Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 175, Issue 3, pp 757–772 | Cite as

Contribution of the Surface and Down-Hole Seismic Networks to the Location of Earthquakes at the Soultz-sous-Forêts Geothermal Site (France)

  • X. Kinnaert
  • E. Gaucher
  • T. Kohl
  • U. Achauer
Article
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

Seismicity induced in geo-reservoirs can be a valuable observation to image fractured reservoirs, to characterize hydrological properties, or to mitigate seismic hazard. However, this requires accurate location of the seismicity, which is nowadays an important seismological task in reservoir engineering. The earthquake location (determination of the hypocentres) depends on the model used to represent the medium in which the seismic waves propagate and on the seismic monitoring network. In this work, location uncertainties and location inaccuracies are modeled to investigate the impact of several parameters on the determination of the hypocentres: the picking uncertainty, the numerical precision of picked arrival times, a velocity perturbation and the seismic network configuration. The method is applied to the geothermal site of Soultz-sous-Forêts, which is located in the Upper Rhine Graben (France) and which was subject to detailed scientific investigations. We focus on a massive water injection performed in the year 2000 to enhance the productivity of the well GPK2 in the granitic basement, at approximately 5 km depth, and which induced more than 7000 earthquakes recorded by down-hole and surface seismic networks. We compare the location errors obtained from the joint or the separate use of the down-hole and surface networks. Besides the quantification of location uncertainties caused by picking uncertainties, the impact of the numerical precision of the picked arrival times as provided in a reference catalogue is investigated. The velocity model is also modified to mimic possible effects of a massive water injection and to evaluate its impact on earthquake hypocentres. It is shown that the use of the down-hole network in addition to the surface network provides smaller location uncertainties but can also lead to larger inaccuracies. Hence, location uncertainties would not be well representative of the location errors and interpretation of the seismicity distribution possibly biased. This result also emphasizes that it is still necessary to properly describe the seismic propagation medium even though the addition of down-hole sensors increases the coverage of a surface network.

Keywords

Location inaccuracy location uncertainty network design induced seismicity Soultz-sous-Forêts EGS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted in the framework of the excellence laboratory “Labex G-EAU-THERMIE PROFONDE” (University of Strasbourg). It was funded by the French National Research Agency, as part of the French “Investments for the future” program, by the Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (EnBW), the French institution CNRS, and by the French-German University (DFH-UFA). We wish to thank the EEIG “Heat Mining” for sharing data. We are grateful to N. Cuenot and A. Genter for fruitful discussions on the Soultz experiments and raw seismic datasets. We also thank L. and C. Dorbath for providing the seismic data catalogues and sharing their knowledge on the seismic datasets. We are very grateful to T. Plenefisch and another anonymous reviewer for their advices and remarks, which greatly improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Bachura, M., & Fischer, T. (2016). Detailed velocity ratio mapping during the aftershock sequence as a tool to monitor the fluid activity within the fault plane. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 453, 215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baillieux, P., Schill, E., Edel, J.-B., & Mauri, G. (2013). Localization of temperature anomalies in the Upper Rhine Graben: Insights from geophysics and neotectonic activity. International Geology Review, 55(14), 1744–1762.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2013.794914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardainne, T., & Gaucher, E. (2010). Constrained tomography of realistic velocity models in microseismic monitoring using calibration shots. Geophysical Prospecting, 58(5), 739–753.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00912.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baria, R., Baumgärtner, J., Gérard, A., & Garnish, J. (2000). The European HDR programme: main targets and results of the deepening of the well GPK2 to 5000 m. In Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000, Kyushu-Tohoku, Japan, 28 May–10 June 2000, pp. 3643–3652.Google Scholar
  5. Calò, M., Dorbath, C., Cornet, F. H., & Cuenot, N. (2011). Large-scale aseismic motion identified through 4-D P-wave tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 186(3), 1295–1314.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charléty, J., Cuenot, N., Dorbath, C., & Dorbath, L. (2006). Tomographic study of the seismic velocity at the Soultz-sous-Forêts EGS/HDR site. Geothermics, 35(5–6), 532–543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2006.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charléty, J., Cuenot, N., Dorbath, L., Dorbath, C., Haessler, H., & Frogneux, M. (2007). Large earthquakes during hydraulic stimulations at the geothermal site of Soultz-sous-Forêts. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44(8), 1091–1105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornet, F. H., Bérard, T., & Bourouis, S. (2007). How close to failure is a granite rock mass at a 5 km depth? International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 44(1), 47–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuenot, N. (2009). Réponse du granite fracturé de Soultz-sous-Forêts à des injections massives de fluide: Analyse de la microsismicité induite et du régime de contraintes, Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
  10. Cuenot, N., Dorbath, C., & Dorbath, L. (2008). Analysis of the microseismicity induced by fluid injections at the EGS site of Soultz-sous-Forêts (Alsace, France): Implications for the characterization of the geothermal reservoir properties. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 165(5), 797–828.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-008-0335-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahm, T., & Fischer, T. (2014). Velocity ratio variations in the source region of earthquake swarms in NW Bohemia obtained from arrival time double-differences. Geophysical Journal International, 196(2), 957–970.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorbath, L., Cuenot, N., Genter, A., & Frogneux, M. (2009). Seismic response of the fractured and faulted granite of Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) to 5 km deep massive water injections. Geophysical Journal International, 177(2), 653–675.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04030.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dyer, B. C. (2001). Soultz GPK2 stimulation June/July 2000: Seismic monitoring report. Socomine: Semore Seismic Report.Google Scholar
  14. Dyer, B. C. (2005). Soultz GPK4 stimulation September 2004 to April 2005: Seismic monitoring report, Semore Seismic Report BP38, EEIG Heat Mining, F-67250 Kutzenhausen.Google Scholar
  15. Dyer, B. C., Baria, R., & Michelet, S. (2003). Soultz GPK3 stimulation and GPK3-GPK2 circulation May to July 2003: Seismic monitoring report, Semore Seismic Report, 69 pp., EEIG Heat Mining.Google Scholar
  16. Gaucher, E. (1998). Comportement hydromécanique d’un massif fracturé: Apport de la microsismicité induite. Application au site géothermique de Soultz-sous-Forêts (Hydro-mechanical behaviour of a fractured rock mass: Induced microseismicity contribution. Application to the Soultz-sous-Forêts geothermal site), Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris 7, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  17. Gaucher, E., Kinnaert, X., Achauer, U., & Kohl, T. (2016). Propagation of velocity model errors in earthquake absolute locations: Application to the Rittershoffen (France) Geothermal Field, in 41st workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering.Google Scholar
  18. Genter, A., Evans, K., Cuenot, N., Fritsch, D., & Sanjuan, B. (2010). Contribution of the exploration of deep crystalline fractured reservoir of Soultz to the knowledge of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 342(7–8), 502–516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2010.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gérard, A., & Kappelmeyer, O. (1987). The Soultz-sous-Forets project. Geothermics, 16(4), 393–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6505(87)90018-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gritto, R., & Jarpe, S. P. (2014). Temporal variations of Vp/Vs-ratio at The Geysers geothermal field, USA. Geothermics, 52, 112–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Held, S., Genter, A., Kohl, T., Kölbel, T., Sausse, J., & Schoenball, M. (2014). Economic evaluation of geothermal reservoir performance through modeling the complexity of the operating EGS in Soultz-sous-Forêts. Geothermics, 51, 270–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kinnaert, X., Gaucher, E., Achauer, U., & Kohl, T. (2016). Modelling earthquake location errors at a reservoir scale: A case study in the Upper Rhine Graben. Geophysical Journal International, 206, 861–879.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohl, T., & Mégel, T. (2007). Predictive modeling of reservoir response to hydraulic stimulations at the European EGS site Soultz-sous-Forêts. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44(8), 1118–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.07.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kwiatek, G., Bohnhoff, M., Dresen, G., Schulze, A., Schulte, T., Zimmermann, G., et al. (2010). Microseismicity induced during fluid-injection: A case study from the geothermal site at Groß Schönebeck, North German Basin. Acta Geophysica, 58(6), 995–1020.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-010-0032-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lomax, A. (2011). The NonLinLoc home page. http://alomax.free.fr/nlloc/.
  26. Lomax, A., Michelini, A., & Curtis, A. (2009). Earthquake location, direct, global-search methods. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 2449–2473). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Megies, T., & Wassermann, J. (2014). Microseismicity observed at a non-pressure-stimulated geothermal power plant. Geothermics, 52, 36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Place, J., Diraison, M., Naville, C., Géraud, Y., Schaming, M., & Dezayes, C. (2010). Decoupling of deformation in the Upper Rhine Graben sediments. Seismic reflection and diffraction on 3-component Vertical Seismic Profiling (Soultz-sous-Forêts area). Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 342(7–8), 575–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2010.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Podvin, P., & Lecomte, I. (1991). Finite difference computation of travel times in very contrasted velocity models: A massively parallel approach and its associated tools. Geophysical Journal International, 105(1), 271–284.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb03461.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sausse, J., Dezayes, C., Dorbath, L., Genter, A., & Place, J. (2010). 3D model of fracture zones at Soultz-sous-Forêts based on geological data, image logs, induced microseismicity and vertical seismic profiles. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 342(7–8), 531–545.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2010.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schill, E., Genter, A., Cuenot, N., & Kohl, T. (2017). Hydraulic performance history at the Soultz EGS reservoirs from stimulation and long-term circulation tests. Geothermics, 70(Supplement C), 110–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schnaebele, R. (1948). Monographie géologique du champ pétrolifère de Pechelbronn. Strasbourg: Mémoire du Service de la Carte Géologique d’Alsace et de Lorraine.Google Scholar
  33. Schoenball, M., Dorbath, L., Gaucher, E., Wellmann, J. F., & Kohl, T. (2014). Change of stress regime during geothermal reservoir stimulation. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(4), 1163–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tarantola, A., & Valette, B. (1982). Inverse problems=quest for information. Journal of Geophysics, 50, 159–170.Google Scholar
  35. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Behavioral Science (p. 503). Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  36. Wenzel, F., & Brun, J.-P. (1991). A deep reflection seismic line across the Northern Rhine Graben. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 104(2–4), 140–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(91)90200-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wittlinger, G., Herquel, G., & Nakache, T. (1993). Earthquake location in strongly heterogeneous media. Geophysical Journal International, 115(3), 759–777.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1993.tb01491.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Geothermal Research, Institute of Applied GeosciencesKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.EOST-IPGS UMR7516University of StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations