Interplay between productivity and regional species pool determines community assembly in aquatic microcosms
The relative importance of deterministic and neutral processes in shaping assembly of communities remains controversial, partly due to inconsistencies between theoretical, empirical, and experimental studies. We investigate the interplay between local (productivity) and regional (size of species pool) assembly mechanisms in communities of phytoplankton and zooplankton in 72 experimental microcosms. Local environmental conditions were manipulated by varying the level of nutrients in the water (ambient, low, high). The size of regional species pool colonizing each microcosm was manipulated by mixing phytoplankton and zooplankton species from different numbers of source ponds (n = 2, 4, 8 and 16). Our results show that local communities assembled differently depending on the numbers of sources available for colonization. Microcosms with larger species pools supported greater numbers of species. In contrast, the effects of productivity led to different results across trophic groups. Phytoplankton communities were, on average, more diverse on more productive treatments, while zooplankton communities were more diverse under less productive treatments. Phytoplankton and zooplankton communities responded to both sources of variation, although the size of species pool was a better predictor of communities’ composition than the local effects of productivity. These results reinforce the view that community assembly is influenced by the interplay of both local and regional drivers but that the relative importance of these factors varies with trophic groups.
KeywordsDeterministic processes Phytoplankton Stochastic processes Trophic group Zooplankton
Research by CLP, MGM, and MBA was supported through the Integrated Program of IC&DT (1/SAESCTN/ALENT-07-0224-FEDER-001755). MGM acknowledges support by a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme (FORECOMM) and TrophicResponse-Trophic responses to macroecological gradients funded by FCT (PTDC/BIA-BIC/0352/2014). CLP acknowledges support by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) through Ph.D. studentship (SFRH/BD/102020/2014). MBA acknowledges support by a Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness project (CGL2015-68438-P).
MGM designed the experiment; CLP and MGM performed the surveys, collected and processed samples; MGM, CLP and MBA conceived and performed the analysis of data; CLP, MGM and MBA wrote the first draft of the manuscript and contributed revisions to the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The surveys performed comply with the current laws of Spain.
- Altermatt F, Fronhofer EA, Garnier A, Giometto A, Hammes F, Klecka J, Legrand D, Mächler E, Massie TM, Pennekamp F, Plebani M, Pontarp M, Schtickzelle N, Thuillier V, Petchey OL (2015) Big answers from small worlds: a user’s guide for protist microcosms as a model system in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol Evol 6:218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: A roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cadotte MW (2006) Metacommunity influences on community richness at multiple spatial scales: a microcosm experiment. Ecology 87:1008–1016. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5B1008:MIOCRA%5D2.0.CO;2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cornell HV, Harrison SP (2014) What are species pools and when are they important? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:45–67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Diamond J, Case TJ (1986) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Dodson SI, Arnott SE, Cottingham KL (2000) The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness. Ecology 81:2662–2679. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081%5B2662:TRILCB%5D2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ejrnæs R, Bruun HH, Graae BJ (2006) Community assembly in experimental grasslands: suitable environment or timely arrival? Ecology 87:1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5B1225:CAIEGS%5D2.0.CO;2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heino J, Melo AS, Bini LM, Altermatt F, Al-Shami SA, Angeler DG, Bonada N, Brand C, Callisto M, Cottenie K, Dangles O, Dudgeon D, Encalada A, Göthe E, Grönroos M, Hamada N, Jacobsen D, Landeiro VL, Ligeiro R, Martins RT, Miserendino ML, Rawi CSM, Rodrigues ME, Roque FO, Sandin L, Schmera D, Sgarbi LF, Simaika JP, Siqueiro T, Thompson RM, Townsend CR (2015b) A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels. Ecol Evol 5:1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1439 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Kärnä O-M, Grönroos M, Antikainen H, Hjort J, Ilmonen J, Paasivirta L, Heino J (2015) Inferring the effects of potential dispersal routes on the metacommunity structure of stream insects: as the crow flies, as the fish swims or as the fox runs? J Anim Ecol 84:1342–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12397 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kraft NJB, Comita LS, Chase JM, Sanders NJ, Swenson NG, Crist TO, Stegen JC, Vellend M, Boyle B, Anderson MJ, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Freestone AL, Inouye BD, Harrison SP, Myers JA (2011) Disentangling the drivers of beta diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients. Science 333:1755–1758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208584 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leibold MA (1999) Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities. Evol Ecol Res 1:73–95. doiGoogle Scholar
- Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Lae R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lessard J-P, Weinstein BG, Borregaard MK, Marske KA, Martin DR, McGuire JA, Parra JL, Rahbek C, Graham CH (2016) Process-based species pools reveal the hidden signature of biotic interactions amid the anfluence of temperature filtering. Am Nat 187:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/684128 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner HH (2016) Vegan: 2.4-0., community ecology package. R package version. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
- Olenina I, Hjdu S, Edler L, Andersson A, Wasmund N, Busch S, Göbel J, Gromisz S, Huseby S, Huttunen M, Jaanus A, Kokkonen P, Ledaine I, Niemkiewicz E (2006) Biovolumes and size-classes of phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea. HELCOME Balt Sea Enciron Proc 106:144 ppGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
- Stewart RIA, Dossena M, Bohan DA, Jeppesen E, Kordas RL, Ledger MR, Meerhoff M, Moss B, Mulder C, Shurin JB, Suttle B, Thompson R, Trimmer M, Woodward G (2013) Mesocosm experiments as a tool for ecological climate-change research. Adv Ecol Res 48:71–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417199-2.00002-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warren PH, Law R, Weatherby AJ (2003) Mapping the assembly of protist communities in microcosms. Ecology 84:1001–1011. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084%5B1001:MTAOPC%5D2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar