Effect of Dynamical Phase on the Resonant Interaction Among Tsunami Edge Wave Modes
Different modes of tsunami edge waves can interact through nonlinear resonance. During this process, edge waves that have very small initial amplitude can grow to be as large or larger than the initially dominant edge wave modes. In this study, the effects of dynamical phase are established for a single triad of edge waves that participate in resonant interactions. In previous studies, Jacobi elliptic functions were used to describe the slow variation in amplitude associated with the interaction. This analytical approach assumes that one of the edge waves in the triad has zero initial amplitude and that the combined phase of the three waves φ = θ1 + θ2 − θ3 is constant at the value for maximum energy exchange (φ = 0). To obtain a more general solution, dynamical phase effects and non-zero initial amplitudes for all three waves are incorporated using numerical methods for the governing differential equations. Results were obtained using initial conditions calculated from a subduction zone, inter-plate thrust fault geometry and a stochastic earthquake slip model. The effect of dynamical phase is most apparent when the initial amplitudes and frequencies of the three waves are within an order of magnitude. In this case, non-zero initial phase results in a marked decrease in energy exchange and a slight decrease in the period of the interaction. When there are large differences in frequency and/or initial amplitude, dynamical phase has less of an effect and typically one wave of the triad has very little energy exchange with the other two waves. Results from this study help elucidate under what conditions edge waves might be implicated in late, large-amplitude arrivals.
KeywordsTsunamis edge waves nonlinear resonance earthquake stochastic slip
The author very much appreciates the constructive comments received on the manuscript by Efim Pelinovsky, Kenny Ryan, and an anonymous reviewer, as well as the thoughtful insights of Editor Alexander Rabinovich.
- Bricker J. D., Munger S., Pequignet C., Wells J. R., Pawlak G., & Cheung K. F. (2007). ADCP observations of edge waves off Oahu in the wake of the November 2006 Kuril Islands tsunami. Geophysical Research Letters, 34. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl032015.
- Bustamante M. D., & Kartashova E. (2009a). Dynamics of nonlinear resonances in Hamiltonian systems. Europhysics Letters, 85. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/1285/14004.
- Bustamante M. D., & Kartashova E. (2009b). Effect of the dynamical phases on the nonlinear amplitudes’ evolution. Europhysics Letters, 85. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/1285/34002.
- Carrier, G. F. (1995). On-shelf tsunami generation and coastal propagation. In Y. Tsuchiya & N. Shuto (Eds.), Tsunami: Progress in prediction, disaster prevention and warning (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Herrero, A., & Bernard, P. (1994). A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 1216–1228.Google Scholar
- Hindmarsh, A. C. (1983). ODEPACK, a systematized collection of ODE solvers. In R. S. Stepleman (Ed.), Scientific computing. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Kartashova, E. (2011). Nonlinear resonance analysis: Theory, computation, applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kenyon, K. E. (1970). A note on conservative edge wave interactions. Deep-Sea Research, 17, 197–201.Google Scholar
- Kirby J. T., Putrevu U., & Özkan-Haller H. T. (1998). Evolution equations for edge waves and shear waves on longshore uniform beaches. In: Proceedings of 26th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. ASCE, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 203–216.Google Scholar
- Leblond, P. H., & Mysak, L. A. (1978). Waves in the ocean. Amseterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Mai P. M., & Beroza G. C. (2002). A spatial random field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jb000588.
- Mei, C. C., Stiassnie, M., & Yue, D. K.-P. (2005). Theory and applications of ocean surface waves. Part 2: Nonlinear aspects. Singpore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- Miller, G. R., Munk, W. H., & Snodgrass, F. E. (1962). Long-period waves over California’s continental borderland Part II. Tsunamis. Journal of Marine Research, 20, 31–41.Google Scholar
- Okada, Y. (1985). Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75, 1135–1154.Google Scholar
- Snodgrass, F. E., Munk, W. H., & Miller, G. R. (1962). Long-period waves over California’s continental borderland Part I. Background spectra. Journal of Marine Research, 20, 3–30.Google Scholar
- Sobarzo, M., Garcés-Vargas, J., Bravo, L., Tassara, A., & Quiñones, R. A. (2012). Observing sea level and current anomalies driven by a megathrust slope-shelf tsunami: The event on February 27, 2010 in central Chile. Continental Shelf Research, 49, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yamazaki Y., & Cheung K. F. (2011). Shelf resonance and impact of near-field tsunami generated by the 2010 Chile earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 38. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl047508.
- Yankovsky A. E. (2009). Large-scale edge waves generated by hurricane landfall. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jc005113.