Large Stress Release During Normal-Faulting Earthquakes in Western Turkey Supported by Broadband Ground Motion Simulations
- 50 Downloads
This article investigates the stress drop variability of shallow normal-faulting earthquakes in western Anatolia through strong-motion simulations. For this purpose, source characteristics of three moderate to large magnitude events are constrained by the empirical Green’s function simulation in a broadband frequency range. Recordings of ten strong-motion stations in 78-km epicentral distance range are utilized for the simulation. Estimated strong-motion generation areas (SMGAs) are 22 km2, 66 km2, and 110 km2 where rise times are 0.6 s, 0.7 s, and 0.6 s, respectively, for the 2011 Simav (Mw 5.8), 2017 Lesvos (Mw 6.3), and 2017 Bodrum-Kos (Mw 6.6) earthquakes. Those values are found to be consistent with global source-scaling relationships. One particular observation is that stress drop ratios between the mainshock and aftershock for all events are relatively large compared with those previously calculated for strike-slip events in Turkey. Stress drops of SMGAs for the Simav and Bodrum earthquakes are in the range of 25 MPa, and this value drops to 19 MPa for the Lesvos earthquake. To further investigate the stress drop variation of earthquakes in Western Anatolia, an earthquake source database (fc-Mo) offered by Yamanaka et al. (IAG-IASPEI 2017, S07-1-03, 2017) is utilized. Brune (Journal of Geophysical Research, 76:5002, 1971) stress drop values of > 360 small to moderate earthquakes (Mw 3.0–6.0) are calculated with the given corner frequency and seismic moment information assuming a constant shear wave velocity. Results indicate that the majority of the earthquakes have a stress drop value < 5 MPa. This value changes to between 5 and 57 MPa for the remaining earthquakes. These high stress drop values support the former findings stating that normal-faulting earthquakes may release higher stress than strike-slip earthquakes. This indicates that the regional stress regime in western Turkey may cause relatively larger stress release during the normal-faulting mainshocks.
KeywordsNormal faulting ground motion empirical Green’s function method stress drop
We thank the Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) of Turkey for providing the strong-motion data used in the study. Some figures were prepared using the GMT plotting tool of Wessel and Smith (1995). This study is supported by the Joint Research Project under the Bilateral Program of the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TUBITAK 116Y524).
- Akkar, S., Tanircan, G., Pinar, A., Yenier, E., & Kale, O. (2018). A preliminary study to investigate the regional effects on ground motion predictive models for Turkey, Proceedings of the Best Practices in Physics-based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Installations: Issues and challenges towards full Seismic Risk Analysis.Google Scholar
- Alçık, H., Korkmaz. A., Çırağ, O., & Şafak, E. (2017). Kos Island - gökova bay earthquake acceleration records and properties, Earthquake engineering department report (in Turkish). https://eqe.boun.edu.tr/en/reports. Accessed Nov 6 2019.
- Aochi, H., & Miyake, H. (2018). On near-field ground motions of normal and reverse fault from viewpoint of dynamic rupture model. In Proceedings of the Best Practices in Physics-based Fault Rupture Models for Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Installations: Issues and challenges towards full Seismic Risk Analysis.Google Scholar
- Baykal, M., Miyake, H., & Yokoi, T. (2012). Source model of the 2010 Elazig Kovancilar earthquake (Mw 6.1) for broadband ground motion simulation. In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 0074.Google Scholar
- Irikura, K. (1986). Prediction of strong acceleration motions using empirical Green’s function. In Proceedings of the 7th Japan earthquake engineering symposium, pp. 151–156.Google Scholar
- Irikura, K., & Kamae, K. (1994). Estimation of strong ground motion in broad-frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an empirical Green’s function technique. Annali di Geofisica,37, 1721–1743.Google Scholar
- Kale, Ö., Akkar, S., Ansari, A., & Hamzehloo, H. (2015). A ground-motion predictive model for Iran and Turkey for horizontal PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped response spectrum: investigation of possible regional effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(2A), 963–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kamae, K., & Irikura, K. (1998a). Source model of the 1995 Hyoko-Ken Nanbu earthquake an simulation of near-source ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,88, 400–412.Google Scholar
- Kamae, K, Irikura, K. (1998b). A source model of the 1994 Northridge earthquake (Mw 6.7). in Proceedings of 10th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symp., 643–648, Yokohama, Japan 25–27 November 1998 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
- Margaris, B. N., & Boore, D. M. (1998). Determination of Δσ and κ0 from response spectra of large earthquakes in Greece. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,88, 170–182.Google Scholar
- Şengör, A. M. C., Görür, N., & Şaroğlu, F. (1985). Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study. Strike-slip Deformation, Basin Formation, and Sedimentation Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication,37, 227–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yamanaka, H., Ozmen, O., Ceken, U., & Alkan, M. (2017). Estimation of site amplification using ground motion records at strong motion stations in Turkey, IAG-IASPEI 2017, S07-1-03.Google Scholar