The role of patch size in ecosystem engineering capacity: a case study of aquatic vegetation
- 406 Downloads
Submerged aquatic plants are ecosystem engineers that are able to modify their habitat. However, the role of patch size in the engineering capacity of aquatic plants has not yet been fully investigated, while it could be essential for elucidating the consequences of plant presence. Our objectives were to investigate the effects of patch size on plant-flow-sediment interactions in lotic ecosystems and to determine whether these effects differed according to environmental characteristics. We performed in situ measurements of velocity and grain size along natural patches of increasing length (L) at two sites presenting different flow and sediment characteristics. Our results indicated that a minimum patch size was needed to induce in-patch reduction of the time averaged velocity component in the flow direction (i.e. streamwise velocity) and fine sediment accumulation. Streamwise velocity decreased linearly with L independently of the site conditions. The sediment texture was instead dependent on site conditions: for the site characterized by higher velocity and coarser sediment, the sediment grain size exponentially decreased with L, reaching a minimum value at L ≥ 1.0 m, while for the site characterized by lower velocity and finer sediment, it reached a minimum value already at L > 0.3 m. This study demonstrated that a minimal patch size is required to trigger the ecosystem engineering capacity of aquatic plant patches in lotic environments and that this capacity increases with patch length. Small patches induce little to no modification of the physical habitat, with possible negative feedbacks for plants. With increasing patch size, the habitat modifications induced by plants become more important, potentially triggering positive feedbacks for plants.
KeywordsAquatic plants Patch dynamics Feedbacks Hydrodynamics Sediment dynamics
We thank Geraldene Wharton for her valuable comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript, Vanessa Gardette, Myriam Hammada, Youssouf Sy and Félix Vallier for field and laboratory assistance and the Compagnie Nationale du Rhône (CNR) for access to field sites. This research was supported by the Research Executive Agency through the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union, Support for Training and Career Development of Researchers (Marie Curie—FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN), which funded the Initial Training Network (ITN) HYTECH ‘Hydrodynamic Transport in Ecologically Critical Heterogeneous Interfaces’, N.316546. This study was conducted under the aegis of the Rhône Basin Long-Term Environmental Research (ZABR, Zone Atelier Bassin du Rhône).
- Badin A-L, Méderel G, Béchet B, Borschneck D, Delolme C (2009) Study of the aggregation of the surface layer of Technosols from stormwater infiltration basins using grain size analyses with laser diffractometry. Geoderma 153:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.07.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bouma TJ, van Duren LA, Temmerman S, Claverie T, Blanco-Garcia A, Ysebaert T, Herman PMJ (2007) Spatial flow and sedimentation patterns within patches of epibenthic structures: combining field, flume and modelling experiments. Cont Shelf Res 27:1020–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goring DG, Nikora VI (2002) Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. J Hydraul Eng 128:117–126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:1(117) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- James WF, Barko JW, Butler MG (2004) Shear stress and sediment resuspension in relation to submersed macrophyte biomass. Hydrobiologia 515:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:Hydr.0000027329.67391.C6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mori N, Suzuki T, Kakuno S (2007) Noise of acoustic Doppler velocimeter data in bubbly flows. J Eng Mech 133:122–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:1(122) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Phillips JM, Walling DE (1999) The particle size characteristics of fine-grained channel deposits in the River Exe Basin, Devon, UK. Hydrol Process 13:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199901)13:1%3C1::AID-HYP674%3E3.0.CO;2-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pluntke T, Kozerski HP (2003) Particle trapping on leaves and on the bottom in simulated submerged plant stands. Hydrobiologia 506:575–581. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:Hydr.0000008569.29286.Ec CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sand-Jensen K (1997) Macrophytes as biological engineers in the ecology of Danish streams. In: Sand-Jensen K, Pedersen O (eds) Freshwater Biology. Priorities and development in Danish research. G.E.C. Gad, Copenhagen, pp 74–101Google Scholar
- Sand-Jensen K, Madsen TV (1992) Patch dynamics of the stream macrophyte, Callitriche cophocarpa. Freshw Biol 27:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00539.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tison J-M, de Foucault B (2014) Flora Gallica—Flore de France. Biotope edn.Google Scholar