Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 174, Issue 10, pp 3689–3711 | Cite as

Earthquake Triggering Inferred from Rupture Histories, DInSAR Ground Deformation and Stress-Transfer Modelling: The Case of Central Italy During August 2016–January 2017

  • G. A. Papadopoulos
  • A. Ganas
  • A. Agalos
  • A. Papageorgiou
  • I. Triantafyllou
  • Ch. Kontoes
  • I. Papoutsis
  • G. Diakogianni
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. The Central Italy Earthquake Crisis with onset August 24, 2016

Abstract

On August 24, October 26 and 30, 2016, Central Apennines (Italy) were hit by three shallow, normal faulting very strong earthquakes rupturing in an NW–SE striking zone. Event 3 (Norcia) occurred between event 1 (Amatrice) at the SE and event 2 (Visso) at the NW of the entire rupture zone. The rupture histories of the three events, as revealed by teleseismic P-wave inversion, showed that all were characterized by bilateral rupture process with stronger rupture directivity towards NW for events 1 and 3 and towards SSE for event 2. Maximum seismic slip of 1.2, 0.8, and 1.4 m in the hypocenter and magnitude of M w 6.2, 6.1, and 6.5 were calculated for the three events, respectively. DInSaR measurements based on Sentinel-1 and 2 satellite images showed ground deformation directivity from events 1 and 2 towards event 3, which is consistent with the rupture process directivity. For events 1, 2, and 3, the maximum ground subsidence was found equal to 0.2, 0.15, and 0.35 m. Based on rupture directivity and ground deformation pattern, we put forward the hypothesis that the area of the second event was stress loaded by the first one and that both the first and second earthquake events caused stress loading in the area, where the third event ruptured. Coulomb stress-transfer modelling yields strong evidence in favor of our hypothesis. The stress in the fault plane of event 2 was increased by ~0.19 bars due to loading from event 1. Event 3 fault plane was loaded by an amount of ~2 bars, due to the combined stress transfer from the two previous events, despite its proximity to the negative/positive lobe boundary. The three events produced combined stress loading of more than +0.5 bar along the Apennines to the NW and SE of the entire rupture zone. In the SE stress lobe, a series of strong earthquakes of M w 5.3, 5.6, and 5.7 occurred on January 18, 2017, but likely, seismic potential remains in the area. We consider that in the NW and more extensive stress lobe, the seismic potential has also elevated due to stress loading.

Keywords

Rupture histories teleseismic P-wave inversion stress transfer DInSAR central Italy 2016–2017 earthquakes earthquake triggering 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Center of Excellence BEYOND (“Building a Centre of Excellence for EO-based monitoring of Natural Disasters”), funded by the EU-FP7-REGPOT-2012-2013-1, G.A. 316210 project. This is also a contribution to the internal research project EARTHWARN of the Institute of Geodynamics, National Observatory of Athens (NOA). We acknowledge Bob Simpson for making available the DLC code. Ch. Kyriakopoulos, S. Valkaniotis, and Ch. Tsimi helped with Italian geophysical data. Thanks are due to Gian Maria Bocchini, PhD student at NOA, for useful discussions on the tectonics of Apennines. All illustrations were prepared using the GMT software (Wessel et al. 2013). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which helped to improve substantially the initial manuscript.

References

  1. Albano, M., Saroli, M., Moro, M., Falcucci, E., Gori, S., Stramondo, S., et al. (2016). Minor shallow gravitational component on the Mt. Vettore surface ruptures related to M w 6, 2016 Amatrice earthquake. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5, 1–6. doi: 10.4401/ag-7299.Google Scholar
  2. Avallone, A., Latorre, D., Serpelloni, E., Cavaliere, A., Herrero, A., Cecere, G., et al. (2016). Coseismic displacement waveforms for the 2016 August 24 M w 6.0 Amatrice earthquake (central Italy) carried out from high-rate GPS data. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5. doi: 10.4401/ag-7275.Google Scholar
  3. Basili, R., & Meghraoui, M. (2001). Coseismic and postseismic displacements related with 1997 earthquake sequence in Umbria–Marche (central Italy). Geophysical Research Letters, 28(14), 2695–2698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bignami, C., Tolomei, C., Pezzo, G., Guglielmino, F., Atzori, S., Trasatti, E., et al. (2016). Source identification for situational awareness of August 24th 2016 central Italy event. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5. doi: 10.4401/AG-7233.Google Scholar
  5. Boncori, J. P. M., Papoutsis, I., Pezzo, G., Tolomei, C., Atzori, S., Ganas, A., et al. (2015). The February 2014 Cephalonia earthquake (Greece): 3D deformation field and source modeling from multiple SAR techniques. Seismological Society of America, 86(1), 124–137. doi: 10.1785/0220140126. (early edition).Google Scholar
  6. Bonini, L., Maesano, F. E., Basili, R., Burrato, P., Cosimo Carafa, M. M., Fracassi, U., et al. (2016). Imaging the tectonic framework of the 24 August 2016, Amatrice (central Italy) earthquake sequence: New roles for old players? Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track. doi: 10.4401/ag-7229.Google Scholar
  7. Cocco, M., Nostro, C., & Ekström, G. (2000). Static stress changes and fault interaction during the 1997 Umbria–Marche earthquake sequence. Journal of Seismology, 4, 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costantini, M. (1998). A novel phase unwrapping method based on network programming. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36(3), 813–821. doi: 10.1109/36.673674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Agostino, N., Giuliani, R., Mattone, M., & Bonci, L. (2001). Active crustal extension in the Central Apennines (Italy) inferred from GPS measurements in the interval 1994–1999. Geophysical Research Letters. doi: 10.1029/2000GL012462.Google Scholar
  10. Dalla Via, G., De Natale, G., Troise, C., Pingue, F., Obrizzo, F., Riva, R., et al. (2003). First evidence of post seismic deformation in the central Mediterranean: Crustal viscoelastic relaxation in the area of the 1980 Irpinia earthquake (Southern Italy). Geophysical Journal International, 154, F9–F14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falcucci, E., Gori, S., Galadini, F., Fubelli, G., Moro, M., & Saroli, M. (2016). Active faults in the epicentral and mesoseismal M L 6.0 August 24, 2016 Amatrice earthquake region, central Italy. Methodological and seismotectonic issues. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5. doi: 10.4401/ag-7266.Google Scholar
  12. Farr, T. G., & Kobrick, M. (2000). Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data. EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 81, 583–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freed, A. M. (2005). Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122505.Google Scholar
  14. Ganas, A., Chousianitis, K., Batsi, E., Kolligri, M., Agalos, A., Chouliaras, G., et al. (2013). The January 2010 Efpalion earthquakes (Gulf of Corinth, Central Greece): Earthquake interactions and blind normal faulting. Journal of Seismology, 17(2), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ganas, A., Gosar, A., & Drakatos, G. (2008). Static stress changes due to the 1998 and 2004 Krn Mountain (Slovenia) earthquakes and implications for future seismicity. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 8, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ganas, A., Grecu, B., Batsi, E., & Radulian, M. (2010). Vrancea slab earthquakes triggered by static stress transfer. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 10, 2565–2577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ganas, A., Roumelioti, Z., & Chousianitis, K. (2012). Static stress transfer from the May 20, 2012, M6.1 Emilia-Romagna (northern Italy) earthquake using a co-seismic slip distribution model. Annals of Geophysics, 55(4), 655–666.Google Scholar
  18. Ganas, A., Roumelioti, Z., Karastathis, V., Chousianitis, K., Moshou, A., & Mouzakiotis, E. (2014). The Lemnos 8 January 2013 (M w = 5.7) earthquake: Fault slip, aftershock properties and static stress transfer modeling in the north Aegean Sea. Journal of Seismology, 18(3), 433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein, R. M., & Werner, C. L. (1998). Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications. Geophysical Research Letters, 25(21), 4035–4038. doi: 10.1029/1998GL900033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gomberg, J., Reasenberg, P. A., Bodin, P., & Harris, R. A. (2001). Earthquake triggering by seismic waves following the Landers and Hector mine earthquakes. Nature, 411, 462–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanks, T. C., & Kanamori, H. (1979). A moment magnitude scale. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, 2348–2350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris, R. A. (1998). Introduction to special section: Stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 24347–24358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, R. A., Simpson, R. W., & Reasenberg, P. A. (1995). Influence of static stress changes on earthquake locations in southern California. Nature, 375, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartzell, S. H., & Heaton, T. H. (1983). Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 73, 1553–1583.Google Scholar
  25. Hartzell, S. H., & Langer, Ch. (1993). Importance of model parameterization in finite fault inversions: Application to the 1974 M w 8.0 Peru earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 22123–22134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartzell, S. H., Pengcheng, L., & Mendoza, C. (1996). The 1994 Northridge, California earthquake: Investigation of rupture velocity, rise time and high-frequency radiation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 20091–20108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heaton, T. H. (1982). The 1971 San Fernando earthquake: A double event? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72, 2037–2062.Google Scholar
  28. Herrmann, R. B., Malagnini, L., & Munafò, I. (2011). Regional moment tensors of the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake sequence. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101, 975–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang, M. -H., Fielding, E. J., Liang, C., Milillo, P., Bekaert, D., Dreger, D., & Salzer, J. (2017). Coseismic deformation and triggered landslides of the 2016 Mw 6.2 Amatrice earthquake in Italy. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 1266–1274. doi: 10.1002/2016GL071687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacques, E., Monaco, C., Tapponnier, P., Tartorici, L., & Winter, T. (2001). Faulting and earthquake triggering during the 1783 Calabria seismic sequence. Geophysical Journal International, 147, 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kilb, D., Gomberg, J., & Bodin, P. (2000). Triggering of earthquake aftershocks by dynamic stresses. Nature, 408, 570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langston, C. A., & Helmberger, D. V. (1975). A procedure for modeling shallow dislocation sources. Geophysics Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 42, 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lanzano, G., Luzi, L., Pacor, F., Puglia, R., D’Amico, M., Felicetta, C., et al. (2016). Preliminary analysis of the accelerometric recordings of the August 24th, 2016 MW 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5. doi: 10.4401/ag-7201.Google Scholar
  34. Lavecchia, G., et al. (2016). Ground deformation and source geometry of the 24 August 2016 Amatrice earthquake (Central Italy) investigated through analytical and numerical modeling of DInSAR measurements and structural-geological data. Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 12389–12398. doi: 10.1002/2016GL071723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Louvari, E., & Kiratzi, A. (1997). Rake: A window’s program to plot earthquake focal mechanisms and stress orientation. Computers and Geosciences, 23, 851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marchetti, A., et al. (2016). The Italian Seismic Bulletin: Strategies, revised pickings and locations of the central Italy seismic sequence. Annals of Geophysics. doi: 10.4401/ag-7169.Google Scholar
  37. Mendoza, C., & Hartzell, S. (2013). Finite-Fault source inversion using teleseismic P waves: Simple parameterization and rapid analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103, 834–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murru, M., Taroni, M., Akinci, A., & Falcone, G. (2016). What is the impact of the August 24, 2016 Amatrice earthquake on the seismic hazard assessment in central Italy? Annals of Geophysics. doi: 10.4401/AG-7209.Google Scholar
  39. Okada, Y. (1992). Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 82, 1018–1040.Google Scholar
  40. Pace, P., & Calamita, F. (2014). Push-up inversion structures vs. fault-bend reactivation anticlines along oblique thrust ramps: Examples from the Apennines fold-and-thrust belt (Italy). Journal of the Geological Society, 171, 227–238. doi: 10.1144/0016-76492013-053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parsons, T., Ogata, Y., Zhuang, J., & Geist, E. L. (2012). Evaluation of static stress change forecasting with prospective and blind tests. Geophysical Journal International, 188, 1425–1440. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05343.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parsons, T., Yeats, R. S., Yagi, Y., & Hussain, A. (2006). Static stress change from 8 October, 2005 M = 7.6 Kashmir earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L06304. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perniola, B., Bressan, G., & Pondrelli, S. (2003). Changes in failure stress and stress transfer during the 1976–1977 Friuli earthquake sequence. Geophysical Journal International, 156, 297–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02146.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pischiutta, M., Akinci, A., Malagnini, L., & Herrero, A. (2016). Characteristics of the Strong Ground Motion from the 24th August 2016 Amatrice Earthquake. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5. doi: 10.4401/AG-7219.Google Scholar
  45. Pondrelli, S., Salimbeni, S., & Perfetti, P. (2016). Moment tensor solutions for the Amatrice 2016 seismic sequence. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5. doi: 10.4401/ag-7240.Google Scholar
  46. Pucci, S., et al. (2016). Coseismic effects of the 2016 Amatrice seismic sequence: First geological results. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5, 1–8. doi: 10.4401/AG-7195.Google Scholar
  47. Reasenberg, P. A., & Simpson, R. W. (1992). Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by Loma Prieta earthquake. Science, 255, 1687–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Riva, R., Aoudia, A., Vermeersen, L. L. A., Sabadini, R., & Panza, G. F. (2000). Crustal versus asthenospheric relaxation and post-seismic deformation for shallow normal faulting earthquakes: The Umbria-Marche (central Italy) case. Geophysical Journal International, 141, F7–F11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberts, G. P., & Michetti, A. M. (2004). Spatial and temporal variations in growth rates along active normal fault systems: An example from Lazio-Abruzzo, central Italy. Journal of Structural Geology, 26, 339–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rovelli, A., & Calderoni, G. (2014). Stress drops of the 1997–1998 Colfiorito, Central Italy Earthquakes: Hints for a common behaviour of normal faults in the Apennines. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171, 2731. doi: 10.1007/s00024-014-0856-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rovida, A., Locati, M., Camassi, R., Lolli, B., & Gasperini, P. (2016). CPTI15, the 2015 version of the Parametric Catalogue of Italian Earthquakes. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia. doi: 10.6092/INGV.IT-CPTI15.Google Scholar
  52. Saccorotti, G., Piccinini, D., & Giunchi, C. (2016). Rupture imaging for the 2016 August 24, M w = 6.0 central Italy earthquake, from back projection of strong motion array data. Annals of Geophysics, 59, Fast Track 5. doi: 10.4401/AG7294.Google Scholar
  53. Scholz, C. H. (1968). Microfractures, aftershocks and seismicity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58, 1117–1130.Google Scholar
  54. Simpson R. W., & Reasenberg, P. A. (1994). Earthquake-induced static-stress changes on central California Faults. In: R. W. Simpson (Ed.), U.S. geological survey professional paper 1550-F “The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989Tectonic Processes and Models”, p 134.Google Scholar
  55. Somerville, P., Irikura, K., Graves, R., Sawada, S., Wald, D., Abrahamson, N., et al. (1999). Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion. Seismological Research Letters, 70, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stein, R. S., Barka, A. A., & Dietrich, J. H. (1997). Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since by 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophysical Journal International, 128, 594–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stein, S., & Wysession, M. (2003). An introduction to seismology, earthquakes, and earth structure (p. 498). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Tinti, E., Scognamiglio, L., Michelini, A., & Cocco, M. (2016). Slip heterogeneity and directivity of the M L 6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid finite-fault inversion. Geophysical Research Letters. doi: 10.1002/2016GL071263.Google Scholar
  59. Toda, S., Stein, R. S., & Lin, J. (2011). Widespread seismicity excitation throughout central Japan following the 2011 M = 9.0 Tohoku earthquake and its interpretation by Coulomb stress transfer. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L00G03. doi: 10.1029/2011GL047834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Toda, S., Stein, R. S., Reasenberg, P. A., & Dieterich, J. H. (1998). Stress transferred by the M w = 6.5 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 24543–24565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wells, D. L., & Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974–1002.Google Scholar
  62. Wessel, P., Smith, W. H. F., Scharroo, R., Luis, J. F., & Wobbe, F. (2013). Generic mapping tools: Improved version released. EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 94, 409–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Papadopoulos
    • 1
  • A. Ganas
    • 1
  • A. Agalos
    • 1
  • A. Papageorgiou
    • 1
  • I. Triantafyllou
    • 1
  • Ch. Kontoes
    • 2
  • I. Papoutsis
    • 2
  • G. Diakogianni
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of GeodynamicsNational Observatory of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and Remote SensingNational Observatory of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations