Aquatic Sciences

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 675–687 | Cite as

Bacterial processes and biogeochemical changes in the water body of kettle holes - mainly driven by autochthonous organic matter?

  • Katrin Attermeyer
  • Hans-Peter Grossart
  • Sabine Flury
  • Katrin Premke
Research Article


Kettle holes are small inland waters formed from glacially-created depressions often situated in agricultural landscapes. Due to their high perimeter-to-area ratio facilitating a high aquatic-terrestrial coupling, kettle holes can accumulate high concentrations of organic carbon and nutrients, fueling microbial activities and turnover rates. Thus, they represent hotspots of carbon turnover in the landscape, but their bacterial activities and controlling factors have not been well investigated. Therefore, we aimed to assess the relative importance of various environmental factors on bacterial and biogeochemical processes in the water column of kettle holes and to disentangle their variations. In the water body of ten kettle holes in north-eastern Germany, we measured several physico-chemical and biological parameters such as carbon quantity and quality, as well as bacterial protein production (BP) and community respiration (CR) in spring, early summer and autumn 2014. Particulate organic matter served as an indicator of autochthonous production and represented an important parameter to explain variations in BP and CR. This notion is supported by qualitative absorbance indices of dissolved molecules in water samples and C:N ratios of the sediments, which demonstrate high fractions of autochthonous organic matter (OM) in the studied kettle holes. In contrast, dissolved chemical parameters were less important for bacterial activities although they revealed strong differences throughout the growing season. Pelagic bacterial activities and dynamics might thus be regulated by autochthonous OM in kettle holes implying a control of important biogeochemical processes by internal primary production rather than facilitated exchange with the terrestrial surrounding due to a high perimeter-to-area ratio.


Bacterial production Carbon turnover Growth efficiency Ponds Respiration DOC quality LC-OCD 



We would like to thank Lisa-Maria Weber, Robert Taube, Jan Oestmann and Uta Mallok for their assistance in the field and laboratory. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments to improve the manuscript and Raven Bier for her help in correcting the language and style. The study was performed within the LandScales project (‘Connecting processes and structures driving the landscape carbon dynamics over scales’) and funded by the Pact for Innovation and Research of the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Scientific Community.

Supplementary material

27_2017_528_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 18 KB)


  1. Attermeyer K, Premke K, Hornick T, Hilt S, Grossart HP (2013) Ecosystem-level studies of terrestrial carbon reveal contrasting bacterial metabolism in different aquatic habitats. Ecology 94:2754–2766CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aufdenkampe AK, Mayorga E, Raymond PA, Melack JM, Doney SC, Alin SR, Aalto RE, Yoo K (2011) Riverine coupling of biogeochemical cycles between land, oceans, and atmosphere. Front Ecol Environ 9:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell RT, Kuparinen J (1984) Assessing phytoplankton and bacterioplankton production during early spring in Lake Erken, Sweden. Appl Environ Microb 48:1221–1230Google Scholar
  4. Bell RT, Ahlgren GM, Ahlgren I (1983) Estimating bacterioplankton production by measuring [3H] thymidine incorporation in a eutrophic Swedish lake. Appl Environ Microb 45:1709–1721Google Scholar
  5. Bennion H, Smith M (2000) Variability in the water chemistry of shallow ponds in southeast England, with special reference to the seasonality of nutrients and implications for modelling trophic status. Hydrobiologia 436:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berggren M, Lapierre JF, del Giorgio PA (2012) Magnitude and regulation of bacterioplankton respiratory quotient across freshwater environmental gradients. ISME J 6:984–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouvy M, Arfi R, Cecchi P, Corbin D, Pagano M, Saint-Jean L, Thomas S (1998) Trophic coupling between bacterial and phytoplanktonic compartments in shallow tropical reservoirs (Ivory Coast, West Africa). Aquat Microb Ecol 15:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brothers SM, Hilt S, Attermeyer K, Grossart HP, Kosten S, Lischke B, Mehner T, Meyer N, Scharnweber K, Köhler J (2013) A regime shift from macrophyte to phytoplankton dominance enhances carbon burial in a shallow, eutrophic lake. Ecosphere 4: art137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buesing N, Gessner MO (2006) Benthic bacterial and fungal productivity and carbon turnoverin a freshwater marsh. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:596–605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole JJ, Findlay S, Pace ML (1988) Bacterial production in fresh and saltwater ecosystems: a cross-system overview. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 43:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole JJ, Pace ML, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (2000) Persistence of net heterotrophy in lakes during nutrient addition and food web manipulations. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1718–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole JJ et al (2007) Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10:172–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniel C, Gutseit K, Anesio AM, Granéli W (2005) Microbial food webs in the dark: independence of lake plankton from recent algal production. Aquat Microb Ecol 38:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Del Giorgio PA, Cole JJ (1998) Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 29: 503–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downing JA, Cole JJ, Middelburg JJ, Striegl RG, Duarte CM, Kortelainen P, Prairie YT, Laube KA (2008) Sediment organic carbon burial in agriculturally eutrophic impoundments over the last century. Global Biogeochem Cy 22:GB1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S (2001) Multi-and megavariate data analysis: principles and applications. Umetrics AB, UmeåGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer H, Pusch M (2001) Comparison of bacterial production in sediments, epiphyton and the pelagic zone of a lowland river. Freshw Biol 46:1335–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerke HH, Koszinski S, Kalettka T, Sommer M (2010) Structures and hydrologic function of soil landscapes with kettle holes using an integrated hydropedological approach. J Hydrol 393:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giancoli Barreto SR, Nozaki J, Barreto WJ (2003) Origin of dissolved organic carbon studied by UV-vis Spectroscopy. Acta Hydroch Hydrob 31:513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu B, Chapman AB, Schelske CL (2006) Factors controlling seasonal variations in stable isotope composition of particulate organic matter in a soft water eutrophic lake. Limnol Oceanogr 51:2837–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guildford SJ, Hecky RE (2000) Total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nutrient limitation in lakes and oceans: is there acommon relationship? Limnol Oceanogr 45:1213–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall EK, Cotner JB (2007) Interactive effect of temperature and resources on carbon cycling by freshwater bacterioplankton communities. Aquat Microb Ecol 49:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayashi M, Van Der Kamp G, Schmidt R (2003) Focused infiltration of snowmelt water in partially frozen soil under small depressions. J Hydrol 270:214–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hessen DO, Andersen T, Brettum P, Faafeng BA (2003) Phytoplankton contribution to sestonic mass and elemental ratios in lakes: implications for zooplankton nutrition. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1289–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodell DA, Schelske CL (1998) Production, sedimentation, and isotopic composition of organic matter in Lake Ontario. Limnol Oceanogr 43:200–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Höskuldsson A (1988) PLS regression methods. J Chemometr 2:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huber SA, Balz A, Abert M, Pronk W (2011) Characterisation of aquatic humic and non-humic matter with size-exclusion chromatography – organic carbon detection – organic nitrogen detection (LC-OCD-OND). Water Res 45:879–885CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jansson M, Bergström AK, Blomqvist P, Drakare S (2000) Allochthonous organic carbon and phytoplankton/bacterioplankton production relationships in lakes. Ecology 81:3250–3255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jansson M, Persson L, De Roos AM, Jones RI, Tranvik LJ (2007) Terrestrial carbon and intraspecific size-variation shape lake ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 22:316–322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalettka T, Rudat C (2006) Hydrogeomorphic types of glacially created kettle holes in North-East Germany. Limnologica 36:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalettka T, Rudat C, Quast J (2001) “Potholes” in Northeast German agro-landscapes: functions, land use impacts, and protection strategies. In: Tenhunen JD, Lenz R, Hantschel R (eds) Ecosystem Approaches to Landscape Management in Central Europe. Ecological Studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 291–298Google Scholar
  32. Karlsson J, Bergström AK, Byström P, Gudasz C, Rodriguez P, Hein C (2015) Terrestrial organic matter input suppresses biomass productionin lake ecosystems. Ecology 96:2870–2876CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirchman DL (1993) Leucine incorporation as a measure of biomass production by heterotrophic bacteria. In: Kemp PF (ed) Handbook of methods in aquatic microbial ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 509–512Google Scholar
  34. Kleeberg A, Neyen M, Kalettka T (2016) Element-specific downward fluxes impact the metabolism and vegetation of kettle holes. Hydrobiologia 766:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koroleff F (1976) Determination of total phosphorus. In: Grasshoff K (ed) Methods of Seawater analysis. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 168–172Google Scholar
  36. Kritzberg ES, Langenheder S, Lindström ES (2006) Influence of dissolved organic matter source on lake bacterioplankton structure and function—implications for seasonal dynamics of community composition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56:406–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Am Stat Assoc 47:583–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Laurion I, Ventura M, Catalan J, Psenner R, Sommaruga R (2000) Attenuation of ultraviolet radiation in mountain lakes: factors controlling the among-and within-lake variability. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1274–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lischeid G, Kalettka T (2012) Grasping the heterogeneity of kettle hole water quality in Northeast Germany. Hydrobiologia 689:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 18:50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Merbach W, Kalettka T, Rudat C, Augustin J (2002) Trace gas emissions from riparian areas of small eutrophic inland waters in Northeast-Germany. In: Broll G, Merbach W, Pfeiffer EM (eds) Wetlands in central Europe–Soil organisms, soil ecological processes and trace gas emissions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 235–244Google Scholar
  42. Meyers PA (1994) Preservation of elemental and isotopic source identification of sedimentary organic matter. Chem Geol 114:289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mukhopadhyay G, Mondal D, Biswas P, Dewanji A (2004) Water quality monitoring of tropical ponds: location and depth effect in two case studies. Acta Hydroch Hydrob 32:138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nixdorf B, Jander J (2003) Bacterial activities in shallow lakes—a comparison between extremely acidic and alkaline eutrophic hard water lakes. Hydrobiologia 506:697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peuravuori J, Pihlaja K (1997) Molecular size distribution and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. Anal Chim Acta 337:133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prairie YT, Bird DF, Cole JJ (2002) The summer metabolic balance in the epilimnion of southeastern Quebec lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 47:316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Premke K et al. (2016) The importance of landscape diversity for carbon fluxes at the landscape level: small-scale heterogeneity matters. WIREs Water 3:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rautio M, Vincent WF (2006) Benthic and pelagic food resources for zooplankton in shallow high-latitude lakes and ponds. Freshw Biol 51:1038–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riemann B, Fuhrman J, Azam F (1982) Bacterial secondary production in freshwater measured by 3H-thymidine incorporation method. Microb Ecol 8:101–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rostan J, Cellot B (1995) On the use of UV spectrophotometry to assess dissolved organic carbon origin variations in the Upper Rhône River. Aquat Sci 57:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schindler DW (1978) Factors regulating phytoplankton production and standing crop in the worldʼs freshwaters. Limnol Oceanogr 23:478–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sell AF, Overbeck J (1992) Exudates: phytoplankton-bacterioplankton interactions in Pluβsee. J Plankton Res 14:1199–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shibata A, Goto Y, Saito H, Kikuchi T, Toda T, Taguchi S (2006) Comparison of SYBR Green I and SYBR Gold stains for enumerating bacteria and viruses by epifluorescence microscopy. Aquat Microb Ecol 43:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sigee D (2005) Freshwater Microbiology. Wiley, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  55. Simon M, Azam F (1989) Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 51:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sobek S, Tranvik LJ, Prairie YT, Kortelainen P, Cole JJ (2007) Patterns and regulation of dissolved organic carbon: an analysis of 7,500 widely distributed lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 52:1208–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sommaruga R (1995) Microbial and classical food webs: a visit to a hypertrophic lake. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 17:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Jensen JP (2005) Pond or lake: does it make any difference? Arch Hydrobiol 162:143–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strickland J, Parsons T (1968) A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 167. Ottawa, p 311Google Scholar
  60. Teixeira MC, de Azevedo JCR, Pagioro TA (2013) Photo-degradation effect on dissolved organic carbon availability to bacterioplankton in a lake in the upper Paraná river floodplain. Acta Sci Biol Sci 35:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Theil-Nielsen J, Søndergaard M (1999) Production of epiphytic bacteria and bacterioplankton in three shallow lakes. Oikos 86:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thurman E (1985) Humic substances in groundwater. In: Aiken GR, McKnight DM, Wershaw RL, MacCarthy P (eds) Humic substances in soil, sediment, and water: geochemistry, isolation, and characterization. Wiley, New York, pp 87–103Google Scholar
  63. Torremorell A, Pérez G, Lagomarsino L, Huber P,·Queimaliños C, Bustingorry J, Fermani P, Llames ME, Unrein F (2014) Microbial pelagic metabolism and CDOM characterization in a phytoplankton-dominated versus a macrophyte-dominated shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 752: 203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tranvik LJ (1988) Availability of dissolved organic carbon for planktonic bacteria in oligotrophic lakes of differing humic content. Microb Ecol 16:311–322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Tranvik LJ et al (2009) Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol Oceanogr 54:2298–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Volk CJ, Volk CB, Kaplan LA (1997) Chemical composition of biodegradable dissolved organic matter in streamwater. Limnol Oceanogr 42:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waiser MJ (2006) Relationship between hydrological characteristics and dissolved organic carbon concentration and mass in northern prairie wetlands using a conservative tracer approach. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 111:G02024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waiser MJ, Robarts RD (2004) Net heterotrophy in productive prairie wetlands with high DOC concentrations. Aquat Microb Ecol 34:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weishaar JL, Aiken GR, Bergamaschi BA, Fram MS, Fujii R, Mopper K (2003) Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Technol 37:4702–4708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wetzel R (1984) Detrital dissolved and particulate organic carbon functions in aquatic ecosystems. Bull Mar Sci 35:503–509Google Scholar
  71. Wetzel R, Likens G (1991) Limnological analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L 2001. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab 58: 109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Chemical Analytics and BiogeochemistryBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Genetics, LimnologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Experimental LimnologyStechlinGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Biochemistry and BiologyPotsdam UniversityPotsdamGermany
  5. 5.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  6. 6.Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)Institute for Landscape BiogeochemistryMünchebergGermany

Personalised recommendations