Advertisement

Aquatic Sciences

, Volume 78, Issue 2, pp 291–301 | Cite as

Invertebrate assemblage responses and the dual roles of resistance and resilience to drying in intermittent rivers

  • Catherine Leigh
  • Núria Bonada
  • Andrew J. Boulton
  • Bernard Hugueny
  • Scott T. Larned
  • Ross Vander Vorste
  • Thibault Datry
Research Article

Abstract

Intermittent rivers are naturally dynamic ecosystems in which flow cessation and riverbed drying cause temporal fluctuations in aquatic biodiversity. We analysed datasets from intermittent rivers in different climate zones across the world to examine responses of aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages to drying, in relation to both taxonomic composition and traits of resistance and resilience. First, we compared the differences in taxonomic richness and turnover and in trait diversity, richness and redundancy before and after intermittent sites dried with the differences in concurrently sampled perennial sites. We found such high levels of variation in the before-after differences at intermittent and perennial sites that we could not detect statistical differences between them. Second, we examined the effects of climate (arid, Mediterranean, temperate) and durations of dry and post-dry (flowing) periods on responses to drying at intermittent sites. Only climate had a detectable effect; the proportion of taxa at intermittent sites that persisted through drying-rewetting phases was greatest in arid-zone rivers. Regardless of climate, the invertebrates that persisted at intermittent sites were dominated by taxa resistant to drying. By contrast, taxa that persisted at perennial sites had fewer traits conferring resistance but more conferring resilience. The contributions of resistance and resilience combined with the presence of both intermittent and perennial reaches likely supports the long-term stability and persistence of communities in intermittent rivers, despite the inherently high variation in short-term responses to drying.

Keywords

Climate Disturbance Invertebrate community Traits Persistence Temporary river 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Vicenç Acuña, Michael Bogan, Nancy Grimm, Rachel Stubbington, Paul Wood and their research teams for supplying data and answering our many questions; Rob Rolls for discussions on statistical analyses; and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions which improved the manuscript. Data from Lebanon and Spain were originally provided to NB for a project supported by the ‘Secretaría de Estado de Educación y Universidades’ (Spain) and co-funded by the European Social Fund (see Bonada et al. 2007; Statzner et al. 2007). CL was funded by IRBAS (Intermittent River Biodiversity Analysis and Synthesis working group; www.irbas.fr), led by TD and supported by the Centre for Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB), and funded jointly by the French Foundation for Research and Biodiversity (FRB) and the French National Agency for Water and Aquatic Environments (ONEMA). CL, NB, AB, BH, SL and TD are IRBAS participants. RV was funded by IRSTEA.

Supplementary material

27_2015_427_MOESM1_ESM.docx (45 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 44 kb)
27_2015_427_MOESM2_ESM.docx (49 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 48 kb)
27_2015_427_MOESM3_ESM.docx (32 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 32 kb)
27_2015_427_MOESM4_ESM.docx (549 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 548 kb)

References

  1. Acuña V, Muñoz I, Giorgi A, Omella M, Sabater F, Sabater S (2005) Drought and postdrought recovery cycles in an intermittent Mediterranean stream: structural and functional aspects. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:919–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arscott DB, Larned S, Scarsbrook MR, Lambert P (2010) Aquatic invertebrate community structure along an intermittence gradient: Selwyn River, New Zealand. J N Am Benthol Soc 29:530–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bêche LA, Resh VH (2007) Short-term climatic trends affect the temporal variability of macroinvertebrates in California ‘Mediterranean’ streams. Freshw Biol 52:2317–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bêche LA, Connors PG, Resh VH, Merenlender AM (2009) Resilience of fishes and invertebrates to prolonged drought in two California streams. Ecography 32:778–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchette ML, Pearson RG (2013) Dynamics of habitats and macroinvertebrate assemblages in rivers of the Australian dry tropics. Freshw Biol 58:742–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boersma KS, Bogan MT, Henrichs BA, Lytle DA (2014) Invertebrate assemblages of pools in arid-land streams have high functional redundancy and are resistant to severe drying. Freshw Biol 59:491–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogan MT, Lytle DA (2007) Seasonal flow variation allows ‘time-sharing’ by disparate aquatic insect communities in montane desert streams. Freshw Biol 52:290–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogan MT, Lytle DA (2011) Severe drought drives novel community trajectories in desert stream pools. Freshw Biol 56:2070–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogan MT, Boersma KS, Lytle DA (2013) Flow intermittency alters longitudinal patterns of invertebrate diversity and assemblage composition in an arid-land stream network. Freshw Biol 58:1016–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogan MT, Boersma KS, Lytle DA (2014) Resistance and resilience of invertebrate communities to seasonal and supraseasonal drought in arid-land headwater streams. Freshw Biol. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12522 Google Scholar
  11. Bonada N, Dolédec S, Statzner B (2007) Taxonomic and biological trait differences of stream macroinvertebrate communities between mediterranean and temperate regions: implications for future climatic scenarios. Glob Change Biol 13:1658–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Botta-Dukát Z (2005) Rao’s quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits. J Veg Sci 16:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boulton AJ (2003) Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages. Freshw Biol 48:1173–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chase JM (2007) Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:17430–17434CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Chester ET, Robson BJ (2011) Drought refuges, spatial scale and recolonisation by invertebrates in non-perennial streams. Freshw Biol 56:2094–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cottingham KL, Brown BL, Lennon JT (2001) Biodiversity may regulate the temporal variability of ecological systems. Ecol Letters 4:72–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Datry T (2012) Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate assemblages along a flow intermittence gradient: effects of duration of dry events. Freshw Biol 57:563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Datry T, Corti R, Philippe M (2012) Spatial and temporal aquatic-terrestrial transitions in the temporary Albarine River, France: responses of invertebrates to experimental rewetting. Freshw Biol 57:716–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Datry T, Larned ST, Fritz KM, Bogan MT, Wood PJ, Meyer EI, Santos AN (2014a) Broad-scale patterns of invertebrate richness and community composition in temporary rivers: effects of flow intermittence. Ecography 37:94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Datry T, Larned ST, Tockner K (2014b) Intermittent rivers: a challenge for freshwater ecology. Bioscience 64:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Death RG (2010) Disturbance and riverine benthic communities: what has it contributed to general ecological theory? Riv Res Appl 26:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fowler RT (2004) The recovery of benthic invertebrate communities following dewatering in two braided rivers. Hydrobiologia 523:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fritz KM, Dodds WK (2004) Resistance and resilience of macroinvertebrate assemblages to drying and flood in a tallgrass prairie stream system. Hydrobiologia 527:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenwood MJ, Booker DJ (2015) The influence of antecedent floods on aquatic invertebrate diversity, abundance and community composition. Ecohydrology 8:188–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grimm NB, Fisher SG (1989) Stability of periphyton and macroinvertebrates to disturbance by flash floods in a desert stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 8:293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grimm N, Fisher S, Bessler J, Bills R, Blaine T, Boulton A, Cetin J, Clinton S, Colella T, Corbett A, Dent L, Donovan K, Downs L, Drake N, Dudley T, Edmonds J, Ford S, Fredrickson C, Freeman J, Gavin J, Goettl A, Gómez R, Greene D, Grove K, Harper B, Henry J, Holland S, Holmes B, Hunter J, Jackson A, Jones J, Kochert C, Main T, Mallett M, Martí E, Millan A, Murphy M, Myers M, Naegeli M, Peralta R, Peterson B, Peterson C, Petrone K, Rector S, Roach J, Schade J, Schrot A, Seddon J, Sponseller R, Stanley E, Stinchfield K, Tseng M, Valett M, Velasco J, Welter J, Wood D, Zachary J, Zhu W (2007) Sycamore Creek macroinvertebrate collections after flooding event. Data catalogue ID 375. Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research project. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. http://caplter.asu.edu/. Accessed 28 Oct 2013
  28. Heino J (2013) The importance of metacommunity ecology for environmental assessment research in the freshwater realm. Biol Rev 88:166–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes AR, Byrnes JE, Kimbro DL, Stachowicz JJ (2007) Reciprocal relationships and potential feedbacks between biodiversity and disturbance. Ecol Lett 10:849–864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins KM, Boulton AJ (2007) Detecting impacts and setting restoration targets in arid-zone rivers: aquatic micro-invertebrate responses to reduced floodplain inundation. J Appl Ecol 44:823–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khalaf G, Lahoud M (1983) Contribution a l’etude ecologique des fleuves cotiers du Liban, 1: Le Nahr-el-Kalb. Bull Mens Soc Linn Lyon 52:21–32Google Scholar
  32. Koleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ (2003) Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. J Anim Ecol 72:367–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lake PS (2000) Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:573–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Laliberté E, Shipley B (2011) FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0-11Google Scholar
  36. Larned ST, Datry T, Robinson CT (2007) Invertebrate and microbial responses to inundation in an ephemeral river reach in New Zealand: effects of preceding dry periods. Aquat Sci 69:554–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larned ST, Datry T, Arscott DB, Tockner K (2010) Emerging concepts in temporary-river ecology. Freshw Biol 55:717–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larned ST, Schmidt J, Datry T, Konrad CP, Dumas JK, Diettrich JC (2011) Longitudinal river ecohydrology: flow variation down the lengths of alluvial rivers. Ecohydrology 4:532–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ledger ME, Harris RML, Milner AM, Armitage PD (2006) Disturbance, biological legacies and community development in stream mesocosms. Oecologia 148:682–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ledger ME, Harris RM, Armitage PD, Milner AM (2012) Climate change impacts on community resilience: evidence from a drought disturbance experiment. Adv Ecol Res 46:211–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leigh C (2013) Dry season changes in macroinvertebrate assemblages of highly seasonal rivers: responses to low flow, no flow and antecedent hydrology. Hydrobiologia 703:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leigh C, Stubbington R, Sheldon F, Boulton AJ (2013) Hyporheic invertebrates as bioindicators of ecological health in temporary rivers: a meta-analysis. Ecol Indic 32:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leigh C, Boulton AJ, Courtwright JL, Fritz K, May CL, Walker RH, Datry T (2015) Ecological research and management of intermittent rivers: an historical review and future directions. Freshw Biol. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12646 Google Scholar
  45. McCluney KE, Sabo JL (2014) Sensitivity and tolerance of riparian arthropod communities to altered water resources along a drying river. PLoS ONE 9:e109276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82:591–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2015) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.2-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  48. Palmer MA, Poff NL (1997) The influence of environmental heterogeneity on patterns and processes in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Paltridge RM, Dostine PL, Humphrey CL, Boulton AJ (1997) Macroinvertebrate recolonization after re-wetting of a tropical seasonally-flowing stream (Magela Creek, Northern Territory, Australia). Mar Freshw Res 48:633–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team (2012) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-105Google Scholar
  51. Podani J, Schmera D (2011) A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence–absence data. Oikos 120:1625–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rao CR (1982) Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theor Popul Biol 21:24–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Resh VH, Rosenberg DM (1989) Spatial–temporal variability and the study of aquatic insects. Can Entomol 121:941–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Resh VH, Brown AV, Covich AP, Gurtz ME, Li HW, Minshall GW, Reice SR, Sheldon AL, Wallace JB, Wissmar RC (1988) The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:433–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schmera D, Podani J, Erős T, Heino J (2014) Combining taxon-by-trait and taxon-by-site matrices for analysing trait patterns of macroinvertebrate communities: a rejoinder to Monaghan & Soares (2014). Freshw Biol 59:1551–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sponseller RA, Grimm NB, Boulton AJ, Sabo JL (2010) Responses of macroinvertebrate communities to long-term flow variability in a Sonoran Desert stream. Glob Change Biol 16:2891–2900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sponseller RA, Heffernan JB, Fisher SG (2013) On the multiple ecological roles of water in river networks. Ecosphere 4:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stanley EH, Buschman DL, Boulton AJ, Grimm NB, Fisher SG (1994) Invertebrate resistance and resilience to intermittency in a desert stream. Am Midl Nat 131:288–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Statzner B, Bonada N, Dolédec S (2007) Conservation of taxonomic and biological trait diversity of European stream macroinvertebrate communities: a case for a collective public database. Biodivers Conserv 16:3609–3632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stubbington R (2011) The hyporheic zone as a refugium for benthic invertebrates in groundwater-dominated streams. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  61. Stubbington R, Datry T (2013) The macroinvertebrate seedbank promotes community persistence in temporary rivers across climate zones. Freshw Biol 58:1202–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stubbington R, Wood P, Reid I (2011) Spatial variability in the hyporheic zone refugium of temporary streams. Aquat Sci 73:499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tilman D, Downing JA (1994) Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367:363–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. US Geologic Survey (USGS) (2007) Discharge data from USGS gage near Sycamore Creek research site. https://caplter.asu.edu/data/data-catalog/?id=391. Accessed 28 Oct 2013
  65. Vander Vorste R, Corti R, Sagouis A, Datry T (2015) Invertebrate communities in gravel-bed, braided rivers are highly resilient to flow intermittence. Freshw Sci. doi: 10.1086/683274 Google Scholar
  66. Walker SC, Poos MS, Jackson DA (2008) Functional rarefaction: estimating functional diversity from field data. Oikos 117:286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wood PJ, Armitage PD (2004) The response of the macroinvertebrate community to low-flow variability and supra-seasonal drought within a groundwater dominated stream. Arch Hydrobiol 161:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Leigh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Núria Bonada
    • 3
  • Andrew J. Boulton
    • 4
  • Bernard Hugueny
    • 5
  • Scott T. Larned
    • 6
  • Ross Vander Vorste
    • 1
  • Thibault Datry
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Irstea, UR MALY, Centre de Lyon-VilleurbanneVilleurbanne CedexFrance
  2. 2.CESAB-RB Immeuble Henri PoincaréAix-en-Provence Cedex 3France
  3. 3.Grup de Recerca Freshwater Ecology and Management (FEM), Departament d’Ecologia, Facultat de BiologiaUniversitat de Barcelona (UB)BarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  5. 5.UMR ‘‘BOREA’’ CNRS 7208/IRD 207/MNHN/UPMC, DMPA, Museum National d’Histoire NaturelleParis CedexFrance
  6. 6.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations