle have applications to the study of Yangians and of twisted Yangians.
Keywords
Harish-Chandra modules Family algebras Differential operator algebrasMathematics Subject Classification
17B35References
- 1.Bernstein, J.N.: Analytic continuation of generalized functions with respect to a parameter. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozen. 6(4), 26–40 (1972)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bernstein, J.N., Gelfand, S.I.: Tensor products of finite- and infinite-dimensional representations of semisimple Lie algebras. Composit. Math. 41(2), 245–285 (1980)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bernstein, J.N., Gelfand, I.M., Gelfand, S.I.: Structure of representations that are generated by vectors of highest weight (Russian). Funckcional. Anal. i Prilozen 5(1), 1–9 (1971)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bernstein, J.N., Gelfand, I.M., Gelfand, S.I.: Schubert cells, and the cohomology of the spaces G/P. (Russian) Uspehi Mat. Nauk 28(3(171)), 3–26 (1973)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 5.Borho, W., Brylinski, J.-L.: Differential operators on homogeneous spaces. I. Irreducibility of the associated variety for annihilators of induced modules. Invent. Math. 69(3), 437–476 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 6.Dixmier, J.: Algèbres enveloppantes. Reprint of the 1974 original. Les Grands Classiques Gauthier-Villars. Éditions Jacques Gabay, Paris (1996)Google Scholar
- 7.Duflo, M.: Sur la classification des idéaux primitifs dans l’algèbre enveloppante d’une algèbre de Lie semi-simple. Ann. Math. 105(1), 107–120 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 8.Enright, T.J., Joseph, A.: An intrinsic analysis of unitarizable highest weight modules. Math. Ann. 288(4), 571–594 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Gabber, O., Joseph, A.: On the Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand resolution and the Duflo sum formula. Composit. Math. 43(1), 107–131 (1981)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Herstein, I.N.: Noncommutative rings. Reprint of the 1968 original. With an afterword by Lance W. Small. Carus Mathematical Monographs, 15. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC (1994)Google Scholar
- 11.Joseph, A.: Dixmier’s problem for Verma and principal series submodules. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 20(2), 193–204 (1979)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 12.Joseph, A.: Rings of \({\mathfrak{b}}\)-finite endomorphisms of simple highest weight modules are Goldie. Ring theory 1989 (Ramat Gan and Jerusalem, 1988/1989). In: Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 124–134. Weizmann, Jerusalem (1989)Google Scholar
- 13.Joseph, A.: Quantum Groups and Their Primitive Ideals. Springer, Berlin (1995)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.Joseph, A.: Sur l’annulateur d’un module de Verma. With an outline of the annihilation theorem by M. Gorelik and E. Lanzmann. NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci. 514. Representation theories and algebraic geometry (Montreal, PQ, 1997), pp. 237–300. Kluwer Acad. Publ, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
- 15.Joseph, A.: Selected Topics in Representation Theory. http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~gorelik/agrt.htm
- 16.Joseph, A.: Analogue Zhelobenko invariants, Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand operators and the Kostant Clifford algebra conjecture. Transform. Groups 17(3), 823–833 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 17.Joseph, A.: Modules for relative Yangians and Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials. Transform. Groups 19(1), 105–129 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 18.Khoroshkin, S., Nazarov, M.: Mickelsson algebras and representations of Yangians. TAMS 364(3), 1293–1367 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kirillov, A.A.: Introduction to family algebras. Mosc. Math. J. 1(1), 49–63 (2001)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kirillov, A.A.: Family algebras and generalized exponents for polyvector representations of simple Lie algebras of type Bn (Russian). Funct. Anal. Appl. 42(4), 308–316 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kostant, B.: Clifford algebra analogue of the Hopf–Koszul–Samelson theorem, the \(\rho \)-decomposition \(C(\mathfrak{g})=V_\rho \otimes C(P)\), and the \(\mathfrak{g}\)-module structure of \(\wedge \mathfrak{g}\). Adv. Math. 125(2), 275–350 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kostant, B.: Lie group representations on polynomial rings. Am. J. Math. 85, 327–404 (1963)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 23.McConnell, J.C., Robson, J.C.: Noncommutative Noetherian rings. In: Small, L.W. (ed.) Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York). Wiley, Chichester (1987)Google Scholar
- 24.Levasseur, T., Stafford, J.T.: Invariant differential operators and an homomorphism of Harish-Chandra. J. Am. Math. Soc. 8(2), 365–372 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 25.Popov, V.L., Vinberg, E.B.: Invariant theory. In: Parshin, A.N., Shafarevich, I.R. (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Math. Sciences, Algebraic Geometry IV, vol. 55. Springer, Berlin (1991)Google Scholar
- 26.Wallach, N.R.: Invariant differential operators on a reductive Lie algebra and Weyl group representations. J. Am. Math. Soc. 6(4), 779–816 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 27.Zahid, A.: Les endomorphismes \(\mathfrak{k}\)-finis des modules de Whittaker. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 117(4), 451–477 (1989)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 28.Zhelobenko, D.P.: Harmonic Analysis on Semisimple Complex Lie Groups Izdat. Nauka, Moscow (1974)Google Scholar