Correction to: The carbon pump supports high primary production in a shallow lake
Correction to: Aquatic Sciences (2019) 81:24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0622-7
In the original publication, the subscript number 2 were incorrectly added without the subscript format as ‘CO2’ and ‘O2’ in Figs. 4 and 5 legends. The correct figure legends are given here.
Fig. 4 Atmospheric fluxes of CO2 and O2 with the lake water. Average diel flux rates of CO2 (a) and O2 (b) May 30th–June 9th 2016. During this time of early summer the CO2 flux is constantly positive from the atmosphere to the lake water. The oxygen flux varies from a nocturnal inward flux from the atmosphere to the lake water (above the dotted line) and an outward flux during the day. Dashed lines are 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 5 Relationships between daily NEP O2, NEP DIC and DIC removal. a NEPday O2 vs. NEPday DIC; y = 0.97x − 7.5, n = 29, R2 = 0.75. b NEPday O2 vs. DIC removal: y = 0.65x − 8.3, n = 29, R2 = 0.59. c NEPday DIC vs. DIC removal, y = 0.69x − 2.8, n = 29, R2 = 0.84. The dotted lines are the fitted slopes of linear regressions, the dashed lines are the 1:1 lines.