A Regional Approach of Decadal Assessment of Extreme Precipitation Estimates: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Basin, China
- 16 Downloads
Changes in overall observed precipitation have been recognized in many parts of the world in recent decades, leading to the argument on climate change and its impact on extreme precipitation. However, the concept of natural variations and the complex physical mechanisms hidden in the observed data sets must also be taken into consideration. This study aims to examine the matter further with reference to inter-decadal variability in extreme precipitation quantiles appropriate for risk analysis. Temporal changes in extreme precipitation are assessed using a parametric approach incorporating a regional method in region-of-influence form. The index-flood method with the application of generalized extreme value distribution is used to estimate the decadal extreme precipitation. The study also performs a significance test to determine whether the decadal extremes are significant. A case study is performed on the Yangtze River Basin, where annual maximum 1-day precipitation data for 180 stations were analyzed over a 50-year period from 1961 to 2010. Extreme quantiles estimated from the 1990s data emerged as the significant values on several occasions. The immediate drop in the quantile values in the following decade, however, suggested that it is not practical to assign more weight to recent data for the quantile estimation process. The temporal patterns identified are in line with the previous studies conducted in the region and thus make it an alternative way to perform decadal analysis with an advantage that the scheme can be transferred to ungauged conditions.
KeywordsRegional frequency analysis extreme precipitation analysis decadal analysis hydrometeorology
This study is supported by Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology in the form of a grant (grant no. 2243141501015) to the first author. Comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.
- Dalrymple, T. (1960). Flood frequency methods. U. S. Geological Survey,1543, 11–51.Google Scholar
- Guo, J., Chen, H., Xu, C. Y., et al. (2012). Prediction of variability of precipitation in the Yangtze River Basin under the climate change conditions based on automated statistical downscaling. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,26, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0464-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Institute of Hydrology. (1999). Flood Estimation Handbook (Vol. 1-5). Wallingford: Institute of Hydrology.Google Scholar
- IPCC. (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ju, Q., Yu, Z., Hao, Z., et al. (2014). Response of hydrologic processes to future climate changes in the Yangtze River Basin. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scherrer, S. C., Fischer, E. M., Posselt, R., Liniger, M. A., Croci-Maspoli, M., & Knutti, R. (2016). Emerging trends in heavy precipitation and hot temperature extremes in Switzerland. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 121(6), 2626–2637. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Svensson, C., & Jones, D. A. (2010). Review of rainfall frequency estimation methods. Journal of Flood Risk Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318x.2010.01079.x/abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wallis, J. R., Schaefer, M. G., Barker, B. L., & Taylor, G. H. (2007). Regional precipitation-frequency analysis and spatial mapping for 24-hour and 2-hour durations for Washington State. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,11, 415–442. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-415-2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, Q., Xu, C. Y., Zhang, Z., et al. (2008). Spatial and temporal variability of precipitation maxima during 1960–2005 in the Yangtze River basin and possible association with large-scale circulation. Journal of Hydrology,353, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar