Aquatic Sciences

, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 567–579 | Cite as

Do seasonal changes in habitat features influence aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages in perennial versus temporary Mediterranean streams?

  • Eduardo M. García-RogerEmail author
  • M. del Mar Sánchez-Montoya
  • Rosa Gómez
  • M. Luisa Suárez
  • M. Rosario Vidal-Abarca
  • Jérôme Latron
  • Maria Rieradevall
  • Narcís Prat
Recent Perspectives on Temporary River Ecology


In this study we examined the importance of seasonal changes in habitat features and aquatic macroinvertebrate responses in temporary and perennial streams from two different catchments in the Western Mediterranean region in Spain. Macroinvertebrate sampling was spatially intensive to account for the relative frequency of meso- (i.e., riffles and pools) and micro-habitats (i.e., different mineral and organic-based substrata) at each site. Samples were collected at two distinctly different phases of the hydrograph: (1) during the flowing period, when pool-riffle sequences were well-established, and (2) during the dry phase, when only isolated pools were expected to occur in the temporary streams. During the dry season, both a reduction in the available total habitat and in microhabitat diversity in all sites studied was observed. As a result, taxon richness decreased in all streams, but more dramatically at temporary stream sites and particularly so in the infrequently remaining discontinuous riffles. Macroinvertebrate assemblages differed among catchments (i.e., geographical identity) and sites (perennial vs. temporary). Invertebrate differences were also strong within and among meso- and micro-habitats, particularly mineral and organic microhabitat patches, and differences were due to both loss of taxa from some habitats and some taxa exhibiting certain habitat affinities.


Aquatic macroinvertebrates Habitat features Mediterranean climate Temporary streams Undisturbed conditions 



This study is framed within the Mediterranean Intermittent River MAnaGEment project FP7-ENV-2007-1 (MIRAGE), which is supported by funding from the specific programme ‘Cooperation’, theme ‘Environment (including Climate Change)’ under the 7th Research Framework Programme of the European Union. Investigations in the Vallcebre Research Catchments are supported by the Probase (CGL2006-11619 /HID), Montes (CSD2008-00040) and RespHiMed (CGL2010-18374) projects, funded by the Spanish Government. J. Latron was the beneficiary of a research contract (Ramón y Cajal program) funded by the ‘Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación’. We would also like to thank P. Fortuño, I. Verkaik, N. Sánchez and I. Navarro for field assistance. The authors are also grateful to D. Arscott and an anonymous referee whose comments contributed to substantially improve the paper.

Conflict of interest



  1. Acuña V, Muñoz I, Giorgi A, Omella M, Sabater F, Sabater S (2005) Drought and postdrought recovery cycles in an intermittent Mediterranean stream: structural and functional aspects. J North Am Benth Soc 24:919–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan JD (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:257–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ (2001) Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:626–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armitage PD, Cannan CE (2000) Annual changes in summer patterns of mesohabitat distribution and associated macroinvertebrate assemblages. Hydrolog Process 14:3161–3179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonada N, Rieradevall M, Prat N, Resh VH (2006) Benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and macrohabitat connectivity in Mediterranean-climate streams of northern California. J North Am Benth Soc 25:32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonada N, Rieradevall M, Prat N (2007) Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia 589:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulton AJ (2003) Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages. Freshw Biol 48:1173–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown AV, Brussock PP (1991) Comparisons of benthic invertebrates between riffles and pools. Hydrobiologia 220:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunn SE, Davies PM (1992) Community structure of the macroinvertebrate fauna and water quality of a saline river system in south-western Australia. Hydrobiologia 248:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaves ML, Rieradevall M, Chainho P, Costa JL, Costa MJ, Prat N (2008) Macroinvertebrate communities of non-glacial high altitude intermittent streams. Freshw Biol 53:55–76Google Scholar
  11. Clarke KR, Warwick RN (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 1st edn. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  12. Closs GP, Lake PS (1994) Spatial and temporal variation in the structure of an intermittent-stream food web. Ecol Monogr 64:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Del Rosario RB, Resh VH (2000) Invertebrates in intermittent and perennial streams: is the hyporheic zone a refuge from drying? J North Am Benth Soc 19:680–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delucchi CM (1988) Comparison of community structure among streams with different temporal flow regimes. Can J Zool 66:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delucchi CM (1989) Movement patterns of invertebrates in temporary and permanent streams. Oecologia 78:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delucchi CM, Peckarsky BL (1989) Life history patterns of insects in an intermittent and a permanent stream. J North Am Benth Soc 8:308–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  18. Feminella JW (1996) Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrates assemblages in small streams along a gradient of flow permanence. J North Am Benth Soc 15:651–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flinders CA, Magoulick DD (2002) Effects of stream permanence on crayfish community structure. Am Midl Nat 149:134–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritz KM, Dodds WK (2005) Harshness: characterization of intermittent stream habitat over space and time. Mar Freshw Res 56:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallart F, Llorens P, Latron P, Regüés D (2002) Hydrological processes and their seasonal controls in a small Mediterranean mountain catchment in the Pyrenees. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6:527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gasith A, Resh VH (1999) Streams in Mediterranean climate regions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable seasonal events. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gotellli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hering D, Moog O, Sandin L, Verdonschot PFM (2004) Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huryn AD, Wallace JB (1987) Local geomorphology as a determinant of macrofaunal production in a mountain stream. Ecology 68:1932–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hynes HBN (1958) The effect of drought on the fauna of a small mountain stream in Wales. Verh Int Verein Limn 13:826–833Google Scholar
  27. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comp Graph Stat 5:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacobson PJ, Jacobson KM, Angermeier PL, Cherry DS (2004) Variation in material transport and water chemistry along a large ephemeral river in the Namid Desert. Freshw Biol 44:481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keddy PA (1991) Working with heterogeneity: an operator’s guide to environmental gradients. In: Kolasa J, Pickett TA (eds) Ecological heterogeneity. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Kruskal JB (1964) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lake PS (2003) Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshw Biol 48:1161–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Larned ST, Datry T, Arscott DB, Tockner K (2010) Emerging concepts in temporary-river ecology. Freshw Biol 55:717–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Latron J, Gallart F (2008) Runoff generation processes in a small Mediterranean research catchment (Vallcebre, Eastern Pyrenees). J Hydrol 358:206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Latron J, Llorens P, Gallart F (2009) The hydrology of Mediterranean mountain areas. Geog Compass 3:2045–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCreadie JW, Adler PH (2006) Ecoregions as predictors of lotic assemblages of blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Ecography 29:603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCulloch DL (1986) Benthic macroinvertebrate distributions in the riffle-pool communities of two east Texas streams. Hydrobiologia 135:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller A, Golladay M (1996) Effects of spates and drying on macroinvertebrate assemblages of an intermittent and a perennial prairie stream. J North Am Benth Soc 15:670–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Munné A, Prat N, Solà C, Bonada N, Rieradevall M (2003) A simple field method for assessing the ecological quality of riparian habitat in rivers and streams: a QBR index. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 13:147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pardo I, Álvarez M, Casas J, Moreno JL, Vivas S, Bonada N, Alba-Tercedor J, Jáimez-Cuéllar P, Moyà G, Prat N, Robles S, Suárez ML, Toro M, Vidal-Abarca MR (2004) El hábitat de los ríos mediterráneos Diseño de un índice de diversidad de hábitat. Limnetica 21:115–133Google Scholar
  41. Pires AM, Cowx IG, Coelho MM (2000) Benthic macroinvertebrate communities of intermittent streams in the middle reaches of the Guadiana Basin (Portugal). Hydrobiologia 435:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poff NL (1997) Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J North Am Benth Soc 16:391–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Puntí T, Rieradevall M, Prat N (2007) Chironomidae assemblages in reference condition Mediterranean streams: environmental factors, seasonal variability and ecotypes. Fund Appl Limnol 170:149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Rieradevall M, Bonada N, Prat N (1999) Community structure and water quality in the Mediterranean streams of a natural park (St Llorenç del Munt, NE Spain). Limnetica 17:45–56Google Scholar
  46. Sánchez-Montoya MM, Puntí T, Suárez ML, Vidal-Abarca MR, Rieradevall M, Poquet JM, Zamora-Muñoz C, Robles S, Álvarez M, Alba-Tercedor J, Toro M, Pujante AM, Munné A, Prat N (2007) Concordance between ecotypes and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Mediterranean streams. Freshw Biol 52:2240–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sánchez-Montoya MM, Vidal-Abarca MR, Puntí T, Poquet JM, Prat N, Rieradevall M, Alba-Tercedor J, Zamora-Muñoz C, Toro M, Robles S, Álvarez M, Suárez ML (2009) Defining criteria to select reference sites in Mediterranean streams. Hydrobiologia 619:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? J Anim Ecol 46:337–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Statzner B, Higler B (1986) Stream hydraulics as a major determinant of benthic invertebrate zonation patterns. Freshw Biol 16:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Statzner B, Gore JA, Resh VH (1988) Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. J North Am Benth Soc 7:307–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stehr WC, Branson JW (1938) An ecological study of an intermittent stream. Ecology 19:294–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tachet H, Richoux P, Bournard M, Usseglio-Polatera P (2000) Invertébrés d’Eau Douce–Systématique, Biologie, Écologie. (2nd corrected impression). CNRS éditions, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  53. Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1994) Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshw Biol 31:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Townsend CR, Dolédec S, Norris R, Peacock K, Arbuckle CJ (2003) The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshw Biol 48:768–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Uys M, O’Keefe J (1997) Simple words and fuzzy zones: early directions for temporary river research in South Africa. Env Manag 21:517–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward JV (1989) The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. J North Am Benth Soc 8:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams DD (1985) Biotic adaptations in temporary lentic waters, with special reference to those in semi-arid and arid regions. Hydrobiologia 125:85–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams DD (1996) Environmental constraints in temporary fresh waters and their consequences for the insect fauna. J North Am Benth Soc 15:634–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams DD, Hynes HBN (1976) The ecology of temporary streams I. The fauna of two Canadian streams. Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol 61:761–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams DD, Hynes HBN (1977) The ecology of temporary streams. II. General remarks on temporary streams. Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol 62:53–61Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo M. García-Roger
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. del Mar Sánchez-Montoya
    • 2
  • Rosa Gómez
    • 2
  • M. Luisa Suárez
    • 2
  • M. Rosario Vidal-Abarca
    • 2
  • Jérôme Latron
    • 3
  • Maria Rieradevall
    • 1
  • Narcís Prat
    • 1
  1. 1.Departament d’EcologiaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Departmento de Ecología e HidrologíaUniversidad de MurciaMurciaSpain
  3. 3.Grup d’Hidrologia Superficial i Erosió, Institut de Diagnosi Ambiental i Estudis de l’Aigua (IDAEA-CSIC)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations