Dynamic Modelling of Induced Seismicity by Using Seismic Efficiency Constraints and a New Scaling Law for Slip-Weakening Distance

  • Atsushi SainokiEmail author
  • Chiaki Hirohama
  • Adam Karl Schwartzkopff


In the numerical simulation of induced seismicity, much attention is generally paid to the calibration of the frictional resistance of the causative fault to obtain a seismic moment consistent with that of the actual event, whereas sufficient investigation is not made in the estimation of the slip-weakening distance Dc as well as in the calibration of seismically radiated energy. The present study addresses this problem by numerically and analytically investigating the relation between Dc and seismic source parameters. First, this study performs the dynamic simulation of an induced seismic event caused by a decrease in the effective normal stress. The analysis demonstrated that seismic efficiency η can be used to improve the accuracy of estimating the critical slip-weakening distance and the coefficient of kinetic friction µd whilst considering not only seismic moment but also radiated energy in the calibration. This gave insight into the development of the new calibration method for induced seismicity that considers energy-related seismic source parameters. Furthermore, a new scaling law of the slip-weakening distance was derived from the theoretical expression of seismic efficiency η, considering seismic moment Mo and scaled energy \( \hat{e} \). The proposed scaling law can yield the relation between Dc and Mo, which is shown to be similar to that obtained from a previous study, but additionally considers the relation between seismically radiated energy and Dc. The dependency of Dc on seismically radiated energy implied from the proposed scaling law has been verified from the dynamic analyses where η = 0.06 was used to place a constraint on Dc for seismic events with different magnitudes. The developed numerical simulation methodology of induced seismicity as well as the scaling law considering the energy indices significantly contributes to improving the accuracy of back-analysis, thus leading to a more accurate estimation of the mechanical properties of faults and/or shear zones in seismically active regions of deep underground mines or reservoirs composed of discontinuous hard rock masses.


Induced seismicity seismic efficiency scale effect critical slip-weakening distance 



This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 19K15493.


  1. Aki, K. (1966). Generation and propagation of G waves from the Niigata earthquakes of June 16, 1964. II. Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress–strain drop from the G wave spectrum. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research, 44, 73–88.Google Scholar
  2. Alber, M., & Fritschen, R. (2011). Rock mechanical analysis of a M1 = 4.0 seismic event induced by mining in the Saar District, Germany. Geophysical Journal International, 186, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alber, M., Fritschen, R., Bischoff, M., & Meier, T. (2009). Rock mechanical investigations of seismic events in a deep longwall coal mine. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 46, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, D. J. (1985). Dynamic plane-strain shear rupture with a slip-weakening friction law calculated by a boundary integral method. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 75(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  5. Bahaaddini, M., Hagan, P., Mitra, R., & Hebblewhite, B. H. (2013). Numerical investigation of asperity degradation in the direct shear test of rock joints. In M. Kwasniewski & D. Lydzba (Eds.), Eurock, Poland (pp. 391–397). London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  6. Baisch, S., Vörös, R., Rothert, E., Stang, H., Jung, R., & Schellschmidt, R. (2010). A numerical model for fluid injection induced seismicity at Soultz-sous-Forêts. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 47, 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandis, S., Lumsden, A. C., & Barton, N. R. (1983). Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics, 20(6), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton, N. (1973). Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Engineering Geology, 7(4), 287–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barton, N. (2013). Shear strength criteria for rock, rock joints, rockfill and rock masses: Problems and some solutions. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 5, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barton, N., Bandis, S., & Bakhtar, K. (1985). Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics, 22(3), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barton, N., & Choubey, V. (1977). The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 10, 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beeler, N. M. (2001). Stress drop with constant, scale independent seismic efficiency and overshoot. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(17), 3353–3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birhanu, Y., Wilks, M., Biggs, J., Kendall, J. M., Ayele, A., & Lewi, E. (2018). Seasonal patterns of seismicity and deformation at the Alutu geothermal reservoir, Ethiopia, induced by hydrological loading. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 356, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bizzarri, A. (2012). Rupture speed and slip velocity: What can we learn from simulated earthquake? Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 317, 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blöcher, G., Cacace, M., Jacquey, A. B., Zang, A., Heidbach, O., Hofmann, H., et al. (2018). Evaluating micro-seismic events triggered by reservoir operations at the geothermal site of Groß Schönebech (Germany). Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 51, 3265–3279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, E. T., & Hoek, E. (1978). Trends in relationships between measured in situ stresses and depth. International journal of rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstract, 15, 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buijze, L., Niemeijer, A. R., Han, R., Shimamoto, T., & Spiers, C. J. (2017). Friction properties and deformation mechanisms of halite(-mica) gouges from low to high sliding velocities. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 458, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Byerlee, J. (1978). Friction of rocks. PAGEOPH, 116, 615–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cappa, F., & Rutqvist, J. (2011). Impact of CO2 geological sequestration on the nucleation of earthquakes. Geophysical research letters, 38(L17313), 1–6.Google Scholar
  20. Cardiff, M., Lim, D. D., Patterson, J. R., Akerley, J., Spielman, P., Lopeman, J., et al. (2019). Geothermal production and reduced seismicity: Correlation and proposed mechanism. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 482, 470–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Castro, L. A. M., Carter, T. G., & Lightfoot, N. (2009). Investigating factors influencing fault-slip in seismically active structures. In 3rd CANUS Rock Mechanics Symposium, Toronto, 2009. Google Scholar
  22. Chambon, G., Schmittbuhl, J., & Corfdir, A. (2006a). Frictional response of a thick gouge sample: 1. Mechanical measurements and microstructures. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(B09308), 1–17.Google Scholar
  23. Chambon, G., Schmittbuhl, J., & Corfdir, A. (2006b). Frictional response of a thick gouge sample: 2 Friction law and implications for faults. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(B09308), 1–12.Google Scholar
  24. Chiu, C. C., Weng, M. C., & Huang, T. H. (2016). Modeling rock joint behavior using a rough-joint model. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 89, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cocco, M., & Bizzarri, A. (2002). On the slip-weakening behavior of rate- and state dependent constitutive laws. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(11), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cocco, M., Tinti, E., Marone, C., & Piatanesi, A. (2009). Scaling of slip weakening distance with final slip during dynamic earthquake rupture. In E. Fukuyama (Ed.), Fault-zone properties and earthquake rupture dynamics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Cooke, M. L., & Murphy, S. (2004). Assessing the work budget and efficiency of fault systems using mechanical models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109(B10408), 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. Cueto-Felgueroso, L., Santillán, D., & Mosquera, J. (2017). Stick-slip dynamics of flow-induced seismicity on rate and state faults. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(9), 4098–4106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cueto-Felgueroso, L., Vila, C., Santillán, D., & Mosquera, J. (2018). Numerical modeling of injection-induced earthquakes using laboratory-derived friction laws. Water Resources Research, 54(12), 9833–9859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dieterich, J. H. (1978). Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of strike-slip. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 116, 790–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dieterich, J. H. (1979). Modeling of rock friction 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84(B5), 2161–2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dieterich, J. H. (1981). Constitutive properties of faults with simulated gouge (vol. 24, Mechanical behavior of crustal rocks: the Handin volume).Google Scholar
  33. Dieterich, J. H. (1986). A model for the nucleation of earthquake slip (vol. 37, Earthquake Source Mechanism).Google Scholar
  34. Dieterich, J. H. (2007). Applications of rate- and state-dependent friction to models of fault slip and earthquake occurrence.Google Scholar
  35. Dieterich, J. H., & Kilgore, B. (1996). Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction. In National academy of science, U.S.A., 1996 (vol. 93, pp. 3787–3794, vol. 9).Google Scholar
  36. Domański, B., & Gibowicz, S. J. (2008). Comparison of source parameters estimated in the frequency and time domains for seismic events at the Rudna copper mine, Poland. Acta Geophysica, 56(2), 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Elsworth, D., Im, K., Fang, Y., Ishibashi, T., & Wang, C. (2018). Induced seismicity and permeability evolution in gas shales, CO2 storage and deep geothermal energy. In L. Hu, X. Gu, & J. Tao (Eds.), GeoShanghai 2018, Sahnghai, 2018 (pp. 1–20). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Fang, Y., Elsworth, D., Wang, C., Ishibashi, T., & Fitts, J. (2017a). Frictional stability-permeability relationships for fractures in shales. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(3), 1760–1776.Google Scholar
  39. Fang, Y., Wang, C., Elsworth, D., & Ishibashi, T. (2017b). Seismicity-permeability coupling in the behavior of gas shales, CO2 storage and geothermal energy. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 3(2), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fukuyama, E., Mikumo, T., & Olsen, B. (2003). Estimation of the critical slip-weakening distance: Theoretical background. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93, 1835–1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gan, Q., & Elsworth, D. (2016). Production optimization in fractured geothermal reservoirs by coupled discrete fracture network modeling. Geothermics, 62, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gaucher, E., Schoenball, M., Heidbach, O., Zang, A., Fokker, P. A., Wees, J.-D., et al. (2015). Induced seismicity in geothermal reservoirs: A review of forecasting approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1473–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gibowicz, S. J., Young, R. P., Talebi, S., & Rawlence, D. J. (1991). Source parameters of seismic events at the Underground Research Laboratory in Manitoba, Canada: scaling relations for events with moment magnitude smaller than-2. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 81, 1157–1182.Google Scholar
  44. Grigoli, F., Cesca, S., Rinaldi, A. P., Manconi, A., López-Comino, J. A., Clinton, J. F., et al. (2018). The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea. Science, 360(6392), 1003–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Guatteri, M., Mai, P. M., & Beroza, G. C. (2004). A pseudo-dynamic approximation to dynamic rupture models for strong ground motion prediction. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 94(6), 2051–2063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harris, R. A., & Day, S. M. (1999). Dynamic 3D simulations of earthquakes on en echelon faults. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(14), 2089–2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hincks, T., Aspinall, W., Cooke, R., & Gernon, T. (2018). Oklahoma’s induced seismicity strongly linked to wastewater injection depth. Science, 359, 1251–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hirose, T., & Shimamoto, T. (2003). Fractal dimension of molten surfaces as a possible parameter to infer the slip-weakening distance of faults from natural pseudotachylytes. Journal of Structural Geology, 25, 1569–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hoek, E. (2007). Practical rock engineering, 2007 edn. Rocscience, Toronto.
  50. Hofmann, G. F., & Scheepers, L. J. (2011). Simulating fault slip areas of mining induced seismic tremors using static boundary element numerical modelling. Mining Technology, 120(1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hongjian, W., Da’an, L., Weili, G., & Liyun, L. (2015). Dynamic analysis of granite rockburst based on the PIV technique. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 25, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Huang, Y., Ampuero, J., & Kanamori, H. (2014). Slip-weakening models of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and constrains on stress drop and fracture energy. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171(10), 2555–2568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hudyma, M., & Beneteau, D. L. (2012). Time—A Key Seismic Source Parameter. In C. Hawkes (Ed.), 21st Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium ROCKENG12ROCK ENGINEERING FOR NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012 (pp. 311–318). Canada: The Canadian Rock Mechanics Association.Google Scholar
  54. Ida, Y. (1972). Cohesive force across the tip of a longitudinal-shear crack and Griffith’s specific surface energy. Journal of Geophysical Research, 77(20), 3769–3778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ide, S., & Beroza, G. (2001). Does apparent stress vary with earthquake size? Geophysical Research Letters, 28(17), 3349–3352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ide, S., & Takeo, M. (1997). Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 27379–27391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ikari, M., Saffer, D., & Marone, C. (2009). Frictional and hydrologic properties of clay-rich fault gouge. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(B5), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jacquey, A. B., Cacace, M., Blöcher, G., & Scheck-Wenderoth, M. (2015). Numerical investigation of thermoelastic effects on fault slip tendency during injection and production of geothermal fluids. Energy Procedia, 76, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kaiser, P. K., & Cai, M. (2012). Design of rock support system under rockburst conditions. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 4(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jost, M., Bübelberg, T., Jost, Ö., & Harjes, H.-P. (1998). Source parameters of injection-induced microearthquakes at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site, Germany. Bulletin of the Seismological society of America, 88, 815–832.Google Scholar
  61. Kanamori, H. (2001). Energy budget of earthquakes and seismic efficiency. International Geophysics, 76, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kanamori, H., & Rivera, L. (2006). Energy partitioning during an earthquake. In R. Abercrombie, A. McGarr, G. Di Toro, & H. Kanamori (Eds.), Earthquakes: Radiated energy and the physics of faulting (pp. 3–13). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kaneko, Y., Fukuyama, E., & Hamling, I. J. (2017). Slip-weakening distance and energy budget inferred from near-fault ground deformation during the 2016 Mw7.8 Kaikoura earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(10), 4765–4773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Karami, A., & Stead, D. (2008). Asperity degradation and damage in the direct shear test: a hybrid FEM/DEM approach. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 41(2), 229–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kato, N. (2012). Dependence of earthquake stress drop on critical slip-weakening distance. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117(B01301), 1–10.Google Scholar
  66. Kulatilake, P. H. S., Shreedharan, S., Sherizadeh, T., Shu, B., Xing, Y., & He, P. (2016). Laboratory estimation of rock joint stiffness and frictional parameters. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 34, 1723–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Li, Y., Oh, J., Mitra, R., & Hebblewhite, B. (2016). Modelling of the mechanical behaviour of an opened rock joint. In R. Ulusay, O. Aydan, H. Gerçek, M. A. Hindistan, & E. Tuncay (Eds.), EUROCK2016, Turkey, 2016. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  68. Liao, Z., & Reches, Z. (2019). An experimentally-based friction law for high-velocity, long-displacement slip-pulse events during earthquakes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 515, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lu, C. P., Liu, B., Liu, B., Liu, Y., Wang, H. Y., & Zhang, H. (2019). Anatomy of mining-induced fault-slip and a triggered rockburst. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 5147–5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lu, C. P., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Zhao, T. B., & Wang, H. Y. (2018). In-situ and experiment investigations of rockburst precursor and prevention induced by fault-slip. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 108, 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ma, J., Dong, L., Zhao, G., & Li, X. (2018). Qualitative method and case study for ground vibration of tunnels induced by fault-slip in underground mines. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 52(6), 1887–1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mair, K., & Marone, C. (1999). Friction of simulated fault gouge for a wide range of velocities and normal stresses. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 28899–28914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Majer, E. L., Baria, R., Stark, M., Oates, S., Bommer, J., Smith, B., et al. (2007). Induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics, 36, 185–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Marone, C., Cocco, M., Richardson, E., & Tinti, E. (2009). The critical slip distance of seismic and aseismic fault zones of finite width. In E. Fukuyama (Ed.), Fault-zone properties and earthquake rupture dynamics (Vol. 94, pp. 135–162). Cambridge: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Marone, C., Hobbs, B. E., & Ord, A. (1992). Coulomb constitutive laws for friction: Contrasts in frictional behavior for distributed and localized shear. PAGEOPH, 139(2), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Marone, C., & Kilgore, B. (1993). Scaling of the critical slip distance for seismic faulting with shear strain in fault zones. Nature, 362, 618–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Marone, C., Raleigh, C. B., & Scholz, C. H. (1990). Frictional behavior and constitutive modeling of simulated fault gouge. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(85), 7007–7025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mayeda, K., Gök, R., Walter, W., & Hofstetter, A. (2005). Evidence for non-constant energy/moment scaling from coda-derived source spectra. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(L10306), 1–4.Google Scholar
  79. McClure, M. W. (2015). Generation of large postinjection-induced seismic events by backflow from dead-end faults and fractures. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(16), 6647–6654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McClure, M. W., & Horne, R. N. (2011). Investigation of injection-induced seismicity using a coupled fluid flow and rate/state friction model. In Thirty-Sixth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanfort University, 2011.Google Scholar
  81. McGarr, A. (1994). Some comparisons between mining-induced and laboratory earthquakes. PAGEOPH, 142, 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McGarr, A. (1999). On relating apparent stress to the stress causing earthquake fault slip. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(B2), 3003–3011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McGarr, A. (2002). Control of strong ground motion of minig-induced earthquakes by the strength of the seismogenic rock mass. The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 102, 225–229.Google Scholar
  84. McGarr, A. (2012). Relating stick-slip friction experiments to earthquake source parameters. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(5), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. McGarr, A., & Fletcher, J. B. (2001). A method for mapping apparent stress and energy radiation applied to the 1994 Northridge earthquake fault zone—revisited. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(18), 3529–3532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. McGarr, A., & Fletcher, J. B. (2002). Mapping apparent stress and energy position radiation over fault zones of major earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92, 1633–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Meng, F., Zhou, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, L., Kong, L., Li, S., et al. (2017). Experimental study of factors affecting fault-slip rockburst in deeply buried hard rock tunnels. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 76, 1167–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mikumo, T., Olsen, K. B., Fukuyama, E., & Yagi, Y. (2003). Stress-breakdown time and slip-weakening distance inferred from slip-velocity functions on earthquake faults. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(1), 264–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Noda, H., & Shimamoto, T. (2009). Constitutive properties of clayey fault gouge from the Hanaoka fault zone, southwest Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(B04409), 29. Scholar
  90. Oglesby, D. D., & Mai, P. M. (2012). Fault geometry, rupture dynamics and ground motion from potential earthquakes on the North Anatolian Fault under the Sea of Marmara. Geophysical Journal International, 188, 1071–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Oglesby, D. D., Mai, P. M., Atakan, K., & Pucci, S. (2008). Dynamic models of earthquakes on the North Anatolian fault zone under the Sea of Marmara: Effect of hypocenter location. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(18), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ohnaka, M. (2000). A physical scaling relation between the size of an earthquake and its nucleation zone size. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 157, 2259–2282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ohnaka, M. (2003). A constitutive scaling law and a unified comprehension for frictional slip failure, shear fracture of intact rock, and earthquake rupture. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(B2), ESE 6-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ohnaka, M., Kuwahara, Y., & Yamamoto, K. (1987). Constitutive relations between dynamic physical parameters near a tip of the propagationg slip zone during stick-slip shear failure. Tectonophysics, 144, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ohnaka, M., & Shen, L. (1999). Scaling of the shear rupture from nucleation to dynamic propagation: Implication of geometric irregularity of the rupturing surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 817–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ohnaka, M., & Yamashita, T. (1989). A cohesive zone model for dynamic shear faulting based on experimentally inferred constitutive relation and strong source parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94(4), 4089–4104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Okubo, P. G., & Dieterich, J. H. (1984). Effects of physical fault properties on frictional instabilities produced on simulated faults. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(B7), 5817–5827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Olsen, B., Madariaga, R., & Archuleta, R. J. (1997). Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake. Science, 278, 834–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Olsson, B., & Barton, N. (2001). An improved model for hydromechanical coupling during shearing of rock joints. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 38, 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Ortlepp, W. D. (2000). Observation of mining-induced faults in an intact rock mass at depth. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 37, 423–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Oth, A., Bindi, D., Parolai, S., & Giacomo, D. (2010). Earthquake scaling characteristics and the scale-(in)dependence of seismic energy-to-moment ratio: Insights from KiK-net data in Japan. Geophysical research letters, 37(L19304), 1–5.Google Scholar
  102. Pampillón, P., Santillán, D., Mosquera, J. C., & Cueto-Felgueroso, L. (2018). Dynamic and quasi-dynamic modeling of injection-induced earthquakes in poroelastic media. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(7), 5730–5759.Google Scholar
  103. Peyrat, S., Olsen, K., & Madariaga, R. (2001). Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 26467–26482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Picozzi, M., Oth, A., Parolai, S., Bindi, D., De Landro, G., & Amoroso, O. (2017). Accurate estimation of seismic source parameters of induced seismicity by a combined approach of generalized inversion and genetic algorithm: Application to The Geysers geothermal area, California. Journal of Geophysical Research, 122(5), 3916–3933.Google Scholar
  105. Pulido, N., & Irikura, K. (2000). Estimation of dynamic rupture parameters from the radiate seismic energy and apparent stress. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 3945–3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rice, J. R. (1983). Constitutive relations for fault slip and earthquake instabilities. PAGEOPH, 121(3), 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rice, J. R. (2006). Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(B05311), 1–29.Google Scholar
  108. Rivera, L., & Kanamori, H. (2005). Representations of the radiated energy in earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International, 162, 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ruina, A. (1983). Slip instability and state variable friction laws. Journal of Geophysical Research, 88(12), 10359–10370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Rutqvist, J., Birkholzer, J., Cappa, F., & Tsang, C.-F. (2007). Estimating maximum sustainable injection pressure during geological sequestration of CO2 using coupled fluid flow and geomechanical fault-slip analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 48, 1798–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Rutqvist, J., Cappa, F., Mazzoldi, A., & Rinaldi, A. (2013a). Geomechanical modeling of fault response and the potential for notable seismic events during underground CO2 injection. Energy Procedia, 37, 4774–4784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rutqvist, J., Rinaldi, A., Cappa, F., & Moridis, G. J. (2013b). Modeling of fault reactivation and induced seismicity during hydraulic fracturing of shale-gas reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 107, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Saeb, S. (1990). A variance on the Ladanyi and Archambault’s shear strength criterion. Loen: Paper presented at the International Conference on Rock Joints.Google Scholar
  114. Sagy, A., Brodsky, E. E., & Axen, G. J. (2007). Evolution of fault-surface roughness with slip. The Geology Society of America, 35(3), 284–286.Google Scholar
  115. Sainoki, A., & Mitri, H. S. (2014a). Dynamic behaviour of mining-induced fault slip. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 66c, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Sainoki, A., & Mitri, H. S. (2014b). Dynamic modelling of fault slip with Barton’s shear strength model. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 67, 155–163. Scholar
  117. Sainoki, A., & Mitri, H. S. (2014c). Simulating intense shock pulses due to asperities during fault-slip. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 103, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sainoki, A., & Mitri, H. S. (2015). Effect of slip-weakening distance on selected seismic source parameters of mining-induced fault-slip. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 73, 115–122. Scholar
  119. Sainoki, A., & Mitri, H. S. (2016). Back analysis of fault-slip in burst prone environment. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 134, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sainoki, A., Mitri, H. S., & Chinnasane, D. (2017). Characterization of aseismic fault-slip in a deep hard rock mine through numerical modelling: case study. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 50(10), 2709–2729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Saito, T., Ishida, T., Terada, M., & Tanaka, Y. (1988). The general tendency of initial stress state in Japan with the data of in situ measurements. Journal of JSCE, 394, 71–78.Google Scholar
  122. Scholz, C. H. (1988). The critical slip distance for seismic faulting. Nature, 336, 761–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Scholz, C. H. (1998). Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature, 391(6662), 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Scognamiglio, L., Magnoni, F., Tinti, E., & Casarotti, E. (2016). Uncertainty estimations for moment tensor inversions: The issue of the 2012 May 20 Emilia earthquake. Geophysical Journal International, 206, 792–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sepehr, K., & Stimpson, B. (1988). Induced seismicity in potash mining: A finite element study. International Journal of Mining and Geological Engineering, 6, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sherburn, S., Bromley, C., Bannister, S., Sewell, S., & Bourguignon, S. (2015). New Zealand geothermal induced seismicity: an overview. In World Geothermal Congress, Melbourne, Australia. Google Scholar
  127. Sherman, C. S., Templeton, D. C., Morris, J. P., & Matzel, E. (2016). Modeling induced microseismicity in an enhanced geothermal system. In 50th US Rock Mechanics Symposium/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, TX, United States, 2016. Google Scholar
  128. Sjöberg, J., Perman, F., Quinteiro, C., Malmgren, L., Dahner-Lindkvist, C., & Boskovic, M. (2012). Numerical analysis of alternative mining sequences to minimise potential for fault slip rockbursting. Mining Technology, 121(4), 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Taron, J., & Elsworth, D. (2010). Coupled mechanical and chemical processes in engineered geothermal reservoirs with dynamic permeability. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 47, 1339–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Tinti, E., Cocco, M., Fukuyama, E., & Piatanesi, A. (2009). Dependence of slip weakening distance (Dc) on final slip during dynamic rupture of earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International, 177(3), 1205–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Trutnevyte, E., & Azevedo, I. (2018). Induced seismicity hazard and risk by enhanced geothermal system: an expert elicitation approach. Environmental Research Letter, 13, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Urpi, L., Rinaldi, A., Rutqvist, J., Cappa, F., & Spiers, C. (2016). Dynamic simulation of CO2-injection-induced fault rupture with slip-rate dependent friction coefficient. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 7, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Venkatarangan, A., Beroza, G., Ide, S., Imanishi, K., Ito, H., & Iio, Y. (2006). Measurements of spectral similarity for microearthquakes in western Nagano, Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(B03303), 1–10.Google Scholar
  134. Venkatarangan, A., & Kanamori, H. (2004). Observational constrains on the fracture energy of subduction zone earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109(B5), 1–20.Google Scholar
  135. Wang, J. A., & Park, H. D. (2001). Comprehensive prediction of rockburst based on analysis of strain energy in rocks. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 16, 29–57.Google Scholar
  136. Wassing, B. B. T., Van Wees, J. D., & Fokker, P. A. (2014). Coupled continuum modeling of fracture reactivation and induced seismicity during enhanced geothermal operations. Geothermics, 52, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wibberley, C. A. J., & Shimamoto, T. (2005). Earthquake slip weakening and asperities explained by thermal pressurization. Nature, 436(7051), 689–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wu, Q., Jiang, L., & Wu, Q. (2017). Study on the law of mining stress evolution and fault activation under the influence of normal fault. Acta Geodynamics et Geomaterialia, 14(3), 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Xie, Y., & Kato, N. (2017). Fracture energies at the rupture nucleation points of large strike-slip earthquakes on the Xianshuihe fault, southwestern China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 134, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Yamada, T., Mori, J., Ide, S., Abercrombie, R. E., Kawakata, H., Nakatani, M., et al. (2007). Stress drops and radiated seismic energies of microearthquakes in a South African gold mine. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(B03305), 1–12.Google Scholar
  141. Yamashita, T. (1979). Energy balance of fault motions, and radiated seismic energy and seismic efficiency of shallow earthquakes. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 27(3), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Yang, J., Rong, G., Hou, D., Peng, J., & Zhou, C. (2016). Experimental study on peak shear strength criterion for rock joints. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49, 821–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Yao, L., Ma, S., Platt, J. D., Niemeijer, A. R., & Shimamoto, T. (2016). The crucial role of temperature in high-velocity weakening of faults: Experiments on gouge using host blocks with different thermal conductivities. Geology, 44(1), 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Zhang, X., Jiang, Q., Chen, N., Wei, W., & Feng, X. (2016). Laboratory investigation on shear behavior of rock joints and a new peak shear strength criterion. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49, 3495–3512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Zhao, X. G., & Cai, M. (2014). Influence of specimen height-to-width ratio on the strianburst characteristics of Tianhu granite under tru-triaxial unloading conditions. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52, 890–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atsushi Sainoki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chiaki Hirohama
    • 2
  • Adam Karl Schwartzkopff
    • 1
  1. 1.International Research Organization for Advanced Science and TechnologyKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations