Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 176, Issue 11, pp 4809–4831 | Cite as

Site-Specific Relationships between Bedrock Depth and HVSR Fundamental Resonance Frequency Using KiK-NET Data from Japan

  • Mostafa ThabetEmail author
Article
  • 139 Downloads

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) technique enables the detection of the fundamental resonance frequency (\(f_{\text{HVSR}}\)) of a given site. The utility of this \(f_{\text{HVSR}}\) is analyzed using the nonlinear regression relationships between \(f_{\text{HVSR}}\) and bedrock depth (\(h\)). The derived relationships are mostly site-specific, so that the present paper consists of two main parts. The first is a literature review for the available empirical relationships between \(f_{\text{HVSR}}\) and \(h\). The aim of this part is to highlight the practical limitations of these established relationships and to make fair comparisons. The second is to generate new relationships, taking advantage of the very wide range of available lithological, geophysical, and geotechnical borehole drilling data of the 697 KiK-NET seismic stations in Japan. For this purpose, HVSR are calculated using 10,000 weak earthquakes or linear events recorded at KiK-NET stations to determine the \(f_{\text{HVSR}}\) and correlate it with the corresponding \(h\). The overlying layers/bedrock interface falling within sedimentary, igneous, or metamorphic layers significantly affect the derived frequency–depth relationships. In addition, these relationships are strongly reproduced by the \(V_{\text{p}} /V_{\text{s}}\) ratio of the bedrock in the range of 1.6–2.2. Interestingly, it is found that \(f_{\text{HVSR}}\) less than 1 Hz corresponding to \(h\) more than 100 m leads the trend of the overall frequency–depth relationship.

Keywords

H/V spectral ratio geophysical exploration seismic site classification bedrock depth KiK-NET (Japan) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is very grateful to the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) for making the valuable KiK-NET data available. The author appreciates the valuable and constructive comments and suggestions from the editor and the reviewers.

References

  1. Anbazhagan, P., & Sitharam, T. G. (2009). Spatial variability of the depth of weathered and engineering bedrock using multichannel analysis of surface wave method. Pure and Applied Geophysics,166, 409–428.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-009-0450-0. (0033-4553/09/030409-20).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bard, P. Y., & SESAME team. (2004). Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations: Measurements, processing and interpretation, SESAME European research project, WP12—Deliverable D23. 12.Google Scholar
  3. Bindi, D., Parolai, S., Spallarossa, D., & Cattaneo, M. (2000). Site effects by H/V ratio: Comparison of two different procedures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering,4, 97–113.Google Scholar
  4. Birgören, G., Özel, O., & Siyahi, B. (2009). Bedrock depth mapping of the coast south of İstanbul: Comparison of analytical and experimental analyses. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences,18, 315–329.  https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-0712-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castro, R. R., Mucciarelli, M., Pacor, F., & Petrungaro, C. (1997). S-wave site response estimates using horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,87, 256–260.Google Scholar
  6. Del Monaco, F., Tallini, M., De Rose, C., & Durante, F. (2013). HVNSR survey in historical downtown L’Aquila (central Italy): Site resonance properties vs. subsoil model. Engineering Geology,158, 34–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delgado, J., Casado, C. L., Estévez, A., Giner, J., Cuenca, A., & Molina, S. (2000a). Mapping soft soils in the Segura river valley (SE Spain): A case study of microtremors as an exploration tool. Journal of Applied Geophysics,45, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delgado, J., Casado, C. L., Giner, J., Estévez, A., Cuenca, A., & Molina, S. (2000b). Microtremors as a geophysical exploration tool: Applications and limitations. Pure and Applied Geophysics,157, 1445–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ducellier, A., Kawase, H., & Matsushima, S. (2013). Validation of a new velocity structure inversion method based on horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) spectral ratios of earthquake motions in the Tohoku Area, Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,103(2A), 958–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fäh, D., Kind, F., & Giardini, D. (2001). A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios. Geophysical Journal International,145, 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fairchild, G.M., Lane, J.W., Voytek, E.B., & LeBlanc, D.R. (2013). Bedrock topography of western Cape Cod, Massachusetts, based on bedrock altitudes from geologic borings and analysis of ambient seismic noise by the horizontal-to-vertical spectral-ratio method, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3233, 1 sheet, maps variously scaled, p 17. Pamphlet, on one CD–ROM. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3233. Accessed 20 Feb 2017.
  12. FEMA 222A. (1994). NEHRP recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings, 1994 edition, Part 1—provisions, Federal Emergency Management AgencyGoogle Scholar
  13. FEMA 450. (2004). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, 2003 edition, part 1—provisions (p. 356). National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.: Building Seismic Safety Council.Google Scholar
  14. Field, E. H. (1996). Spectral amplification in a sediment-filled valley exhibiting clear basin-edge-induced waves. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,86, 991–1005.Google Scholar
  15. Field, E. H., & Jacob, K. (1993). The theoretical response of sedimentary layers to ambient seismic noise. Geophysical Research Letters,20–24, 2925–2928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García-Jerez, A., Piña-Flores, J., Sánchez-Sesma, F. J., Luzón, F., & Perton, M. (2016). A computer code for forward computation and inversion of the H/V spectral ratio under the diffuse field assumption. Computers & Geosciences,97, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harutoonian, P., Leo, C. J., Tokeshi, K., Doanh, T., Castellaro, S., Zou, J. J., et al. (2013). Investigation of dynamically compacted ground by HVSR-based approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,46, 20–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hinzen, K. G., Weber, B., & Scherbaum, F. (2004). On the resolution of H/V measurements to determine sediment thickness, a case study across a normal fault in the lower Rhine Embayment, Germany. Journal of Earthquake Engineering,8(6), 909–926.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IBC. (2009). The international building code, International Code Council, ISBN: 978-1-58001-725-1 (soft-cover edition), ISBN: 978-1-58001-724-4 (loose-leaf edition) , pp 752.Google Scholar
  20. Ibs-von Seht, M., & Wohlenberg, J. (1999). Microtremors measurements used to map thickness of soft soil sediments. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,89, 250–259.Google Scholar
  21. Kawase, H., Mori, Y., & Nagashima, F. (2018). Difference of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of observed earthquakes and microtremors and its application to S-wave velocity inversion based on the diffuse field concept. Earth, Planets and Space,70, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0766-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawase, H., Sánchez-Sesma, F. J., & Matsushima, S. (2011), Application of the H/V spectral ratios for earthquake and microtremor ground motions. In: 4th IASPEI/IAEE international symposium: effects of surface geology on seismic motion, August 23–26, (2011), University of California Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  23. Lachet, C., & Bard, P. Y. (1994). Numerical and theoretical investigations on the possibilities and limitations of Nakamura’s technique. Journal of Physics of the Earth,42, 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lermo, J., & Chavez-Garcia, F. J. (1993). Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,83, 1574–1594.Google Scholar
  25. Lermo, J., & Chavez-Garcia, F. J. (1994). Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,84, 1350–1364.Google Scholar
  26. Lontsi, A. M., Sánchez-Sesma, F. J., Molina-Villegas, J. C., Ohrnberger, M., & Krüger, F. (2015). Full microtremor H/V(z, f) inversion for shallow subsurface Characterization. Geophysical Journal International,202, 298–312.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maeda, T. (2004), Observatory shed effect on strong motion records identified by micro-tremor measurement, in Proceedings of the thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Paper No. 568Google Scholar
  28. Miller, R. D., Xia, J., Park, C. B., & Ivanov, J. (1999). Multichannel analysis of surface waves to map bedrock. The Leading Edge,18(12), 1392–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mucciarelli, M. (1998). Reliability and applicability of Nakamura’s technique using microtremors on the ground surface: an experimental approach. Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2, 625–638.Google Scholar
  30. Nakamura, Y. (1989). A method for dynamic characteristics estimations of subsurface using microtremors on the ground surface. Q Rep RTRI Jpn,30, 25–33.Google Scholar
  31. Nakamura, Y. (2000), Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura’s technique and its application, in Proceedings of the XII world conference earthquake engineering. Auckland, New Zeeland, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Nath, S.K. (2007). Seismic microzonation framework—principles and applications, in Proceedings of the workshop on microzonation, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 26–27 June 2007, India, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
  33. Nogoshi, M., & Igarashi, T. (1970). On the propagation characteristics estimations of subsurface using microtremors on the ground surface. Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan,23, 264–280.Google Scholar
  34. Nogoshi, M., & Igarashi, T. (1971). On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor (Part 2). Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan,24, 26–40.Google Scholar
  35. Özalaybey, S., Zor, E., Ergintav, S., & Tapırdamaz, M. C. (2011). Investigation of 3-D basin structures in the İzmit Bay area (Turkey) by single-station microtremor and gravimetric methods. Geophysical Journal International,186, 883–894.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parolai, S., Bormann, P., & Milkert, C. (2002). New relationships between Vs, thickness of sediments, and resonance frequency calculated by the H/V ratio of seismic noise for Cologne Area (Germany). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,92, 2521–2527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parolai, S., Richwalski, S. M., Milkereit, C., & Bormann, P. (2004). Assessment of the stability of H/V spectral ratios from ambient noise and comparison with earthquake data in the Cologne area (Germany). Tectonophysics,390, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sánchez-Sesma, F. J., Rodríguez, M., Iturrarán-Viveros, U., Luzón, F., Campillo, M., Margerin, L., et al. (2011). A theory for microtremor H/V spectral ratio: application for a layered medium. Geophysical Journal International,186, 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Satoh, T., Kawase, H., & Matsushima, S. (2001). Differences between site characteristics obtained from microtremors, S-waves, P-waves and codas. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,91, 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spica, Z. J., Perton, M., Nakata, N., Liu, X., & Beroza, G. C. (2018). Site characterization at Groningen gas field area through joint surface-borehole H/V analysis. Geophysical Journal International,00, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun, C. G. (2014). Earthquake engineering bedrock based on the shear wave velocities of Rock Strata in Korea. The Journal of Engineering Geology,24(2), 273–281.  https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2014.2.273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tün, M., Pekkan, E., Özel, O., & Guney, Y. (2016). An investigation into the bedrock depth in the Eskisehir Quaternary Basin (Turkey) using the microtremor method. Geophysical Journal International,207(1), 589–607.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yamanaka, H., Takemura, M., Ishida, H., & Niwa, M. (1994). Characteristics of long-period microtremors and their applicability in exploration of deep sedimentary layers. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,84, 1831–1841.Google Scholar
  44. Yoshimura, C., Hibino, H., Uchiyama, Y., Maeda, T., Kurauchi, N., & Aoi, S. (2003), Vibration characteristics of the observation house at KiK-net Hino, Japan Earth and Planetary Science Joint Meeting (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seismology Lecturer, Geology Department, Faculty of ScienceAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt

Personalised recommendations